Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On the Implications of Knowledge Bases for Regional Innovation Policies in Germany Cover

On the Implications of Knowledge Bases for Regional Innovation Policies in Germany

Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 33 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. Asheim B.T., 2007. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences Research 20: 223-241.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Asheim B.T., Boschma R., Cooke P., 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies 45 (7): 893-904.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Asheim B.T., Gertler M.S., 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 291-317.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Asheim B.T., Isaksen A., Nauwelaers C., Tödtling F. (eds), 2003. Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2012. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52: 134-152.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Berg S.-H., Hassink R., 2013. Creative industries from an evolutionary perspective: A critical literature review. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 13.06. Utrecht.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Enright M., 2003. Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. In: Bröcker J., Dohse D., Soltwedel R. (eds), Innovation clusters and interregional competition. Springer, Berlin: 99-129.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Fritsch M., Stephan A., 2005. Regionalization of innovation policy - Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy 34: 1123-1127.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Hassink R., 1996. Technology transfer agencies and regional economic development. European Planning Studies 4(2): 167-184.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Hassink R., Berg S.-H., 2014. Regional innovation support systems and technopoles. In: Oh D.S., Phillips F.Y. (eds), Technopolis: Best practices for science & technology cities. Springer, Heidelberg (forthcoming).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Manniche J., 2012. Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge base model. European Planning Studies 20: 1823-1841.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Martin R., Moodysson J., 2013. Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies 20: 170-187.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Martin R., Moodysson J., Zukauskaite E., 2011. Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2: 550-568.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2011. Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. IEB Working Papers, 2011/14, University of Barcelona.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Menzel M.-P., Fornahl D., 2010. Cluster life cycles - dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial Corporate Change 19(1): 205-238.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Nauwelaers C., Wintjes R., 2003. Towards a new paradigm for innovation policy? In: Asheim B., Isaksen A., Nauwelaers C., Tödtling F. (eds), Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: 193-220.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. OECD, 2010. Regional development policies in OECD countries. OECD, Paris.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. OECD, 2011. Regions and innovation policy. OECD reviews of regional innovation. OECD, Paris.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Plum, O., 2011. Developing biotech products, making cars, creating video games: Disentangling knowledge bases in three German regions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kiel.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Plum O., Hassink R., 2011. On the nature and geography of innovation and interactive learning: A case study of the biotechnology industry in the Aachen Technology Region, Germany. European Planning Studies 19: 1141-1163.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Plum O., Hassink R., 2013. Analytical vs. synthetic knowledge: Which knowledge base configuration drives Southwest Saxony’s automotive firms? European Urban and Regional Studies 20: 206-226.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Prange H., 2008. Explaining varieties of regional innovation policies in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 15: 39-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Tödtling F., Schneider R., Grillitsch M., Höglinger C., 2011. Constructing regional advantage in the Austrian ICT sector - Towards fine-tuned innovation policies? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2: 533-549.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Tödtling F., Trippl M., 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy. Research Policy 34(1): 203-1219
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2014-0045 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103 (formerly 0137-477X)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 16
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2013
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
regional innovation policy,
place-based approach,
knowledge bases,
fine-tuning
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2014 Robert Hassink, Oliver Plum, Arne Rickmers, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 33 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article