Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Engineering a Non-Markovian Environment to Enhance Entanglement and To Generate Hidden Quantum Networks Cover

Engineering a Non-Markovian Environment to Enhance Entanglement and To Generate Hidden Quantum Networks

By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Y. Chen, J. Q. You and T. Yu (2014). Exact non-Markovian master equations for multiple qubit systems: Quantum-trajectory approach. Phys. Rev. A, 90, 052104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.052104.
  2. R.-X. Xu, P. Cui, X.-Q. Li, Y. Mo and Y. Yan (2005). Exact quantum master equation via the calculus on path integrals. J. Chem. Phys., 122, 041103. DOI: 10.1063/1.1850899.
  3. X. Li, S.-X. Lyu, Y. Wang, R.-X. Xu, X. Zheng and Y. Yan (2024). Toward quantum simulation of non-Markovian open quantum dynamics: A universal and compact theory. Phys. Rev. A, 110, 032620. DOI: 10.1103/Phys-RevA.110.032620.
  4. B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz and Y. Zhang (1992). Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise. Phys. Rev. D, 45, 2843–2861. DOI: 10.1103/Phys-RevD.45.2843.
  5. D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch, I.-O. Stamatescu and H. D. Zeh (2013). Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory; Springer: Berlin, ISBN: 978-3-662-03263-3.
  6. W. H. Zurek (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 715–775. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715.
  7. A. Levy, A. Kiely, J. G. Muga, R. Kosloff and E. Torrontegui (2018). Noise-resistant quantum control using dynamical invariants. New J. Phys., 20, 025006. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aaa9e5.
  8. A. Soare, H. Ball, D. Hayes, J. Sastrawan, M. C. Jarratt, J. J. Mcloughlin, X. Zhen, T. J. Green and M. J. Biercuk (2014). Experimental noise filtering by quantum control. Nat. Phys., 10, 825–829. DOI: 10.1038/nphys3115.
  9. M. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brandão and M. Plenio (2008). Quantum many-body phenomena in coupled cavity arrays. Laser Photonics Rev., 2, 527–541. DOI: 10.1002/lpor.200810046.
  10. D. E. Browne, M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga (2003). Robust creation of entanglement between ions in spatially separate cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 067901. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.067901.
  11. N. Khaneja and S. J. Glaser (2002). Efficient transfer of coherence through Ising spin chains. Phys. Rev. A, 66, 060301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.060301.
  12. X. Zhao, J. Jing, B. Corn and T. Yu (2011). Dynamics of interacting qubits coupled to a common bath: Non-Markovian quantum-state-diffusion approach. Phys. Rev. A, 84, 032101. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.032101.
  13. Q. Mu, X. Zhao and T. Yu (2016). Memory-effect-induced macroscopic-microscopic entanglement. Phys. Rev. A, 94, 012334. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012334.
  14. Z.-X. Man, Y.-J. Xia and R. Lo Franco (2015). Harnessing non-Markovian quantum memory by environmental coupling. Phys. Rev. A, 92, 012315. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.012315.
  15. K. H. Lim, W.-K. Mok and L.-C. Kwek (2023). Oscillating bound states in non-Markovian photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. A, 107, 023716. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.023716.
  16. J. Agustí, C. M. F. Schneider, K. G. Fedorov, S. Filipp and P. Rabl (2025). Non-Markovian thermal reservoirs for autonomous entanglement distribution. arXiv, arXiv:2506.20742.
  17. A. Serafini, S. Mancini and S. Bose (2006). Distributed quantum computation via optical fibers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 010503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.010503. :contentReference[oaicite:0]index=0
  18. J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble and H. Mabuchi (1997). Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3221–3224. DOI: 10.1103/Phys-RevLett.78.3221.
  19. K.-L. Liu and H.-S (2007). Goan, Non-Markovian entanglement dynamics of quantum continuous variable systems in thermal environments. Phys. Rev. A, 76, 022312. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.022312.
  20. J. S. Prauzner-Bechcicki (2004). Two-mode squeezed vacuum state coupled to the common thermal reservoir. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 37, L173–L179. DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/37/15/L04.
  21. J.-H. An and W.-M. Zhang (2007). Non-Markovian entanglement dynamics of noisy continuous-variable quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A, 76, 042127. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042127.
  22. G.-X. Li, L.-H. Sun and Z. Ficek (2010). Multi-mode entanglement of N harmonic oscillators coupled to a non-Markovian reservoir. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 43, 135501. DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/43/13/135501.
  23. J. P. Paz and A. J. Roncaglia (2008). Dynamics of the entanglement between two oscillators in the same environment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 220401. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.220401.
  24. K. Audenaert, J. Eisert, M. B. Plenio and R. F. (2002). Werner, Entanglement properties of the harmonic chain. Phys. Rev. A, 66, 042327. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042327.
  25. T. A. Brun and J. B. Hartle (1999). Classical dynamics of the quantum harmonic chain. Phys. Rev. D, 60, 123503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123503.
  26. D. Portes, H. Rodrigues, S. B. Duarte and B. Baseia (2013). Perfect transfer of quantum states in a network of harmonic oscillators. Eur. Phys. J. D, 67, 156. DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2013-40161-y.
  27. C.-H. Chou, T. Yu and B. L. Hu (2008). Exact master equation and quantum decoherence of two coupled harmonic oscillators in a general environment. Phys. Rev. E, 77, 011112. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.011112.
  28. C.-H. Chou, B. L. Hu and T. Yu (2008). Quantum Brownian motion of a macroscopic object in a general environment. Physica A, 387, 432–444. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.09.025.
  29. K. Mui, A. Couvertier and T. Yu (2025). Enhanced quantum state swapping via environmental memory. APL Quantum, 2, 016126. DOI: 10.1063/5.0253875.
  30. T. Yu, L. Diósi, N. Gisin and W. T. Strunz (2000). Post-Markov master equation for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Phys. Lett. A, 265, 331–336. DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00014-1.
  31. T. Yu, L. Diósi, N. Gisin and W. T. Strunz (1999). Non-Markovian quantum-state diffusion: Perturbation approach. Phys. Rev. A, 60, 91–103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.91.
  32. L. Diósi, N. Gisin and W. T. Strunz (1998). Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion. Phys. Rev. A, 58, 1699–1712. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1699.
  33. W. T Strunz, L. Diósi and N. Gisin (1999). Open system dynamics with non-Markovian quantum trajectories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 1801–1804. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1801.
  34. G. Ritschel and A. Eisfeld (2014). Analytic representations of bath correlation functions for ohmic and super ohmic spectral densities using simple poles. J. Chem. Phys., 141, 094101. DOI: 10.1063/1.4893931.
  35. P. Chen (2007). Dynamical decoupling-induced renormalization of non-Markovian dynamics. Phys. Rev. A, 75, 062301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.062301.
  36. C. Uchiyama (2002). Aihara, M. Multipulse control of decoherence. Phys. Rev. A, 66, 032313. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032313.
  37. R. Simon, E. C. G. Sudarshan and N. Mukunda (1987). Gaussian-Wigner distributions in quantum mechanics and optics. Phys. Rev. A, 36, 3868–3880. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.3868.
  38. R. F. Werner, M. Wolf and M. Bound (2001). entangled Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 3658–3661. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3658.
  39. G. Adesso and F. Illuminati (2005). Gaussian measures of entanglement versus negativities: Ordering of twomode Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. A, 72, 032334. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032334.
  40. M. Hillery and M.S. Zubairy (2006). Entanglement conditions for two-mode states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 050503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.050503.
  41. R. Simon (2000). Peres-Horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2726–2729. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726.
  42. L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller (2000). Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2722–2725. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2722.
  43. E. Shchukin and W. Vogel (2005). Inseparability criteria for continuous bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 230502. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.230502.
  44. M. B. Plenio, J. Hartley and J. Eisert (2004). Dynamics and manipulation of entanglement in coupled harmonic systems with many degrees of freedom. New J. Phys., 6, 36. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/036
  45. J. Eisert and M. B. Plenio (2003). Introduction to the basics of entanglement theory in continuous-variable systems. Int. J. Quantum Inf., 1, 479–506.
  46. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner (2002). Computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A, 65, 032314. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314
  47. A. K. Ekert and P. L. Knight (1989). Correlations and squeezing of two-mode oscillations. Am. J. Phys., 57, 692–697. DOI: 10.1119/1.15922.
  48. C. Shang and H. Li (2024). Resonance-dominant optomechanical entanglement in open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Appl., 21, 044048. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevAppl.21.044048. :contentReference[oaicite:1]index=1
  49. T. Hiroshima, G. Adesso and F. Illuminati (2007). Monogamy inequality for distributed Gaussian entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 050503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.050503.
  50. G. Adesso and F. Illuminati (2006). Continuous variable tangle, monogamy inequality, and entanglement sharing in Gaussian states of continuous variable systems. New J. Phys., 8, 15. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/8/1/015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/qic-2026-0011 | Journal eISSN: 3106-0544 | Journal ISSN: 1533-7146
Language: English
Page range: 210 - 229
Submitted on: Sep 26, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2026
Published on: Jun 4, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Kenneth Mui, Da-Wei Luo, Duan Wang, Ting Yu, published by Cerebration Science Publishing Co., Limited
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.