References
- Alkholaiwi, F. (2023). Quality of life of patients with nasal obstruction who underwent septoplasty: Assessed with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Cureus, 15 (9), e45523. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45523.
- Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25 (24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
- Browning, G. G., Kubba, H., Whitmer, W. M. (2021). Revised 15-item Glasgow Benefit Inventory with five factors based on analysis of a large population study of medical and surgical otorhinolaryngological interventions. Clin. Otolaryngol., 46 (1), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13649.
- Cantone, E., Torrisi, A., D’Ecclesia, A., Massimilla, E. A., Motta, G., Motta, G. (2023). QoL following dacryocystorhinostomy: Linguistic adaptation of Italian version of GBI. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 75 (3), 1660–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03638-z.
- ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition) (2017). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf (accessed 04.08.2024).
- Dev, A. N., Adhikari, S., Lohith, U., Dutt, C. S., Dutt, S. N. (2019). Assessment of quality of life outcomes with the Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory following cochlear implantation in children. J. Laryngol. Otol., 133 (9), 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119001555.
- Elias, C. C. L., Teixeira, A. R., Souza, M. E. C., Rosito, L. P. S., Costa, S. S. D. (2024). Translation and cultural adaptation of “Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory” into Brazilian Portuguese. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol., 90 (1), 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101353.
- Fan, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Fan, Y., Chen, Y., Zhu, Y., Chen, X. (2017). Aesthetic and hearing rehabilitation in patients with bilateral microtiaatresia [Article]. Int. J. Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol., 101, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.008.
- Freilich, D. A., Penna, F. J., Nelson, C. P., Retik, A. B., Nguyen, H. T. (2010). Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Results from modified Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory Survey. J. Urol, 183 (2), 704–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.040.
- Green, F. R., Sanders, M. I., Davies, P., Mirza, S., Sinha, S. (2022). Quality of life outcomes after transnasal endoscopic pituitary surgery using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Brit. J. Neurosurg, 36 (6), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2022.2106352.
- Halliday, E., Gittins, J., Ahsan, S. F. (2020). Using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaire to quantify the health benefits of lymphoedema treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. Appl. Cancer Res., 40 (1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41241-020-00093-y.
- Ianovski, I., Morton, R. P., Ahmad, Z. (2014). Patient-perceived outcome after sialendoscopy using the glasgow benefit inventory. Laryngoscope, 124 (4), 869–874. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24343.
- Katta, M., Udani, P., Heemraz, B. S., Lee, C. N., Hammond, C. J., Mahroo, O. A. (2018). Exploring correlations between change in visual acuity following routine cataract surgery and improvement in quality of life assessed with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Eye (Lond), 32 (9), 1549–1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0116-1.
- Kubba, H., Swan, I. R., Gatehouse, S. (2004). The Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory: A new instrument for assessing health-related benefit after an intervention. Ann. Otol Rhinol Laryngol., 113 (12), 980–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940411301208.
- Kyrodimos, E., Aidonis, I., Skalimis, A., Sismanis, A. (2011). Use of Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) in Meniere’s disease managed with intratympanic dexamethasone perfusion: Quality of life assessment. Auris Nasus Larynx, 38 (2), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2010.07.009.
- Leong, S. C., Wilkie, M. D., Webb, C. J. (2012). Impact of endoscopic stapling of Zenker’s diverticulum on patient health status as assessed by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 121 (9), 576–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100903.
- Lui, J. T., Lee, J. J. W., Ma, Y., Dixon, P. R., Crowson, M. G., Dahm, V., Shipp, D. B., Chen, J. M., Lin, V. Y. (2021). Glasgow Benefit Inventory in Cochlear implantation: A reliable though ancillary quality of life metric. Otol Neurotol, 42(10), e1464-e1469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003292.
- Meier, B. A., Holst, R., Schousboe, L. P. (2015). Patient-perceived benefit of sialendoscopy as measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngo-scope, 125 (8), 1874–1878. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25369.
- Mileshina, N. A., Osipenkov, S. S., Bakhshinyan, V. V., Tavartkiladze, G. A. (2016). The impact of implantable technologies on the quality of life in the patients with hearing loss. Vestnik otorinolaringologii, 81 (6), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681622-24 (in Russian).
- Redfors, Y. D., Jonsson, R., Tideholm, B., Finizia, C. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory in otosclerosis subjects. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol., 4 (6), 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.320.
- Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., Browning, G. G. (1996). Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 105 (6), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500601.
- Sanchez-Cuadrado, I., Lassaletta, L., Perez-Mora, R., Munoz, E., Gavilan, J. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Spanish Glasgow Benefit Inventory after cochlear implant surgery in adults. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 272 (2), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2844-y
- Schwentner, I., Schwentner, C., Schmutzhard, J., Radmayr, C., Grabher, G., Sprinzl, G., Hofer, S. (2007). Validation of the German Glasgow children’s benefit inventory. J. Eval.. Clin. Pract., 13 (6), 942–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00823.x.
- Shen, Y., Xiao, L., Luo, Q., Feng, Y., Zheng, Z. (2020). [Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Glasgow Benefit Inventory]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 34 (8), 689–694 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.08.004.
- Taylor, C. M., Marino, M. J., Bansberg, S. F. (2023). Septal perforation repair quality of life outcomes using the revised 15-item Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 132 (12), 1550–1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894231170938
- van Egmond, M., van Heerbeek, N., Ter Haar, E. L. M., Rovers, M. M. (2017). Clinimetric properties of the Glasgow Health Status Inventory, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, and 4-Phase Rhinomanometry in adults with nasal obstruction. Rhinology, 55 (2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin16.296.
- Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ. Med. J., 11 (2), 49–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.