Clinical Application of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Glasgow Benefit Inventory with Five Factors: Current Evidence

Kondratiško, Jekaterina; Kremņeva, Anna; Trups-Kalne, Ingrīda; Derovs, Aleksejs; Briģis, Ģirts

doi:10.2478/prolas-2024-0033

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to assess the worldwide clinical utilisation of Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and New Five-factor Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI-5F) for various clinical and scientific objectives, as well as to validate its application in Latvia. Numerous articles indexed in the MedLine Library (Pubmed.gov) were examined, spanning from the initial GBI publication to the present. Various applications of these questionnaires have been investigated across multiple medical specialties, including otolaryngology, ophthalmology, urology, paediatric practice, neuro-surgery, gastroenterology, oncology, and maxillofacial surgery in different countries. The use of the questionnaire in Latvia, following examples from other countries, can aid in assessing factors such as General Health, Support, Quality of Life, Self-Confidence and Social Involvement post-intervention in chronic conditions. This could help compare treatment outcome data both in clinical practice within our country and within the scientific community on an international level.

References

Alkholaiwi, F. (2023). Quality of life of patients with nasal obstruction who underwent septoplasty: Assessed with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Cureus, 15 (9), e45523. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45523.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25 (24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Browning, G. G., Kubba, H., Whitmer, W. M. (2021). Revised 15-item Glasgow Benefit Inventory with five factors based on analysis of a large population study of medical and surgical otorhinolaryngological interventions. Clin. Otolaryngol., 46 (1), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13649.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cantone, E., Torrisi, A., D’Ecclesia, A., Massimilla, E. A., Motta, G., Motta, G. (2023). QoL following dacryocystorhinostomy: Linguistic adaptation of Italian version of GBI. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 75 (3), 1660–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03638-z.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition) (2017). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf (accessed 04.08.2024).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dev, A. N., Adhikari, S., Lohith, U., Dutt, C. S., Dutt, S. N. (2019). Assessment of quality of life outcomes with the Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory following cochlear implantation in children. J. Laryngol. Otol., 133 (9), 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119001555.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elias, C. C. L., Teixeira, A. R., Souza, M. E. C., Rosito, L. P. S., Costa, S. S. D. (2024). Translation and cultural adaptation of “Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory” into Brazilian Portuguese. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol., 90 (1), 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101353.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fan, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Fan, Y., Chen, Y., Zhu, Y., Chen, X. (2017). Aesthetic and hearing rehabilitation in patients with bilateral microtiaatresia [Article]. Int. J. Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol., 101, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freilich, D. A., Penna, F. J., Nelson, C. P., Retik, A. B., Nguyen, H. T. (2010). Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Results from modified Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory Survey. J. Urol, 183 (2), 704–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.040.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, F. R., Sanders, M. I., Davies, P., Mirza, S., Sinha, S. (2022). Quality of life outcomes after transnasal endoscopic pituitary surgery using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Brit. J. Neurosurg, 36 (6), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2022.2106352.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halliday, E., Gittins, J., Ahsan, S. F. (2020). Using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaire to quantify the health benefits of lymphoedema treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. Appl. Cancer Res., 40 (1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41241-020-00093-y.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ianovski, I., Morton, R. P., Ahmad, Z. (2014). Patient-perceived outcome after sialendoscopy using the glasgow benefit inventory. Laryngoscope, 124 (4), 869–874. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24343.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katta, M., Udani, P., Heemraz, B. S., Lee, C. N., Hammond, C. J., Mahroo, O. A. (2018). Exploring correlations between change in visual acuity following routine cataract surgery and improvement in quality of life assessed with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Eye (Lond), 32 (9), 1549–1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0116-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kubba, H., Swan, I. R., Gatehouse, S. (2004). The Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory: A new instrument for assessing health-related benefit after an intervention. Ann. Otol Rhinol Laryngol., 113 (12), 980–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940411301208.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kyrodimos, E., Aidonis, I., Skalimis, A., Sismanis, A. (2011). Use of Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) in Meniere’s disease managed with intratympanic dexamethasone perfusion: Quality of life assessment. Auris Nasus Larynx, 38 (2), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2010.07.009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leong, S. C., Wilkie, M. D., Webb, C. J. (2012). Impact of endoscopic stapling of Zenker’s diverticulum on patient health status as assessed by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 121 (9), 576–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100903.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lui, J. T., Lee, J. J. W., Ma, Y., Dixon, P. R., Crowson, M. G., Dahm, V., Shipp, D. B., Chen, J. M., Lin, V. Y. (2021). Glasgow Benefit Inventory in Cochlear implantation: A reliable though ancillary quality of life metric. Otol Neurotol, 42(10), e1464-e1469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003292.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meier, B. A., Holst, R., Schousboe, L. P. (2015). Patient-perceived benefit of sialendoscopy as measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngo-scope, 125 (8), 1874–1878. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25369.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mileshina, N. A., Osipenkov, S. S., Bakhshinyan, V. V., Tavartkiladze, G. A. (2016). The impact of implantable technologies on the quality of life in the patients with hearing loss. Vestnik otorinolaringologii, 81 (6), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681622-24 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Redfors, Y. D., Jonsson, R., Tideholm, B., Finizia, C. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory in otosclerosis subjects. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol., 4 (6), 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.320.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., Browning, G. G. (1996). Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 105 (6), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500601.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanchez-Cuadrado, I., Lassaletta, L., Perez-Mora, R., Munoz, E., Gavilan, J. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Spanish Glasgow Benefit Inventory after cochlear implant surgery in adults. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 272 (2), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2844-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schwentner, I., Schwentner, C., Schmutzhard, J., Radmayr, C., Grabher, G., Sprinzl, G., Hofer, S. (2007). Validation of the German Glasgow children’s benefit inventory. J. Eval.. Clin. Pract., 13 (6), 942–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00823.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shen, Y., Xiao, L., Luo, Q., Feng, Y., Zheng, Z. (2020). [Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Glasgow Benefit Inventory]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 34 (8), 689–694 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.08.004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Taylor, C. M., Marino, M. J., Bansberg, S. F. (2023). Septal perforation repair quality of life outcomes using the revised 15-item Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 132 (12), 1550–1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894231170938
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Egmond, M., van Heerbeek, N., Ter Haar, E. L. M., Rovers, M. M. (2017). Clinimetric properties of the Glasgow Health Status Inventory, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, and 4-Phase Rhinomanometry in adults with nasal obstruction. Rhinology, 55 (2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin16.296.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ. Med. J., 11 (2), 49–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Clinical Application of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Glasgow Benefit Inventory with Five Factors: Current Evidence

Abstract

Paradigm

My account