References
- Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan (2010), ‘Why is there non-Western international relations theory? An introduction’, in Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia. Politics in Asia, 1–25, London and New York: Routledge.
- Ashley, Richard K. (Spring 1984) ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, 38, (2): 225–286.
- Adler, Emanuel and Petert M. Haas (1992), ‘Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program’, International Organization, 46(1): 367–390.
- Adler, Emanuel (1997), ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319–363.
- Albert, Mathias, Barry Buzan and Micheal Michael, eds. (2013) Bringing Sociology to International Relations. World Politics as Differentiation Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Alvesson, Mats and Kaj Sköldberg (2013), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, London, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
- Banks, Christopher P. and John C. Blakeman (2012), The U.S. Supreme Court and New Federalism: From the Rehnquist to the Roberts Court, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Barnett, Michael (2006), ‘Social Constructivism’, in John Byalis and Steve Smith, eds. The Glozbalization of World Politics. An Introduction to international relations,148–164, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
- Barkin Samuel (2009), ‘Realism, Prediction, and Foreign Policy’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 5: 233–246.
- Bauman, Zygmunt (2006), ‘Płynna nowoczesność’, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
- Beck, Ulrich (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage: New Delhi.
- Beck, Ulrich (2006), The Cosmopolitan Vision, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beeman, Richard R., Stephen Botein, Edward C. Carter, eds. (1987) Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 1987.
- Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng and Michael L. (2003), ‘Latent Dirichlet Allocation’, Journal of Machine Learning Research 3(3):993–1022.
- Booth, Ken (1995), ‘Dare not to Know: International Relations Theory versus the Future’, in Ken Booth and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theory Today Oxford: Polity Press.
- Bourdieu, Pierre (1984), Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bourdieu, Pierre (1990), In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
- Bourdieu, Pierre (1992), The Logic of Practice, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
- Burgess, Michael (2000), Federalism and the European Union: The Building of Europe, 1950–2000, London and New York: Routledge.
- Ceruti, Furio and Sonia Lucarelli, eds. (2011)The Search for a European Identity: Values, Policies and Legitimacy of the European Union, London and New York: Routledge.
- Checkel, Jeffrey T. and Peter J. Katzenstein, eds. (2009), European Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Choucri, Nazli (1979), ‘Comments on “Scientific Forecasts in International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 23(1): 145–149.
- Choucri, Nazli (1974), Forecasting in International Relations: Problems and Prospects, International Interactions 1: 63–86.
- Christopoulos, Dimitrios C. (2010), ‘Peer Esteem Snowballing: A methodology for expert surveys’, European Commission, available athttp://ec.europa.eu/ (13 October,2015).
- Chwedczuk-Szulc, Karol and Andrzej Polus (2015), ‘Konstruktywizm społeczny a prognozowanie w stosunkach międzynarodowych’, in Elżbieta bStadtmüller and Łukasz Fijałkowski, eds. Normy, wartości i instytucje we współczesnych stosunkach międzynarodowych”, Warszawa: Rambler.
- Dijk, van Teun A. (2000), On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration, in Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak, eds., The semiotics of racism. Approaches to critical discourse analysis, 85–103, Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
- ‘DoD News Briefing — Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers’ (2002), U.S. Department of Defence, available at http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/ (30 January, 2015).
- Doran, Charles F. (1999), ‘Why Forecasts Fail: The Limits and Potential of Forecasting in International Relations and Economics’, International Studies Review 1(2): 11–41.
- Drake, Frederic D. and Lynn R. Nelson (1999), eds., States’ Rights and American Federalism: A Documentary History, Wesport: Greenwood.
- Elias, Norbert (1978), The Civilizing Process, New York: Urizen Books.
- Fabbrini, Sergio and Simona Piattoni, eds. (2007), Italy in the European Union: Redefining National Interest in a Compound Polity, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Fabbrini, Sergio (2009), Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Faust, Drew G. (1990), The Creation of Confederate Nationalism: Ideology and Identity in the Civil War South, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
- Feeley, Malcolm and Edward Rubin (2011), Federalism: Political Identity and Tragic Compromise, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Fransson, Niklas and Tommy Garling (1999), ‘Environmental Concern: Conceptual Definitions, Measurement Methods and Research Findings’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 19(4): 369–382.
- Freeman, John R. and Brian L. Job (1979), ‘Scientific forecast in international relations’, International Studies Quarterly 23(1): 113–143.
- Freedman, Lawrence (2009), ‘Przyszłość studiów strategicznych’ in: Baylis, John, Withs James, Gray Collin, Cohen Eliot, eds. Strategia we współczenym świecie, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
- Friedman, George (2009), The Next 100 Years, New York: Anchor Books.
- Friedmam, Rebeca and Marcus Thiel, eds. (2012)European Identity and Culture: Narratives of Transnational Belonging, Farnham: Ashgate.
- Gaddis, John Lewis (1992–1993), ‘International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War’. International Security, 17( 3,): 5–58.
- Giddens, Anthony (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
- Gilardi, Fabrizio (2012), ‘Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies’, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth Simmons, eds., Handbook of International Relations,453–477, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 2012.
- Gilpin, Robert (1999), ‘War and Change in World Politics’, in Paul Viotti and Mark Kauppi, eds. International Relations Theory. Pluralism, Globalism and Beyond, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Glencross, Andrew (2009), What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gould, Andrew C. and Anthony M. Messina, eds. (2014), Europe’s Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014.
- Grześkowiak, Alicja (2014), ‘Assesment of Interpersonal Trust of Poles by the Principle Components Analysis and Log-Linear Modeling’, Econometrics 1(43): 74–86.
- Guzzini, Stefano (2000), ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism In International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147–182.
- Halberstam, Daniel, and Mathias Reimann (2013), Federalism and Legal Unification: A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, New York: Springer.
- Hay, Colin (2002), Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Heiss-Morse, Elisabeth (2009), Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Herrmann, Richard K., Thomas Risse and Marilynn B. Brewer, eds. (2004), Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Hitlin, Steven, ‘Values As the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links Between Two Theories of Self’, Social Psychology Quarterly 66(2): 118–137
- Homer, Pamela H. and Lynn R. Kahle (1988), ‘A Structural Equation Test of the Value-Attitude-Behaviour Hierarchy’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 638–646.
- Hopf, Ted (1998), ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security 23(1): 171–200.
- Hopf, Ted (2010), ‘The logic of habit in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 539–561.
- Jarvis, Darryl S.L. (2000), International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism. Defending the Discipline, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
- Jones, Jeffrey J. (2014), ‘Record-High 42% of Americans Identify as Independents’, Gallup. com, available athttp://www.gallup.com/poll (15 June, 2016).
- Jonsson, Christer, Sven Tagil and Gunnar Tornqvist (2000), Organizing European Space, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Kaminski, John P. and Richard Lefler (1998), Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Kaplan, Morton A. (1966), ‘The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations’,World Politics19(1): 1–20.
- Karmis, Dimitrios and Wayne Norman (2005), Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Basing-stoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Keating, Joshua E. (2011), ‘Megatrends that Weren’t. A look at yesterday’s Next Big Things, from the Japanese rising sun to Dow 36,000’, Foreign Policy, (September/October).
- Keulman, Kenneth and Anges K. Koos (2014), European Identity: Its Feasibility and Desirability, Lanham: Lexington Books.
- Knight, Frank H. (1964), Risk, uncertainty and profit, New York: Sentery Press.
- LaCroix, Alison L. (2011), The Ideological Origins of American Federalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Lahire Bernard (2003), ‘From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions. Towards a sociology at the level of the individual’, Poetics, 31: 329–355.
- Lasswell, Harold D. (1970), ‘The Emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences’, Policy Sciences, 1(1).
- Lasswell, Harold D. (1971), A-Pre-View of Policy Sciences, New York: Elsevier.
- Lee Ray, James (1998), ‘Does Democracy cause Peace?’ Annual Review of Political Science 1: 27–46.
- Lewis, Alan (2008), The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
- Maciag, Mike, ‘Public Approval of State and Local Government Rises, Federal Rating Tumbles’, Governing, available at http://www.governing.com/ (19 October, 2015).
- Madison, James (1788), ‘The Federalist No. 51. The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments’, Independent Journal, (6 February, 1788).
- Mazuri, Ali A. (1999), Progress” Illegitimate Child of Judeo-Christian Universalism and Western Ethnocentrism — A Third World Critique, in: Leo Marx, Bruce Mazlish, eds. Progress. Fact or Illusion?: The University of Michigan Press.
- McCarthy, Justin (2014), ‘Americans Still Trust Local Government More Than State’, Gallup.com, available at http://www.gallup.com/poll (19 June, 2016).
- McCourt, David, M. (2016) Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism, “International Studies Quarterly”, (60)
- McGuire, Steven and Michael Smith (2008), The European Union and the United States: Convergence and Competition in the Global Arena, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Merton, Robert K. (1968), Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: The Free Press.
- Mesquita, de Bruce B. (2010)., The Predictioneer’s Game. Using the Logic of Brazen Self-Interest to See and Shape the Future, Ney York: Random House.
- Meyer, Christoph O. (2011), ‘The Purpose and Pitfalls of Constructivist Forecasting: Insights from Strategic Culture Research for the European Union’s Evolution as a Military Power’, International Studies Quarterly 55 (3): 669–690.
- Milfont, Taciano L., John Duckitt and Claire Wagner (2010), A Cross-Cultural Test of the Value–Attitude–Behavior Hierarchy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40(11): 2791–2813.
- Moran Dermont (2011), ‘Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology of Habituality and Habitus’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42, (1): 53–77.
- Müftüler-Bac, Meltem and Yannis A. Stivachtis, eds. (2008), Turkey-European Union relations: dilemmas, opportunities, and constraints, Lanham: Lexington Books.
- National Research Council (2010), Persistent Forecasting of Disruptive Technologies, Washington D.C.: National Academic Press.
- Norman, Wayne (2006), Negotiating Nationalism: Nation-Building, Federalism, and Secession in the Multinational State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nugent, Neill (2010), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Phelan, William (2012), ‘What is Sui Generis about the European Union? Costly International Cooperation in a Self-Contained Regime’, International Studies Review, 14(3): 367–385.
- Pickel, Andreas (2005), ‘The Habitus Process. A Biopsychosocial Conception’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35(4): 436–461.
- ‘Public Trust in Government: 1958–2014’ (2014),Pew Research Centre, available at http://www.people-press.org/ (19 June 2016).
- Reid, T.R. (2005), The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the End of American Supremacy, London: Penguin Books.
- Riley, Patrick (2006), ‘The Social Contract and Its Critics’ in Mark Goldie and Robert Wokler, eds. The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, 347–379 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
- Risse, Thomas (2010), A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Schatz, Bettina (2014), How to Establish a Corporate Identity for the European Union: Development of a Brand Concept to create an “us-feeling” amongst European Citizens, Saarbrucken: AV Akademikerverlag.
- Schlenker, Andrea (2013), ‘Cosmopolitan Europeans or Partisans of Fortress Europe? Supranational Identity Patterns in the EU’, Global Society 27(1): 25–51.
- Schoutheete, Philippe de and Sami Andoura (2007), ‘The Legal Personality of the European Union; Studia Diplomatica 60(1): 1–9.
- Shim, Soyeon, Patti Warrington and Ellen Goldsberry (1999), A personal value-based model of college students’ attitudes and expected choice behaviour regarding retailing careers, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 28(1): 28–51.
- Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll (2010), This Violent Empire: The Birth of an American National Identity, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
- Stackelberg, Peter von Alex McDowell (2015), What in the World? Storyworlds, Science Fiction, and Futures Studies, Journal of Futures Studies 20(12): 47–65.
- ‘State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low’ (2013), Pew Research Centre, available athttp://www.people-press.org/ (19 June 2016).
- Hechter, Michael, ‘Symposium on Prediction in the Social Sciences’ (1995), American Journal of Sociology 100(6): 1520–1527.
- Tallberg, Jonas (2003), European Governance And Supranational Institutions: Making States Comply, London and New York: Routledge.
- Tocqueville, Alexis de (1992), Democracy in America, London: Penguin Classics.
- Trechsel, Alexander H. (2005), ‘How to Federalize European Union… and Why Bother?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(3): 401–418.
- Trubek, David M. and Thiery Bourgoignie (2013), eds. Consumer Law, Common Markets and Federalism in Europe and the United States, Berlin: Verlag De Gruyter-Recht.
- University of California Television (UCTV), Conversations with History: Kenneth Waltz, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9eV5gPlPZg&t=1274s (visited: 21.05.2019).
- Vaske, Jerry J. and Maureen P. Donnelly (1999), ‘A value–attitude–behaviour model predicting wild land preservation voting intentions’, Society and Natural Resources 12(6): 523–537.
- Vertovec, Steven and Robin Cohen (2002), eds. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Vincent, Jack E. (1980), ‘Scientific Prediction versus Crystal Ball Gazing: Can the Unknown be Known?’, International Studies Quarterly 24(3): 450–454.
- Wacquant Loïc (2016), ‘A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus’, The Sociological Review, 64: 64–72.
- Waever, Ole (1996), The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate, in: Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski, eds. International Theory: Positivism & Beyond,149–185, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wæver, Ole (1998), ‘The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization 52(4): 687–727.
- Wendt, Alexander (1992), ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization 46(2): 391–425.
- Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zimmerman, Joseph F. (2009), Contemporary American Federalism: The Growth of National Power, New York: State University of New York Press.