Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Investigation of Galvanic Corrosion Behaviour in Ship Shafting Systems Considering Rotational Hydrodynamic Coupling Effects Cover

Numerical Investigation of Galvanic Corrosion Behaviour in Ship Shafting Systems Considering Rotational Hydrodynamic Coupling Effects

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Melchers R E, Jeffrey R. Early corrosion of mild steel in seawater. Corros. Sci. 2005, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1678–1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.08.006.
  2. Kimoto H. Corrosion of aluminized steel in seawater. In Proc. ASME/JSME 2004 Pressure Vessels Piping Conf. (Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference Proceedings, Vol. 490). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2004-3066.
  3. Liu W, Yuan J, Hu J, Deng P, Cao X. Galvanic corrosion of Q345 steel in seawater under varying dissolved oxygen conditions. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2025, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478422X241307122.
  4. Zhang H, Miao H, Chen J, Mao F, Hu W, Dong C, Xiao K. Study on galvanic corrosion behavior of pipeline structure. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2024, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoes.2024.100498.
  5. Da Silva F N, de Oliveira P M, da Fonseca Tinoco de Souza Araújo N M, de Carvalho Filho E T, da Cunha J D, Silva D R, de Medeiros J T N. Corrosion-cavitation-erosion: Surface morphology study of a carbon steel in a multiphasic saline bath. Matéria (Rio J.) 2019, vol. 24, no. 1, p. e12302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-707620190001.0639.
  6. Jakubowski M. Influence of pitting corrosion on strength of steel ships and offshore structures. Pol. Marit. Res. 2011, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 54–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-011-0027-6.
  7. Zima B et al. Influence of corrosion degradation on the dynamic response of steel plates. Pol. Marit. Res. 2025, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 132–140. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0028.
  8. Deshpande K. Numerical modeling of micro-galvanic corrosion. Electrochim. Acta 2011, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.044.
  9. Liu K, Wu Y, Liu H, Chen H, Li W. Numerical simulation of galvanic corrosion and electrical insulation for TC4/304 galvanic couple. Materials 2025, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010038.
  10. Banaszek A et al. Corrosion influence on safety of hydraulic pipelines installed on decks of contemporary product and chemical tankers. Pol. Marit. Res. 2018, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 71–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0056.
  11. Copson H R. Effects of velocity on corrosion. Corrosion 1960, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 130–136. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-16.2.130.
  12. Felicjancik J et al. Numerical simulations of hydrodynamic open-water characteristics of a ship propeller. Pol. Marit. Res. 2016, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0067.
  13. Chruściel T et al. CFD and FEM model of an underwater vehicle propeller. Pol. Marit. Res. 2014, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 40–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2014-0028.
  14. Quang PK et al. Effects of rudder and blade pitch on hydrodynamic performance of marine propeller using CFD. Pol. Marit. Res. 2022, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 55–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0017.
  15. Zou J et al. Numerical simulation of the ducted propeller and application to a semi-submerged vehicle. Pol. Marit. Res. 2020, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 19–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0023.
  16. Cheng X et al. Numerical simulation study of the hydrodynamic properties of a floating breakwater of pontoons. Pol. Marit. Res. 2025, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 47–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0035.
  17. Barjasteh M, Zeraatgar H. Numerical simulation of cushioning problem for blunt bodies using boundary element method. Pol. Marit. Res. 2018, vol. 25, no. s1, pp. 85–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0028.
  18. Emilianowicz K. Monitoring of underdeck corrosion by using acoustic emission method. Pol. Marit. Res. 2013, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54–61. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2014-0008.
  19. Emilianowicz K et al. Application of the corrosion tester in corrosion tests using the acoustic emission method. Pol. Marit. Res. 2022, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 167–175. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0037.
  20. Jakubowski M. Influence of pitting corrosion on fatigue and corrosion fatigue of ship structures Part I: Pitting corrosion of ship structures. Pol. Marit. Res. 2013, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 62–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2014-0009.
  21. Jakubowski M. Influence of pitting corrosion on fatigue and corrosion fatigue of ship and offshore structures, Part II: Load–pit–crack interaction. Pol. Marit. Res. 2015, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2015-0057.
  22. Qiao D et al. Fatigue analysis of deepwater hybrid mooring line under corrosion effect. Pol. Marit. Res. 2014, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 68–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2014-0032.
  23. Kyzioł L. Stress-corrosion resistance of the EN AW-AlZn5Mg1,5CuZr alloy in different heat treatment states. Pol. Marit. Res. 2013, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2013-0039.
  24. Łabanowski J et al. Effect of microstructure on mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of 2205 duplex stainless steel. Pol. Marit. Res. 2015, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 108–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2014-0047.
  25. Jurczak W. The effect of heat treatment on the structure and corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg alloys. Pol. Marit. Res. 2008, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 66–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-007-0099-5.
  26. Dudzik K, Jurczak W. Influence of friction stir welding (FSW) on mechanical and corrosion properties of AW-7020M and AW-7020 alloys. Pol. Marit. Res. 2016, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0036.
  27. Abramowski T, Szelangiewicz T. Numerical analysis of influence of ship hull form modification on ship resistance and propulsion characteristics. Pol. Marit. Res. 2010, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-008-0059-8.
  28. Chunhui L, Xishan P, Jie K, Xiaotian D. Comparison of 2D and 3D models of salinity numerical simulation. Pol. Marit. Res. 2015, vol. 22, no. s1, pp. 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2015-0028.
  29. Xue G, Liu Y, Zhang M, Zhang W, Zhang J, Luo H, Jia R. Optimal design and numerical simulation on fish-like flexible hydrofoil propeller. Pol. Marit. Res. 2016, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0070.
  30. DeGiorgi V G, Thomas E D III, Lucas K E. Scale effects and verification of modeling of ship cathodic protection systems. Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem. 1998, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-7997(98)80012-X.
  31. Hu L-F et al. The CFD method-based research on damaged ship’s flooding process in time-domain. Pol. Marit. Res. 2019, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 72–81. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0009.
  32. Ammar N R, Farag A I. CFD modeling of syngas combustion and emissions for marine gas turbine applications. Pol. Marit. Res. 2016, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0030.
  33. Abbas N et al. A novel approach to wave energy conversion using CFD technique. Pol. Marit. Res. 2024, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 113–125. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0041.
  34. Zeraatgar H et al. Analysis of instantaneous ship resistance-increase in waves with CFD URANS. Pol. Marit. Res. 2025, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0001.
  35. Grudziński K, Grudziński P, Jaroszewicz W, Ratajczak J. Assembling of bearing sleeve on ship propulsion shaft by using EPY resin compound. Pol. Marit. Res. 2012, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-012-0015-5.
  36. Qu H et al. Numerical simulation study on exposed reinforced anti-corrosion layer damage of the cross-sea bridge under the marine environment. Pol. Marit. Res. 2017, vol. 24, no. s3, pp. 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2017-0124.
  37. Lei B et al. Numerical simulation and experimental study on formation of high concentration of H2 generated by gas explosion. Pol. Marit. Res. 2016, vol. 23, no. s1, pp. 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0057.
  38. Phuong N T H et al. Investigation of the scale effects on roll motion for the ship Bettica using numerical simulation. Pol. Marit. Res. 2024, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0016.
  39. Jurkovic M, Illes L, Sosedová J, Prabowo A R, Melnyk O, Stopka O. Hydrodynamic assessment of distributed propulsion systems for shallow-draft inland vessels. Pol. Marit. Res. 2025, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 20–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0047.
  40. Ammar N R, Almas M, Nahas Q. Economic analysis and the EEXI reduction potential of parallel hybrid dual-fuel engine–fuel cell propulsion systems for LNG carriers. Pol. Marit. Res. 2023, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 59–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2023-0039.
  41. Fernández I A, Gómez M R, Gómez J R, López-González L M. Generation of H2 on board LNG vessels for consumption in the propulsion system. Pol. Marit. Res. 2020, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 83–95. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0009.
  42. Głuch J, Kodlewicz T, Drosińska-Komor M, Ziółkowska N, Breńkacz Ł, Ziółkowski P. Thermodynamic efficiency of an advanced 4th generation VHTR propulsion engine for large container ships. Pol. Marit. Res. 2024, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0052.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2026-0042 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 134 - 145
Published on: Sep 10, 2026
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Chia-Ling Chen, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.