Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Investigation of Longitudinal Motion and Vertical Acceleration of SWATH and SLICE Vessels with Varying Strut Angles in Regular Waves Cover

Numerical Investigation of Longitudinal Motion and Vertical Acceleration of SWATH and SLICE Vessels with Varying Strut Angles in Regular Waves

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Sea SLICE. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/sea-slice.htm
  2. Salvesen N. A note on the seakeeping characteristics of small-waterplane-area-twin-hull ships. AIAA SNAME/USN Advanced Marine Vehicles Meeting, Annapolis, Maryland, July 17-19, 1972. https://trid.trb.org/View/4704.
  3. Lee C M, Curphey R M. Prediction of motion, stability and wave load of small waterplane twin hull ships. Trans SNAME, 1977, vol. 85, pp. 94–130.
  4. Olson S. The military utility of the small waterplane area twin hull SWATH concept, AIAA Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, 1978. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1978-738.
  5. Lamb G. Some guidance for hull form selection for SWATH ships, Marine Technology 1988, vol. 25, pp. 239-252.
  6. Lee S, Kim Y, Hong D. Motion prediction of the small-waterplane-area twin-hull ship. Journal of SNAK, 1986, vol. 23 pp. 35-43. http://doi.or.kr/10.PSN/ADPER0000174664
  7. Lee P, Lee S, Hong S, Hong D,.Motion control of a SWATH ship in waves, 17th report by the Korean Institute of Dispatching Research, 1987, vol. 17, pp. 157-165. http://doi.or.kr/10.PSN/ADPER0000165189.
  8. Reilly E, Shin Y S, Kotte H. A prediction of structural load and response of a SWATH ship in waves. Naval Engineers Journal 1988, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1988.tb01506.x.
  9. Schellin T, Papanikolaou A. Prediction of seakeeping performance of a SWATH ship and comparison with measurements. Proc. 1st FAST’91 Conference at Trondheim, 1991. https://www.academia.edu/58541276.
  10. Fang M, Her S S. Nonlinear SWATH ship motion in large longitudinal waves, International Shipbuilding Progress 1995, vol. 42, no. 431, pp. 197-220.
  11. Fang M C, Lin B N. The simulation of SWATH ship motion with controllable fin in longitudinal waves. International Shipbuilding Progress 1998, vol. 45, no. 443, pp. 283-307.
  12. Fang M, Chiou S. SWATH ship motion simulation based on a self-tuning fuzzy control, Journal of Ship Research 2000, vol. 44, no. (2), pp. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2000.44.2.108
  13. Subramanian V A, Beena, V I. Numeric design and evaluation of SWATH form. Int Ship Build Progr 2002, vol. 49, no. (2), pp. 95-125. https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-shipbuilding-progress/49-jun-2.
  14. Zajic H W. Optimization of an advanced high speed hull form. Master thesis. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1995.
  15. Al-Jowder J A. Comparative resistance calculations for SWATH SLICE hulls. Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California,1995.
  16. Michalski J P. A parametric method for evaluation of resistance of SWATH ships. Polish Maritime Research 2008, vol. 15, no. 1(55), pp. 3-10. doi:10.2478/v10012-007-0045-6.
  17. Brizzolara S. Parametric optimization of SWAT-hull forms by a viscous-inviscid free surface method driven by a differential evolution algorithm. 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St. John’s, Canada, 2004. https://www.academia.edu/5678023.
  18. Dubrovsky V. Multi-hulls new options and scientific developments. Ships and Offshore Structures 2010, vol. 5, no. (1), pp. 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445300903149038.
  19. Brizzolara S, Villa D. Hydrodynamic assessment and optimization of SLICE hull forms. 4th Annual Conference MAST2009 Maritime Systems and Technology, 2009.
  20. Yoshida M, Kihara H, Iwashita H, Kinoshita T. Conceptual design and seaworthiness of resonance free SWATH as an oceangoing fast ship. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers 2009, vol. 10, pp. 73-81. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.10.73.
  21. Brizzolara S, Vernengo, G. Automatic optimization computational method for unconventional SWATH ships resistance. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 2011, vol. 5, no. (5), pp. 882-889. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267540826.
  22. Liang L, Wang B, Ji M. Adaptive fuzzy control for SWATH ship seakeeping characteristics. International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, August 5-8, Chengdu, China, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2012.6282883.
  23. Maimun A, Rahimuddin R. Seakeeping of semi-SWATH using fin stabilizer with fuzzy logic controller in following seas. International Conference on Marine Safety and Environment, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 2013. http://eprints.utm.my/38472.
  24. Bondarenko O V, Boiko Anzhela P, Seropyan I R. Determination of the main characteristics of the small waterplane area twin hull ships at the initial stage of design. Polish Maritime Research 2013, vol. 20, no. 1(77), pp. 11-22. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2013-0002.
  25. Krishna Y, Gupta A. Powering and motion analysis of twin-strut SWATH vessels. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2014, vol. 7, no. (S7), pp. 28-40. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2014/v7sp7.19.
  26. Begovic E, Bertorello C, Mancini S. Hydrodynamic performances of small size SWATH craft. Brodogradnja 2015, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1-22. https://doaj.org/article/e3202ef21ac041e8b9b018a72ef63f25.
  27. Brizzolara S. The second generation of autonomous surface vessels optimized performance for AUVs assistance at sea. OCEANS, Genova, Italy, 2015, pp. 1-8. doi: 10.1109/OCEANS-Genova.2015.7271640.
  28. Qian P, Yi H, Li Y. Numerical and experimental studies on hydrodynamic performance of a small-waterplane-area-twin-hull (SWATH) vehicle with inclined struts. Ocean Engineering 2015, vol. 96, pp. 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.039.
  29. Begovic E, Bertorello C, Bove A, de Luca F. Exploitation of SWATH hull form concept for small working/pleasure craft. In Maritime Technology and Engineering 3, Guedes Soares & Santos (Eds.) Taylor & Francis Group; 2016, pp. 603-609. doi: 10.1201/b21890-79.
  30. Sun X, Yao Y, Ye Q. Numerical investigation on seakeeping performance of SWATH with three-dimensional translating-pulsating source Green function. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2016, vol. 73, pp. 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.10.005.
  31. Begovic E, Bertorello C, Bove A, de Luca F. Experimental study on hydrodynamic performance of SWATH vessels in calm water and in head waves. Applied Ocean Research 2019, vol. 85, pp. 88-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.012.
  32. Guan G, Zhuang Z, Yang Q, Jin S. Design parameter sensitivity analysis for SWATH with minimum resistance at design and service speeds. Ocean Engineering 2021, vol. 240, art. 109961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109961.
  33. Guan G, Zhuang Z, Yang Q, Wang P, Jin S. Hull form optimization design of SWATH with combination evaluations of resistance and seakeeping performance. Ocean Engineering 2022, vol. 264, art. 112513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112513.
  34. Zare A, Sayyadi H, Karimi M H. Numerical modeling of an advanced semi-SWATH hull in calm water and regular head wave. Journal of Marine Science and Application 2021, vol. 20, pp. 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-021-00239-6.
  35. Wang J, Zhuang J, Jin M, Xu F, Su Y. Experimental and numerical study on the adjustment of twin hydrofoils of a variable-structure SWATH. Ocean Engineering 2024, vol. 303, art. 117712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117712.
  36. Nazari H, Ghassemi H, Ghaisi M, He G, Akbari Vakilabadi K. Review of resistance and seakeeping characteristics of SWATH ships. Ships and Offshore Structures 2025, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2025.2483312.
  37. Majdfar S, Ghassemi H, Zarenezhad Ashkezari A, He G. Review of the seakeeping characteristics of trimaran, catamaran, and SWATH ships. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin 2025, vol. 83, no. (155), pp. 32-50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395667243_Review_of_the_seakeeping_characteristics_of_trimaran_Catamaran_and_SWATH_ships.
  38. Tan C-L, Wu C-M, Hsu C-H, Chau S-W. The pontoon design optimization of a SWATH vessel for resistance reduction. J Mar Sci Eng 2025, vol. 13, p. 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081504.
  39. Chen C-W, Yin J, Lu J, Song S, Hu C, Chen C. A novel nonlinear ship seakeeping method for comparing the seakeeping performance of SWATH and monohull ships in UUV recovery. Ships and Offshore Structures 2025, pp. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2025.2591949.
  40. ITTC report. Retrieved from https://www.ittc.info/media/11950/75-03-01-01.pdf.
  41. [Wang J, Zhuang J, Su Y. A study on longitudinal motion stability of a variable-structure SWATH USV with and without twin hydrofoils. Ocean Engineering 2022, vol. 265, art. 112606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112606.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2026-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 40
Published on: Sep 10, 2026
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Hadi Nazari, Hassan Ghassemi, Mahmoud Ghiasi, Guanghua He, Karim Akbari Vakilabadi, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.