Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ensemble Machine Learning and Simulated Annealing for Behaviour Prediction of a Diesel Engine Fuelled with Dimethyl Ether Cover

Ensemble Machine Learning and Simulated Annealing for Behaviour Prediction of a Diesel Engine Fuelled with Dimethyl Ether

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Kowalski J, Tarelko W. NOx emission from a two-stroke ship engine. Part 1: Modeling aspect. Appl Therm Eng 2009, vol. 29, pp. 2153–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.06.032
  2. Pham TN, Nguyen HP, Nguyen VN, Sirichokpokin P, Hadiyanto H, Rudzki K, et al. Application of hybrid fuzzy-TOPSIS approach in enhancing green logistics towards sustainable maritime. Polish Marit Res 2025, vol. 32, pp. 156–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0030
  3. Cao DN, Johnson AJT. A simulation study on a premixed-charge compression ignition mode-based engine using a blend of biodiesel/diesel fuel under a split injection strategy. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2024, vol. 14, pp. 451–71. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.2.20007
  4. Hoang AT, Nayak SK, Vujanović M, Guerrero‐Pérez MO, Rodríguez‐Castellón E, López‐Escalante MC, et al. Towards sustainable development goals: Application of hydrogen‐ enriched mahua biodiesel/diesel blend to dual‐fuel diesel engine. Glob Challenges 2025, vol. 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202500260
  5. Wei C, Jiang G, Wu G, Zhou Y, Liu Y. Effects on of blended biodiesel and heavy oil on engine combustion and black carbon emissions of a low-speed two-stroke engine. Polish Marit Res 2024, vol. 31, pp. 94–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0010
  6. Othman MF, Adam A, Najafi G, Mamat R. Green fuel as alternative fuel for diesel engine: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017, vol. 80, pp. 694–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.140
  7. Zeńczak W, Łuszczynski D. Biomass as an alternative fuel— Selected aspects. Polish Marit Res 2025, vol. 32, pp. 147–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0042
  8. Nguyen VN, Sharma P, Kumar A, Pham MT, Le HC, Truong TH, et al. Optimization of biodiesel production from Nahar oil using Box-Behnken design, ANOVA and grey wolf optimizer. Int J Renew Energy Dev 2023, vol. 12, pp. 711–9. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.54941
  9. Nguyen H-B, Nguyen V-T-A, Ly V-D, Bui T-A. Biodiesel produced from pangasius oil operating a diesel engine: Case Study in Vietnam. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2022, vol. 12, pp. 477–82. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.12.2.16159
  10. Cao W, Geng P, Xu X, Tarasiuk T. Energy management strategy considering energy storage system degradation for hydrogen fuel cell ship. Polish Marit Res 2023, vol. 30, pp. 95–104. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2023-0025
  11. Hoang AT, Bora BJ, Huynh DNL, Nguyen DKP, Le VV. Dual-fuel diesel engine features powered by ammonia under various pilot-fuel injection timing: Comprehensive analysis and response surface methodology-based optimization. Int J Engine Res 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874251341036
  12. Hoang AT, Chen W-H, López-Escalante MC, Guerrero-Pérez MO, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Kowalski J, et al. Methanol for decarbonization of the maritime sector: From ideological strategy to practical solutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2026, vol. 229, p. 116638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116638
  13. Zastempowski M, Kaszkowiak J, Jablonicky J, Hujo L, Gromnicki M. Effect of using gasoline with bioethanol on power, torque and selected exhaust gas components: Case study of a small spark-ignition outboard engine. Polish Marit Res 2025, vol. 32, pp. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2025-0009
  14. Wei C, Chen X-X, Chen L, Li P, Liu M. Effects of pilot oil injection timing on combustion, covariance and knocking of a natural gas–diesel duel-fuel low-speed engine. Polish Marit Res 2024, vol. 31, pp. 69–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0051
  15. Bui VG, Bui TMT, Nguyen MT, Bui VH, Do PN, Tran NAH, et al. Enhancing the performance of syngas-diesel dual-fuel engines by optimizing injection regimes: From comparative analysis to control strategy proposal. Process Saf Environ Prot 2024, vol. 186, pp. 1034–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.042
  16. Bui VG, Tu Bui TM, Ong HC, Nižetić S, Bui VH, Xuan Nguyen TT, et al. Optimizing operation parameters of a spark-ignition engine fueled with biogas-hydrogen blend integrated into biomass-solar hybrid renewable energy system. Energy 2022, vol. 252, p. 124052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124052
  17. Nguyen TA, Pham TY, Le HC, Nguyen VG, Nguyen LH. Exploring the feasibility of dimethyl ether (DME) and LPG fuel blend for small diesel engine: A simulation perspective. Int J Renew Energy Dev 2024, vol. 13, pp. 559–71. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2024.60250
  18. Doan QB, Nguyen XP, Pham VV, Dong TMH, Pham MT, Le TS. Performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine using ether additives: A review. Int J Renew Energy Dev 2022, vol. 11, pp. 255–74. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.42522
  19. Anggarani R, Aisyah L, Wibowo CS, Nugroho YS, Dhiputra IMK. Experimental comparison of working region, flame stability, and flame height of LPG, DME, and DME-mixed LPG in an atmospheric diffusion cylindrical burner. Int J Technol 2020, vol. 11, p. 400. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i2.3914
  20. Sun C, Liu Y, Qiao X, Ju D, Tang Q, Fang X, et al. Experimental study of effects of exhaust gas recirculation on combustion, performance, and emissions of DME-biodiesel fueled engine. Energy 2020, vol. 197, p. 117233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117233
  21. Le TT, Balasubramanian D, Le AT, Cao DN, Chen W-H, Venugopal IP, et al. Partially-charged advanced low-temperature combustion in diesel engine: Progress and prospects. Alexandria Eng J 2025, vol. 129, pp. 373–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.06.021
  22. Arcoumanis C, Bae C, Crookes R, Kinoshita E. The potential of di-methyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel for compression-ignition engines: A review. Fuel 2008, vol. 87, pp. 1014–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.007
  23. Jie L, Shenghua L, Yi L, Yanju W, Guangle L, Zan Z. Regulated and nonregulated emissions from a dimethyl ether powered compression ignition engine. Energy & Fuels 2010, vol. 24, pp. 2465–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9016043
  24. Park SH, Kim HJ, Lee CS. Effects of dimethyl-ether (DME) spray behavior in the cylinder on the combustion and exhaust emissions characteristics of a high speed diesel engine. Fuel Process Technol 2010, vol. 91, pp. 504–13.
  25. Yoon SH, Cha JP, Lee CS. An investigation of the effects of spray angle and injection strategy on dimethyl ether (DME) combustion and exhaust emission characteristics in a common-rail diesel engine. Fuel Process Technol 2010, vol. 91, pp. 1364–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.04.017
  26. Namasivayam AM, Korakianitis T, Crookes RJ, Bob-Manuel KDH, Olsen J. Biodiesel, emulsified biodiesel and dimethyl ether as pilot fuels for natural gas fuelled engines. Appl Energy 2010, vol. 87, pp. 769–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.014
  27. Soltic P, Hilfiker T, Wright Y, Hardy G, Fröhlich B, Klein D. The potential of dimethyl ether (DME) to meet current and future emissions standards in heavy-duty compression-ignition engines. Fuel 2024, vol. 355, p. 129357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129357
  28. Preuß J, Munch K, Denbratt I. Performance and emissions of renewable blends with OME3-5 and HVO in heavy duty and light duty compression ignition engines. Fuel 2021, vol. 303, p. 121275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121275
  29. Gelner AD, Pang GA, Weber M, Haisch C, Beck HA, Pastoetter C, et al. Gaseous emissions of a heavy-duty engine fueled with polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (OME) in transient cold-start operation and methods for after-treatment system heating. Environ Sci Adv 2022, vol. 1, pp. 470–82. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2VA00080F
  30. Liu H, Wang Z, Zhang J, Wang J, Shuai S. Study on combustion and emission characteristics of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers/diesel blends in light-duty and heavy-duty diesel engines. Appl Energy 2017, vol. 185, pp. 1393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.183
  31. Shojae K, Mahdavian M. Modification of piston bowl geometry and injection strategy, and investigation of EGR composition for a DME-burning direct injection engine. Adv Environ Technol 2017, vol. 3, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22104/aet.2017.503
  32. Benajes J, Novella R, Pastor JM, Hernández-López A, Kokjohn S. Computational optimization of a combustion system for a stoichiometric DME fueled compression ignition engine. Fuel 2018, vol. 223, pp. 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.022
  33. Jamei M, Sharma P, Ali M, Bora BJ, Malik A, Paramasivam P, et al. Application of an explainable glass-box machine learning approach for prognostic analysis of a biogas-powered small agriculture engine. Energy 2024, vol. 288, p. 129862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129862
  34. Sunil Kumar K, Surakasi R, Patro SGK, Govil N, Ramis MK, Razak A, et al. Performance, combustion, and emission analysis of diesel engine fuelled with pyrolysis oil blends and n-propyl alcohol-RSM optimization and ML modelling. J Clean Prod 2024, vol. 434, p. 140354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140354
  35. Tuan Hoang A, Nižetić S, Chyuan Ong H, Tarelko W, Viet Pham V, Hieu Le T, et al. A review on application of artificial neural network (ANN) for performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine fueled with biodiesel-based fuels. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 2021, vol. 47, p. 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101416
  36. Tarelko W, Rudzki K. Applying artificial neural networks for modelling ship speed and fuel consumption. Neural Comput Appl 2020, p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05111-2
  37. Zhang E, Zhou F, Xi H, Duan X, Liu J. Predicting cycle-to-cycle variations in liquid methane engines using CTGAN-augmented machine learning. J Mar Sci Eng 2025, vol. 13, p. 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081513
  38. Mohammedali AAM, Albadwi A, Omara AAM, Ali K, Ali MIH. Machine learning prediction and evolutionary multi-objective optimization on performance and emissions of a syngas-diesel dual-fuel engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2025, vol. 162, p. 150781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150781
  39. Nachippan M, Pathmanabhan P, Nagappan B, Upadhye VJ, Kaliappan N, Balaji V, et al. Machine learning predictions for enhancing engine performance and emission using aluminum oxide nano additives in castor biodiesel. Sci Rep 2025, vol. 15, p. 36514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02388-y
  40. Godwin DJ, Varuvel EG, Martin MLJ. Prediction of combustion, performance, and emission parameters of ethanol powered spark ignition engine using ensemble least squares boosting machine learning algorithms. J Clean Prod 2023, vol. 421, p. 138401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138401
  41. Sharma P, Sahoo BB. Precise prediction of performance and emission of a waste derived biogas–biodiesel powered dual– fuel engine using modern ensemble boosted regression tree: A critique to artificial neural network. Fuel 2022, vol. 321, p. 124131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124131
  42. Sharma P, Sahoo BB, Said Z, Hadiyanto H, Nguyen XP, Nižetić S, et al. Application of machine learning and Box-Behnken design in optimizing engine characteristics operated with a dual-fuel mode of algal biodiesel and waste-derived biogas. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023, vol. 48, pp. 6738–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.152
  43. Bhowmik S, Panua R, Debroy D, Paul A. Artificial neural network prediction of diesel engine performance and emission fueled with diesel–kerosene–ethanol blends: A fuzzy-based optimization. J Energy Resour Technol 2017, vol. 139. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035886
  44. Hoang AT, Chen W-H, Olga Guerrero-Pérez M, Rodríguez-Castellón E, López-Escalante MC, Huynh DNL, et al. Machine learning and simulated annealing/moth-flame based prediction-optimization for improving ultrasonication-assisted co-anaerobic digestion. Energy 2026, vol. 344, p. 139831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139831
  45. Asadi J, Jalali Farahani F. Optimization of dimethyl ether production process based on sustainability criteria using a homotopy continuation method. Comput Chem Eng 2018, vol. 115, pp. 161–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.03.014
  46. Bashiri S, Yasari E, Tayyebi S. Comparison of different sampling and surrogate modelling approaches for a multi-objective optimization problem of direct dimethyl ether synthesis in the fixed-bed reactor. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2022, vol. 230, p. 104683. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOLAB.2022.104683
  47. Ying W, Genbao L, Wei Z, Longbao Z. Study on the application of DME/diesel blends in a diesel engine. Fuel Process Technol 2008, vol. 89, pp. 1272–80. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.05.023
  48. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science (80- ) 1983, vol. 220, pp. 671–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671
  49. Sylejmani K, Gashi E, Ymeri A. Simulated annealing with penalization for university course timetabling. J Sched 2023, vol. 26, pp. 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-022-00747-5
  50. Dubey K, Sharma SC, Nasr AA. A simulated annealing based energy-efficient VM placement policy in cloud computing. 2020 Int. Conf. Emerg. Trends Inf. Technol. Eng., IEEE; 2020, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.119
  51. Liu C, Zhang F, Zhang H, Shi Z, Zhu H. Optimization of assembly sequence of building components based on simulated annealing genetic algorithm. Alexandria Eng J 2023, vol. 62, pp. 257–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.025
  52. Karaboga D, Akay B. A comparative study of artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl Math Comput 2009, vol. 214, pp. 108–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090
  53. Karaboga D, Gorkemli B, Ozturk C, Karaboga N. A comprehensive survey: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artif Intell Rev 2014, vol. 42, pp. 21–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9328-0
  54. Luo J, Liu Q, Yang Y, Li X, Chen M, Cao W. An artificial bee colony algorithm for multi-objective optimisation. Appl Soft Comput 2017, vol. 50, pp. 235–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.11.014
  55. Karaboga D, Basturk B. Artificial bee colony (ABC) Optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems. Found Fuzzy Log Soft Comput, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; n.d., p. 789–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72950-1_77
  56. Sonmez M, Akgüngör AP, Bektaş S. Estimating transportation energy demand in Turkey using the artificial bee colony algorithm. Energy 2017, vol. 122, pp. 301–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.074
  57. Shirneshan A, Samani BH, Ghobadian B. Optimization of biodiesel percentage in fuel mixture and engine operating conditions for diesel engine performance and emission characteristics by artificial bees colony algorithm. Fuel 2016, vol. 184, pp. 518–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.117
  58. Sabzekar M, Hasheminejad SMH. Robust regression using support vector regressions. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2021, vol. 144, p. 110738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110738
  59. Dong H, Jin X, Lou Y, Wang C. Lithium-ion battery state of health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction based on support vector regression-particle filter. J Power Sources 2014, vol. 271, pp. 114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.176
  60. Ahmad MW, Reynolds J, Rezgui Y. Predictive modelling for solar thermal energy systems: A comparison of support vector regression, random forest, extra trees and regression trees. J Clean Prod 2018, vol. 203, pp. 810–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.207
  61. Huang H, Wei X, Zhou Y. An overview on twin support vector regression. Neurocomputing 2022, vol. 490, pp. 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.10.125
  62. Ban B, Yang J, Chen P, Xiong J, Wang Q. Ship track regression based on support vector machine. IEEE Access 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2749260
  63. Kumar K P, Alruqi M, Hanafi HA, Sharma P, Wanatasanappan VV. Effect of particle size on second law of thermodynamics analysis of Al2O3 nanofluid: Application of XGBoost and gradient boosting regression for prognostic analysis. Int J Therm Sci 2024, vol. 197, p. 108825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108825
  64. Liu Y, Dong Y, Jiang Z, Li Y, Zha W, Du Y, et al. XGBoost-based model for predicting hydrogen content in electroslag remelting. J Iron Steel Res Int 2023, vol. 30, pp. 887–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-023-00962-0
  65. Bae D-J, Kwon B-S, Song K-B. XGBoost-based day-ahead load forecasting algorithm considering behind-the-meter solar PV generation. Energies 2021, vol. 15, p. 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010128
  66. Han P, Liu Z, Sun Z, Yan C. A novel prediction model for ship fuel consumption considering shipping data privacy: An XGBoost-IGWO-LSTM-based personalized federated learning approach. Ocean Eng 2024, vol. 302, p. 117668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117668
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2026-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 85 - 97
Published on: May 6, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Dinh Trung Pham, Diep Ngoc, Joanna Grochowalska, Lan Huong Nguyen, Duc Pham, Van Hung Bui, Thanh Hieu Chau, Thanh Nam Dang, Huu Cuong Le, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.