Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Use of the AHP Method for Preference Determination in Yacht Design Cover

Use of the AHP Method for Preference Determination in Yacht Design

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. G. Di Bucchianico and A. Vallicelli, “User-centered approach for sailing yacht design,” in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design, vol. 2, W. Karwowski, M. Soares, and N. Stanton, Eds., 2011, pp. 445–463.
  2. S. Tavakoli, D. Khojasteh, M. Haghani, and S. Hirdaris, “A review on the progress and research directions of ocean engineering,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 272, p. 113617, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2023.113617.
  3. T. Song, T. Tan, and G. Han, „Research on preventive maintenance strategies and systems for in-service ship equipment,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 85–96, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2022-0009.
  4. A. Mancuso, A. Saporito, and D. Tumino, “Parametric hull design with rational Bézier curves,” in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021, pp. 221–227 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70566-4_36.
  5. S. Khan, E. Gunpinar, K. M. Dogan, B. Sener, and P. Kaklis, “ModiYacht: Intelligent CAD tool for parametric, generative, attributive and interactive modelling of yacht hull forms,” in SNAME 14th International Marine Design Conference, IMDC 2022, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 2022, doi: 10.5957/IMDC-2022-311.
  6. J. R. Binns and P. A. Brandner, “Dynamic interaction of breaking waves and inverted sailing yachts: Explaining the efficacy of mast height retention relative to vertical centre of gravity,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 35, no. 17–18, pp. 1759–1768, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.013.
  7. G. Guelfi and E. Canepa, “New development in 6-DOF algorithms for sailing yacht velocity prediction program and new insight in appendages force modelling,” Master’s Degree in Nautical Engineering, 2013.
  8. C. A. Marchaj, Aero-Hydrodynamics of Sailing. Adlard Coles Nautical, 2000.
  9. B. Augier, P. Bot, F. Hauville, and M. Durand, “Dynamic behaviour of a flexible yacht sail plan,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 66, pp. 32–43, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.03.017.
  10. T. Matulja, L. Jedretić, and M. Hadjina, “Influence analysis of deck equipment positioning on performances in sailing,” pp. 101–109.
  11. C. M. Rizzo and D. Boote, “Scantling of mast and rigging of sail boats: A few hints from a test case to develop improved design procedures,” 2010.
  12. M. Pawłusik, R. Szłapczyński, and A. Karczewski, “Optimising rig design for sailing yachts with evolutionary multi-objective algorithm,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 36–49, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0064.
  13. W. Karwowski, M. M. Soares, and N. A. Stanton, “Human factors and ergonomics in consumer product design uses and applications,” CRC Press. 2011.
  14. N. Kalkan, “Human factors and ergonomic considerations for super-fast boat design,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://mybroadband.co.za/photos/showfull.
  15. S. Ö. Felek, “Parametric sailing yacht exterior and interior design,” 2020, doi: 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2019.30085.
  16. D. Harris, S. Mccartan, B. Verheijden, H. Groningen, and M. Lundh, “European Boat Design Innovation Group: The marine design manifesto. Human factors in safety management systems view project next generation civil flight deck concepts view project,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280065046.
  17. M. Bilski, “Selected Human Factors in Marina Design,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, pp. 1646–1653, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j. promfg.2015.07.482.
  18. T. Bosma, “A human factor’s approach to mega yacht concept design,” Master of Philosophy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 2013.
  19. R. Gill, “Approaches to design,” Des. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 141–145, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(80)90020-4.
  20. P. von Buelow, ‘Using Evolutionary algorithms to aid designer of architectural structures,” in Creative Evolutionary Systems, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 315–336. doi: 10.1016/ B978-155860673-9/50050-1.
  21. L. Larson, R. E. Eliasson, and M. Orych, Podstawy Projektowania Jachtów, 4th ed., vol. 1. Warszawa: Almapress, 2014.
  22. B. Branowski, M. Zabłocki, P. Kurczewski, and A. Walczak, „Selected issues in universal design of yachts for people with disabilities,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 4–15, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2021-0030.
  23. E. Miszewska, M. Niedostatkiewicz, and R. Wisniewski, “The selection of anchoring system for floating houses by means of AHP method,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 4, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS10040075.
  24. M. Naujok, Boat Interior Construction: A Bestselling Guide to DIY Interior Boatbuilding, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Adlard Coles Nautical, 2002.
  25. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Decision Making Series), vol. 1. McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  26. W. C. H. Beck, A. Prusak, and P. Stefanów, “Budowa i analiza modeli decyzyjnych krok po kroku AHP-analityczny proces hierarchiczny,” 2014.
  27. G. Khatwani and A. K. Kar, “Improving the cosine consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process for solving multi-criteria decision making problems,” Applied Computing and Informatics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 118–129, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2016.05.001.
  28. A. Jozaghi et al., “A comparative study of the AHP and TOPSIS techniques for dam site selection using GIS: A case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran,” Geosciences (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 12, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ geosciences8120494.
  29. F. de Felice and A. Petrillo, “Absolute measurement with analytic hierarchy process: A case study for Italian racecourse,” International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 209, 2013, doi: 10.1504/IJADS.2013.054931.
  30. F. de Felice and A. Petrillo, “Multicriteria approach for process modelling in strategic environmental management planning,” International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, 2013, doi: 10.1504/IJSPM.2013.055190.
  31. J. Benítez, X. Delgado-Galván, J. Izquierdo, and R. Pérez-García, “Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 219, no. 5, pp. 2432–2441, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.079.
  32. J. Krejčí and J. Stoklasa, “Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: Why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 114, pp. 97–106, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.060.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2023-0055 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 30
Published on: Dec 11, 2023
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2023 Jan Sierzputowski, Artur Karczewski, Przemysław Krata, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.