Blade Section Profile Array Lifting Surface Design Method for Marine Screw Propeller Blade

Przemysław Król

doi:10.2478/pomr-2019-0075

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Blade Section Profile Array Lifting Surface Design Method for Marine Screw Propeller Blade

Polish Maritime Research

Volume 26 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

By: Przemysław Król

Open Access

|Dec 2019

Abstract

The lifting surface model is widely used in screw propeller design and analysis applications. It serves as a reliable tool for determination of the propeller blade mean line and pitch distribution. The main idea of this application was to determine the blade shape that would satisfy the kinematic boundary condition on its surface with the prescribed bound circulation distribution over it. In this paper a simplified lifting surface method is presented – in which the 3D task for the entire blade is replaced by a set of 2D tasks for subsequent blade section profiles.

References

1. Bugalski T., Streckwall H., Szantyr J. A. (2013): Critical review of propeller performance scaling methods, based on model experiments and numerical calculations. Polish Maritime Research, 4(80), Vol. 20, 71–80.10.2478/pomr-2013-0043
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Brockett T. (1981): Lifting-Surface Hydrodynamics for Design of Rotating Blades, Propellers ‘81 Symposium.10.5962/bhl.title.47399
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Gaggero S., Gonzalez-Adalid J., Perez Sobrino M. (2016): Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms. Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 55, 102–129.10.1016/j.apor.2015.12.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Greeley D. S., Kerwin J. E. (1982): Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 90, 415–453.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Jarzyna H., Koronowicz T., Szantyr J. A. (1996): Design of marine propellers, Selected problems. Ossolineum, Wrocław.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Kobyliński L. (1955): Śruby okrętowe (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Komunikacyjne, Warszawa.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Koyama K. (1993): Comparative calculations of propellers by surface panel method, Workshop organized by 20th ITTC Propulsor Committee. Papers of Ship Research Institute.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Król P., Bugalski T. (2018): Application of vortex flow model in propeller – stator system design and analysis. Polish Maritime Research, 1(97), Vol. 25, 35–44.10.2478/pomr-2018-0004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Król P., Tesch K. (2018): Experimental and numerical validation of the improved vortex method applied to CP745 marine propeller model. Polish Maritime Research, 2(98), Vol. 25, 57–66.10.2478/pomr-2018-0054
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Lee K. J., Hoshino T., Lee J. H. (2014): A lifting surface optimization method for the design of marine propeller blades. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 88, 472–470.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.07.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Lee T., Park S. O. (2009): Improved iteration algorithm for nonlinear vortex lattice method. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, No. 6.10.2514/1.44829
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Luca G., Roberto M., Claudio T. (2014): Marine propellers performance and flow-field prediction by a free-wake panel method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Vol. 26 (5), 780–795.10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60087-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Miclea-Bleiziffer M., Untaroiu A., Delgado A. (2014): Development of a novel design method for marine propellers by computing the exact lift of arbitrary hydrofoils in cascade. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 83, 87–98.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Morgan B., Silovic V., Denny S. B. (1968): Propeller Lifting-Surface Corrections. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 76, 309–347.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Muscari R., Mascio A., Verzicco R. (2013): Modeling of vortex dynamics in the wake of a marine propeller. Computers & Fluids, Vol. 73, 65–79.10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.12.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Noosomton J., Gunnuang W. (2017): Case study on CFD simulation and experiment of new developed propeller for training Thai boat. Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors – SMP’17, Espoo.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Suchecki W. (2018): Studies on velocity fields around the cavitation vortices generated by the model of a rotating blade. Polish Maritime Research, 2(98), Vol. 25, 66–70.10.2478/pomr-2018-0055
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Szantyr J. (1984): Deformable lifting surface method for determination of unsteady cavitation on screw propeller blade and its hydrodynamic results (in Polish). IMP PAN Gdańsk.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Zeraatgar H., Hossein Ghaemi M. (2019): The analysis of overall ship fuel consumption in acceleration manoeuvre using hull-propeller-engine interaction principles and governor features. Polish Maritime Research, 1(101), Vol. 26, 162–173.10.2478/pomr-2019-0018
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0075 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 134 - 141

Published on: Dec 31, 2019

Published by: Gdansk University of Technology

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

marine propeller,

lifting surface,

blade section profile,

design

Related subjects:

Engineering,

Introductions and overviews,

Engineering, other,

Geosciences,

Atmospheric science and climatology,

Life sciences,

Life sciences, other

© 2019 Przemysław Król, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 26 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)