Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sleep-disordered breathing and obstructive sleep apnoea in asthma: impact on disease control, exacerbation frequency and clinical outcomes – a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Cover

Sleep-disordered breathing and obstructive sleep apnoea in asthma: impact on disease control, exacerbation frequency and clinical outcomes – a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram illustrating study identification, screening, eligibility assessment and inclusion. Records were identified from five databases (n = 6958); 21 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Table 1.

GRADE certainty of evidence for primary outcomes.

Outcome

Studies (N)

Design

RoB

Incons.

Indirect.

Imprec.

Pub. Bias

Certainty

Effect [95% CI]

Paediatric: poor asthma control (adjusted)

2 (n = 475)

Observational

–1

–1

0

–1

0

VL

OR 2.48 [1.45, 4.23]

Adults: persistent symptoms (OSA-risk questionnaire)

2 (n = 1153)

Observational

–1

0

0

0

–1

Low

OR 1.74 [1.49, 2.02]

Adults: persistent symptoms (diagnosed OSA)

2 (n = 1553)

Observational

–1

–1

0

–1

0

VL

OR 2.06 [0.63, 6.77]

Adults: severe asthma (diagnosed OSA)

1 (n = 813)

Observational

–1

–1

0

–1

0

VL

OR 3.49 [1.49, 8.15]

Adults: poor control (symptom-defined SA)

1 (n = 428)

Observational

–1

0

0

–1

0

VL

OR 1.77 [1.01, 3.07]

Adults: hospital readmission (OSA coded)

1 (n = 65731)

Observational

–1

0

0

0

0

Low

IRR/HR 1.09 [1.04, 1.15]

Adults: severe exacerbation (OSA by PSG)

1 (n = 303)

Observational

–1

0

0

–1

0

VL

OR 14.23 [4.60, 44.04]

Paediatric: length of stay (OSA coded)

1 (n = 564,468)

Observational

–1

0

0

0

0

Low

IRR 1.34 [1.28, 1.40]

Paediatric: mechanical ventilation (OSA coded)

1 (n = 564,468)

Observational

–1

–1

0

0

0

VL

OR 6.62 [4.29, 10.22]

Asthma predicts incident OSA (bidirectional)

4–6 (≥200,000)

Observational

–1

–1

0

–1

0

VL

OR/HR/RR 2.11 [1.35, 3.29]

OSA/SDB prevalence in asthma (PSG/ HSAT)

7 (n = 592)

Observational

–1

–1

0

–1

0

VL

62.3% [34.7%, 83.7%]

[i] CI, confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; IRR: incidence rate ratio; OR, odds ratio; OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; PSG, polysomnography; RR: relative risk; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

[ii] Domains: RoB: risk of bias; Incons: inconsistency; Indirect: indirectness; Imprec: imprecision; Pub. Bias: publication bias.

[iii] Ratings: 0 = not downgraded; –1 = downgraded one level; –2 = downgraded two levels. Certainty: VL = very low; L = low.

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies

Study, Year [Ref]

Country

Design

Population/ Setting

N

Age group

Female (%)

BMI

Asthma diagnosis

OSA/SDB measure

Threshold

OSA/SDB prevalence

Outcomes

Effect measure

Key effect estimate [95% Cl]

Covariates adjusted

Overall RoB

Kheirandish-Gozal 2011 (19)

USA

Prospective referred cohort; before-after T&A

Children with poorly controlled asthma (PCA), age 3–10 years

92

Paediatric

NR

NR

Physician diagnosis

Overnight PSG

AH I ≥ 5/hrTST

58/92 (63.0%)

Exacerbations/ year; beta-agonist use; asthma symptom score

Pre-post

Exacerba tions: –56.1%; Rescue: –51.2%

Age, sex (T&A non-ran-domised)

Serious

Araujo 2022 (20)

Brazil

Cross- sectional

Severe asthma patients on biologic therapy

56

Adult

78.6%

34.3 kg/m2

Physician diagnosis; severe GINA criteria

HSAT (Apnea-Link Air)

RDI ≥ 5/hr

30/56 (53.6%)

ACT; asthma control classification

OR

ACT association: null

BMI, smoking

Serious

Byun 2013 (21)

South Korea

Cross-sec-tional clinic sample

Pulmonary/sleep clinic patients with SDB symptoms

167

Adult

40.7%

NR

Physician diagnosis

ApneaLink + PSG subset

AHI ≥ 5

111/167 (66.5%)

Asthma predicts OSA; OSA prevalence by asthma severity

OR

OR 4.25 [1.50, 12.16]

Age, sex, BMI, smoking

Serious

Teodorescu 2012 (24)

USA

Cross-sec-tional tertiary asthma clinic

Adult asthma clinic patients age 18–75

752

Adult

67.0%

32.0 kg/m2

Physician diagnosis

SA-SDQ + medical record

SA-SDQ ≥ 36 (M), ≥ 32 (F)

High-risk 212/752; Diagnosed 60/752

Persistent daytime/nighttime symptoms; beta-agonist use

OR

High-risk: OR 1.96 [1.31, 2.94]

Age, sex, BMI, rhinitis, GERD, ICS

Serious

Teodorescu 2013 (25)

USA

Cross-sec-tional asthma clinic

Older (≥40 year) and younger (< 40 year) adult asthma patients

813

Adult

67.0%

31.5 kg/m2

Physician diagnosis

Medical record diagnosis

Record-based

Older OSA 13%; younger OSA 7%

Persistent nocturnal symptoms; severe asthma

OR

Nocturnal older: OR 4.56 [1.55, 13.43]; Severe asthma pooled: OR 3.49 [1.49, 8.15]

Age, sex, BMI, rhinitis, smoking

Serious

Teodorescu 2015 SARP (26)

USA

Cross-sectional multi centre SARP

Severe asthma, n on-severe asthma, and normal controls

401

Adult

69.0%

31.8 kg/m2

SARP physician diagnosis

SA-SDQ questionnaire

High risk: men ≥ 36, women ≥ 32

Severe asthma 26% high-risk

Daily symptoms; beta-agonist; nightly symptoms

OR

Daily symptoms pooled: OR 1.74 [1.49, 2.02]

Age, sex, BMI, rhinitis, smoking

Serious

Teodorescu 2015 JAMA (12)

USA

Prospective population-based cohort

Wisconsin Sleep Cohort adults free of OSA at baseline

547

Adult

54.1%

28.9 kg/m2

Self-report question naire

Laboratory PSG

AHI ≥5 or PAP

Incident OSA: 22/81 asthma vs 75/466 no asthma

Incident OSA

RR

RR 1.39 [1.06, 1.82]

Age, sex, BMI, smoking, sleepiness

Serious

Wang 2016 (34)

China

Matched clinical observational

Adults with asthma and matched healthy controls; all had PSG

303

Adult

NR

NR

Physician diagnosis; spirometry

Full-night PSG

Threshold NE

Asthma 19.2%; controls 9.6%

Severe asthma exacerbation; OSA prevalence

OR/RR

Exacerbation: OR 14.23 [4.60, 44.04]; Prevalence: RR 2.25 [1.15, 4.40]

Matching (age,sex, BMI)

Serious

Shen 2015 (13)

Taiwan

Retrospective population cohort

Newly diagnosed adult asthma vs matched comparators

194,187

Adult

55.0%

NR

Administrative ICD (asthma)

Administrative claims OSA

N/A

Incident OSA rate: 12.1 vs 4.84/1000 PY

Incident OSA

HR

HR 1.87 [1.61, 2.17]

Age, sex, income, comorbidities

Serious

Hi ray am a 2020 (30)

USA

Retrospective administrative cohort

Adults 18–54 hospitalised for asthma; 7 State Inpatient DBs

65,731

Adult

61.0%

NR

ICD hospitalisation code

ICD-9-CM OSA diagnosis

N/A

10.0%

All-cause and asthma-specific readmission; time to readmission

IRR/HR

Pooled IRR/ HR: 1.09 [1.04, 1.15]

Age, sex, obesity, depression, SES

Moderate

Kauppi 2016 (31)

Finland

Retrospective before-after CPAP

CPAP users with pre-existing asthma

152

Adult

60.0%

30.4 kg/m2

Physician diagnosis

Home respiratory polygraphy

REI ≥ 15 or 5–14 with symptoms

All enrolled (100%)

ACT improvement after longterm CPAP

Pre-post

ACT improvement: 29.0%

None (uncontrolled)

Serious

Serrano- Pariente 2016 (23)

Spain

Prospective multi centre before-after CPAP

Adults with asthma + moder-ate-severe OSA starting CPAP

99

Adult

71.0%

32.3 kg/m2

Physician diagnosis; GINA criteria

PSG or cardiorespiratory polygraphy

RDI ≥ 20

All enrolled (100%)

Exacerbations; ACQ; mini-AQLQ

Pre-post

Exacerba tions: –51.4%; ACQ: –28.1%

CPAP compliance subgroup

Serious

Study, Year [Ref]

Country

Design

Population/ Setting

N

Age group

Female (%)

BMI

Asthma diagnosis

OSA/SDB measure

Threshold

OSA/SDB prevalence

Outcomes

Effect measure

Key effect estimate [95% Cl]

Covariates adjusted

Overall RoB

Sato 2021 (27)

Japan

Prospective cohort

Middle-aged and older adult asthma patients with Watch-PAT

62

Adult

63.0%

24.6 kg/m2

Physician diagnosis

V\fetch-PAT

pAHI ≥ 5

50/62 (80.6%)

Asthma worsening/exacerbation by OSA severity

OR

pAHI not retained in final model

Age, sex, BMI, smoking, ICS

Serious

Sakhamuri 2020 (29)

Trinidad & Tobago

Cross-sectional specialty clinic survey

Adult physician-diagnosed asthma patients in specialty clinics

428

Adult

71.2%

NR

Physician diagnosis

Symptom features (≥ 2 features)

NR

150/428 (35.0%)

Poor asthma control (ACT < 20); quality of life

OR

ACT < 20: OR 1.77 [1.01, 3.07]

Age, sex, BMI, smoking, GERD

Serious

Zandieh 2016 (35)

USA

Cross-sec-tional school survey

Urban ninth-grade students

9565

Adolescent

52.0%

NR

Self-reported probable asthma

Self-report questionnaire SDB

Frequent symptoms per criteria

1220/9565 (12.8%)

Probable asthma vs SDB; bidirectional

OR

Asthma predicts SDB: OR 2.63 [2.30, 3.00]; SDB predicts asthma: OR 2.44 [1.86, 3.20]

Age, sex, race, BMI

Serious

Li 2015 (32)

China

Cross-sec-tional school survey + me-ta-analysis

Schoolchildren age 5–12 across 8 Chinese cities

22,478

Paediatric

46.0%

NR

Question naire physician-diagnosed

Questionnaire SDB items (snoring, stops, snorts)

Usual/often categories

SDB prevalence 12.0%

Physician-diag-nosed asthma vs SDB

OR

Pooled OR 1.53 [1.03, 2.27]

Age, sex, city, ethnicity

Serious

Locci 2024 (22)

Italy

Cross- sectional

Children age 5–12 with asthma

78

Paediatric

51.3%

NR

Physician diagnosis

PSQ-SDBS questionnaire

PSQ-SD-BS ≥ 0.33

29/78 (37.2%)

Poor asthma control; SDB prevalence

OR

Adjusted OR 2.81 [0.91, 8.64]; Crude OR 4.15 [1.49, 11.60]

Age, sex, BMI, rhinitis, GERD

Serious

Tao 2024 (36)

China

Cross- sectional

Paediatric asthma outpatients age 0–18

397

Paediatric

44.8%

NR

Physician diagnosis

PSQ-SRBD questionnaire

PSQ- SRBD ≥ 0.33

86/397 (21.7%)

Poor asthma control

OR

Adjusted OR 2.39 [1.30, 4.39]; Crude OR 2.33 [1.35, 4.04]

Age, sex, BMI, rhinitis, medication

Serious

Tsou 2021 (33)

USA

Retrospective national inpatient database

Children hospitalised for acute asthma exacerbation 2000–2012

564,468

Paediatric

44.5%

NR

ICD hospitalisation code

Administrative ICD code OSA

N/A

4209/564,468 (0.75%)

Length of stay; invasive/ non-invasive ventilation

IRR/OR

LOS: IRR 1.34 [1.28, 1.40]; IMV: OR 5.33 [4.35, 6.54]; NIV: OR 8.30 [6.56, 10.51]; Pooled ventilation: OR 6.62 [4.29, 10.22]

Age, sex, year, race, insurance, hospital type

Moderate

Yigla 2003 (37)

Israel

Prospective clinical series

Difficu It-to-control asthma on long-term oral steroids

22

Adult

54.5%

NR

Physician diagnosis; steroid-dependent

Full-night PSG

RDI≥ 15 + symptoms

21/22 (95.5%)

Descriptive OSA severity (mild vs moderate-severe)

Descrip tive

95.5% prevalence; no comparative control outcome

None

Serious

Madama 2016 (28)

Portugal

Retrospective clinical series

Asthma patients referred for suspected OSA

47

Adult

NR

NR

Physician diagnosis

PSG 68%; polygraphy 32%

NE

27/47 (57.4%)

OSA prevalence; treated follow-up descriptive

Descrip tive

57.4% prevalence

None

Serious

[i] ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire; ACT: Asthma Control Test; CI, confidence interval; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; GINA, Global Initiative for Asthma; GERD: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; HR: hazard ratio; HSAT: home sleep apnoea test; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; IRR: incidence rate ratio; NE: not extracted; NR: not reported; OR, odds ratio; OSA: obstructive sleep apnoea; PSG: polysomnography; PSQ: Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire; RR: relative risk; RoB: risk of bias; SA-SDQ: Sleep Apnoea-Sleep Disorders Questionnaire; SDB: sleep-disordered breathing; T&A: adenotonsillectomy.

Figure 2.

Forest plot of OSA/SDB prevalence in asthma populations stratified by ascertainment method. Administrative coding, question-naire-based SDB assessment and objective sleep testing are presented in separate subgroups to avoid misleading synthesis. Proportions are pooled on the logit scale with random effects where k ≥ 2. OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Figure 3.

Forest plot of adult asthma control and symptom burden: OSA/SDB association. Effect rows are stratified by OSA ascertainment method and outcome family; multiple correlated endpoints from the same study are shown as subgroup evidence. Random-effects REML is used inside compatible subgroups; Hartung-Knapp interval correction is applied when k ≥ 3 and z-intervals when k = 2. OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Figure 4.

Forest plot of paediatric asthma control: OSA/SDB and poor asthma control. RevMan-style random-effects forest plot; adjusted and crude estimates are presented in separate subgroups to avoid double-counting. Squares represent study estimates sized by random-effects weight; diamonds represent subgroup pooled effects where k ≥ 2. Ratio effect on log scale; no-effect line = 1.0. OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Figure 5.

Forest plot of future-risk outcomes associated with OSA/SDB in asthma: exacerbation, mechanical ventilation, hospital readmission and length of stay. Outcome-family strata prevent inappropriate pooling of clinical exacerbations with utilisation endpoints. Ratio measures include OR, HR and IRR; the no-effect line is 1.0. HR: hazard ratio; IRR: incidence rate ratio; OR, odds ratio; OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Figure 6.

Forest plot of bidirectional asthma-OSA/SDB associations. This secondary framework demonstrates that asthma also independently predicts incident and prevalent OSA/SDB, a key confounding and mechanistic consideration. Pooling is performed within directional strata using random-effects REML. HR: hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Table 3.

Summary of meta-analysis results by objective and subgroup

Objective

Subgroup/stratum

k studies

k effects

Statistical model

Pooled effect [95% CI]

P-value

I2 (%)

T2

Q P-value

GRADE

OBJ1: Paediatric asthma control

Children: adjusted SDB/ OSA and poor control

2

2

RE-REML, z-test

OR 2.48 [1.45, 4.23]

<0.001

0%

0.000

0.805

L

OBJ1: Paediatric asthma control

Children: crude SDB/ OSA and poor control

2

2

RE-REML, z-test

OR 2.65 [1.63, 4.31]

<0.001

0%

0.000

0.332

L

OBJ2: Adult control/symptom burden

OSA-risk questionnaire and daily symptoms

2

5

RE-REML, HK

OR 1.74 [1.49, 2.02]

<0.001

0%

0.000

0.829

L

OBJ2: Adult control/symptom burden

Diagnosed OSA and persistent symptoms

2

3

RE-REML, HK

OR 2.06 [0.63, 6.77]

0.121

27%

0.050

0.198

VL

OBJ2: Adult control/symptom burden

Diagnosed OSA and severe asthma

1

2

RE-REML, z-test

OR 3.49 [1.49, 8.15]

0.004

32%

0.139

0.227

L

OBJ2: Adult control/symptom burden

Symptom-defined SA and poor ACT control

1

1

Single estimate; NP

OR 1.77 [1.01, 3.07]

0.047

-

-

-

VL

OBJ3: Exacerbation/future risk

Adult admin cohort: readmission/utilisation

1

3

RE-REML, HK

IRR/HR 1.09 [1.04, 1.15]

0.017

0%

0.000

0.462

L

OBJ3: Exacerbation/future risk

Adult clinical: severe exacerbation

1

1

Single estimate; NP

OR 14.23 [4.60, 44.04]

<0.001

-

-

-

VL

OBJ3: Exacerbation/future risk

Paediatric admin cohort: length of stay

1

1

Single estimate; NP

IRR 1.34 [1.28, 1.40]

<0.001

-

-

-

L

OBJ3: Exacerbation/future risk

Paediatric admin cohort: ventilation severity

1

2

RE-REML, z-test

OR 6.62 [4.29, 10.22]

<0.001

87%

0.085

0.005

VL

OBJ5: Bidirectional pathway

Asthma predicts incident/prevalent OSA/SDB

4

5

RE-REML, HK

OR/HR/RR 2.11 [1.35, 3.29]

0.009

85%

0.083

<0.001

VL

OBJ5: Bidirectional pathway

Bidirectional association (Zandieh 2016)

1

2

RE-REML, z-test

OR 2.39 [1.96, 2.93]

<0.001

0%

0.000

0.839

L

OBJ5: Bidirectional pathway

SDB predicts physician-diagnosed asthma

1

2

RE-REML, z-test

OR 1.53 [1.03, 2.27]

0.034

70%

0.058

0.066

VL

OBJ6: OSA/SDB prevalence

Objective sleep test (seven studies)

7

7

RE-logit, HK

62.3% [34.7%, 83.7%]

0.320

95%

1.168

<0.001

VL

OBJ6: OSA/SDB prevalence

Administrative code (two studies)

2

2

RE-logit, z-test

2.8% [0.2%, 28.7%]

0.008

100%

3.617

<0.001

VL

OBJ6: OSA/SDB prevalence

Questionnaire/symptom-defined SDB (three studies)

3

3

RE-logit, HK

30.4% [13.4%, 55.2%]

0.076

89%

0.153

<0.001

VL

[i] ACT: Asthma Control Test; CI, confidence interval; HK: Hartung-Knapp; HR: hazard ratio; IRR: incidence rate ratio; k: number of effect estimates; NP: not pooled (single compatible estimate); OR: odds ratio; OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing; REML: restricted maximum likelihood; RR: relative risk.

[ii] GRADE certainty: L = low; VL = very low.

Supplementary Figure S1.

Risk-of-bias profile across observational studies (ROBINS-I adapted domains). Stacked bar chart showing the distribution of judgements (low, moderate, some concerns, serious, other/NA) for each domain across all 21 included studies. N/A.

Supplementary Figure S2.

Funnel plot for adult asthma control: OSA/SDB association. The vertical blue line represents the pooled log ratio effect (log-scale = 0.552). Dotted lines indicate the pseudo-95% confidence region. Asymmetry at larger standard errors suggests possible small-study publication bias. OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Supplementary Figure S3.

Leave-one-study-out sensitivity analysis for the bidirectional asthma-OSA/SDB association (Objective 5). The x-axis shows the pooled ratio effect on the log scale after omission of each study in turn. All pooled estimates remain substantially above the null value (1.0), confirming robustness of the main finding. OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing.

Supplementary Figure S4.

Treatment response after OSA-directed therapy: relative improvement from baseline across asthma outcomes following CPAP (green) and adenotonsillectomy/T&A (blue). Direction is harmonised so that positive values indicate improvement. Pre-post evidence is not treated as causal owing to uncontrolled before-after designs. CPAP, OSA.

Supplementary Figure S5.

Evidence map showing which objectives each included study addresses. Bubble size reflects approximate precision where standard errors were available. Point colour indicates direction of signal (harm, benefit/null-reverse, continuous, or no direction).

Table S1.

Risk-of-bias assessment by domain for all 21 included primary studies (ROBINS-I-adapted framework; underlies Supplementary Figure S4). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed for each included study using domains adapted from the ROBINS-I framework: selection bias, exposure measurement, outcome measurement, confounding, temporality, missing data and selective reporting. Each domain was rated low, moderate, some concerns or serious risk of bias. An overall risk-of-bias judgement was assigned per study by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved through consensus discussion. Corresponds to Supplementary Figure S4 and the Risk of bias assessment / RoB and GRADE certainty sections of the main text.

Study (ref.)

Selection bias

Exposure measurement

Outcome measurement

Confounding

Temporality

Missing data

Selective reporting

Overall RoB

Rationale

Kheirandish-Gozal 2011 (19)

Serious

Low

Moderate

Serious

Some concerns (T&A follow-up)

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Objective PSG and 1-year outcomes, but selected poorly controlled children and non-ran-domised T&A.

Araujo 2022 (20)

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Serious

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Objective HSAT and ACT, but small severe-asthma-on-bioiogics cohort with cross-sectional analysis.

Byun 2013 (21)

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Serious

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Symptomatic clinic sample; only a subset underwent PSG; reverse-di-rection association.

Teodorescu 2012 (24)

Moderate

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Large asthma clinic sample with adjusted models; OSA risk/diagnosis not by systematic PSG.

Teodorescu 2013 (25)

Moderate

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Age-stratified adjusted estimates; OSA ascertained from history/ records, not systematic testing.

Teodorescu 2015 SARP (26)

Moderate

Serious

Low

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Well-characterised SARP outcomes and sputum data, but OSA risk by questionnaire only.

Teodorescu 2015 JAMA (12)

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Prospective

Some concerns

Some concerns

Moderate

Repeated laboratory PSG and prospective design; asthma ascertained by self-report.

Wang 2016 (34)

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Serious

Partly retrospective outcomes

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Full PSG for all subjects; small OSA subgroup and covariate model not fully reported.

Shen 2015 (13)

Moderate

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Cohort follow-up

Some concerns

Some concerns

Moderate- to-serious

Large incident-OSA cohort; administrative claims lack BMI/smoking/se-verity detail.

Hirayama 2020 (30)

Moderate

Serious

Low

Moderate

Cohort follow-up

Some concerns

Some concerns

Moderate-to- serious

Large longitudinal readmission data with extensive adjustment; administrative coding may misclassify exposure/outcome.

Kauppi 2016 (31)

Serious

Moderate

Serious

Serious

Retrospective before-after

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Long CPAP duration, but recalled pre-CPAPACT/ symptoms and no control group.

Serrano-Pariente 2016 (23)

Moderate

Low

Low

Serious

Before-after

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Validated ACQ/ AQLQ and objective OSA diagnosis, but uncontrolled CPAP before-after design.

Sato 2021 (27)

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Serious

Prospective

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Prospective exacerbation follow-up; small sample and an unexpected inverse pAHI association.

Sakhamuri 2020 (29)

Serious

Serious

Low

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Validated ACT/ AQLQ, but sleep apnoea defined by symptoms only; specialty-clinic sample.

Zandieh 2016 (35)

Moderate

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Large urban adolescent cohort; self-reported SDB and probable asthma.

Li 2015 (32)

Moderate

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Very large sample with adjusted models; SDB and asthma both by parent questionnaire.

Locci 2024 (22)

Moderate

Serious

Low

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Validated C-ACT/ PedsQL outcomes, but SDB ascertained by questionnaire and small sample.

Tao 2024 (36)

Moderate

Serious

Low

Moderate

Cross-sectional

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Large paediatric sample with adjusted model; SDB by PSQ only, not objective testing.

Tsou 2021 (33)

Moderate

Serious

Low

Moderate

Index hospitalisation

Some concerns

Some concerns

Moderate-to- serious

Very large adjusted inpatient sample; administrative OSA coding likely under-ascertains exposure.

Yigla 2003 (37)

Serious

Low

Serious

Serious

Cross-sectional / descriptive

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Objective PSG, but a highly selected steroid-dependent sample with no asthma-control comparator.

Madama 2016 (28)

Serious

Moderate

Serious

Serious

Retrospective

Some concerns

Some concerns

Serious

Referred suspect-ed-OSA sample; outcome reported only as qualitative improvement.

[i] RoB, risk of bias; ROBINS-I, Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (adapted for observational exposure-outcome studies). ‘Some concerns’ ratings for missing data and selective reporting reflect incomplete reporting of pre-specified outcomes or attrition detail typical of the source publications rather than a specific identified flaw. Reference numbers correspond to the main manuscript reference list.

Table S2.

OSA/SDB prevalence extraction, stratified by ascertainment method (underlies Figure 2). Twelve studies reported OSA/SDB prevalence in asthma populations. Studies are grouped into three ascertainment strata (objective sleep test, administrative code, and questionnaire/symptom-defined SDB) as pooling across strata was not performed, given the marked heterogeneity in prevalence estimates by ascertainment method. Pooled estimates use a random-effects logit-scale (metaprop) model with Hartung-Knapp correction where k ≥ 3, back-transformed to the prevalence scale; corresponds to Figure 2, Table 1 and Table 3 (Objective 6) in the main text.

Study (ref.)

Age group

Ascertainment stratum

Events (n)

Total (N)

Prevalence

OSA/SDB measure

Threshold / cut-off

Kheirandish-Gozal 2011 (19)

Paediatric

Objective sleep test

58

92

63.0%

Overnight polysomnography (PSG)

AHI ≥ 5/hr TST

Araujo 2022 (20)

Adult

Objective sleep test

30

56

53.6%

HSAT (ApneaLink Air)

RDI ≥ 5/hr

Byun 2013 (21)

Adult

Objective sleep test

111

167

66.5%

ApneaLink + PSG subset

AHI ≥ 5

Sato 2021 (27)

Adult

Objective sleep test

50

62

80.6%

Watch-PAT (peripheral arterial tonometry)

pAHI ≥ 5

Madama 2016 (28)

Adult

Objective sleep test

27

47

57.4%

PSG (68%) or cardiorespiratory polygraphy (32%)

Not extracted

Wang 2016 (34)

Adult

Objective sleep test

28

146

19.2%

Full-night PSG

Threshold not extracted

Yigla 2003 (37)

Adult

Objective sleep test

21

22

95.5%

Full-night PSG

RDI ≥ 15 + symptoms

Pooled (Objective sleep test; k=7)

325

592

62.3% [34.7%, 83.7%]

I2 = 95%

τ2 = 1.168

Hirayama 2020 (30)

Adult

Administrative code

6549

65,731

10.0%

Administrative ICD-9-CM diagnosis

Not applicable

Tsou 2021 (33)

Paediatric

Administrative code

4209

564,468

0.7%

Administrative ICD hospitalisation code

Not applicable

Pooled (Administrative code; k=2)

10,758

630,199

2.8% [0.2%, 28.7%]

I2 = 100%

τ2 = 3.617

Locci 2024 (22)

Paediatric

Questionnaire / symp-tom-defined SDB

29

78

37.2%

Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ-SDBS)

PSQ-SDBS ≥ 0.33

Tao 2024 (36)

Paediatric

Questionnaire / symp-tom-defined SDB

86

397

21.7%

Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ-SRBD)

PSQ-SRBD ≥ 0.33

Sakhamuri 2020 (29)

Adult

Questionnaire / symp-tom-defined SDB

150

428

35.0%

Symptom features (≥2 of: snoring, witnessed apnoeas, daytime sleepiness)

≥ 2 features

Pooled (Questionnaire / symptom-defined SDB; k=3)

265

903

30.4% [13.4%, 55.2%]

I2 = 89%

τ2 = 0.153

[i] AHI, apnoea-hypopnoea index; HSAT, home sleep apnoea test; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; NPSG, nocturnal polysomnography; OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; PSG, polysomnography; PSQ-SDBS/PSQ-SRBD, Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire sleep-disordered-breathing / sleep-related-breathing-disorder scale; RDI, respiratory disturbance index; SDB, sleep-disordered breathing; TST, total sleep time; pAHI, pulse-oximetry-derived (peripheral) apnoea-hypopnoea index (Watch-PAT). I2, heterogeneity statistic; τ2, between-study variance. Reference numbers correspond to the main manuscript reference list.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pneum-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2247-059X | Journal ISSN: 2067-2993
Language: English, Romanian
Page range: 94 - 119
Published on: Aug 18, 2026
Published by: Romanian Society of Pneumology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Jeevarathinam Thirumalai, Bhavadharani T, Muthupandi Sankar, published by Romanian Society of Pneumology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.