References
- Androutsopoulos, J. (2013). Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: Performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube. In D. Tannen & A. M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 47–72). Georgetown University Press.
- Antieau, L. (2006). A distributional analysis of rural Colorado English [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia] UGA Athaneum. https://esploro.libs.uga.edu/esploro/outputs/doctoral/A-distributional-analysis-of-rural-Colorado-English/9949332921302959
- Bailey, G., & Tillery, J. (1999). The Rutledge effect: The impact of interviewers on survey results in linguistics. American Speech, 74(4), 389–402.
- Battistella, E. L. (1995). The syntax of the double modal construction. Linguistica Atlantica, 17, 19–44.
- Beal, J. (2004). English dialects in the north of England: Morphology and syntax. In B. Kortmann, K. Burridge, R. Mesthrie, E. W. Schneider, & C. Upton (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English vol. 2: Morphology and syntax (pp. 114–141). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Blackwell.
- Bernstein, C. (2003). Grammatical features of southern speech: Yall, might could, and fixin to. In S. J. Nagle & S. L. Sanders (Eds.), English in the Southern United States (pp. 106–118). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486715.007
- Biber, D. (1994) An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber, D. & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register variation (pp. 31–56). Oxford University Press.
- Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689
- Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language, 65, 487–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/415220
- Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1992). The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based English genres from the 17th to the 20th centuries. In M. Rissanen, O. Ihalainen, T. Nevalainen, & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics (pp. 688–704). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020101
- Bou-Franch, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2012). Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 17, 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x
- Brown, K. (1991). Double modals in Hawick Scots. In P. Trudgill & J. Chambers (Eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in grammatical variation (pp. 74–103). Longman.10.4324/9781315505459-8
- Butters, R. (1973). Acceptability judgments for double modals in Southern dialects. In R. Bailey & R. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in linguistics. Georgetown University Press.
- Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3
- Close, J. (2004). English auxiliaries: A syntactic study of contraction and variation [Doctoral Dissertation, University of York]. White Rose eTheses Online. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/9870/1/424126.pdf
- Coats, S. (2019). A corpus of regional American language from YouTube. In C. Navarretta, M. Agirrezabal, & B. Maegaard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Digital Humanities in the Nordic Countries Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, March 6–8, 2019 (pp. 79–91). CEUR.
- Coats, S. (2020). Articulation rate in American English in a corpus of YouTube videos. Language and Speech, 63(4), 799–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919894720
- Coats, S. (forthcoming). Dialect corpora from YouTube.
- Coats, S. (2022). Naturalistic double modals in North America. American Speech. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-9766889
- Corrigan, K. (2010). Irish English, volume 1: Northern Ireland. Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748634286.001.0001
- Di Paolo, M. (1989). Double modals as single lexical items. American Speech, 64(3), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/455589
- Dynel, M. (2014). Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 73, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001
- Feagin, C. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Georgetown University Press.
- Fennell, B. A., & Butters, R. R. (1996). Historical and contemporary distribution of double modals in English. In E. W. Schneider (Ed.), Focus on the USA: Varieties of English around the world (pp. 265–88). John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g16.14fen
- Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M. & Jasperson R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 185–237). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.004
- Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Blackwell.
- Hasty, J. D. (2012). We might should oughta take a second look at this: A syntactic re-analysis of double modals in Southern United States English. Lingua, 122(14), 1716–1738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.005
- Hasty, J. D. (2014). We might should be thinking this way: Theory and practice in the study of syntactic variation. In R. Zanuttini & L. R. Horn (Eds.), Micro-syntactic variation in North American English (pp. 269–293). Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199367221.003.0009
- Hasty, J. D., Hesson, A., Wagner, S. E., & Lannon, R. (2012). Finding needles in the right haystack: Double modals in medical consultations. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 18(2), 41–47.
- Herring, S. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4. https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761/
- Honnibal, M., Montani, I., Van Landeghem, S., & Boyd, A. (2020). spaCy: Industrial-strength natural language processing in Python. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212303
- Hutchby, I. (2006). Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Open University Press.
- Kaur, J. (2011). Raising explicitness through self-repair in English as a lingua franca. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2704–2715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.012
- Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Leech, G. (2003). Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In R. Facchinetti, F. Palmer, & M. Krug (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 223–240). De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110895339.223
- Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210
- Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(4), 41–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
- Levelt, W. J. M., & Cutler, A. (1983). Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics, 2, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/semant/2.2.205
- Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99001776
- Levinson, S. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s participation framework. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161–227). Polity Press.
- Lickley, R. J. (2015). Fluency and disfluency. In M. A. Redford (Ed.), The handbook of speech production (pp. 445–469). Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584156.ch20
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schutze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809071
- McDavid, R. I., & O’Cain, R. K. (1980). Linguistic atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic states, fascicles 1–2. University of Chicago Press.
- Montgomery, M. (1989). Exploring the roots of Appalachian English. English World-Wide, 10(2), 227–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.10.2.03mon
- Montgomery, M. (1998). Multiple Modals in LAGS and LAMSAS. In M. Montgomery & T. E. Nunnally (Eds.), From the Gulf States and beyond: The legacy of Lee Pederson and LAGS (pp. 90–122). University of Alabama Press
- Montgomery, M., & Nagle. S. J. (1994). Double modals in Scotland and the Southern United States: Trans-Atlantic inheritance or independent development? Folia Linguistica Historica, 14(1–2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.1993.14.1-2.91
- Myhill, J. (1995). Change and continuity in the function of the American English modals. Linguistics, 33, 157–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.2.157
- Nagle, S. J. (2003). Double modals in the southern United States: Syntactic structure or syntactic structures? In R. Facchinetti, F. Palmer, & M. Krug (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 349–371). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339.349
- Nakatani, C., & Hirschberg, J. (1993). A speech-first model for repair detection and correction. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 46–53). https://doi.org/10.3115/1075671.1075748
- Palmer, F. R. (1990). Modality and the English modals (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Pederson, L., McDaniel, S. L., & Adams, C. M. (1986–1992). Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States (7 vols.). University of Georgia Press.
- Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
- Plevoets, K. & Defrancq, B. (2018). The cognitive load of interpreters in the European Parliament: A corpus-based study of predictors for the disfluency uh(m). Interpreting, 20(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00001.ple
- Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00090-1
- Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language (2nd ed.). Longman.
- Reed, P., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.). (2016). MultiMo: The database of multiple modals. http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/multimo/welcome
- Ribeiro, M. T., S. Singh, & C. Guestrin. (2016). Why should I trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. arXiv:1602.04938 [cs.LG].10.1145/2939672.2939778
- Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 70–85). Multilingual Matters.
- Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361– 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107
- Schneider, E. W. (2003). Shakespeare in the coves and hollows? Toward a history of Southern English. In S. J. Nagle & S. L. Sanders (Eds.), English in the Southern United States (pp. 17–35). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486715.003
- Schneider, E. W. (2004). The English dialect heritage of the southern United States. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Legacies of colonial English: Studies in transported dialects (pp. 262–309). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486920.012
- Shriberg, E., Bear, J., & Dowding, J. (1992). Automatic detection and correction of repairs in human-computer dialog. In M. Marcus, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop (pp. 419–424). Harriman.10.3115/1075527.1075628
- Williamson, S. L. (2018). Might should we consider this? Patterns of double modal inversion in Southern United States English [Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University]. SFU Summit. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/19080
- Zullo, D., Pfenninger, S. E., & Schreier, D. (2021). A pan-Atlantic ‘multiple modal belt’? American Speech, 96(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-8620506