Testing the impact of paraverbal irony signals. Experimental study on verbal irony identification in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication

Ellis, Raissa

doi:10.2478/plc-2022-0004

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an experimental study with a between subject design (N = 122) whose aim was to compare irony comprehension rates in face-to-face (FTF) and computer-mediated communication (CMC), and examine the influence of paraverbal irony signals on irony identification rates. An irony comprehension test was intersemiotically translated to three conditions: FTF (n = 46), paraverbal signal-rich CMC (n = 30), and paraverbal signal-poor CMC (n = 46). The study adopted a relevance theoretic account of irony. There was a statistically significant difference between the signal-rich CMC and FTF conditions - irony identification rates were higher in the signal-rich CMC condition. The results are important since they suggest that paraverbal irony signals are not essential for correct irony identification if relevant contextual information is available, and the CMC medium is not only unlikely to be an obstacle in communicating the ironic intent, but with the addition of the medium-specific irony signals, may be significantly better.

References

Aguert, M., Laval, V., Gauducheau, N., Atifi, H., & Marcoccia, M. (2016). Producing irony in adolescence: A comparison between face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-001310.1515/plc-2016-0013
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor, 16(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.01210.1515/humr.2003.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bryant, G. A., & Fox-Tree, J. E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830905048003010110.1177/00238309050480030101
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burgers, C., Van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.58319410.1080/10926488.2011.583194
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dery, M. (1993). Flame wars. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 92(4), 559–568.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dynel, M. (2017). The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-016-0003-6.10.1007/s41701-016-0003-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics 38(8), 1239–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.00310.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ellis, R. (2019). Badanie ironii w komunikacji internetowej – szanse i zagrożenia [Studying verbal irony in Internet communication – opportunities and risks]. In K. Burska, & B. Cieśla (Eds.), Kreatywność językowa w przekazach internetowych [Linguistic creativity in Internet messages] (pp. 27–38). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.10.18778/8142-461-5.03
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ganster, T., Eimler, S. & Kramer, N. (2012). Same but different!? The differential influence of smilies and emoticons on person perception. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15(4), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.017910.1089/cyber.2011.0179
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X0426958710.1177/0261927X04269587
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancock, J. T., Dunham, P. J., & Purdy, K. (2000). Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD01020410.1207/S15327647JCD010204
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jakobson, R. (1959/2000). On linguistic aspects of translation. In: L. Venuti (Ed.). The translation studies reader (pp. 113–118). Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jodłowiec, M. (2012). The implicit revisited. In: A. Piskorska (Ed.), Relevance studies in Poland, vol. 4: Essays on language and communication (pp. 64–74). Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jorgensen, J., Miller, G., & Sperber, D. (1984). Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.11210.1037/0096-3445.113.1.112
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katz, A. (2009). Commentary on ‘Does an ironic situation favour an ironic interpretation?‘. In: J. Vandaele & G. Brône (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 401–405). Mouton.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaźmierczak, M. (2017). Od przekładu intersemiotycznego do intersemiotycznych aspektów tłumaczenia. Przekładaniec. 34, 7–35.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kreuz, R. & Link, K.E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/02627X0202100200210.1177/02627X02021002002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milanowicz, A., & Bokus, B. (2020). W krzywym zwierciadle ironii. O kobietach i mężczyznach nie wprost [The distorted mirror of irony. About men and women non directly]. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.10.31338/uw.9788323541301
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milanowicz, A., Tarnowski, A., & Bokus, B. (2017). When sugar-coated words taste dry: The relationship between gender, anxiety, and response to irony. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0221510.3389/fpsyg.2017.02215
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Padilla Cruz, M. (2013). Meta-psychological awareness of comprehension and epistemic vigilance of L2 communication in interlanguage pragmatic development. Journal of Pragmatics 59(A), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.00510.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Partington, A. (2007). Irony and the reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1547–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.00910.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Piskorska, A. (2014). A relevance-theoretic perspective on humorous irony and its failure. Humor, 27(4), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-009510.1515/humor-2014-0095
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott, K. (2015). The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 81, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.01510.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32(11), 1492–1512. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.149210.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whalen, J. M., Pexman, P. M., & Gill, A. J. (2009). “Should be fun—not!”: Incidence and marking of nonliteral language in e-mail. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X0933525310.1177/0261927X09335253
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whalen, J. M., Pexman, P. M., Gill, A. J., & Nowson, S. (2013). Verbal irony use in personal blogs. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(6), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.63041810.1080/0144929X.2011.630418
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wigboldus, D., & Douglas, K. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79–106). Psychology Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?. Lingua 116, 1722–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.00110.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilson, D. (2017). Irony, hyperbole, jokes and banter. In: J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal models in the study of language (pp. 201–219). Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_11
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1), 53–76.10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins10.1075/pbns.213
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yus, F. (2019). An outline of some future research issues for internet pragmatics. Internet Pragmatics 2(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00018.yus10.1075/ip.00018.yus
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yus, F. (2021). Smartphone communication. Interactions in the app ecosystem. Routledge.10.4324/9781003200574
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ziółkowski, A. (2015). Analiza metod filozofii eksperymentalnej na wybranych przykładach [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Testing the impact of paraverbal irony signals. Experimental study on verbal irony identification in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication

Abstract

Paradigm

My account