Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
References
- Akiba, D. (2016). On modal interpretations in noun phrases. Sophia Linguistica, 65.
- Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. Methuer.
- Ball, T. (2011). Manipulation: As old as democracy itself (and sometimes dangerous). In W. Le Cheminant, & J. M. Parrish (Eds.), Manipulating democracy: Democratic theory, political psychology, and mass media (pp. 4158). Routledge.
- Biber. D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
- Brim, O. G. (1955). Attitude content-intensity and probability expectations. American Sociological Review, 20(1), 68–76.
- Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2014). Economic growth and political integration: Estimating the benefits from membership in the European Union using the synthetic counterfactuals method. Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 8162.
- Chouliaraki, L. (2005). The soft power of war. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 1–10.
- Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Croom Helm.
- Deacon, D. (2016). 82% circulation advantage in favour of Brexit as The Sun declares. Centre for Research in Communication and Culture, Loughborough University, June 14.
- Denton, R. E., & Woodward, G. C. (1990). Political communication in America. Praeger.
- Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2018). Intercultural and interdisciplinary variation in the use of epistemic lexical verbs in linguistics and economics research articles. Linguistica Pragensia, 28(2), 154–167.
- Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–373.
- Edwards, D. (2004). Discursive psychology. In K. Fitch, & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
- Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
- Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2018). Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection”. (May 2018). Working Paper 24631. National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In J. A. Krosnick, & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-245). Erlbaum Associates.
- Guttman, L., & Suchman, E. A. (1947). Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis. American Sociological Review, 12(1), 57–67.
- Hänska, M., & Bauchowitz, S. (2017). Tweeting for Brexit: How social media influenced the Referendum. In J. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy, & R. Tait (Eds.), Brexit, Trump and the media (pp. 31–35). Abramis Academic Publishing.
- Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157.
- Herrman, J. (2016). ‘Brexit’ talk on social media favored the ‘Leave’ side. New York Times, July 16.
- Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
- Ilkhanipour, N. (2016). Tense and modality in the nominal domain. Linguistica, 56(1), 143–160.
- Kaid, L. L., Gerstle, J., & Sanders, K. R. (Eds.). (1991). Mediated politics in two cultures: Presidential campaigning in the United States and France. Praeger.
- Katz, D. (1944). The measurement of intensity. In H. Cantril (Ed.), Gauging public opinion (pp. 51–65). Princeton University Press.
- Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155–162.
- McDill, E. L. (1959). A comparison of three measures of attitude intensity. Social Forces, 38(2), 95–99.
- McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. Taylor and Francis.
- Melkumian, A. A. (2018). A note on the demographics of UK referendums on "staying or leaving the European Union". The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(5), 40–45.
- Minford, P. (2006). Measuring the economic costs and benefits of the EU. Open Economies Review, 17(4–5), 509–524.
- Nye, J. (2004). Soft power. The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
- Ottaviano, G. I., Pessoa, J.P., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). The costs and benefits of leaving the EU. Center for Financial Studies Working Paper Series, 472, 1–18.
- Pain, N., & Young, G. (2004). The macroeconomic impact of UK withdrawal from the EU. Economic Modeling, 21(3), 387–408.
- Palmer, F. (1990). Modality and the English modals. Longman.
- Perloff, R. M. (2018). The dynamics of political communication. Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
- Polonski, V. (2016). Social media voices in the UK’s EU referendum. Medium, May 15.
- Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2-3), 219–229.
- Quirk, R., Sidney, G., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
- Rozumko, A. (2017). Adverbial markers of epistemic modality across disciplinary discourses: A contrastive study of research articles in six academic disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 52(1), 73–101.
- Salazar, D., & Verdaguer, I. (2009). Polysemous verbs and modality in native and non-native argumentative writing: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Studies, 9(3), 209–219.
- Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
- Simon-Vandenbergen, A., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Mouton de Gruyter.
- Suchman, E. A. (1950). The intensity component in attitude and opinion research. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazardsfeld, S. A. Star, & J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 213–276). Princeton University Press.
- Tannenbaum, P. H. (1956). Initial attitude toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(2), 413–425.
- Tendera-Właszczuk, H. (2018). Study on the brexit's background and causes. Ekonomia i Prawo, 17(3), 307–317.
- Van linden, A. (2012). Modal adjectives: English deontic and evaluative constructions in diachrony and synchrony. Mouton de Gruyter
- Velasquez Chafloque, H. (2014). A reduplicative analysis of sentence modal adverbs in Spanish. PhD Thesis. University of Southern California.
- Whitehead, K. A. (2015). Extreme-case formulations. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons.
- Zhang, J. (2019). A semantic approach to the English modality. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 879–885.
- Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political effects of the Internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 415–438.
Language: English
Page range: 120 - 144
Published on: Aug 18, 2021
Published by: University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Isabel Iñigo-Mora, published by University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.