Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Metaphorical Descriptions of Well-Doers Cover
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. Baldwin, C. P., & Baldwin, A. L. (1970). Children’s judgments of kindness. Child Development, 41(1), 29–47. doi:10.2307/112738710.2307/1127387
  2. Bartczak, M., & Bokus, B. (2013). Rozumienie pojęć w depresji. [Understanding metaphors in depression]. Piaseczno: LEXEM.
  3. Białecka-Pikul, M. (2003). Metaphors in preschool child thinking about the mind. Psychology of Language and Communication, 7(2), 37–47.
  4. Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–43). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004
  5. Bloom, P. (2013). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. New York, NY: Crown.
  6. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-610.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
  7. Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.39710.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
  8. Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143. doi:10.1002/ejsp.74410.1002/ejsp.744
  9. Chandler, M. J., Greenspan, S., & Barenboim, C. (1973). Judgments of intentionality in response to videotaped and verbally presented moral dilemmas: The medium is the message. Child Development, 44(2) 315–320. doi:10.2307/112805310.2307/1128053
  10. Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, P. (2003). Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics, 31, 51–68. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00003-210.1016/S0304-422X(03)00003-2
  11. Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Smykowski, T. (2003). Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 85–105. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1802_210.1207/S15327868MS1802_2
  12. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., Lieberman, M., Fischer, K., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(1–2), 1–124. doi:10.2307/116593510.2307/1165935
  13. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-010.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
  14. Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.00610.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
  15. Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
  16. Dryll, E. M. (2009). Changes in metaphor comprehension in children. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40(4/2009), 49–57. doi:10.2478/s10059-009-0015-110.2478/s10059-009-0015-1
  17. Dryll, E. M. (2017). Metaphorical descriptions of wrongdoers. Psychology of Language and Communication, 21(1), 171–191. doi:10.1515/plc-2017-000910.1515/plc-2017-0009
  18. Dryll, E. M., & Bokus, B. (2016). Zrozumieć metaforę: Studium z psycholingwistki rozwojowej [Understanding metaphors: A study in developmental psycholinguistics]. Piaseczno: LEXEM.
  19. Dryll, E. M., & Bokus, B. (2018). Разбиране от деца и юноши на метафори, описващи хора [Children’s and adolescents’ comprehension of metaphors describing people]. Ezik i Literatura [Language and Literature]. No. 1–2, 9–26. Print ISSN: 0324-1270 Online ISSN: 2535-1036 Retrieved from http://www.ezik-i-literatura.eu/2018/1-2/2-Dril-Bokus
  20. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.00510.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  21. Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2015). Moral perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 631–633. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.00410.1016/j.tics.2015.08.004
  22. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_310.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
  23. Gentner, D., & Clement, C. A. (1988). Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (pp. 307–358). New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60044-4
  24. Gibbs R. W. Jr (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4), 317–333. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.967890010.1080/10926488.2001.9678900
  25. Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2002). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92–96. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-210.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2
  27. Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories–quickly. In R. W. Gibbs Jr (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.006
  28. Glucksberg, S., & Haught C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21(3), 360–378. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x
  29. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.310.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3
  30. Gottwald, J. M., Elsner, B., & Pollatos, O. (2015). Good is up: Spatial metaphors in action observation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1605. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0160510.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605
  31. Góralski, A. (1987). Metody opisu i wnioskowania statystycznego dla psychologów i pedagogów [Methods of description and statistical reasoning for psychologists and pedagogues]. Warsaw: PWN.
  32. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. doi:10.1037/a002184710.1037/a0021847
  33. Graves, M. P. (1983). Functions of key metaphors in early Quaker sermons, 1671–1700. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69(4), 364–378. doi:10.1080/0033563830938366310.1080/00335638309383663
  34. Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101–124. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.65138710.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
  35. Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557.10.1038/nature06288
  36. Karylowski, J. (1982). Doing good to feel good v. doing good to make others feel good: Some child-rearing antecedents. School Psychology International, 3(3), 149–156. doi:10.1177/014303438203300410.1177/0143034382033004
  37. Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, D. L. (1999). What makes a metaphor stronger than a simile? Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 63–69. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1401_710.1207/s15327868ms1401_7
  38. Kubicka, D. (2005). Myślenie metaforyczne i jego uwarunkowania u dzieci w wieku od 4 do 10 lat [Make strange familiar and make familiar strange: Metaphoric thinking in children from 4 to 10]. Studia Psychologiczne, 43(2), 59–73.
  39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  40. Lapsley, D. K., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(4), 345–363. doi:10.1207/S1532706XID0104_0310.1207/S1532706XID0104_03
  41. Levin, I., & Bekerman-Greenberg, R. (1979). Moral judgment and moral behavior in sharing: A developmental analysis. Israeli Journal of Psychology & Counseling in Education, 11, 24–34.
  42. Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268–294.10.1093/applin/aml004
  43. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1990). Analogical mapping during similarity judgments (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 38–44). Cambridge, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
  44. Matheson, J. L., & McCollum, E. E. (2008). Using metaphors to explore the experiences of powerlessness among women in 12-step recovery. Substance Use & Misuse, 43(8–9), 1027–1044. doi:10.1080/1082608080191428710.1080/10826080801914287
  45. Nippold, M. A., & Fey, S. H. (1983). Metaphoric understanding in preadolescents having a history of language acquisition difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14(3), 171–180. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.1403.17110.1044/0161-1461.1403.171
  46. Noveck, I. A., Bianco, M., & Castry, A. (2001). The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1–2), 109–121. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.967888910.1080/10926488.2001.9678889
  47. Ortony, A. (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86(3), 161–180. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.16110.1037/0033-295X.86.3.161
  48. Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865
  49. Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 569–594. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-610.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-6
  50. Peterson, L. (1980). Developmental changes in verbal and behavioral sensitivity to cues of social norms of altruism. Child Development, 51(3), 830–838. doi:10.2307/112947110.2307/1129471
  51. Peterson, L., Hartmann, D. P., & Gelfand, D. M. (1977). Developmental changes in the effects of dependency and reciprocity cues on children’s moral judgments and donation rates. Child Development, 48(4), 1331–1339. doi:10.2307/112849110.2307/1128491
  52. Pisula, E. (2003). Cognitive and social aspects of communication deficits in children with autism. Psychology of Language and Communication, 7(2), 49–67.
  53. Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2011). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/13091-005
  54. Ricoeur, P. (1978). Metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 143–159. doi:10.1086/44797710.1086/447977
  55. Rudnicka, E. (2004). Znaczenie metaforyczne w polskiej tradycji słownikarskiej: Studium leksykologiczno-leksykograficzne. [Metaphorical significance in Polish dictionary tradition: Lexicological and lexicographical study]. Warszawa: Semper.
  56. Saltzstein, H. D., & Weiner, A. S. (1982). Moral intentionality: Children’s representation of adult judgments and attribution processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology Association, Washington, DC.
  57. Shure, M. B. (1968). Fairness, generosity, and selfishness: The naive psychology of children and young adults. Child Development, 39(3), 875–886. doi:10.2307/112699010.2307/1126990
  58. Sims, S. A. (1978). Sharing by children: Effects of behavioral example, induction, and resources. The Journal of Psychology, 100(1), 57–65. doi:10.1080/00223980.1978.992347110.1080/00223980.1978.9923471
  59. Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x
  60. Smith, C. L., Gelfand, D. M., Hartmann, D. P., & Partlow, M. E. (1979). Children’s causal attributions regarding help giving. Child Development, 50(1), 203–210. doi:10.2307/112905710.2307/1129057
  61. Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L., & Diermeier, D. (2011). Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1249–1254. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.01010.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.010
  62. Walker, L. J., & Hennig, K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 629. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.62910.1037/0022-3514.86.4.629
  63. Weiss, R. J. (1982). Understanding moral thought: Effects on moral reasoning and decision making. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 852. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.85210.1037/0012-1649.18.6.852
  64. Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283-301. doi:16/j.cognition.2005.05.00210.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002
  65. Veale, T., & Hao, Y. (2007). Learning to understand figurative language: From similes to metaphors to irony. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 29(29), 683–688.
  66. Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, D. (2001). Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion. 25(2), 85–100.10.1023/A:1010633908298
  67. Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202–214. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.00510.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2019-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 330 - 356
Published on: Nov 18, 2019
Published by: University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2019 Ewa Marta Dryll, published by University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.