References
- 1. ICRU Report 24. Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of x- or gamma-rays in radiotherapy procedures. J ICRU. 1976;os13(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/os13.1.Report24
- 2. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, et al. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys. 1994;21(4):581–618. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597316
- 3. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 Report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4197-242. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3190392
- 4. Loyd MD, Lane RG, Laxton J, et al. Long term variation in beam symmetry as a function of gantry angle for a computer-controlled linear accelerator. Med Phys. 1989;16(4):614-617. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596363
- 5. Blad B, Jacobsson L, Wendel P. The influence of the magnetron frequency, the servo settings and the gantry angle on the flatness and the dose calibration of a linear accelerator. J Med Eng Technol. 1998;22(4):185-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091909809032539
- 6. Huang JC, Reinstein LE. Evaluation of an innovative plastic cube phantom designed to improve the efficiency of accelerator QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2000;1(4):153-7. https://doi.org/10.1120/1.1312382
- 7. Gersh J. Stereotactic beam characterization using the IBA stealth chamber reference detector. IBA Dosimetry Whitepaper 2014.
- 8. Vazquez Quino L, Huerta C, Calvo O, et al. Evaluation of a novel reference chamber “stealth chamber” through Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2015;3:4049. https://doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.32.22