Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Rhetoric Structure of Research Article Abstracts in English Studies Journals Cover

The Rhetoric Structure of Research Article Abstracts in English Studies Journals

By: Katalin Doró  
Open Access
|Feb 2014

References

  1. Askehave, Inger and John Malcolm Swales. “Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A Problem and a Possible Solution.” Applied Linguistics 23.2 (2011): 195-212.10.1093/applin/22.2.195
  2. Bhatia, Vijak. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman, 1993.
  3. Chardonnens, László Sándor and Rosanne Hebing. “A Descriptive Analysis of Nijmegen, Universiteitsbibliotheek, HS 194, a Late Medieval English Manuscript at Nijmegen University Library.” English Studies 92.1 (2011): 20-38.10.1080/0013838X.2010.536693
  4. Doró, Katalin. “Selling their Research: _e Linguistic Realization of Rhetoric Moves in English _esis Abstracts Written by Hungarian Undergraduates.” Romanian Journal of English Studies 10.1 (2013): 181-91.10.2478/rjes-2013-0016
  5. Hartley, James. “Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology: _e Case for Structure.” Science Communication 24.3 (2003): 366-79. ---. “Current Findings from Research on Structured Abstracts.” Journal of Medical Library Association 92.3 (2004): 368-71.
  6. Hirano, Eliana. “Research Article Introduction in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English.” English for Specific Purposes 28 (2009): 240-50.10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001
  7. Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing.
  8. London: Longman, 2000. ---. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. New York: Continuum, 2005.
  9. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  10. Löfrgen, Hans. “Cooper’s Pioneer: Breaking the Chain of Representation.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 8.3 (2009): 1-19.10.35360/njes.195
  11. Lon, Chuah Ek et al. “Conveying Communicative Intent: Moves and Metadiscourse in Abstract Writing.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 1.7 (2012): 56-65.10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.56
  12. Lorés, Rosa. “On RA Abstracts: From Rhetorical Structure to _ematic Organization.” English for Specific Purposes 23 (2004): 280-302.10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
  13. Martín-Martín, Pedro. _e Rhetoric of Abstracts in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse: A Cross-Cultural Genre-Analytic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang, 2005.
  14. Ozturk, Ismet. “_e Textual Organization of Research Article Introduction in Applied Linguistics: Variability within a Single Discipline.” English for Specific Purposes 26 (2007): 25-38.10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003
  15. Pho, Phuong Dzung. “Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Education Technology: A Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetoric Structure and Authorial Stance.” Discourse Studies 10.2 (2008): 231-50.10.1177/1461445607087010
  16. Samraj, Betty. “An Exploration of a Genre Set: Research Article Abstracts and Introduction in Two Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes 24 (2005): 141-56.10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
  17. San, Lam Yik and Helen Tan. “A Comparative Study of the Rhetorical Moves in Abstracts of Published Research Articles and Students’ Term Papers in the Field of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 1.7 (2012): 40-50.10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.40
  18. Santos, Mauro Bittercourt Dos. “_e Textual Organization of Research Paper Abstracts in Applied Linguistics.” Text 16. 4 (1996): 481-99.10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481
  19. Sheldon, Elena. “Rhetorical Differences in RA Introductions Written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 Writers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10 (2011): 238-51. Simon, Ellen and Miriam Taverniers. ---. “Advanced EFL Learners’ Beliefs about Language Learning and Teaching: a Comparison between Grammar, Pronunciation, and Vocabulary.” English Studies 92.8 (2011): 896-922.
  20. Stotesbury, Hilkka. “Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts in the Narrative and Hard Sciences.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (2003): 327-41.10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3
  21. Suntara, Watinee and Siriluck Usaha. “Research Article Abstracts in Two Related Disciplines: Rhetorical Variation between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics.” English Language Teaching 6.2 (2013): 84-99.10.5539/elt.v6n2p84
  22. Swales, John Malcolm. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. ---. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  23. Tseng, Fan-ping. “Analysis of Move Structure and Verb Tense of Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics Journals.” International Journal of English Linguistics 1.2 (2011): 27-39.10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27
  24. KATALIN DORÓ 138
  25. Youdeowei, Anthony et al., eds. Scientific Writing for Agricultural Research Scientists: A Training Resource Manual. Wageningen: CTA, 2012.
  26. Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  27. Zand-Vakili, Elham and Alireza Fard Kashani. “_e Contrastive Move Analysis: An Investigation of Persian and English Research Articles’ Abstract and Introduction Parts.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 3.2 (2012): 129-32.
Language: English
Page range: 119 - 139
Published on: Feb 14, 2014
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2014 Katalin Doró, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.