Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Permeabilization Process of Baker’s Yeast Cover

Application of Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Permeabilization Process of Baker’s Yeast

Green Sciences
Volume 16 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jun 2014
References

References

  1. 1. Eberhard, A.M., Pedroni, V., Volpe, M. & Ferreira, M.L. (2004). Immobilization of catalase fromon inorganic and biopolymeric supports for HOdecomposition.47, 153–163. DOI: 10.1016/j. apcatb.2003.08.007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Tarhan, L. (1995). Use of immobilized catalase to remove HOused in the sterilisation of milk.30, 623–8. DOI: 10.1016/0032-9592(94)00066-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Venkateshwaran, G., Somashekar, D., Prakash, M.H., Agrawal, R., Basappa, S.C. & Joseph, R. (1999). Production and utilization of catalase using.34, 187–191. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00087-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Sirbu, T. (2011). The searching of active catalase producers among the microscopic fungi.2, 164–167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Choi, M.M.F. & Yiu, T.P. (2004). Immobilization of beef liver catalase on eggshell membrane for fabrication of hydrogen peroxide biosensor.34, 41–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.08.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Yu, M.A., Wei, Y.M., Zhao, L., Jiang, L., Zhu, X.B. & Qi, W. (2007). Bioconversion of ethyl 4-chloro-3-oxobutanoate by permeabilized fresh brewer’s yeast cells in the presence of allyl bromide.34, 151–156. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-006-0179-z.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Malik, M., Ganguli, A. & Ghosh, M. (2012). Modeling of permeabilization process inG7 for enhanced limonin bioconversion.95, 223–231. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-3880-z.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Scherrer, R., Louden, L. & Gerhardt, P. (1974). Porosity of the yeast cell wall and membrane.118, 534–540.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Zlotnik, H., Fernandez, M.P., Bowers, B. & Cabib, E. (1984).mannoproteins form an external cell wall layer that determines wall porosity.159, 1018–1026.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Joshi, M.S., Gowda, L.R., Katwa, L.C. & Bhat, S.G. (1989). Permeabilization of yeast cells () to lactose by digiton.11, 439–443. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(89)90140-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Gowda, L.R., Bachhawat, N., & Santhoor, G.B. (1991). Permeabilization of bakers’ yeast by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide for intracellular enzyme catalysis.13, 154–157. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(91)90172-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Sekhar, S., Bhat, N. & Bhat, S.G. (1999). Preparation of detergent permeabilized bakers’ yeast whole cell catalase.34, 349–354. DOI: 10.1016/S00329592(98)00105-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Vrsalovic Presecki, A., Zelic, B. & Vasic-Racki, D. (2007). Comparison of the L-malic acid production by isolated fumarase and fumarase in permeabilized baker’s yeast cells.41, 605–612. DOI: 10.1016/j. enzmictec.2007.05.007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Abraham, J. & Bhat, S.G. (2008). Permeabilization of baker’s yeast with N-lauroyl sarcosine.35, 799–804. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0350-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Kaur, G., Panesar, P.S., Bera, M.B. & Kumar, H. (2009). Hydrolysis of whey lactose using CTAB-permeabilized yeast cells.. 32, 63–67. DOI: 10.1007/s00449008-0221-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Mutanda, T., Wilhelmi, B.S. & Whiteley, C.G. (2008). Response surface methodology: Synthesis of inulooligosaccharides with an endoinulinase from.43, 362–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.06.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Panesar, P.S. (2008). Application of response surface methodology in the permeabilization of yeast cells for lactose hydrolysis.39, 91–96. DOI: 10.1016/j. bej.2007.08.017.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Khataee, A.R. (2009). Application of central composite design for the optimization of photodestruction of a textile dye using UV/SOprocess.11(4), 38–45. DOI:10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Balasubramanian, A. & Venkatesan, S. (2012). Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology for the removal of phenol by emulsion liquid membrane.14(1), 46–49. DOI: 10.2478/v10026-012-0058-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Montgomery, D.C. (2001).. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Delrio, L.A., Gomezortega, M., Leallopez, A. & Lopezgorge, J. (1977). More sensitive modification of catalase assay with clark oxygen-electrode-application to kinetic study of pea leaf enzyme.80, 409–15. DOI: 10.1016/00032697(77)90662-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Olczak, I., Grubecki, I. & Wójcik, M. (2010). Optimization of permeabilization process ofyeast by methanol.49(2), 89–90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Akhnazarova, S. & Kafarov, V. (1982).. Moscow, Russia: Mir Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjct-2014-0026 | Journal eISSN: 3072-0389 (formerly 1899-4741) | Journal ISSN: 1509-8117
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 35
Published on: Jun 26, 2014
Published by: West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
permeabilization,
baker’s yeast,
response surface methodology,
isopropyl alcohol
Related subjects:
Industrial chemistry,
Biotechnology,
Chemical engineering,
Process engineering

© 2014 Ilona Trawczyńska, Marek Wójcik, published by West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 16 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article