Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Permeabilization Process of Baker’s Yeast Cover

Application of Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Permeabilization Process of Baker’s Yeast

Open Access
|Jun 2014

References

  1. 1. Eberhard, A.M., Pedroni, V., Volpe, M. & Ferreira, M.L. (2004). Immobilization of catalase from Aspergillus niger on inorganic and biopolymeric supports for H2O2 decomposition. Appl. Catal. B: Enviro. 47, 153–163. DOI: 10.1016/j. apcatb.2003.08.007.
  2. 2. Tarhan, L. (1995). Use of immobilized catalase to remove H2O2 used in the sterilisation of milk. Process Biochem. 30, 623–8. DOI: 10.1016/0032-9592(94)00066-2.10.1016/0032-9592(94)00066-2
  3. 3. Venkateshwaran, G., Somashekar, D., Prakash, M.H., Agrawal, R., Basappa, S.C. & Joseph, R. (1999). Production and utilization of catalase using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem. 34, 187–191. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00087-9.10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00087-9
  4. 4. Sirbu, T. (2011). The searching of active catalase producers among the microscopic fungi. An. U. O. Fasc. Biol. 2, 164–167.
  5. 5. Choi, M.M.F. & Yiu, T.P. (2004). Immobilization of beef liver catalase on eggshell membrane for fabrication of hydrogen peroxide biosensor. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 34, 41–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.08.005.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.08.005
  6. 6. Yu, M.A., Wei, Y.M., Zhao, L., Jiang, L., Zhu, X.B. & Qi, W. (2007). Bioconversion of ethyl 4-chloro-3-oxobutanoate by permeabilized fresh brewer’s yeast cells in the presence of allyl bromide. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 34, 151–156. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-006-0179-z.10.1007/s10295-006-0179-z
  7. 7. Malik, M., Ganguli, A. & Ghosh, M. (2012). Modeling of permeabilization process in Pseudomonas putida G7 for enhanced limonin bioconversion. Appl Microbiol. Biot. 95, 223–231. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-3880-z.10.1007/s00253-012-3880-z
  8. 8. Scherrer, R., Louden, L. & Gerhardt, P. (1974). Porosity of the yeast cell wall and membrane. J. Bacteriol. 118, 534–540.10.1128/jb.118.2.534-540.1974
  9. 9. Zlotnik, H., Fernandez, M.P., Bowers, B. & Cabib, E. (1984). Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoproteins form an external cell wall layer that determines wall porosity. J. Bacteriol. 159, 1018–1026.10.1128/jb.159.3.1018-1026.1984
  10. 10. Joshi, M.S., Gowda, L.R., Katwa, L.C. & Bhat, S.G. (1989). Permeabilization of yeast cells (Kluyveromyces fragilis) to lactose by digiton. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11, 439–443. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(89)90140-3.10.1016/0141-0229(89)90140-3
  11. 11. Gowda, L.R., Bachhawat, N., & Santhoor, G.B. (1991). Permeabilization of bakers’ yeast by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide for intracellular enzyme catalysis. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 13, 154–157. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(91)90172-7.10.1016/0141-0229(91)90172-7
  12. 12. Sekhar, S., Bhat, N. & Bhat, S.G. (1999). Preparation of detergent permeabilized bakers’ yeast whole cell catalase. Process Biochem. 34, 349–354. DOI: 10.1016/S00329592(98)00105-8.
  13. 13. Vrsalovic Presecki, A., Zelic, B. & Vasic-Racki, D. (2007). Comparison of the L-malic acid production by isolated fumarase and fumarase in permeabilized baker’s yeast cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 41, 605–612. DOI: 10.1016/j. enzmictec.2007.05.007.
  14. 14. Abraham, J. & Bhat, S.G. (2008). Permeabilization of baker’s yeast with N-lauroyl sarcosine. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 35, 799–804. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0350-9.10.1007/s10295-008-0350-918415131
  15. 15. Kaur, G., Panesar, P.S., Bera, M.B. & Kumar, H. (2009). Hydrolysis of whey lactose using CTAB-permeabilized yeast cells. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 32, 63–67. DOI: 10.1007/s00449008-0221-9.
  16. 16. Mutanda, T., Wilhelmi, B.S. & Whiteley, C.G. (2008). Response surface methodology: Synthesis of inulooligosaccharides with an endoinulinase from Aspergillus niger. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 43, 362–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.06.005.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.06.005
  17. 17. Panesar, P.S. (2008). Application of response surface methodology in the permeabilization of yeast cells for lactose hydrolysis. Biochem. Eng. J. 39, 91–96. DOI: 10.1016/j. bej.2007.08.017.
  18. 18. Khataee, A.R. (2009). Application of central composite design for the optimization of photodestruction of a textile dye using UV/S2O82– process. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 11(4), 38–45. DOI:10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y.10.2478/v10026-009-0041-y
  19. 19. Balasubramanian, A. & Venkatesan, S. (2012). Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology for the removal of phenol by emulsion liquid membrane. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 14(1), 46–49. DOI: 10.2478/v10026-012-0058-5.10.2478/v10026-012-0058-5
  20. 20. Montgomery, D.C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
  21. 21. Delrio, L.A., Gomezortega, M., Leallopez, A. & Lopezgorge, J. (1977). More sensitive modification of catalase assay with clark oxygen-electrode-application to kinetic study of pea leaf enzyme. Anal. Biochem. 80, 409–15. DOI: 10.1016/00032697(77)90662-5.
  22. 22. Olczak, I., Grubecki, I. & Wójcik, M. (2010). Optimization of permeabilization process of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast by methanol. Inż. Ap. Chem. 49(2), 89–90.
  23. 23. Akhnazarova, S. & Kafarov, V. (1982). Experiment optimization in chemistry and chemical engineering. Moscow, Russia: Mir Publications.
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 35
Published on: Jun 26, 2014
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 Ilona Trawczyńska, Marek Wójcik, published by West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.