Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Utilization of spent brewer’s yeast for supplementation of distillery corn mashes Cover

Utilization of spent brewer’s yeast for supplementation of distillery corn mashes

Open Access
|Dec 2013

References

  1. 1. Dickinson, J.R. (2004). Nitrogen metabolism. In: J.R. Dickinson & M. Schweizer (Eds.), The Metabolism and MolecularPhysiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, second ed. (pp. 42-104). London: CRC Press.
  2. 2. Kotarska, K., Czupryński, B. & Kłosowski, G. (2006). Effect of varoius activators on the course of alcoholic fermentation. J. Food Eng. 77, 965-971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.041.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.041
  3. 3. Munoz, E. & Ingledew, W.M. (1989). Effect of yeast hulls on stuck and sluggish wine fermentations: importance of the lipid component. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55(6), 1560-1564.10.1128/aem.55.6.1560-1564.198920290416347950
  4. 4. Kawa-Rygielska, J., Pietrzak, W., Regiel, P. & Stencel, P. (2013). Utilization of concentrate after membrane fi ltration of sugar beet thin juice for ethanol production. BioresourceTechnol. 133, 134-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.070.10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.07023425583
  5. 5. Junior, M.M., de Oliveira, J.E., Batistote, M. & Ernandes, J.R. (2012). Evaluation of Brazilian ethanol production yeasts for maltose fermentation in media containing structurally complex nitrogen sources. J. Inst. Brew. 118, 82-88. DOI: 10.1002/jib.3.10.1002/jib.3
  6. 6. Yao, L., Wang, T. & Wang, H. (2011). Effect of soy skim from soybean aqueous processing on the performance of corn ethanol fermentation. Bioresource Technol. 102, 9199-9205. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.071.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.07121775137
  7. 7. Kawa-Rygielska, J. & Pietrzak, W. (2012). Use of dried distiller’s grains with solubles (DDGS) in the production of bioethanol. Przem. Chem. 91(9), 1876-1879.
  8. 8. Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O., Pinho, O., Vieira, E. & Tavarela, J.G. (2010). Brewer’s Saccharomyces yeast biomass: characteristics and potential applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21, 77-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2009.10.008.10.1016/j.tifs.2009.10.008
  9. 9. Liu, H., Lin, J.P., Cen, P.L. & Pan, Y.J. (2004). Co-production of S-adenosyl-L-methionine and glutathione from spent brewer’s yeast cells. Process Biochem. 39, 1993-1997. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2003.09.031.10.1016/j.procbio.2003.09.031
  10. 10. In, M., Kim, D.C. & Chae, H.J. (2005). Downstream process fort he production of yeast extract using brewer’s yeast cells. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E. 10, 85-90.10.1007/BF02931188
  11. 11. Thanardkit, P., Khunrae, P., Suphantharika, M. & Verduyn, C. (2002). Glucan from spent brewer’s yeast: preparation, analysis and use as a potential immunostimulant in shrimp feed. World J. Microb. Biot. 18, 527-539. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016322227535.10.1023/A:1016322227535
  12. 12. Mussatto, S.I. (2009). Biotechnological potential of brewing industry by-products. In: P.S. Nigam & A. Pandey (Eds.) Biotechnology for agro-industrial residues utilisation, (pp. 313-326) London: Springer Science+Business Media.
  13. 13. BS EN ISO 10520:1998. Native starch. Determination of starch content. Ewers polarimetric method, ISBN: 0 580 30395 0.
  14. 14. Kawa-Rygielska, J., Pietrzak, W. & Czubaszek, A. (2012). Characterization of fermentation of waste wheat-rye bread mashes with the addition of complex enzymatic preparations. BiomassBioenerg. 44, 17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.016.10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.016
  15. 15. Millati, R., Edebo, L. & Taherzadeh, M.J. (2005). Performance of Rhizomucor and Mucor in ethanol production from glucose, xylose and wood hydrolyzates. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 36, 294-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.09.007.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.09.007
  16. 16. Jones, A.M. & Ingledew, W.M. (1994). Fermentation of very high gravity wheat mash prepared using fresh yeast autolysate. Bioresource Technol. 50, 97-101.10.1016/0960-8524(94)90059-0
  17. 17. Muthaiyan, A., Limayem, A. & Ricke, S.C. (2011). Antimicrobial strategies for limiting bacterial contaminations in fuel bioethanol fermentations. Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 37, 351-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.005.10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.005
  18. 18. Kawa-Rygielska, J., Pietrzak, W. & Pęksa, A. (2012). Potato granules processing line by-products as a feedstock for ethanol production. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21(5), 1249-1255.
  19. 19. Laopaiboon, L., Nuanpeng, S., Srinophakun, P., Klanrit, P. & Laopaiboon, P. (2009). Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresource Technol., 100, 4176-4182. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.046.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.04619375908
  20. 20. Blomberg, A. & Adler, L. (1989). Roles of glycerol and glucerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) in aquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 171, 1087-1092.10.1128/jb.171.2.1087-1092.19892097052644223
  21. 21. Bely, M., Rinaldi, A. & Dubourdieu, D. (2003). Infl uence of assimilable nitrogen on volatile acidity production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during high sugar fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 96, 507-512. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.96.5 10.1263/jbb.96.5
Language: English
Page range: 102 - 106
Published on: Dec 31, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2013 Witold Pietrzak, Joanna Kawa-Rygielska, published by West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 15 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)