Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The application of ultrafiltration for separation of glycerol solution fermented by bacteria Cover

The application of ultrafiltration for separation of glycerol solution fermented by bacteria

Green Sciences
Volume 15 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Gungormusler, M., Gonen, C. & Azbar, N. (2011). Continuous production of 1,3-propanediol using raw glycerol with immobilizedNRRL B-593 in comparison to suspended culture,. 34, 727-733. DOI: 10.1007/s00449-011-0522-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Liu, B., Christiansen, K., Parnas, R., Xu, Z. & Li, B. (2013). Optimizing the production of hydrogen and 1,3-propanediol in anaerobic fermentation of biodiesel glycerol,, 383, 196-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.135.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Leja, K., Czaczyk, K. & Myszka, K. (2011). The use of microorganisms in 1,3-Propanediol production,, 5 (26), 4652-4658. DOI: 10.5897/AJMR11.847.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Raynaud, C., Sarcabal, P., Meynial-Salles, I., Croux, Ch. & Soucaille, P. (1993). Molecular characterization of the 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD) operon of Clostridium butyricum,, 38, 453-457. DOI: 10.1073_pnas.0734105100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Barbirato, F., Himmi, El H., Conte, T. & Bories, A. (1998). 1,3-propanediol production by fermentation: An interesting way to valorize glycerin from the ester and ethanol industries,7, 281-289. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00059-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Metsoviti, M., Zeng, An.P., Koutinas, A.A. & Papanikolaou, S. (2013). Enhanced 1,3-propanediol production by a newly isolated Citrobacter freundii strain cultivated on biodiesel-derived waste glycerol through sterile and non-sterile bioprocesses,., 163, 408-418. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.11.018.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Anand, P. & Saxena, R.K. (2012). A comparative study of solvent-assisted pretreatment of biodiesel derived crude glycerol of growth and 1,3-propanediol production from Citrobacter freundii,., 29, 199-205. DOI: 10.1016/j. nbt.2011.05.010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Boenigk, R., Bowien, S. & Gottschalk, G. (1993). Fermentation of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol in continuous cultures of,., 38, 453-457. DOI: 10.1007/BF00242936.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Xiu, Z.L. & Zeng, A.P. (2008). Present state and perspective of downstream processing of biologically produced 1,3-propanediol and 2,3-butanediol..,, 917-926. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1387-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Li, Z., Jiang, B., Hang, D. & Xiu, Z. ( 2009). Aqueous two-phase extraction of 1,3-propanediol from glycerol-based fermentation broths,, 66, 472-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.02.009.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Wu, R.C., Ren, H.J. Xu, Y.Z. & Liu, D.H. (2010). The final recover of salt from 1,3-propanadiol fermentation broth., 73, 122-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.03.013.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Annand, P., Saxena, R.K. & Marwah, R.G. (2011). A novel downstream process for 1,3-propanediol from glycerol- -based fermentation,., 90, 1267-1276. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3161-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Vellenga, E. & Trägårdh, G. (1998). Nanofiltration of combined salt and sugar solutions: coupling between retentions.,, 211-220. DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(98)00219-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Schäfer, A.I., Fane, A.G. & Waite, T.D. (Eds.). (2005).. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Advanced Technology.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Bonnélye, V., Guey, L. & Del Castillo, J. (2008). UF/ MF as RO pre-treatment: the real benefit,, 222, 59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.129.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Blanpain-Avet, P., Migdal, J.F. & Bénézech, T. (2009). Chemical cleaning of a tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with a whey protein concentrate suspension-Characterization of hydraulic and chemical cleanliness,337, 153-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.033.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Blanpain-Avet, P., Migdal, J.F. & Bénézech, T. (2004). The effect of multiple fouling and cleaning cycles on a tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with z whey protein concentrate,., 82 (C3), 231-234. DOI: 10.1205/fbio.82.3.231.44182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Ogunbiyi, O.O., Miles, N.J. & Hilal, N. (2008). The effects of performance and cleaning cycles of new tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with a model yeast suspension,, 220, 273-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.034.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Juang, R.S., Chen, H.L. & Chen, Y.S. (2008). Resistance-in-series analysis in cross-flow ultrafiltration of fermentation broths ofculture,, 323, 193-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.032.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Markardij, A., Chen, X.D. & Farid, M.M. (1999). Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of milk: some aspects of fouling and cleaning,., 77, 107-113. DOI: 10.1205/096030899532394.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Karasu, K., Glennon, N., Lawrence, N.D., Stevens, G.W., O’Connor, J.O., Barber, A.R., Yoshikawa, S. & Kentish, S.E. (2010). A comparison between ceramic and polymeric membrane systems for casein concentrate manufacture,63 (2), 284-289. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2010.00582.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Hwang, K.J., Wang, T.T., Iritani, E. & Katagiri, N. (2010). Effect of gel particle softness on the performance of cross-flow microfiltration,., 35, 130-137. DOI: 10.1016/j. memsci.2010.08.043.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Kazemimoghadam, M. & Mohammadi, T. (2007). Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes in the milk industry,, 204, 213-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.030.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Blanpain-Avet, P., Migdal, J.F. & Bénézech, T. (2004). The effect of multiple fouling and cleaning cycles on a tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with a whey protein concentrate. Membrane performance and cleaning efficiency,, 82 (C3), 231-243. DOI: 10.1205/ fbio.82.3.231.44182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Cabero, M.L., Riera, F.A. & Alvarez, R. (1999). Rinsing of ultrafiltration ceramic membranes fouled with whey proteins: effects on cleaning procedures,. 154, 239-250. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00294-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Bachin, P., Aimar, P. & Field, R.W. (2006). Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications,., 281, 42-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.014.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Nigam, M.O., Bansal, B. & Chen, X.D. (2008). Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes,, 218, 313-322. DOI: 10.1016/j. desal.2007.02.027.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Madaeni, S.S. & Mansourpanah, Y. (2004). Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes fouled by whey,, 161, 13-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90036-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjct-2013-0057 | Journal eISSN: 3072-0389 (formerly 1899-4741) | Journal ISSN: 1509-8117
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 120
Published on: Sep 20, 2013
Published by: West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
ultrafiltration,
fouling,
ceramic membrane,
glycerol fermentation
Related subjects:
Industrial chemistry,
Biotechnology,
Chemical engineering,
Process engineering

© 2013 Wirginia Tomczak, Marek Gryta, published by West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 15 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)
Previous article