Accountable AI in Public Administration: A Bibliometric Review of Governance, Transparency, and Public Value
References
- Bloch-Wehba, H. (2020). ACCESS TO ALGORITHMS. Fordham Law Review, 88(4), 1265–1314.
- Bracci, E. (2023). The loopholes of algorithmic public services: An “intelligent” accountability research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 739-763.
- Brown, D. (2005). Electronic government and public administration. International Review Of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053883
- Cerrillo-Martínez, A., & Casadesús-de-Mingo, A. (2021). Data governance for public transparency. Profesional De La Informacion, 30(4), Article e300402. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.02
- Criado, J. I., Valero, J., & Villodre, J. (2020). Algorithmic transparency and bureaucratic discretion: The case of SALER early warning system. Information Polity, 25(4), 449-470.
- Cuc, L. D., Rad, D., Cilan, T. F., Gomoi, B. C., Nicolaescu, C., Almași, R., ... & Pandelica, I. (2025). From AI Knowledge to AI Usage Intention in the Managerial Accounting Profession and the Role of Personality Traits—A Decision Tree Regression Approach. Electronics, 14(6), 1107.
- Cuc, L. D., Rad, D., Săplăcan, S., Șendroiu, C., Bâtcă-Dumitru, G. C., Wysocki, D., ... & Manolescu, A. A. (2024). A hierarchical clustering analysis of the management accounting practices perceptions in Romania. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 19(6).
- David-Gutiérrez, J., & Castellanos-Sánchez, M. (2023). Algorithmic Transparency and Open Government in Colombia. Reflexion Politica, 25(52), 6–21.
- Dragomir, H., Pelau, C., & Gáti, M. (2025, July). Augmented and Virtual Reality in Retail: A Bibliometric Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3988-4001). Bucharest University of Economic Studies.
- Engstrom, D. F., & Ho, D. E. (2020). Algorithmic accountability in the administrative state. Yale Journal on Regulation, 37(3), 800–854.
- Fang, X. M., Zhou, H. Y., & Chen, S. (2025). A Replication of Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision-Making. Public Administration, 103(4), 1232–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70015
- Filgueiras, F. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration: Ambiguity and Choice of IA Systems and Challenges of Digital Governance. Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia, 5–38.
- Filgueiras, F. (2022). New Pythias of public administration: Ambiguity and choice in AI systems as challenges for governance. AI & Society, 37(4), 1473–1486.
- Henman, P. (2020). Improving public services using artificial intelligence: possibilities, pitfalls, governance. Asia Pacific Journal Of Public Administration, 42(4), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188
- Kaun, A. (2022). Suing the algorithm: the mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation. Information Communication & Society, 25(14), 2046–2062. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924827
- Loi, M., & Spielkamp, M. (2021). Towards Accountability in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Public Administrations. Aies ’21: Proceedings Of The 2021 Aaai/Acm Conference On Ai, Ethics, And Society, 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462631
- Miller, S. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2021). Representative Bureaucracy and Attitudes Toward Automated Decision Making. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, 31(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa019
- Pantea, M. F., Cilan, T. F., Cuc, L. D., Rad, D., Bâtcă-Dumitru, G. C., Șendroiu, C., ... & Gomoi, B. C. (2024). Optimizing Romanian managerial accounting practices through digital technologies: A resource-based and technology-deterministic approach to sustainable accounting. Electronics, 13(16), 3206.
- Pelau, C. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Enterprises: How Staff Competencies Requirements of Business Organisations are Evolving through the Integration of Artificial Intelligence. The Amfiteatru Economic journal, 26(67), 698-698.
- Rad, D., Cuc, L. D., Lile, R., Balas, V. E., Barna, C., Pantea, M. F., ... & Rad, G. (2022). A cognitive systems engineering approach using unsupervised fuzzy C-means technique, exploratory factor analysis and network analysis—A preliminary statistical investigation of the bean counter profiling scale robustness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12821.
- Roehl, U. B. U. (2023). Automated decision-making and good administration: Views from inside the government machinery. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101864
- Roehl, U. B. U., & Hansen, M. B. (2024). Automated, administrative decision-making and good governance: Synergies, trade-offs, and limits. Public Administration Review, 84(6), 1184–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13799
- Runcan, R., Hațegan, V., Toderici, O., Croitoru, G., Gavrila-Ardelean, M., Cuc, L. D., ... & Dughi, T. (2025). Ethical AI in Social Sciences Research: Are We Gatekeepers or Revolutionaries?. Societies, 15(3), 62
- Ruschemeier, H., & Hondrich, L. J. (2024). Automation bias in public administration–an interdisciplinary perspective from law and psychology. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101953.
- Shah, H. (2018). Algorithmic accountability. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical And Engineering Sciences, 376(2128). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0362
- Vatamanu, A. F., & Tofan, M. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities. Administrative Sciences, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040149
- Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018). Fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high-stakes public sector decision-making. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-14).
- Waldman, A., & Martin, K. (2022). Governing algorithmic decisions: The role of decision importance and governance on perceived legitimacy of algorithmic decisions. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 20539517221100449.
- Williams, R., Cloete, R., Cobbe, J., Cottrill, C., Edwards, P., Markovic, M., Naja, I., Ryan, F., Singh, J., & Pang, W. (2022). From transparency to accountability of intelligent systems: Moving beyond aspirations. Data & Policy, 4, Article e7. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.37
- Yeung, K. (2022). The New Public Analytics as an Emerging Paradigm in Public Sector Administration. Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International And European Law, 27(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.303
- Zajko, M. (2023). Automated Government Benefits and Welfare Surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 21(3), 246–258.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2026-0283 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 3805 - 3819
Published on: Jul 22, 2026
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Ștefan TIRITEU, Andreea ZAMFIR, Dana RAD, Romina Medea GHEȚIE, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.