Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conventional Machine Learning Methods for Detecting Tax Evasion among Inactive or Insolvent Companies Cover

Conventional Machine Learning Methods for Detecting Tax Evasion among Inactive or Insolvent Companies

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Abedin, M. Z., Chi, G., Uddin, M. M., Satu, Md. S., Khan, Md. I., & Hajek, P. (2021). Tax Default Prediction Using Feature Transformation-Based Machine Learning. IEEE Access, 9, 19864–19881. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048018
  2. Barbu, D.-C., Bâra, A., & Oprea, S.-V. (2024). Impact of Electronic Cash Registers on Tax Collection. In Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Informatics in Economy (IE 2023) (pp. 25–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6529-8
  3. Belkin, M., Hsu, D., Ma, S., & Mandal, S. (2019). Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(32), 15849–15854. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903070116
  4. Carvalho, M., Pinho, A. J., & Brás, S. (2025). Resampling approaches to handle class imbalance: a review from a data perspective. Journal of Big Data, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01119-4
  5. Charizanos, G., Demirhan, H. and İçen, D. (2025) “Binary classification with Fuzzy-Bayesian logistic regression using Gaussian fuzzy numbers,” Intelligent Systems with Applications, 26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200494
  6. Coita, I. F., & Mare, C. (2021). The Utility of Neural Model in Predicting Tax Avoidance Behavior. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Vol. 238, pp. 71–81). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2765-1_6
  7. Costea, A. and Eklund, T. (2003) “A two-level approach to making class predictions,” in 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. IEEE, p. 9 pp. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174207
  8. Demirhan, H. (2025) “Mixed fuzzy C-means clustering,” Information Sciences, 690, p. 121528. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.121528
  9. Höglund, H. (2017). Tax payment default prediction using genetic algorithm-based variable selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.027
  10. Junqué De Fortuny, E., Stankova, M., Moeyersoms, J., Minnaert, B., Provost, F., & Martens, D. (2014). Corporate residence fraud detection. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1650–1659. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623333
  11. Palacio-Niño, J.-O., & Berzal, F. (2019). Evaluation Metrics for Unsupervised Learning Algorithms. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.05667
  12. Pop, I. D., & Coroiu, A. M. (2022). Predicting bankruptcy in Romania using artificial neural network. International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, 14(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.54684/ijmmt.2022.14.3.211
  13. Kleinberg, J. (2019). An Impossibility Theorem for Clustering. Neural Information Processing Systems: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2968618.2968676
  14. Surugiu, M.-R., Vasile, V., Surugiu, C., Mazilescu, C. R., Panait, M.-C., & Bunduchi, E. (2025). Tax Compliance Pattern Analysis: A Survey-Based Approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13010014
Language: English
Page range: 661 - 673
Published on: Jul 16, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Alexandru SIMION, Adrian COSTEA, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.