Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimalisation of Flying Shears Control Structure Using AI Methods Cover

Optimalisation of Flying Shears Control Structure Using AI Methods

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

An example of steel sheet cutting on MPL. Source: Siemens AG (2025). MPL, material processing lines.

Figure 2.

Important areas of rotary shears trajectory. Source: Siemens AG (2025). ESR, end of the synchronous range; FR, formatting range; PP, parking position; RP, reference point; SR, synchronous range; SSR, start of the synchronous range.

Figure 3.

Ideal shears trajectory during the cutting process. Source: Ďurovský et al. (2023).

Figure 4.

The rotary shears control structure. Source: Ďurovský et al. (2023).

Figure 5.

Compensation torque and actual cutting torque during the shearing process.

Figure 6.

Structure fuzzy controller.

Figure 7.

Membership functions of the inputs and output. NM, negative medium; NS, negative small; PM, positive medium; PS, positive small.

Figure 8.

Detailed view of torque prediction error between view of torque prediction error between NN output and measured torque. NN, neural network.

Figure 9.

Flowchart of the NN-based torque compensation algorithm. NN, neural network.

Figure 10.

Input signals used for NN training in the time domain. NN, neural network.

Figure 11.

Comparison of the 1D lookup-table-based compensation torque and the load torque. LUT, lookup table; NN, neural network.

Figure 12.

Simulation results of cutting 3 mm thick and 1,600 mm wide strip at 40 m/min. (a) P-type controller without compensation, (b) PI-type controller without compensation, (c) P-type controller with compensation, (d) P-type controller with anticipative compensation, (e) P-type controller with Fuzzy feedforward, (f) P-type controller NN-based LUT compensation. LUT, lookup table; NN, neural network.

Shears’ position and torque during cut_

ParametersShears’ angle (°)Shears’ arm (mm)Torque on motor side
(Nm)(% of TR)
Beginning of cut33934.0451,872.276.14
End of cut34524.5881,352.155

Fuzzy control rules_

e(k)/Δe(k)NMNSZPSPM
NMNMNMNMNSZ
NSNMNMNSZPS
ZNMNSZPSPM
PSNSZPSPMPM
PMZPSPMPMPM

Parameters of NN predictive model_

ParametersValue/description
Network typeFeedforward NN (MLP)
OutputPrediction of motor torque T^motk+1 {\hat T_{{\rm{mot}}}}\left( {k + 1} \right)
Input vector[Tref (k), Tref (k − 1), Tmot (k), Tmot(k − 1), Tload (k), Tload(k − 1)]
Hidden layers2
Number of neurons10–10
Activation functionsTansig (hidden layers), linear (output layer)
Training algorithmsLevenberg–Marquardt
Input and output normalisationRange [−1, 1]
Sampling periodTs = 100 μs

Performance metrics of the NN torque predictor_

AbbreviationFull nameValueUnit
MAEMean absolute error1.7645Nm
RMSERoot mean square error2.3071Nm
RMSEPercentage RMSE0.0991%
MaxEMaximum absolute error5.7528Nm
R2Coefficient of determination0.9999-

Summary of dynamic performance metrics for all tested control structures and compensation strategies at different strip speeds_

Strip speed [m/min]Control structureCompensationSpeed drop [%]Absolutely speed drop [m/min]Speed overshoot [%]Settling time [ms]
20PNo10.712.1440.11554.2
PINo9.121.8241.53482.3
PYes4.740.9484.3850.1
PAnticipative5.711.1434.2150.7
P + fuzzyNo1.660.332034.7
PNN compensation1.070.2140.0635.7

40PNo5.032.0140.3234.5
PINo4.351.7404.4853.1
PYes1.160.4641.6225.5
PAnticipative0.780.3111.5816.6
P + fuzzyNo0.860.344016.2
PNN compensation0.550.2220.0219.4

80PNo2.281.8250.1323.5
PINo2.031.6211.4744.2
PYes0.560.4480.5219.8
PAnticipative0.470.3770.4519.5
P + fuzzyNo0.430.34408.3
PNN compensation0.280.2260.0110

The shears’ angular velocity drop during the cut considering freewheeling shears (i_e_ without controllers)_

Strip speed (m/min)Shears’ angular velocity
Steady state (rad/s)After cut (rad/s)Difference (rad/s)Difference (%)
2014.747.637.1148.34
5036.84734.0212.8627.77
8058.93857.1801.7582.98

Rotary shears motor parameters_

ParametersSymbolUnitValue
Rated powerPRkW190
Rated voltageVRV400
Rated speednRrpm800
Motor inertiaJmotkg/m24.2
Rated currentIRA335
Rated frequencyfRHz27.2
Rated torqueTRNm2,328
Maximum torqueTmaxNm4,250
Rated power factorcos(ϕ)-0.942
Rated efficiencyη%89
Torque control loop time constantτTms2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pead-2026-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2543-4292 | Journal ISSN: 2451-0262
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 127
Submitted on: Dec 30, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2026
Published on: Feb 21, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Tadeáš Kmecik, Matej Hric, Peter Girovský, František Ďurovský, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.