Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Analysis of Sport Systems: Examining Structure, Strategies, and Public Funding in Relation to Elite Sports Outcomes in Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia Cover

Comparative Analysis of Sport Systems: Examining Structure, Strategies, and Public Funding in Relation to Elite Sports Outcomes in Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Chart 1

General government total expenditure on recreational and sporting services in relation with the national GDP.

Chart 2

Budget structure of Hungarian sport, 2023.

Chart 3

Budget structure of Hungarian sport (2023) – Chapter-managed sport appropriations.

Chart 4

Budget structure of Polish sport (2023).

Chart 5

Budget structure of Romanian sport (2023).

Chart 6

Budget structure of Slovakian sport (2023).

Chart 7

Budget structure of the countries examined in 2023.

Chart 8

Number of Olympic medals won at the Summer and Winter Olympic Games (2012–2024), POL: Poland, SLO: Slovakia, ROM: Romania, Hun: Hungary.

Chart 9

Number of World Championships and European Championships medals in Olympic disciplines (2012–2020).

Medals per capita regarding the time period 2012–2024_

CountryPopulation (approx. 2024)Total medals (2012–2024)Medals per million people
Hungary9.5 million768
Poland38.5 million551.43
Romania19 million261.37
Slovakia5.5 million152.72

Alignment of national sport systems with institutional theory in Central and Eastern Europe_

CountryInstitutional logicGovernance structureFunding styleOlympic trend (2012–2024)Theoretical interpretation
HungaryInstitutional inertiaCentralized, state-ledStrong state supportConsistently highLegacy structures sustain performance
PolandPolicy adaptabilitySemi-centralizedMixed funding with EU and local governmentStable, improvingAdaptive institutions support resilience
RomaniaReform gapsVolatile, fragmentedUnderinvestmentDecliningWeak institutions undermine reform
SlovakiaSelective focusFragmented, federation-ledFocused supportModest, niche successStrategic targeting in lieu of breadth

Comparative analysis of sport strategies in Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia_

CountryStrategic goalsFocus areasImplementationUnique featuresChallenges
Hungary“Sport Nation and Sporting Nation,” national identity, equal opportunitiesElite sports, grassroots, community cohesionSport XXI Strategy (2007–2020), public bodies for sportStrong elite sport focus, national identity emphasisBalancing elite and grassroots sports, maintaining cohesion
PolandActive society, efficient system, decentralized governance, infrastructure developmentCompetitive sport, youth sport, sport-for-all, disabled sport, infrastructureSport Development Programme (2015), focus on local government involvementEarly strategy adoption (2003), focus on decentralizationLow participation, weak infrastructure, ineffective organizations
RomaniaHealthy nation, elite role models, governance reformElite sports, regional centres, coach trainingNational Sport Strategy (2023), sport law reformsRegional excellence centres, decentralizationDelayed governance reform, political instability
SlovakiaSocial-economic sport status, sustainable management, digitalizationElite and grassroots, digitalization, educationNational Sport Strategy (2020), strong legal frameworkBalanced focus, digitalization, and innovationFunding sustainability, digital implementation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1899-4849 | Journal ISSN: 2081-2221
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 121
Published on: May 8, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Nikoletta Sipos-Onyestyák, Fateme Zare, Péter Szabó, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.