Do navigation maps need a legend? Empirical assessment of the intuitiveness of point symbols on mobile maps

Piątek, Robert; Gołębiowska, Izabela

doi:10.2478/pcr-2022-0003

Abstract

Navigation applications and the mobile maps that are integral to them are now widely used all over the world. The most popular applications of this type, such as Google Maps, has more than a billion users a month. To save time, users of navigation applications generally use the maps without referring to their legends, which are not shown in the default settings. In such circumstances, only intuitive symbols are read correctly. Mobile maps often have an extensive system of point symbols (POIs – points of interests), and navigation applications sometimes differ significantly in the symbols they use. Point symbols have been the subject of theoretical considerations and empirical studies of users, but there is a lack of comparative research indicating more and less effective solutions for designing intuitive symbols on mobile maps. This article presents the results of empirical research on the intuitiveness of POI symbols used in selected navigation applications. The study was conducted in the form of a questionnaire with 127 respondents. The results confirmed the hypothesis that the analysed symbols used in navigation applications would differ in level of intuitiveness. In addition, features of design solutions that increase or decrease the intuitiveness of point symbols were identified.

References

Brewer, C. A. (1997). Spectral schemes: controversial color use on maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 24(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304097782439231
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clarke, L. M. (1989). An experimental investigation of the communicative efficiency of point symbols on tourist maps. The Cartographic Journal, 26(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1989.26.2.105
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cybulski, P. (2022). An empirical study on the effects of temporal trends in spatial patterns on animated choropleth maps. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(5), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050273
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Franke, C., & Schweikart, J. (2017). Mental representation of landmarks on maps: Investigating cartographic visualization methods with eye tracking technology. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17(1–2), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2016.1219912
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gkonos, Ch., Iosifescu, E. I., & Hurni, L. (2018). Spinning the wheel of design: evaluating geoportal Graphical User Interface adaptations in terms of humancentred design. International Journal of Cartography, 5(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2018.1468726
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gołębiowska, I. M., & Çöltekin, A. (2022). Rainbow dash: intuitiveness, interpretability and memorability of the rainbow color scheme in visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(7), 2722–2733. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.303582333151882
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gotlib, D. (2012). Mobile maps – modelling of cartographic presentation. Geoinformatica Polonica, 11, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10300-012-0004-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Griffin, A. L., Robinson, A. C., & Roth, R. E. (2017). Envisioning the future of cartographic research. International Journal of Cartography, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1316466
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halik, Ł. (2014). Zmienne graficzne sygnatur punktowych w mobilnym systemie rozszerzonej rzeczywistości. UAM.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halik, Ł., & Medyńska-Gulij, B. (2017). The differentiation of point symbols using selected visual variables in the mobile augmented reality system. The Cartographic Journal, 54(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1253144
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Horbiński, T., Cybulski, P., & Medyńska-Gulij, B. (2020). Graphic design and button placement for mobile map applications. The Cartographic Journal, 57(3), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1631008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kellenberger, B., Iosifescu, E. I., Nicola, R., Iosifescu, E. C. M., Panchaud, N. H., Walt, R., Hotea, M., Piguet, A., & Hurni, L. (2016). The wheel of design: assessing and refining the usability of geoportals. International Journal of Cartography, 2(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2016.1184552
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Korpi, J., & Ahonen-Rainio, P. (2010). Cultural constraints in the design of pictographic symbols. The Cartographic Journal, 47(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1179/000870410X12911337964923
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kozłowski, K. (2020). Oto najnowsze zmiany i ciekawostki o Mapach Google. 15-lecie jednej z najlepszych usług Google, https://antyweb.pl/mapy-google-nowy-wyglad-funkcje-ciekawostki/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luszniewicz, A. (1973). Statystyka ogólna. PWE.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manson, S. M., Kne, L., Dyke, K. R., Shannon, J., & Eria, S. (2012). Using eye-tracking and mouse metrics to test usability of web mapping navigation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1559/1523040639148
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nivala, A.-M., & Sarjakoski, L. T. (2007). User aspects of adaptive visualisation for mobile maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(4), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304007782382954
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nivala, A.-M., Brewster, S., & Sarjakoski, T. L. (2008). Usability evaluation of web mapping sites. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1179/174327708X305120
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Opach, T., Gołębiowska, I. M., & Fabrikant, S. (2013). How do people view multi–component animated maps?. The Cartographic Journal, 51(4), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000049
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ostrowski, W., & Pasławski J. (2006). Przedmiot kartografii i jej powiązania z innymi naukami [in:] J. Pasławski (Ed.) Wprowadzenie do kartografii i topografii (pp. 11–27), Wydawnictwo Nowa Era.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Popelka, S., Vondrakova, A., Beitlova, M., & Drahosova, S. (2021). Eye-tracking comparison of two road atlases. Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the ICA, 3(12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-adv-3-12-2021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roth, R. E., Finch, B. G., Blanford, J. I., Klippel, A., Robinson, A. C., & MacEachren, A. M. (2011). Card sorting for cartographic research and practice. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1559/1523040638289
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., Korpi, J., Lokka, I., Mendonça, A., Ooms K., & van Elzakker C. P. J. M. (2017). User studies in cartography: opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Słomska-Przech, K., & Gołębiowska I. M. (2020). Falling into a digital world: how are paper and interactive maps used by digital natives and immigrants?. Geografie, 125(4), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2020125040447
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolff J. S., & Wogalter M. S. (1998). Comprehension of pictorial symbols: effects of context and test method. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480433
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Do navigation maps need a legend? Empirical assessment of the intuitiveness of point symbols on mobile maps

Abstract

Paradigm

My account