Fig. 1:

Fig. 2:

Fig. 3:

Fig. 4:

Fig. 5:

Fig. 6:

Fig. 7:

Fig. 8:

Fig. 9:

Fig. 10:

Number of repetitions per conditions per trial*
Conditions | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 4 | Trial 5 | Trial 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Exo | 20 | 24 | 19 | 25 | 26 | 32 |
Exo A | 30 | 31 | 27 | 30 | 42 | 44 |
Exo B | 19 | 22 | 25 | 28 | 32 | 38 |
Descriptive analysis of time per repetition per condition per trial in seconds
Trial | Condition | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 | No Exo | 5.353 | 0.413 | 4.501 | 6.198 |
Exo A | 4.586 | 0.262 | 4.000 | 5.003 | |
Exo B | 4.609 | 0.330 | 4.249 | 5.550 | |
Trial 2 | Exo A | 4.008 | 0.258 | 3.500 | 4.500 |
No Exo | 3.685 | 0.263 | 3.250 | 4.251 | |
Exo B | 3.796 | 0.226 | 3.250 | 4.250 | |
Trial 3 | Exo B | 3.912 | 0.247 | 3.500 | 4.499 |
Exo A | 3.654 | 0.265 | 3.250 | 4.249 | |
No Exo | 3.931 | 0.268 | 3.500 | 4.499 | |
Trial 4 | No Exo | 3.836 | 0.277 | 3.251 | 4.252 |
Exo B | 3.567 | 0.292 | 3.000 | 4.249 | |
Exo A | 3.500 | 0.291 | 2.999 | 4.001 | |
Trial 5 | Exo A | 3.559 | 0.245 | 3.000 | 4.249 |
Exo B | 3.497 | 0.254 | 3.000 | 4.001 | |
No Exo | 3.730 | 0.322 | 3.000 | 4.250 | |
Trial 6 | Exo B | 3.703 | 0.219 | 3.249 | 4.001 |
No Exo | 3.863 | 0.265 | 3.250 | 4.252 | |
Exo A | 3.557 | 0.206 | 3.248 | 3.999 |
Percentage difference in repetition count relative to No Exo
Condition | Trial 1 (%) | Trial 2 (%) | Trial 3 (%) | Trial 4 (%) | Trial 5 (%) | Trial 6 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exo A | +150 | +129 | +142 | +120 | +162 | +140 |
Exo B | –5 | –8.33 | +132 | +112 | +123 | +119 |
Percentage difference in repetitions between Exo A and Exo B relative to Exo B
Condition | Trial 1 (%) | Trial 2 (%) | Trial 3 (%) | Trial 4 (%) | Trial 5 (%) | Trial 6 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Differences | 58 | 41 | 8 | 7 | 31 | 16 |
Qualitative observations comparison between Exo A and Exo B
Observation | Exo A | Exo B |
---|---|---|
Comfort and fit |
|
|
Ease of use |
|
|
Support and performance |
|
|
Failure and recovery |
|
|