Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Challenges in pricing preliminaries costs for contractors: An Australian case study Cover

Challenges in pricing preliminaries costs for contractors: An Australian case study

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Abas, A. A., Ismail, F., & Ismail, Z. (2016). Complexity of project and impacts on preliminaries of construction project at tender stage. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Postgraduate Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 1, 2016.
  2. Abas, A. A., Ismail, F., & Ismail, Z. (2019). Reliable description of preliminaries item using civil engineering preliminaries protocol (CEPP) in conventional contracts. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019. EDP Sciences, 03006.
  3. Abdul-Malak, M. A., & Azhari, S. (2008). Use of historical overhead costs for estimation and control purposes. In: AEI 2008: Building Integration Solutions.
  4. Akintoye, A. (2000). Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Construction Management and Economics, 18, pp. 77-89. doi: 10.1080/014461900370979
  5. Akintoye, A., & Fitzgerald, E. (2000). A survey of current cost estimating practices in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 18, pp. 161-172. doi: 10.1080/014461900370799
  6. Boone, Jr., H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), pp. 1-6. doi: 10.34068/joe.50.02.48
  7. Chan, C. T. (2012). The principal factors affecting construction project overhead expenses: An exploratory factor analysis approach. Construction Management and Economics, 30, pp. 903-914. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2012.717706
  8. Chan, C. T. W., & Pasquire, C. (2002). Estimation of project overheads: A contractor’s perspective. In: 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, pp. 2-4. Held at the University of Northumbria in Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2nd to 4th September 2002.
  9. Chao, L. C. (2010). Estimating project overheads rate in bidding: DSS approach using neural networks. Construction Management and Economics, 28, pp. 287-299. doi: 10.1080/01446190903473782
  10. Chao, L.-C., & Kuo, C.-P. (2016). Probabilistic approach to determining overhead-cum-markup rate in bid price. Procedia Engineering, 164, pp. 243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.616
  11. Chen, J. H., Yang, L. R., Chen, W., & Chang, C. (2008). Case‐based allocation of onsite supervisory manpower for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26, pp. 805-814. doi: 10.1080/01446190802014778
  12. CIOB. (2018). New Code of Estimating Practice. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA.
  13. Coelho, P. S., & Esteves, S. P. (2007). The choice between a fivepoint and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction measurement. International Journal of Market Research, 49, pp. 313-339. doi: 10.1177/147078530704900305
  14. Dell’isola, M. D. (2003). Detailed cost estimating. Excerpt from Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice. pp. 1-13. J. A. Demkin (Ed.) John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA.
  15. Eldosouky, I. A., Ibrahim, A. H., & Mohammed, H. E.-D. (2014). Management of construction cost contingency covering upside and downside risks. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 53, pp. 863-881. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2014.09.008
  16. Enshassi, A., Abdul Aziz, A. R., & El Karriri, A. A. (2008). Investigating the overhead costs in construction projects in Palestine. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 13, pp. 35-47. doi: 10.1108/13664380810882066
  17. Erri Pradeep, A., Yiu, T., & Amor, R. (2019). Leveraging blockchain technology in a BIM workflow: A literature review. In: International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC) Driving Data-Informed Decision-Making, University of Cambridge, UK, ICE Publishing, pp. 371-380.
  18. Fiolet, J.-C., Haas, C., & Hipel, K. (2016). Risk-chasing behaviour in on-site construction decisions. Construction Management and Economics, 34, pp. 845-858. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1207790
  19. Haupt, T. C., & Pillay, K. (2016). Investigating the true costs of construction accidents. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14, pp. 373-419. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-07-2014-0041
  20. Hesami, S., & Lavasani, S. A. (2014). Identifying and classifying effective factors affecting overhead costs in constructing projects in Iran. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 3, pp. 24-41. doi: 10.5923/j. ijcem.20140301.03.
  21. Hicks, J. C. (1992). Heavy construction estimates, with and without computers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118, pp. 545-560. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(545)
  22. Hills, R., & Lee, S. (2024). Willis’s Elements of Quantity Surveying. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA.
  23. Jaya, N. M., & Frederika, A. (2015). An identification of construction project overheads for sustainable cost management and controlling practices (CMCPs). Applied Mechanics and Materials, 776, pp. 121-126. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.776.121
  24. Leśniak, A. (2013). The application of artificial neural networks in indirect cost estimation. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, pp. 1312-1315.
  25. Leśniak, A., & Juszczyk, M. (2018). Prediction of site overhead costs with the use of artificial neural network based model. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 18, pp. 973-982. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2018.01.014
  26. Nabil, I., & El-Riyati, A. (2015). An overhead costs assessment for construction projects at Gaza Strip. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 3, pp. 95-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.11
  27. Naderi, M., Nazari, A., Shafaat, A., & Abrishami, S. (2024). Enhancing accuracy in construction overhead cost estimation: A novel integration of activity-based costing and building information modelling. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 14(3), pp. 758-775. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-07-2023-0180.
  28. Odeyinka, H. A., & Yusif, A. (2003). An assessment of the accuracy of quantity surveyors’ preliminary cost estimates in Nigeria. Construction Engineering, 18, pp. 33-38.
  29. Plebankiewicz, E., & Leśniak, A. (2013). Overhead costs and profit calculation by Polish contractors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, pp. 141-161. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2012.763008
  30. Pradeep, P., Seneviratne, L. I. P., Rathnayake, U., & Melagoda, D. (2018). Impact of using minimum preliminary items for building works in Sri Lankan construction industry.
  31. Saini, A., Khursheed, S., Paul, V. K., & Kumar, K. (2021). Analysis of indirect cost of construction projects in India. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology, 4, pp. 9-23. doi: 10.37628/ijsdt.v4i2.864
  32. Shittu, A. A., Idiake, J. E., Akanmu, W. P., & Mac-Barango, D. O. (2022). Effect of cost of scaffolding on cost of preliminaries in multi-storey building projects in Abuja, Nigeria.
  33. Singla, H. K., & Sridharan, S. (2022). Factors influencing the level of accuracy and compromise in overhead estimation for construction projects in India: An exploratory investigation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29, pp. 4040-4060. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0362
  34. Šiškina, A., Juodis, A., & Apanavičiene, R. (2009). Evaluation of the competitiveness of construction company overhead costs. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15, pp. 215-224. doi: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.215-224
  35. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, Jr., A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), pp. 541-542. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
  36. Vaz-Serra, P., & Mitcheltree, H. (2020). Understanding the key master of construction project management graduate competencies required to meet industry needs in Australia. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(3), pp. 222-241. doi: 10.1080/15578771.2020.1739177
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 137 - 153
Submitted on: Oct 15, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 24, 2025
Published on: Jul 16, 2025
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Timothy O’Leary, Paulo Vaz-Serra, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.