Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Success Factors in Online Architectural Education: Comprehensive Analysis of Digital Learning Platforms Cover

Success Factors in Online Architectural Education: Comprehensive Analysis of Digital Learning Platforms

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Akçay Kavakoğlu, A., Güleç Özer, D., Domingo-Callabuig, D., &amp; Bilen, Ö (2022). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. <em>Open House International, 47</em>, pp. 361-384. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-07-2021-0144" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-07-2021-0144</a>
  2. Al Maani, D., Alnusairat, S., &amp; Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Transforming learning for architecture: Online design studio as the new norm for crises adaptation under COVID-19. <em>Open House International, 46</em>, pp. 348-358. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2021-0016" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-01-2021-0016</a>
  3. Alatni, B. S., Abubakar, I. R., &amp; Iqbal, S. A. (2021). COVID-19 and rapid course adaptations in Saudi Arabia: An experiential learning and recommendations for online education. <em>Frontiers in Psychology, 12</em>, p. 643203. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643203" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643203</a>
  4. Alkhalil, S. M., Manasrah, A. A., Dabbour, L. M., Bashayreh, E. A., Abdelhafez, E. A., &amp; Rababa, E. G. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and the E-learning in higher institutions of education: Faculty of engineering and technology at Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan as a case study. <em>Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 31</em>, pp. 464-475. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1829243" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/10911359.2020.1829243</a>
  5. Alnusairat, S., Al Maani, D., &amp; Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Architecture students’ satisfaction with and perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: The case of Jordan universities. <em>Archnet-IJAR, 15</em>, pp. 219-236. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-09-2020-019" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ARCH-09-2020-019</a>
  6. Andiyan, A., Rusmana, D., Hari, Y., Sitorus, M., Trinova, Z., &amp; Surur, M. (2021). Disruption of IoT in Adapting online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. <em>International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 13</em>, pp. 1331-1341. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.9756/INT-JECSE/V13I2.211181" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.9756/INT-JECSE/V13I2.211181</a>
  7. Asadpour, A. (2021). Student challenges in online architectural design courses in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic. <em>E-Learning and Digital Media, 18</em>, pp. 511-529. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022923" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/20427530211022923</a>
  8. Ayat, M., Imran, M., Ullah, A., &amp; Kang, C. W. (2021). Current trends analysis and prioritization of success factors: A systematic literature review of ICT projects. <em>International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14</em>(3), pp. 652-679. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0075" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0075</a>
  9. Bakir, R., &amp; Alsaadani, S. (2022). A mixed methods study of architectural education during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: Student experiences in design studio and technology courses. <em>Open House International, 47</em>, pp. 338-360. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-09-2021-0206" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-09-2021-0206</a>
  10. Becker, K., Newton, C., &amp; Sawang, S. (2013). A learner perspective on barriers to e-learning. <em>Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 53</em>(2), pp. 35-57.
  11. Bhandari, H., Tandon, U., Bansal, K., &amp; Mittal, A. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of technology in learning and assessment of undergraduate architecture students. In: 2020 <em>International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing and Technologies (3ICT). IEEE</em>, pp. 1-5. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/3ICT51146.2020.9311971" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/3ICT51146.2020.9311971</a>
  12. Brzezicki, M. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of architectural education on-line classes conducted during COVID-19. <em>World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18</em>, pp. 381-386.
  13. Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., &amp; Süher, K. H. (2021a). An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. <em>Archnet-IJAR, 15</em>, pp. 203-218. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230</a>
  14. Ceylan, H., Demir, G., &amp; Elri, Z. (2021b). Internet speed issue of Turkey. <em>International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, 3</em>, pp. 121-132. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.47933/ijeir.902060" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.47933/ijeir.902060</a>
  15. Chukwunonso, R., &amp; Nosike, J. (2024). Digitalization in developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. <em>Nigerian Journal of Arts and Humanities (NJAH), 4</em>, pp. 1-11.
  16. Crawford, S. D., Couper, P. C., &amp; Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web surveys perceptions of Burden. <em>Social Science Computer Review, 19</em>, pp. 146-162. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900202" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/089443930101900202</a>
  17. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests*. <em>Psychometrika, 16</em>, pp. 297-334. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/BF02310555</a>
  18. da Silveira, V. C. (2008). E-learning by studying: topics for online architectural design teaching. In: S. Roaf &amp; A. Bairstow (Eds.), <em>In the Oxford Conference: A Re-Evaluation of Education in Architecture</em>. Southampton, Boston, WIT Press, p. 339.
  19. Dennis, M. J. (2021). Digital well-being under pandemic conditions: Catalysing a theory of online flourishing. <em>Ethics and Information Technology, 23</em>, pp. 435-445. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09584-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10676-021-09584-0</a>
  20. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., &amp; Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. <em>Organization Studies, 29</em>, pp. 393-413. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0170840607088020</a>
  21. Deshmukh, J. (2021). Speculations on the post-pandemic university campus – A global inquiry. <em>Archnet-IJAR, 15</em>, pp. 131-147. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0245" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0245</a>
  22. Elrawy, S., &amp; Abouelmagd, D. (2021). Architectural and urban education in Egypt in the post COVID-19 pandemic. <em>European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10</em>, pp. 91-112. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p91" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p91</a>
  23. Ferng, J. (2020). Post-zoom: Screen environments and the human/machine interface. <em>Architectural Theory Review, 24</em>, pp. 207-210. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2020.1809769" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/13264826.2020.1809769</a>
  24. George, B. H. (2018). Drawing online: A comparative analysis of an online basic graphics course. <em>Landscape Journal, 37</em>, pp. 23-37. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.23" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3368/lj.37.1.23</a>
  25. Ghonim, M., &amp; Eweda, N. (2018). Investigating elective courses in architectural education. <em>Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7</em>, pp. 235-256. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.03.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.foar.2018.03.006</a>
  26. Güler, K. (2023). Structuring knowledge-building in online design education. <em>International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33</em>, pp. 1055-1086. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z</a>
  27. Gupta, S. K., Gunasekaran, A., Antony, J., Gupta, S., Bag, S., &amp; Roubaud, D. (2019). Systematic literature review of project failures: Current trends and scope for future research. <em>Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering, 127</em>, pp. 274-285. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.002</a>
  28. Headley, D., Slee, B., &amp; De La Cruz, E., 2015. How do we sketch with someone 1000 miles away?: distance collaboration for designers. In: Crawford, R.H., &amp; Stephan A (Eds.), <em>49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association</em>. Melbourne, 2015, pp. 977-986.
  29. Hettithanthri, U., &amp; Hansen, P. (2022). Design studio practice in the context of architectural education: A narrative literature review. <em>International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32</em>, pp. 2343-2364. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09694-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10798-021-09694-2</a>
  30. Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. <em>Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20</em>, pp. 90-98. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003</a>
  31. Ibrahim, A. F., Attia, A. S., Bataineh, A. M., &amp; Ali, H. H. (2021). Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses case study: College of Architecture at JUST, Jordan. <em>Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12</em>, pp. 2345-2353. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.006</a>
  32. Iranmanesh, A., &amp; Onur, Z. (2021). Mandatory virtual design studio for all: Exploring the transformations of architectural education amidst the global pandemic. <em>International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40</em>, pp. 251-267. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12350" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/jade.12350</a>
  33. Jimenez-Vicario, P. M., Navarro-Moreno, D., Mestre-Martí, M., García-Martínez, P., Ródenas-López, M. A., &amp; Muñoz-Mora, M. J. (2022). COVID-19 and online teaching: Impact on academic results in the subjects of architectural graphic expression at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena. In: Manuel A. Ródenas-López, José Calvo-López &amp; Macarena Salcedo-Galera (Eds.), <em>Architectural Graphics: Volume 3-Graphics for Education and Thought</em>. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 42-50. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04640-7_5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-3-031-04640-7_5</a>
  34. Karademir, A., Yaman, F., &amp; Saatçioğlu, Ö (2020). Challenges of higher education institutions against COVID-19: The case of Turkey. <em>Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4</em>, pp. 453-474. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020063574" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.33902/JPR.2020063574</a>
  35. Khan, A. R., &amp; Thilagam, N. L. (2021). The confluence approach – A theoretical proposition for effective structuring of architecture studio pedagogy in e-learning mode. <em>Open House International, 46</em>, pp. 510-527. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-11-2020-0158" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-11-2020-0158</a>
  36. Khan, A. R., &amp; Thilagam, N. L. (2022). The virtual design studio and the key integrals. <em>Open House International, 47</em>, pp. 316-337. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-05-2021-0113" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-05-2021-0113</a>
  37. Koenig, R., &amp; Schneider, S. (2019). Evaluation of systems for video-based online teaching Create your own MOOC or SPOC. <em>Challenges – EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1</em>, pp. 109-116.
  38. Koh, P. C. L., &amp; Wong, S. K. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning and institution’s engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Taylor’s design, architecture and engineering students. <em>Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 16</em>(1), pp. 635-651.
  39. Komarzyńska-świeściak, E., Adams, B., &amp; Thomas, L. (2021). Transition from physical design studio to emergency virtual design studio. Available teaching and learning methods and tools – A case study. <em>Buildings, 11</em>(7), p. 312. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11070312" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/buildings11070312</a>
  40. Kukina, I., Unagaeva, N., Kamalova, K., Chui, I., &amp; Fedchenko, I. (2016). E-learning technologies in the international urban design: Educational case studies of the Siberian Federal University and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. <em>Architecture and Design Conference Proceedings, 2</em>, pp. 237-244. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/HB42/S07.030" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/HB42/S07.030</a>
  41. Leon, I., Sagarna, M., Mora, F., &amp; Otaduy, J. P. (2021). BIM application for sustainable teaching environment and solutions in the context of COVID‐19. <em>Sustainability (Switzerland), 13</em>(9), p. 4746. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094746" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/su13094746</a>
  42. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. <em>BMJ, 339</em>, p. b2700. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1136/bmj.b2700</a>
  43. Macpherson, A., &amp; Jones, O. (2010). Editorial: Strategies for the development of International Journal of Management reviews. <em>International Journal of Management Reviews, 12</em>(2), pp. 107-113. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00282.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00282.x</a>
  44. Masdéu, M., &amp; Fuses, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing the design studio in architectural education: Distance learning and blended learning as transformation factors. <em>International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR, 11</em>(2), pp. 6-23. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1156" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1156</a>
  45. Mayer, F. (2021). Experiences with digital teaching formats during the COVID-19 pandemic at the Department of Spatial Design at the Faculty of Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, as illustrated by the course Einführen in das Entwerfen (Introduction to Design). FAMagazine. Ricerche e progetti sull’architettura e la città, 170-175.
  46. Megahed, N., &amp; Hassan, A. (2022). A blended learning strategy: Reimagining the post-COVID-19 architectural education. <em>Archnet-IJAR, 16</em>, pp. 184-202. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0081" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0081</a>
  47. Metinal, Y. B., &amp; Gumusburun Ayalp, G. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on architectural education: Bibliometric and content analyses. <em>Open House International, 47</em>, pp. 657-687. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0120" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0120</a>
  48. Metinal, Y. B., &amp; Gumusburun Ayalp, G. (2024). Modeling the critical factors affecting the success of online architectural education to enhance educational sustainability. <em>Sustainability (Switzerland), 16</em>(9), p. 3803. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093803" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/su16093803</a>
  49. Miller, P. A. (2001). Distance learning: Back to the future. Landscape architecture. <em>American Society of Landscape Architects, 91</em>, pp. 54-101.
  50. Milovanović, A., Kostić, M., Zorić, A., Dordević, A., Pešić, M., Bugarski, J., et al. (2020). Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education. <em>Sustainability (Switzerland), 12</em>(17), p. 7024. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/su12177024</a>
  51. Muilenburg, L. Y., &amp; Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. <em>Distance Education, 26</em>(1), pp. 29-48. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01587910500081269</a>
  52. Newman, G., George, B., Li, D., Tao, Z., Yu, S., &amp; Lee, R. J. (2018). Online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, preferences, and student needs in design-related online education. <em>Landscape Journal, 37</em>, pp. 41-63. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.2.41" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3368/lj.37.2.41</a>
  53. Nubani, L., &amp; Lee, E. (2022). Sense of classroom community in interior design studios: In-person learning versus online learning approaches. <em>International Journal of Design, 47</em>, pp. 51-70. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12217" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/joid.12217</a>
  54. Nunnally, J. C., &amp; Bernstein, I. H. (2007). <em>Psychometric Theory</em>, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  55. Peimani, N., &amp; Kamalipour, H. (2021a). Online education in the post COVID-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. <em>Education Sciences (Basel), 11</em>(10), p. 633. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/educsci11100633</a>
  56. Peimani, N., &amp; Kamalipour, H. (2021b). Online education and the COVID-19 outbreak: A case study of online teaching during lockdown. <em>Education Sciences (Basel), 11</em>, pp. 1-16. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020072" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/educsci11020072</a>
  57. Peimani, N., &amp; Kamalipour, H. (2022). The future of design studio education: Student experience and perception of blended learning and teaching during the global pandemic. <em>Education Sciences (Basel), 12</em>(2), p. 140. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020140" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/educsci12020140</a>
  58. Reza Saghafi, M., Franz, J., &amp; Crowther, P. (2012). Perceptions of physical versus virtual design studio education. <em>International Journal of Architectural Research, 6</em>, pp. 6-22.
  59. Ricky, H. (2023). Integrating Zoom with Learning Management Systems: A Comprehensive Guide [WWW Document].
  60. EdisonOS. Available at https://www.edisonos.com/blog/integrating-zoom-with-learning-management-systems-a-comprehensive-guide [accessed 7 October 2024].
  61. Sahuc, P. A. (2021). From pencil to mouse, from face to screen. A teaching experience in times of COVID 19. <em>FAMagazine</em>. Ricerche e progetti sull’architettura e la città, pp. 192–195. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n0-2021" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n0-2021</a>
  62. Scatena, D., Gulel, Z., Terracina, S. A., &amp; Volanti, V. (2021). The architectural plan: Teaching and learning methods in social distance’s times. <em>FAMagazine. Ricerche e progetti sull’architettura e la città</em>, pp. 88-93. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n0-2021" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n0-2021</a>
  63. Schwarz, M., Scherrer, A., Hohmann, C., Heiberg, J., Brugger, A., &amp; Nuñez-Jimenez, A. (2020). COVID-19 and the academy: It is time for going digital. <em>Energy Research &amp; Social Science, 68</em>, p. 101684. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101684" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.erss.2020.101684</a>
  64. Senyapili, B., &amp; Karakaya, A. F. (2009). The future setting of the design studio. <em>Open House International, 34</em>, pp. 104-112. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2009-B0012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/OHI-01-2009-B0012</a>
  65. Shannon, S. J., Francis, R. L., Chooi, Y. L., &amp; Ng, S. L. (2013). Approaches to the use of blended learning in teaching tectonics of design to architecture/design and architectural engineering students. <em>Architectural Science Review, 56</em>, pp. 131-140. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2012.744688" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00038628.2012.744688</a>
  66. Soccio, P., Tregloan, K., &amp; Thompson, J. (2021). Well-coordinated: Learner-focused coordination tactics beyond the pandemergency. <em>Archnet-IJAR, 15</em>, pp. 237-251. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0227" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0227</a>
  67. Sünger, M. (2021). Popular Video Conferencing Softwares: Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Google Meet [WWW Document]. Turkish Red Crescent Academy. Available at https://kizilayakademi. org.tr/en/popular-video-conferencing-softwares-microsoft-teams-zoom-and-google-meet/#:~:text=According%20 to%20a%20report%20dated,in%20Turkey%20and%20also%2-0worldwide [accessed 7 October, 2024].
  68. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. <em>Research in Science Education, 48</em>, pp. 1273-1296. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2</a>
  69. Tan, Y., Xu, W., Li, S., &amp; Chen, K. (2022). Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) for education and training in the AEC industry: A systematic review of research and applications. <em>Buildings, 12</em>(10), p. 1529. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101529" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/buildings12101529</a>
  70. Tandon, U., Mittal, A., Bhandari, H., &amp; Bansal, K. (2022). E-learning adoption by undergraduate architecture students: Facilitators and inhibitors. Engineering. <em>Construction and Architectural Management, 29</em>, pp. 4287-4312. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0376" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0376</a>
  71. Tang, B., Guo, S., Yeboah, M., Wang, Z., &amp; Cheng, S. (2021). Quality evaluation of online courses during COVID-19 pandemic based on integrated FCE-AHP method. <em>Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 41</em>, pp. 1487-1498. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210362" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3233/JIFS-210362</a>
  72. Taslı-Pektas, S. (2012). Virtual design studio revisited: A blended approach for the digital natives. <em>Collaborative Design, 2</em>, pp. 69-75.
  73. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., &amp; Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. <em>British Journal of Management, 14</em>(2), pp. 207-222. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/14678551.00375" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/14678551.00375</a>
  74. Travis, S. (2022). Onsite/online: A case study approach pivots to virtual and back with new strategies learned. <em>Architecture_ MPS, 22</em>, pp. 1-13. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.14324/111.444.amps</a>
  75. Tuç, E. (2023). Distance education during the COVID-19 process in turkey: Implications of web conferencing for open schooling. <em>Global and Lokal Distance Education-GLOKALde, 9</em>, pp. 17-26.
  76. Varma, A., &amp; Jafri, M. S. (2021). COVID-19 responsive teaching of undergraduate architecture programs in India: Learnings for post-pandemic education. <em>Archnet-IJAR, 15</em>, pp. 189-202. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0234" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0234</a>
  77. Vásquez De Velasco, G. (2007). A group of friends: The Las Americas network, virtual studios, and distance education in architecture. <em>International Journal of Architectural Computing, 5</em>, pp. 455-468. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1260/147807707782581765" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1260/147807707782581765</a>
  78. Wu, W. L., Hsu, Y., Yang, Q. F., &amp; Chen, J. J. (2021). A spherical video-based immersive virtual reality learning system to support landscape architecture students’ learning performance during the COVID-19 era. <em>Land (Basel), 10</em>(6), p. 561. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060561" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/land10060561</a>
  79. Xi, W., &amp; Cong, W. (2022). Remote practice methods of survey education for HBIM in the post-pandemic era: Case study of Kuiwen Pavilion in the temple of Confucius (Qufu, China). <em>Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12</em>(2), p. 708. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020708" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/app12020708</a>
  80. Yu, R., Ostwald, M. J., Gu, N., Skates, H., &amp; Feast, S. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of online teaching in architecture courses. <em>Architectural Science Review, 65</em>, pp. 89-100. doi: 10.1 080/00038628.2021.1921689
  81. Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., et al. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. <em>Annals of Translational Medicine, 8</em>, pp. 816-816. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4235" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.21037/atm-20-4235</a>
  82. Zoom. (2023a). Zoom: One Platform to Connect [WWW Document]. Available at https://zoom.us/[accessed 7 May, 2024].
  83. Zoom. (2023b). Limiting Network Bandwidth [WWW Document]. Available at https://support.zoom.com/hc/en/article?id=zm_ kb&amp;sysparm_article=KB0059400#:~:text=Zoom%20 applications%20are%20designed%20to,to%20calculate%20 what%20is%20available [accessed 7 October, 2024].
  84. Zoom. (2023c). Unified Communication and Collaboration Platform for Schools and Universities [WWW Document]. Available at https://explore.zoom.us/en/collaboration-tools/solutions/education/[accessed 7 October, 2024].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2025-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 66
Submitted on: Nov 9, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 24, 2024
Published on: May 9, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2025 Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp, Yusuf Berkay Metinal, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.