References
- Akçay Kavakoğlu, A., Güleç Özer, D., Domingo-Callabuig, D., & Bilen, Ö (2022). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. Open House International, 47, pp. 361-384. doi: 10.1108/OHI-07-2021-0144
- Al Maani, D., Alnusairat, S., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Transforming learning for architecture: Online design studio as the new norm for crises adaptation under COVID-19. Open House International, 46, pp. 348-358. doi: 10.1108/OHI-01-2021-0016
- Alatni, B. S., Abubakar, I. R., & Iqbal, S. A. (2021). COVID-19 and rapid course adaptations in Saudi Arabia: An experiential learning and recommendations for online education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p. 643203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643203
- Alkhalil, S. M., Manasrah, A. A., Dabbour, L. M., Bashayreh, E. A., Abdelhafez, E. A., & Rababa, E. G. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and the E-learning in higher institutions of education: Faculty of engineering and technology at Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan as a case study. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 31, pp. 464-475. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2020.1829243
- Alnusairat, S., Al Maani, D., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Architecture students’ satisfaction with and perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: The case of Jordan universities. Archnet-IJAR, 15, pp. 219-236. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-09-2020-019
- Andiyan, A., Rusmana, D., Hari, Y., Sitorus, M., Trinova, Z., & Surur, M. (2021). Disruption of IoT in Adapting online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 13, pp. 1331-1341. doi: 10.9756/INT-JECSE/V13I2.211181
- Asadpour, A. (2021). Student challenges in online architectural design courses in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18, pp. 511-529. doi: 10.1177/20427530211022923
- Ayat, M., Imran, M., Ullah, A., & Kang, C. W. (2021). Current trends analysis and prioritization of success factors: A systematic literature review of ICT projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), pp. 652-679. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0075
- Bakir, R., & Alsaadani, S. (2022). A mixed methods study of architectural education during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: Student experiences in design studio and technology courses. Open House International, 47, pp. 338-360. doi: 10.1108/OHI-09-2021-0206
- Becker, K., Newton, C., & Sawang, S. (2013). A learner perspective on barriers to e-learning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 53(2), pp. 35-57.
- Bhandari, H., Tandon, U., Bansal, K., & Mittal, A. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of technology in learning and assessment of undergraduate architecture students. In: 2020 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing and Technologies (3ICT). IEEE, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/3ICT51146.2020.9311971
- Brzezicki, M. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of architectural education on-line classes conducted during COVID-19. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18, pp. 381-386.
- Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., & Süher, K. H. (2021a). An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR, 15, pp. 203-218. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230
- Ceylan, H., Demir, G., & Elri, Z. (2021b). Internet speed issue of Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, 3, pp. 121-132. doi: 10.47933/ijeir.902060
- Chukwunonso, R., & Nosike, J. (2024). Digitalization in developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Nigerian Journal of Arts and Humanities (NJAH), 4, pp. 1-11.
- Crawford, S. D., Couper, P. C., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web surveys perceptions of Burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19, pp. 146-162. doi: 10.1177/089443930101900202
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests*. Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
- da Silveira, V. C. (2008). E-learning by studying: topics for online architectural design teaching. In: S. Roaf & A. Bairstow (Eds.), In the Oxford Conference: A Re-Evaluation of Education in Architecture. Southampton, Boston, WIT Press, p. 339.
- Dennis, M. J. (2021). Digital well-being under pandemic conditions: Catalysing a theory of online flourishing. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, pp. 435-445. doi: 10.1007/s10676-021-09584-0
- Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29, pp. 393-413. doi: 10.1177/0170840607088020
- Deshmukh, J. (2021). Speculations on the post-pandemic university campus – A global inquiry. Archnet-IJAR, 15, pp. 131-147. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0245
- Elrawy, S., & Abouelmagd, D. (2021). Architectural and urban education in Egypt in the post COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10, pp. 91-112. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p91
- Ferng, J. (2020). Post-zoom: Screen environments and the human/machine interface. Architectural Theory Review, 24, pp. 207-210. doi: 10.1080/13264826.2020.1809769
- George, B. H. (2018). Drawing online: A comparative analysis of an online basic graphics course. Landscape Journal, 37, pp. 23-37. doi: 10.3368/lj.37.1.23
- Ghonim, M., & Eweda, N. (2018). Investigating elective courses in architectural education. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7, pp. 235-256. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2018.03.006
- Güler, K. (2023). Structuring knowledge-building in online design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, pp. 1055-1086. doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z
- Gupta, S. K., Gunasekaran, A., Antony, J., Gupta, S., Bag, S., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Systematic literature review of project failures: Current trends and scope for future research. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, pp. 274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.002
- Headley, D., Slee, B., & De La Cruz, E., 2015. How do we sketch with someone 1000 miles away?: distance collaboration for designers. In: Crawford, R.H., & Stephan A (Eds.), 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association. Melbourne, 2015, pp. 977-986.
- Hettithanthri, U., & Hansen, P. (2022). Design studio practice in the context of architectural education: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, pp. 2343-2364. doi: 10.1007/s10798-021-09694-2
- Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, pp. 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
- Ibrahim, A. F., Attia, A. S., Bataineh, A. M., & Ali, H. H. (2021). Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses case study: College of Architecture at JUST, Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12, pp. 2345-2353. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.006
- Iranmanesh, A., & Onur, Z. (2021). Mandatory virtual design studio for all: Exploring the transformations of architectural education amidst the global pandemic. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40, pp. 251-267. doi: 10.1111/jade.12350
- Jimenez-Vicario, P. M., Navarro-Moreno, D., Mestre-Martí, M., García-Martínez, P., Ródenas-López, M. A., & Muñoz-Mora, M. J. (2022). COVID-19 and online teaching: Impact on academic results in the subjects of architectural graphic expression at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena. In: Manuel A. Ródenas-López, José Calvo-López & Macarena Salcedo-Galera (Eds.), Architectural Graphics: Volume 3-Graphics for Education and Thought. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 42-50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-04640-7_5
- Karademir, A., Yaman, F., & Saatçioğlu, Ö (2020). Challenges of higher education institutions against COVID-19: The case of Turkey. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4, pp. 453-474. doi: 10.33902/JPR.2020063574
- Khan, A. R., & Thilagam, N. L. (2021). The confluence approach – A theoretical proposition for effective structuring of architecture studio pedagogy in e-learning mode. Open House International, 46, pp. 510-527. doi: 10.1108/OHI-11-2020-0158
- Khan, A. R., & Thilagam, N. L. (2022). The virtual design studio and the key integrals. Open House International, 47, pp. 316-337. doi: 10.1108/OHI-05-2021-0113
- Koenig, R., & Schneider, S. (2019). Evaluation of systems for video-based online teaching Create your own MOOC or SPOC. Challenges – EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1, pp. 109-116.
- Koh, P. C. L., & Wong, S. K. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning and institution’s engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Taylor’s design, architecture and engineering students. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 16(1), pp. 635-651.
- Komarzyńska-świeściak, E., Adams, B., & Thomas, L. (2021). Transition from physical design studio to emergency virtual design studio. Available teaching and learning methods and tools – A case study. Buildings, 11(7), p. 312. doi: 10.3390/buildings11070312
- Kukina, I., Unagaeva, N., Kamalova, K., Chui, I., & Fedchenko, I. (2016). E-learning technologies in the international urban design: Educational case studies of the Siberian Federal University and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Architecture and Design Conference Proceedings, 2, pp. 237-244. doi: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/HB42/S07.030
- Leon, I., Sagarna, M., Mora, F., & Otaduy, J. P. (2021). BIM application for sustainable teaching environment and solutions in the context of COVID‐19. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9), p. 4746. doi: 10.3390/su13094746
- Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, p. b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
- Macpherson, A., & Jones, O. (2010). Editorial: Strategies for the development of International Journal of Management reviews. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), pp. 107-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00282.x
- Masdéu, M., & Fuses, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing the design studio in architectural education: Distance learning and blended learning as transformation factors. International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR, 11(2), pp. 6-23. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1156
- Mayer, F. (2021). Experiences with digital teaching formats during the COVID-19 pandemic at the Department of Spatial Design at the Faculty of Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, as illustrated by the course Einführen in das Entwerfen (Introduction to Design). FAMagazine. Ricerche e progetti sull’architettura e la città, 170-175.
- Megahed, N., & Hassan, A. (2022). A blended learning strategy: Reimagining the post-COVID-19 architectural education. Archnet-IJAR, 16, pp. 184-202. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0081
- Metinal, Y. B., & Gumusburun Ayalp, G. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on architectural education: Bibliometric and content analyses. Open House International, 47, pp. 657-687. doi: 10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0120
- Metinal, Y. B., & Gumusburun Ayalp, G. (2024). Modeling the critical factors affecting the success of online architectural education to enhance educational sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(9), p. 3803. doi: 10.3390/su16093803
- Miller, P. A. (2001). Distance learning: Back to the future. Landscape architecture. American Society of Landscape Architects, 91, pp. 54-101.
- Milovanović, A., Kostić, M., Zorić, A., Dordević, A., Pešić, M., Bugarski, J., et al. (2020). Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), p. 7024. doi: 10.3390/su12177024
- Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), pp. 29-48. doi: 10.1080/01587910500081269
- Newman, G., George, B., Li, D., Tao, Z., Yu, S., & Lee, R. J. (2018). Online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, preferences, and student needs in design-related online education. Landscape Journal, 37, pp. 41-63. doi: 10.3368/lj.37.2.41
- Nubani, L., & Lee, E. (2022). Sense of classroom community in interior design studios: In-person learning versus online learning approaches. International Journal of Design, 47, pp. 51-70. doi: 10.1111/joid.12217
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (2007). Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021a). Online education in the post COVID-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. Education Sciences (Basel), 11(10), p. 633. doi: 10.3390/educsci11100633
- Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021b). Online education and the COVID-19 outbreak: A case study of online teaching during lockdown. Education Sciences (Basel), 11, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.3390/educsci11020072
- Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2022). The future of design studio education: Student experience and perception of blended learning and teaching during the global pandemic. Education Sciences (Basel), 12(2), p. 140. doi: 10.3390/educsci12020140
- Reza Saghafi, M., Franz, J., & Crowther, P. (2012). Perceptions of physical versus virtual design studio education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 6, pp. 6-22.
- Ricky, H. (2023). Integrating Zoom with Learning Management Systems: A Comprehensive Guide [WWW Document].
- EdisonOS. Available at https://www.edisonos.com/blog/integrating-zoom-with-learning-management-systems-a-comprehensive-guide [accessed 7 October 2024].
- Sahuc, P. A. (2021). From pencil to mouse, from face to screen. A teaching experience in times of COVID 19. FAMagazine. Ricerche e progetti sull’architettura e la città, pp. 192–195. doi: 10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n0-2021
- Scatena, D., Gulel, Z., Terracina, S. A., & Volanti, V. (2021). The architectural plan: Teaching and learning methods in social distance’s times. FAMagazine. Ricerche e progetti sull’architettura e la città, pp. 88-93. doi: 10.12838/fam/issn2039-0491/n0-2021
- Schwarz, M., Scherrer, A., Hohmann, C., Heiberg, J., Brugger, A., & Nuñez-Jimenez, A. (2020). COVID-19 and the academy: It is time for going digital. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, p. 101684. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101684
- Senyapili, B., & Karakaya, A. F. (2009). The future setting of the design studio. Open House International, 34, pp. 104-112. doi: 10.1108/OHI-01-2009-B0012
- Shannon, S. J., Francis, R. L., Chooi, Y. L., & Ng, S. L. (2013). Approaches to the use of blended learning in teaching tectonics of design to architecture/design and architectural engineering students. Architectural Science Review, 56, pp. 131-140. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2012.744688
- Soccio, P., Tregloan, K., & Thompson, J. (2021). Well-coordinated: Learner-focused coordination tactics beyond the pandemergency. Archnet-IJAR, 15, pp. 237-251. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0227
- Sünger, M. (2021). Popular Video Conferencing Softwares: Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Google Meet [WWW Document]. Turkish Red Crescent Academy. Available at https://kizilayakademi. org.tr/en/popular-video-conferencing-softwares-microsoft-teams-zoom-and-google-meet/#:~:text=According%20 to%20a%20report%20dated,in%20Turkey%20and%20also%2-0worldwide [accessed 7 October, 2024].
- Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, pp. 1273-1296. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
- Tan, Y., Xu, W., Li, S., & Chen, K. (2022). Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) for education and training in the AEC industry: A systematic review of research and applications. Buildings, 12(10), p. 1529. doi: 10.3390/buildings12101529
- Tandon, U., Mittal, A., Bhandari, H., & Bansal, K. (2022). E-learning adoption by undergraduate architecture students: Facilitators and inhibitors. Engineering. Construction and Architectural Management, 29, pp. 4287-4312. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-05-2021-0376
- Tang, B., Guo, S., Yeboah, M., Wang, Z., & Cheng, S. (2021). Quality evaluation of online courses during COVID-19 pandemic based on integrated FCE-AHP method. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 41, pp. 1487-1498. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-210362
- Taslı-Pektas, S. (2012). Virtual design studio revisited: A blended approach for the digital natives. Collaborative Design, 2, pp. 69-75.
- Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(2), pp. 207-222. doi: 10.1111/14678551.00375
- Travis, S. (2022). Onsite/online: A case study approach pivots to virtual and back with new strategies learned. Architecture_ MPS, 22, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.14324/111.444.amps
- Tuç, E. (2023). Distance education during the COVID-19 process in turkey: Implications of web conferencing for open schooling. Global and Lokal Distance Education-GLOKALde, 9, pp. 17-26.
- Varma, A., & Jafri, M. S. (2021). COVID-19 responsive teaching of undergraduate architecture programs in India: Learnings for post-pandemic education. Archnet-IJAR, 15, pp. 189-202. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0234
- Vásquez De Velasco, G. (2007). A group of friends: The Las Americas network, virtual studios, and distance education in architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 5, pp. 455-468. doi: 10.1260/147807707782581765
- Wu, W. L., Hsu, Y., Yang, Q. F., & Chen, J. J. (2021). A spherical video-based immersive virtual reality learning system to support landscape architecture students’ learning performance during the COVID-19 era. Land (Basel), 10(6), p. 561. doi: 10.3390/land10060561
- Xi, W., & Cong, W. (2022). Remote practice methods of survey education for HBIM in the post-pandemic era: Case study of Kuiwen Pavilion in the temple of Confucius (Qufu, China). Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(2), p. 708. doi: 10.3390/app12020708
- Yu, R., Ostwald, M. J., Gu, N., Skates, H., & Feast, S. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of online teaching in architecture courses. Architectural Science Review, 65, pp. 89-100. doi: 10.1 080/00038628.2021.1921689
- Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., et al. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8, pp. 816-816. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4235
- Zoom. (2023a). Zoom: One Platform to Connect [WWW Document]. Available at https://zoom.us/[accessed 7 May, 2024].
- Zoom. (2023b). Limiting Network Bandwidth [WWW Document]. Available at https://support.zoom.com/hc/en/article?id=zm_ kb&sysparm_article=KB0059400#:~:text=Zoom%20 applications%20are%20designed%20to,to%20calculate%20 what%20is%20available [accessed 7 October, 2024].
- Zoom. (2023c). Unified Communication and Collaboration Platform for Schools and Universities [WWW Document]. Available at https://explore.zoom.us/en/collaboration-tools/solutions/education/[accessed 7 October, 2024].