Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Overview of construction simulation approaches to model construction processes Cover
Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. AbouRizk, S., Halpin, D., Mohamed, Y., & Hermann, U. (2011). Research in modeling and simulation for improving construction engineering operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10), pp. 843–852.
  2. AbouRizk, S. M. (2010). Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(10), pp. 1140–1153.
  3. AbouRizk, S. M., & Halpin, D. W. (1992). Statistical properties of construction duration data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(3), pp. 525–544.
  4. AbouRizk, S. M., & Sawhney, A. (1993). Subjective and interactive duration estimation. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20, pp. 457–470.
  5. Alvanchi, A., Lee, S. H., & AbouRizk, S. (2011). Modeling framework and architecture of hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for construction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26(2), pp. 77–91.
  6. Alzraiee, H., Zayed, T., & Moselhi, O. (2012). Methodology for synchronizing discrete event simulation and system dynamics models. In: Laroque, C., Himmelspach, J., Pasupathy, R., Rose, O., & Uhrmacher, A. M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). IEEE, Berlin, Germany, pp. 1–11.
  7. Alzraiee, H., Zayed, T., & Moselhi, O. (2015). Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulation. Automation in Construction, 49, pp. 176–192.
  8. Ayyub, B. M., & Haldar, A. (1984). Project scheduling using fuzzy set concepts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 110(2), pp. 189–204.
  9. Balaban, M., Hester, P., & Diallo, S. (2014). Towards a theory of multi-method M&S approach: Part I. In: Tolk, A., Diallo, S. Y., Ryzhov, I. O., Yilmaz, L., Buckley, S., & Miller, J. A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Savannah, GA, USA, pp. 1652–1663.
  10. Borshchev, A. (2013). Multi-method modeling. In: Pasupathy, R., Kim, S. -H., Tolk, A., Hill, R., & Kuhl, M. E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Washington DC, USA, pp. 4089–4100. Available at https://informs-sim.org/wsc13papers/includes/files/410.pdf.
  11. Borshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling : reasons, techniques, tools. In: Kennedy, M., Winch, G. W., Langer, R. S., Rowe, J. I., & Yanni, J. M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. System Dynamics Society, Oxford, UK. Available at: http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/systemdyndiscreteeventabm-compared.borshchevfilippov04.pdf.
  12. Dabirian, S., Khanzadi, M., & Moussazadeh, M. (2016). Predicting labor costs in construction projects using agent-based modeling and simulation. Scientia Iranica, 23(1), pp. 91–101.
  13. Dawood, N., Hobbs, B., & Fanning, A. (2001). Standardization of brickwork construction: identification and measurement of standard processes. In: Akintoye, A. (ed.) Proceedings 17th Annual ARCOM Conference. ARCOM, Salford, UK, pp. 321–329. Available at http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2001-321-329_Dawood_Hobbs_and_Fanning.pdf.
  14. De Salles, D. C., Gonçalves Neto, A. C., & Marujo, L. G. (2016). Using fuzzy logic to implement decision policies in system dynamics models. Expert Systems with Applications, 55, pp. 172–183.
  15. Fahrland, D. A. (1970). Combined discrete event continuous systems simulation. Simulation, 14(2), pp. 61–72.
  16. Florez, L. (2017). Crew allocation system for the masonry industry. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 32(10), pp. 874–889.
  17. Florez, L., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2014). Labor management in masonry construction: a sustainable approach. In: 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2014): Automation, Construction and Environment. International Association for Automation & Robotics in Construction (IAARC), Sydney, Australia, pp. 529–536.
  18. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon.
  19. Gordon, G. (1961). A general purpose systems simulation program. In: Proceedings of the December 12–14, 1961, Eastern Joint Computer Conference: Computers - Key to Total Systems Control - AFIPS ’61 (Eastern). ACM Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 87–104.
  20. Hajdu, M., & Bokor, O. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter? Automation in Construction, 65, pp. 1–8.
  21. Hsu, S. C., Weng, K. W., Cui, Q., & Rand, W. (2016). Understanding the complexity of project team member selection through agent-based modeling. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), pp. 82–93.
  22. Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., & Alipour, M. (2012). Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling to determine concession period in BOT projects. Automation in Construction, 22, pp. 368–376.
  23. Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., Mir, M., & Nojedehi, P. (2017). Prediction and improvement of labor productivity using hybrid system dynamics and agent-based modeling approach. Construction Innovation, 18(1), pp. 2–19.
  24. Kunc, M. (2017). System dynamics: a soft and hard approach to modelling. In: Chan, W. K. V., D’Ambrogio, A., Zacharewicz, G., Mustafee, N., Wainer, G., & Page, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 597–606.
  25. Lättilä, L., Hilletofth, P., & Lin, B. (2010). Hybrid simulation models - When, why, how? Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), pp. 7969–7975.
  26. Law, A. M. (2015). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  27. Lorterapong, P., & Moselhi, O. (1996). Project-network analysis using fuzzy sets theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(4), pp. 308–318.
  28. Martinez, J. C. (2010). Methodology for conducting discrete-event simulation studies in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), pp. 3–16.
  29. Mawdesley, M. J., & Al-Jibouri, S. (2009). Modelling construction project productivity using systems dynamics approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(1), pp. 18–36.
  30. Moradi, S., Nasirzadeh, F., & Golkhoo, F. (2015). A hybrid SD–DES simulation approach to model construction projects. Construction Innovation, 15(1), pp. 66–83.
  31. Mosterman, P. J. (1999). An overview of hybrid simulation phenomena and their support by simulation packages. In: Vaandrager, F. W., & van Schuppen, J. H. (eds.) Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. Springer, Berg en Dal, The Netherlands, pp. 165–177.
  32. Mustafee, N., Powell, J., Brailsford, S. C., Diallo, S., Padilla, J., & Tolk, A. (2015). Hybrid simulation studies and hybrid simulation systems: definitions, challenges, and benefits. In: Yilmaz, L., Chan, W. K. V., Moon, I., Roeder, T. M. K., Macal, C., & Rossetti, M. D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, pp. 1678–1692.
  33. Nasirzadeh, F., Khanzadi, M., & Mir, M. (2018). A hybrid simulation framework for modelling construction projects using agent-based modelling and system dynamics: an application to model construction workers’ safety behavior. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(2), pp. 132–143.
  34. Nojedehi, P., & Nasirzadeh, F. (2017). A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivity. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(5), pp. 1516–1524.
  35. Peña-Mora, F., Han, S., Lee, S., & Park, M. (2008). Strategic-operational construction management: hybrid system dynamics and discrete event approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), pp. 701–710.
  36. Raoufi, M., & Robinson Fayek, A. (2015). Integrating Fuzzy logic and agent-based modeling for assessing construction crew behavior. In: Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS. IEEE, Redmond, WA, USA.
  37. Raoufi, M., Seresht, N. G., & Robinson Fayek, A. (2016). Overview of Fuzzy simulation techniques in construction engineering and management. In Ceberio, M., & Kreinovich, V. (eds.) 2016 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS). IEEE, El Paso, TX, USA, pp. 1–6.
  38. Robinson Fayek, A., & Oduba, A. (2005). Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using Fuzzy expert systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), pp. 938–941.
  39. Sargent, R. G. (2015). An introductory tutorial on verification and validation of simulation models. In: Yilmaz, L., Chan, W. K. V., Moon, I., Roeder, T. M. K., Macal, C., & Rossetti, M. D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, pp. 1729–1740.
  40. Sawhney, A., Bashford, H., Walsh, K., & Mulky, A. R. (2003). Agent-based modeling and simulation in construction. In: Chick, S., Sánchez, P. J., Ferrin, D., & Morrice, D. J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1541–1547.
  41. Shaheen, A. A., Robinson Fayek, A., & AbouRizk, S. M. (2009). Methodology for integrating fuzzy expert systems and discrete event simulation in construction engineering. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(9), pp. 1478–1490.
  42. Siebers, P. O., MacAl, C. M., Garnett, J., Buxton, D., & Pidd, M. (2010). Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! Journal of Simulation, 4(3), pp. 204–210.
  43. Son, J. W., Rojas, E. M., & Shin, S.-W. (2015). Application of agent-based modeling and simulation to understanding complex management problems in CEM research. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(8), pp. 998–1013.
  44. Swinerd, C., & McNaught, K. R. (2012). Design classes for hybrid simulations involving agent-based and system dynamics models. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 25, pp. 118–133.
  45. Thomas, H. R., Završki, I. (1999). Construction baseline productivity: theory and practice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), pp. 295–303.
  46. Watkins, M., Mukherjee, A., Onder, N., & Mattila, K. (2009). Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 657–667.
  47. Zadeh, L. A. (1980). Fuzzy sets versus probability. Proceedings of the IEEE, 68(3), p. 421.
  48. Zhang, H., Tam, C. M., & Li, H. (2005). Modeling uncertain activity duration by fuzzy number and discrete-event simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 164, pp. 715–729.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 1853 - 1861
Submitted on: Dec 14, 2018
|
Accepted on: Jan 3, 2019
|
Published on: Mar 8, 2019
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Orsolya Bokor, Laura Florez, Allan Osborne, Barry J. Gledson, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.