References
- Ahadzie, D., Proverbs, D., & Olomolaiye, P. (2008). Critical success criteria for mass house building projects in developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6), pp. 675–687.
- Anantatmula, V. S. (2015). Strategies for enhancing project performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6), p. Article in Press.
- Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp. 337–342.
- Bakker, R. M., Cambré, B., Korlaar, L., & Raab, J. (2011). Managing the project learning paradox: A set-theoretic approach toward project knowledge transfer. International Journal of Project Management, 29(5), pp. 494–503.
- Barrett, P., & Sutrisna, M. (2009). Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), pp. 935–948.
- Bassioni, H., Price, A., & Hassan, T. M. (2004). Performance measurement in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(2), pp. 42–50.
- Chan, A. P. C., & Sidwell, T. (2001). Framework for Measuring Success of Construction Projects. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
- Coakes, E., & Elliman, A. (2011). Developing organisational stories through grounded theory data analysis: A case example for studying IS phenomena. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 3(2), p. 16.
- Cronqvist, L. (2003). Using Multi-Value Logic Synthesis in Social Science. In 2nd General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) [ September 2003], Marburg. Section 6 - Panel 8, pp. 1–22.
- Dainty, A. R. J., Cheng, M.-I., & Moore, D. R. (2003). Redefining performance measures for construction project managers: an empirical evaluation. Construction Management and Economics, 21(2), pp. 209–218.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 532–550.
- Goldkuhl, G., & Cronholm, S. (2003). Adding Theoretical Grounding to Grounded Theory: Toward Multi-Grounded Theory’, in 2nd European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management. Reading, UK.
- Government of India (2013). Department of Fertilizers Annual Report 2012–2013, pp. 1–176.
- Hajdu, M., & Isaac, S. (2016). Sixty years of project planning: history and future. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, 8(1), pp. 1499–1510. doi: 10.1515/otmcj-2016-0013.
- Hwang, B.-G., Thomas, S. R., & Caldas, C. H. (2010). Performance metric development for pharmaceutical construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), pp. 265–274.
- Iyer, K. C., & Banerjee, P. S. (2015). Facilitators and inhibitors in sector wide technology transfer projects in developing economies: An empirical study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, p. 26. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9456-1.
- Iyer, K. C., & Banerjee, P. S. (2016). Measuring and benchmarking managerial efficiency of project execution schedule performance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), pp. 219–236.
- Iyer, K. C., & Banerjee, P. S. (2017). Project ambidexterity: Case of recovering schedule delay in a brownfield airport project in India. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 9(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1515/otmcj-2016-0012.
- Iyer, K. C., & Jha, K. N. (2006). Critical factors affecting schedule performance: Evidence from Indian construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), p. 871.
- Jacobson, C., & Choi, S. O. (2008). Success factors: Public works and public-private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), pp. 637–657.
- Jordan, E. et al. (2011). Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), pp. 1159–1173.
- Krueger, D. C., Parast, M. M., & Adams, S. (2014). Six Sigma implementation: a qualitative case study using grounded theory. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 25(10), pp. 873–889.
- Lam, E. W. M., Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, D. W. M. (2004). Benchmarking design-build procurement systems in construction. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(3), pp. 287–302.
- Laufer, A., Gordon, D. R., & Shenhar, A. J. (1996). Simultaneous management: The key to excellence in capital projects. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), pp. 189–199.
- Lehmann, H. (2010). Research method: Grounded theory for descriptive and exploratory case studies. In The Dynamics of International Information Systems, Anatomy of a Grounded Theory investigation. 1st edn. Springer, US, pp. 53–65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5750-4.
- Ling, F. Y. Y., & Liu, M. (2004). Using neural network to predict performance of design-build projects in Singapore. Building and Environment, 39(10), pp. 1263–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.02.008.
- Petlíková, K., & Jarský, Č. (2017). Modeling of the time structure of construction processes using neural networks. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 9(1), pp. 1559–1564. doi: 10.1515/otmcj-2016-0018.
- Project Management Institute. (2007). Construction Extension to the PMBOK Guide Third Edition. Project Management Institute.
- Project Management Institute. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK Guide). 5th edn. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
- Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Ragin, C. C. (1998). The logic of qualitative comparative analysis. International Review of Social History, 43(Supplement), pp. 105–124.
- Ragin, C. C. (2005). Fuzzy sets and social research. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), pp. 423–430.
- Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), pp. 291–310.
- Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21(5), pp. 679–706.
- Rihoux, B., & De Meur, G. (2008). Crisp set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). In: Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (eds.). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Published: 2009, pp. 33–68. doi: 10.4135/9781452226569.n3. Print ISBN: 9781412942355, Online ISBN: 9781452226569.
- Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), pp. 391–408.
- Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
- Verweij, S., & Gerrits, L. M. (2013). Understanding and researching complexity with qualitative comparative analysis: Evaluating transportation infrastructure projects, Evaluation, 19(1), pp. 40–55.
- Wright, E. R., Cho, K., & Hastak, M. (2014). Assessment of critical construction engineering and management aspects of nuclear power projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(4), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000286.
- Yin, R. K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Zhang, X. (2005). Improving concessionaire selection protocols in public/private partnered infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(5), pp. 670–679.