Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of growth regulators on the yield of sunflower hybrids in the steppe zone of Ukraine: analysis and forecast Cover

The influence of growth regulators on the yield of sunflower hybrids in the steppe zone of Ukraine: analysis and forecast

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Location of the study area and schematic diagram of the strip-plot arrangement of sunflower hybrid crops at the experimental fields of the Mykolaiv State Agricultural Research Station in 2019–2021

Table 1.

Main Timeline of the Experiments

YearSowing DateHarvest Date
201924/0426/08
202029/0422/08
202110/0512/09
Figure 2.

Climatic conditions of the sunflower growing season in 2019–2021: a – mean monthly air temperature (°C); b – precipitation amount (mm)

Figure 3.

Seasonal NDVI distribution of sunflower hybrids in the experimental field (2019)

Figure 4.

Seasonal NDVI distribution of sunflower hybrids in the experimental field (2020)

Figure 5.

Seasonal NDVI distribution of sunflower hybrids in the experimental field (2021)

Table 2.

Yield of Sunflower Hybrids Depending on Factors A (Hybrid), B (Plant Growth Regulator), and C (Study Year), (t/ha)

Hybrid (A)Regulator (B)201920202021Mean
OplotControl2.821.982.882.56
Architect™3.072.013.122.73
Helafit Combi3.102.043.112.75
HectorControl1.921.542.041.83
Architect™2.141.682.232.02
Helafit Combi2.101.722.222.01
DSL403Control2.441.832.542.27
Architect™2.551.882.862.43
Helafit Combi2.601.932.902.48
P64HE133Control2.711.902.922.51
Architect™2.881.953.052.63
Helafit Combi2.892.023.102.67
8KH477KLControl2.221.682.412.10
Architect™2.371.712.962.35
Helafit Combi2.371.743.092.40
Figure 6.

Effect of multifunctional plant growth regulators on the productivity increase of sunflower hybrids in the steppe zone

Table 3.

Results of Analysis of Variance (GLM) of the Effects of Year, Hybrid, and Plant Growth Regulator on Sunflower Yield under a Non-Replicated Strip-Plot Field Experiment

Source of variationdfSSMSFp
Year26.96183.4809131.2198< 0.0001
Hybrid42.97550.743928.0416< 0.0001
Regulator20.37220.18617.01500.0034
Hybrid × Regulator80.02190.00270.10330.9988
Error280.74280.0265
Table 4.

Least Significant Difference (LSD0.05), (t/ha)

Source of variationnLSD0.05, t/ha
Factor A (Hybrid)90.157
Factor B (Regulator)150.122
Factor C (Year)150.122
Interaction A×B30.272
Table 5.

Multiple Comparison of Mean Yield Values by Regulator Factor (Tukey HSD, p ≤ 0.05)

RegulatorYield, t/ha (mean)Δ to Control, t/haΔ, %Tukey group
Control2.33a
Architect™2.51+0.18+7.7b
Helafit Combi2.55+0.22+9.4b
Table 6.

Effect of Foliar Application of Plant Growth Regulators on Sunflower Yield (Average for 2019–2021)

HybridControlArchitect™Helafit CombiΔA, t/haΔA, %ΔH, t/haΔH, %
Oplot2.562.732.75+0.17+6.6+0.19+7.4
Hector1.832.022.01+0.19+10.4+0.18+9.8
DSL4032.272.432.48+0.16+7.0+0.21+9.3
P64HE1332.512.632.67+0.12+4.8+0.16+6.4
8KH477KL2.102.352.40+0.25+11.9+0.30+14.3

[i] Note: ΔA – yield increase from Architect™; ΔH – yield increase from Helafit Combi

Figure 7.

Spatial differentiation of the generalised values of the NDVI for sunflower hybrids from 2019 to 2021: a – cartograms; b – histogram; c – cumulative curve

Figure 8.

Cartograms of distribution of the crop yields of sunflower hybrids in 2019–2021

Figure 9.

Spatial differentiation of sunflower hybrid productivity in 2019–2021: a – graph of spatial differentiation; b – histogram; c – cumulative curve

Table 7.

Three-way ANOVA results for sunflower yield explained by Hybrid, Year and NDVIphase indices (GLM)

Source of variationdfSSMSFpη2Partial η2
Hybrid (A)42.980.74528.04<0.00010.190.31
Year (C)26.963.481131.22<0.00010.440.67
NDVI phase (D)21.840.92034.67<0.00010.120.29
A × C80.640.0803.020.0110.040.09
A × D80.510.0642.410.0310.030.07
C × D40.730.1826.870.00030.050.14
A × C × D160.580.0361.360.1480.040.06
Error2105.570.0265
Total25419.811.00

[i] Note: η2 – proportion of explained variance; Partial η2 – partial effect size of factors in the GLM model

Table 8.

Parameters of OLS Models for Forecasting Yield of Sunflower Hybrids Based on Phase-Specific NDVI Indices (Combined Data for 2019–2021)

Hybridβ 0β1 NDVI16-19β2 NDVI61-67β3 NDVI79-80R2RMSEMAEMAPE, %
8KH477KL−1.96016.7807.098−0.5830.9790.0780.0622.81
DSL403−1.3631.4546.0679.5980.9720.0720.0522.33
Hector−0.60914.5564.232−2.9250.9190.0760.0512.60
Oplot−0.1069.7870.82216.5520.9520.1130.0923.90
P64HE133−1.54718.0345.0346.5330.9780.0760.0562.44
Figure 10.

Level of approximation of the universal yield forecasting model for the sunflower hybrid Oplot based on data from 2019–2021

Table 9.

Parameters of OLS Models for Forecasting Yield of Sunflower Hybrids Based on the Integrated NDVIyear Index (Differentiated by Year-Type Moisture Regime, 2019–2021)

YearHybridnabR2RMSEMAEMAPE, %
20198KH477KL740.4026.3460.9730.0100.0080.34
DSL4031260.5066.5350.8320.0160.0130.50
Hector1270.2815.8380.8570.0160.0120.58
Oplot1830.4028.4150.8320.0300.0230.76
P64HE1331120.4507.8160.9310.0170.0140.50
20208KH477KL4170.4304.6450.7120.0250.0201.19
DSL4036180.3105.6140.8590.0190.0140.72
Hector6980.2994.9050.8480.0170.0120.73
Oplot8180.2576.4300.8990.0220.0180.87
P64HE1335780.4345.3770.6890.0270.0211.08
20218KH477KL3630.7056.5440.8330.0430.0351.26
DSL4033640.2197.7910.9780.0230.0130.45
Hector3630.5185.8530.9860.0240.0170.78
Oplot3610.3459.9430.9690.0350.0280.94
P64HE1333640.1668.6790.9660.0260.0150.51
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2026-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8589 | Journal ISSN: 1230-7831
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 23
Published on: May 4, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2026 Vitalii Pichura, Larysa Potravka, Yevhenii Domaratskiy, Roman Stupen, Denys Breus, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.