Improving Deterministic Air Quality Forecasts Using Supervised Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
By: Lech Łobocki
References
- BAKLANOV A., ZHANG Y. 2020. Advances in air quality modeling and forecasting. Global Transitions 2: 261–270.
- BREIMAN L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 1: 5–32.
- CHEN T., GUESTRIN C. 2016. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794, doi: 10.1145/2939672.29397.
- CHENG H., SANDU A. 2009. Uncertainty quantification and apportionment in air quality models using the polynomial chaos method. Environmental Modelling & Software 24, 917–925.
- CZERNECKI B., MAROSZ M., JĘDRUSZKIEWICZ J. 2021. Assessment of machine learning algorithms in short-term forecasting of PM10 and PM2.5: Concentrations in selected Polish agglomerations. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 21, 7: 200586.
- FRIEDMAN J. 2001. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics 29, 5: 1189–1232.
- GILLIAM R.C., HOGREFE C., GODOWITCH J.M., NAPELENOK S., MATHUR R., RAO S.T. 2015. Impact of inherent meteorology uncertainty on air quality model predictions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 12, 259–280.
- GLAHN H.R., LOWRY D.A. 1972. The use of model output statistics in objective weather forecasting, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 11, 8: 1203–1211.
- GORZELNIK T., BOGACKI M., OLENIACZ R. 2024. Identification of factors influencing episodes of high PM10 concentrations in the air in Krakow (Poland) using random forest method. Sustainability 16, 20: 9015.
- HANNA S.R. 1993. Uncertainties in air quality model predictions. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 62, 3–20.
- HOLNICKI P., NAHORSKI Z. 2015. Emission data uncertainty in urban air quality modeling: Case study. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 20: 583–597.
- JIANG L., BESSAGNET B., MELEUX F., TOGNET F., COUVIDAT F. 2020. Impact of physics parameterizations on high-resolution air quality simulations over the Paris region. Atmosphere 11: 618.
- KAMINSKI J.W., NEARY L., STRUZEWSKA J., MCCONNELL J.C., LUPU A., JAROSZ J., TOYOTA K., GONG S.L., COTE J., LIU X., CHANCE K., RICHTER A. 2008. GEM-AQ, an on-line global multiscale chemical weather modelling system: Model description and evaluation of gas phase chemistry processes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 12: 3255–3281.
- KAWKA M., STRUZEWSKA J., KAMINSKI J.W. 2023. Downscaling of regional air quality model using Gaussian plume model and random forest regression. Atmosphere 14, 7: 1171.
- KLEIN W.H., LEWIS B., ENGER I. 1959. Objective prediction of five-day mean temperatures during winter. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 16, 6: 672–682.
- KONOVALOV I.B., BEEKMANN M., MELEUX F., DUTOT A., FORET G. 2009. Combining deterministic and statistical approaches for PM10 forecasting in Europe. Atmospheric Environment 43: 6425–6434.
- KUJAWSKA J., KULISZ M., OLESZCZUK P., CEL W. 2022. Machine learning methods to forecast the concentration of PM10 in Lublin, Poland. Energies 15, 17: 6428.
- LIU T.H., JENG F-T., HUANG H.-C., BERGE E., CHANG J.S., 2001. Influences of initial conditions and boundary conditions on regional and urban scale Eulerian air quality transport model simulations. Chemosphere: Global Change Science 3: 175–183.
- MÉNDEZ M., MERAYO M.G., NÚÑEZ M. 2023. Machine learning algorithms to forecast air quality: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 56, 9: 10031–10066.
- NEAL L.S., AGNEW P., MOSELEY S., ORDÓÑEZ C., SAVAGE N.H. TILBEE M. 2014. Application of a statistical post-processing technique to a gridded, operational, air quality forecast. Atmospheric Environment, 98: 385–393.
- PETETIN H., BOWDALO D., BRETONNIÈRE P.A., GUEVARA M., JORBA O., ARMENGO J.M., SAMSO CABRE M., SERRADELL K., SORET A., GARCIA-PANDO C.P., 2022. Model output statistics (MOS) applied to Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) O3 forecasts: Trade-offs between continuous and categorical skill scores. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22: 11603–11630.
- PISONI E., ALBRECHT D., MARAB T.A., ROSATI R., TARANTOLA S., THUNIS P. 2018. Application of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to the air quality SHERPA modelling tool. Atmospheric Environment 183: 84–93.
- RAO S.T., LUO H., ASTITHA M., HOGREFE C., GARCIA V., MATHUR R. 2020. On the limit to the accuracy of regional-scale air quality models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20: 1627–1639.
- RITTER M., MÜLLER M.D., JORBA O., PARLOW E., SALLY LIU, L.-J. 2012. Impact of chemical and meteorological boundary and initial conditions on air quality modeling: WRF-Chem sensitivity evaluation for a European domain. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 119: 59–70.
- RYBARCZYK Y., ZALAKEVICIUTE R. (2018). Machine learning approaches for outdoor air quality modelling: a systematic review. Applied Sciences 8: 2570.
- SILVEIRA C., FERREIRA J., MIRANDA A.I. 2019. The challenges of air quality modelling when crossing multiple spatial scales. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 12: 1003–1017.
- SMOLA A.J., SCHÖLKOPF B. 2004. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing 14, 3: 199–222.
- STRUZEWSKA J., KAMINSKI J.W., JEFIMOW M., 2016. Application of model output statistics to the GEM-AQ high resolution air quality forecast. Atmospheric Research 181: 186–199.
- TAN J., ZHANG Y., MA W., YU Q., CHEN L. 2015. Impact of spatial resolution on air quality simulation: A case study in a highly industrialized area in Shanghai, China. Atmospheric Pollution Research 6: 322–333.
- ZAREBA M., DLUGOSZ H., DANEK T., WEGLINSKA E. 2023. Big-data-driven machine learning for enhancing spatiotemporal air pollution pattern analysis. Atmosphere 14, 4: 760.
- ZHALEHDOOST A., AND TALEAI M. 2025. Unravelling the importance of spatial and temporal resolutions in modeling urban air pollution using a machine learning approach. Scientific Reports 15: 27708.
- ZHANG Y., SEIGNEUR C., BOCQUET M., MALLET V., BAKLANOV A., 2012. Real-time air quality forecasting. Part I. history, techniques, and current status. Atmospheric Environment 60: 632–655.
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 29
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Lech Łobocki, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.