Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Response of the Common Buzzard Buteo Buteo to The Changes In Abundance Of Small Mammals Cover

Numerical Response of the Common Buzzard Buteo Buteo to The Changes In Abundance Of Small Mammals

By: László Tóth  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. Andersson, M. & Erlinge, S. 1977. Influence of predation on rodent populations. - Oikos 29: 591-597.10.2307/3543597
  2. Butet, A. & Leroux. A. B. A. 1993. Effect of prey on a predators breeding success - a 7-year study on Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) and Montagus Harrier (Circus pygargus) in a west France marsh. - Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology 14: 857-865.
  3. Chalfoun, A. D., Thompson, F. R. & Ratnaswamy M. J. 2002. Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. - Conservation Biology 16: 306-318.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00308.x
  4. Csörgő, T., Zornánszky, R., Szép, T. & Fehérvári, P. 2012. Should the Common Buzzard be hunted? - Ornis Hungarica 20(2): 1-12.10.2478/orhu-2013-0006
  5. Doyle, F. I. & Smith, J. M. N. 1994. Population responses of northern goshawks to the 10-year cycle in numbers of snowshoe hares. - Studies of Avian Biology 16: 122-129.
  6. Doyle, F. I. & Smith, J. N. M. 2001. Raptors and scavengers. - In: Krebs, C. J., Boutin, S. & Boonstra, R. (eds.) Ecosystem dynamics of the boreal forest. The Kluane Project. - Oxford University Press, pp. 377-404.
  7. Ecsedi, Z. & Sándor, I. 2004. Egerészölyv [Common Buzzard]. - In: Ecsedi, Z. (ed.) 2004. A Hortobágy madárvilága [Birds of Hortobágy]. - Hortobágy Természetvédelmi Egyesület, Winter Fair, Balmazújváros- Szeged, pp. 212-214. (in Hungarian) Goszczynski, J. 1977. Connections between predatory birds and mammals and their prey. - Acta Theriologica 22: 399-430.
  8. Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. - Canadian Entomologist 91: 385-398.10.4039/Ent91385-7
  9. Jędrzejewski, W., Szymura, A. & Jędrzejewska, B. 1994. Reproduction and food of the Buzzard Buteo buteo in relation to the abundance of rodents and birds in Białowieża National Park, Poland. - Ethology Ecology & Evolution 6: 179-190.
  10. Keith, L. B., Todd, A. W. & Brand, C. J. 1977. An analysis of predation during a cyclic fluctuation on snowshoe hares. - 13th International Congress of Game Biology 13: 163-174.
  11. Korpimäki, E. 1985. Rapid tracking of microtine populations by their avian predators: possible evidence for stabilizing predation. - Oikos 45: 281-284.10.2307/3565716
  12. Korpimäki, E. 1994. Rapid or delayed tracking of multi- annual vole cycles by avian predators? - Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 619-628.10.2307/5228
  13. Korpimäki, E. & Krebs, C. J. 1996. Predation and population cycles in small mammals. A reassessment of the predation hypothesis. - BioScience 46: 754-764.10.2307/1312851
  14. Korpimäki, E. & Norrdahl, K. 1991. Numerical and functional responses of Kestrels, Short-Eared Owls, and Long-Eared Owls to vole densities. - Ecology 72: 814-826.
  15. Korpimäki, E., Norrdahl, K. & Rinta-Jaskari, T. 1991. Responses of stoats and least weasels to fluctuating food abundance: is the low phase of the vole cycle due to mustelid predation? - Oecologia 88: 552-561.10.1007/BF0031771928312626
  16. Kostrzewa, A. & Kostrzewa, R. 1990. The relationship of spring and summer weather with density and breeding performance of the Buzzard Buteo buteo, Goshawk Accipiter gentilis and Kestrel Falco tinnunculus. - Ibis 132: 550-559.
  17. Krebs, C. J. 1966. Demographic changes in fluctuating populations of Microtus californicus. - Ecological Monographs 36: 239-273.10.2307/1942418
  18. Krebs, C. J. 1996. Population cycles revisited. - Journal of Mammalogy 77: 8-24. Luttich, S. N., Keith, L. B. & Stephenson, J. D. 1971.
  19. Population dynamics of the Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) at Rochester, Alberta. - The Auk 88: 75-87.10.2307/4083962
  20. Millon, A. & Bretagnolle, V. 2008. Predator population dynamics under a cyclic prey regime: numerical responses, demographic parameters and growth rates. - Oikos 117: 1500-1510.
  21. Millon, A., Arroyo, B. E. & Bretagnolle, V. 2008. Variable but predictable prey availability affects predator breeding success: natural versus experimental evidence. - Journal of Zoology 275: 349-358.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00447.x
  22. Nielsen, O. 1999. Gyrfalcon predation on ptarmigan: numerical and functional responses. - Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 1034-1050.10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00351.x
  23. O’Donoghue, M., Boutin, S. & Krebs, C. J. 1997. Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. - Oikos 80: 150-162.10.2307/3546526
  24. Palatitz, P. & Tóth, L. 2003. Diet variations of three sympatric raptor species in relation to small rodent densities. - 6th World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls (Budapest, Hungary), Abstracts: p. 5.
  25. R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http:// www.R-project.org/.
  26. Reif, V., Tornberg, R., Jungell, S. & Korpimäki, E. 2001. Diet variation of Common Buzzards in Finland supports the alternative prey hypothesis. - Ecography 24: 267-274.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00199.x
  27. Rohner, C. 1995. Great Horned Owls and Snowshoe Hares: what causes the time lag in the numerical response of predators to cyclic prey? - Oikos 74: 61-68.10.2307/3545675
  28. Rohner, C. 1996. The numerical response of Great Horned Owls to the Snowshoe Hare cycle: consequences of non-territorial ʻfloaters’ on demography. - Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 359-370.10.2307/5882
  29. Rohner, C., Doyle, F. I. & Smith, J. N. M. 2001. Great Horned Owls. - In: Krebs, C. J., Boutin, S. & Boonstra, R. (eds.) Ecosystem dynamics of the boreal forest. The Kluane Project. - Oxford University Press, pp. 340-376.
  30. Salamolard, M., Butet, A., Leroux, A. & Bretagnolle, V. 2000. Responses of an avian predator to variations in prey density at a temperate latitude. - Ecology 81: 2428-2441.10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2428:ROAAPT]2.0.CO;2
  31. Smout, S., Asseburg, C., Matthiopoulos, J., Fernández, C. & Redpath, S. 2010. The functional response of a generalist predator. - PLoS ONE 5(5): e10761. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.001076110.1371/journal.pone.0010761
  32. Solomon, M. E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. - Journal of Animal Ecology 18: 1-35.10.2307/1578
  33. Tóth, L. 2009. Egerészölyv [Common Buzzard]. - In: Csörgő, T., Karcza, Zs., Halmos, G., Magyar, G., Gyurácz, J., Szép, T., Bankovics, A., Schmidt, A. & Schmidt, E. (eds.) 2009. Magyar madárvonulási atlasz [Hungarian Bird Migration Atlas]. - Kossuth Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 221-224. (in Hungarian with English Summary) Tóth, L. & Palatitz, P. 2003. Effect of rodent cycles on the reproduction of Buzzard and Goshawk. - 6th World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls (Budapest, Hungary) Abstracts: p. 5.
  34. Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. - 4th Edition, Springer, New York Village, A. 1987. Numbers, territory-size and turnover of Short-eared Owls Asio flammeus in relation to vole abundance. - Ornis Scandinavica 18: 198-204.
  35. Yodzis, P. 1994. Predator-prey theory and management of multispecies fisheries. - Ecological Applications 4: 51-58. ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod/ http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/res40.pl?page=gsod. html 10.2307/1942114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2014-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2061-9588 | Journal ISSN: 1215-1610
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 56
Published on: Dec 4, 2014
Published by: MME/BirdLife Hungary
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 László Tóth, published by MME/BirdLife Hungary
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.