Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does Corporate Entrepreneurship Moderate the Relationship Between Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Company Performance? Cover

Does Corporate Entrepreneurship Moderate the Relationship Between Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Company Performance?

By:   
Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Abou-Moghli, A. A., & Al-Abdallah, G. (2018). Evaluating the association between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(4), 1–11.
  2. Afshar Jahanshahi, A., Nawaser, K., & Brem, A. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: an analysis of top management teams in SMEs. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(4), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2017-0397
  3. Ahmed, U. Shah, S. A., Qureshi, M. A., Shah, M.H., & Khuwaja, F. M. (2018). Nurturing innovation performance through corporate entrepreneurship: The moderation of employee engagement. Studies in Business and Economics, 13(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2018-0017
  4. Bau, F. & Wagner, K. (2015). Measuring corporate entrepreneurship culture. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 25(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976268.00021
  5. Boukamcha, F. (2019). The effect of transformational leadership on corporate entrepreneurship in Tunisian SMEs. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0262
  6. Byron, K. & Post, C. (2016). Women on Boards of Directors and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165
  7. Cambrea, D.R., Lussana, G., Quarato, F. & Varacca Capello, P. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the fashion and luxury industry. Corporate Ownership and Control, 15(1), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p2
  8. Camelo-Ordaz, C., Hernández-Lara, A.B. & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 683–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510613726
  9. Cannella, A.A., Park, J.H. & Lee, H.U. (2008). Top Management Team Functional Background Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Roles of Team Member Colocation and Environmental Uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.33665310
  10. Carpenter, M.A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.226
  11. Certo, S.T., Lester, H.R., Dalton, C.M. & Dalton, D.R. (2006). Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00612.x
  12. Chatman, J.A. & Flynn, F.J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069440
  13. Chen, W.H. & Liu, Y.Y. (2018). How does top management team diversity matter in abruptly dynamic environments? Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(3), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2018.6579
  14. Díaz-Fernández, M.C., González Rodríguez, M.R. & Simonetti, B. (2020). Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory. European Management Journal, 38(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.006
  15. Díaz-Fernández, M.C., González-Rodríguez, M.R. & Simonetti, B. (2015). Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change. Quality and Quantity, 49(3), 1305–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4
  16. Dyduch, W. (2008). Corporate Entrepreneurship Measurement for Improving Organizational Performance. Journal of Economics & Management, 4(12), 15–40.
  17. Elia, G. & Margherita, A. (2018). Assessing the maturity of crowdventuring for corporate entrepreneur-ship. Business Horizons, 61(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.008
  18. Fis, A.M. & Cetindamar, D. (2021). Unlocking the Relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 11(1), 1–22.
  19. Fung, H.G., Qiao, P., Yau, J. & Zeng, Y. (2020). Leader narcissism and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from Chinese firms. International Business Review, 29(1), 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101632
  20. Gil, A., Brouthers, L.E. & Keig, D.L (2019). Top management team diversity, individualism–collectivism, and MNE performance. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 19(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595819870819
  21. Glinyanova, M., Bouncken, R.B., Tiberius, V. & Cuenca Ballester, A.C. (2021). Five decades of corporate entrepreneurship research: measuring and mapping the field. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(4), 1731–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00711-9
  22. Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159303
  23. Heavey, C. & Simsek, Z. (2013). Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12033
  24. He, J., Li, L. & Li, W.N. (2016). Study on TMT Heterogeneity’s Effects on Corporate Performance from the Perspective of Leadership Structure. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4, 148-156.
  25. Hsieh, Y.T., Chen, T.K., Tseng, Y.J. & Lin, R.C. (2018). Top Management Team Characteristics and Accrual-Based Earnings Management. International Journal of Accounting, 53(4), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2018.11.004
  26. Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N.H. & Li, Y. (2021). Sustainable leadership in frontier Asia region: Managerial discretion and environmental innovation. Sustainability, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095002
  27. Jiang, W., Wang, L, Chu, Z. & Zheng, C. (2020). How Does CEO Regulatory Focus Matter? The Impacts of CEO Promotion and Prevention Focus on Firm Strategic Change. Group and Organization Management, 45(3), 386–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119891268
  28. Kakapour, S., Morgan, T., Parsinejad, S., & Wieland, A. (2016). Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in Iran: the role of strategic orientation and opportunity recognition. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 28(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2016.1168676
  29. Kamran, A. (2012). The Role of TMT in Norwegian High-Tech Startups: An Explorative Analysis of Top Management Teams and Firm’s Performance in light of Upper Echelon. Diversity & Performance theories and by utilizing elementary and advance statistical techniques.
  30. Kaya, N. (2006). The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneur-ship on firm performance: Evidence from Turkish firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(12), 2074–2090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601000204
  31. Kock, A. & Talke, K. (2012). Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Strategic Direction, 28(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00851.x
  32. Kokot, K., Tipurić, D., & Klačmer Čalopa, M. (2021). Upper Echelon Theory: A Review and Future Research Agenda. International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management & Entrepreneurship, 123–135, 23 – 24 April 2021, Dubrovnik.
  33. Kolev, K.D. & McNamara, G. (2020). Board demography and divestitures: The impact of gender and racial diversity on divestiture rate and divestiture returns. Long Range Planning, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.05.001
  34. Kontić, L., Vidicki, D. & Domanović, V. (2017). Testing Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument in Transition. Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting. 3 (1), 67–78.
  35. Kuratko, D. F. (2017) Corporate entrepreneurship 2.0: Research development and future directions. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 13(6), 441–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000082
  36. Kuratko, D.F. & Morris, M.H. (2018). Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Critical Challenge for Educators and Researchers. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737291
  37. Kuratko, D.F., Montagno R.V. & Hornsby J.S. (1990). Developing an Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for an Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11, Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship, 49-58.
  38. Landis, R.S. & Dunlap, W.P. (2000). Moderated Multiple Regression Tests Are Criterion Specific. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 254–266.
  39. Lo, F.Y., Wang, Y. & Zhan, W. (2019). Does TMT cultural diversity contribute to firm performance and do social-isation and tenure matter? A test of two competing perspectives. Personnel Review, 49(1), 324–348.
  40. Long-Zeng, V., Li-Qun, W. & Chung-Ming, L. (2017). TMT Educational and Functional Background Diversity, Team Mechanisms and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of CEO Empowering Leadership. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2010.54498889
  41. Lovrinčević, M. (2012) Međuovisnost korporativnog poduzetništva i stakeholderske orijentacije velikih hrvatskih poduzeća. PhD Thesis. University of Split, Croatia.
  42. Magnanelli, B.S., Paolucci, G. & Pirolo, L. (2021). Diversity in boardrooms and firm performance: The role of tenure and educational level of board members. Corporate Board role duties and composition, 17(3), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv17i3art3
  43. Marimuthu, M. & Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Ethnic and Gender Diversity in Boards of Directors and Their Relevance to Financial Performance of Malaysian Companies. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3), 138-149.
  44. Mohr, A. & Batsakis, G. (2019). The Contingent Effect of TMT International Experience on Firms. Internationalization Speed. British Journal of Management, 30(4), 869–887.
  45. Naranjo-Gil, D., Hartmann, F. & Maas, V. S. (2008). Top management team heterogeneity, strategic change and operational performance. British Journal of Management, 19(3), 222–234.
  46. Narodne novine (2016) Pravilnik o znanstvenim i umjetničkim područjima, poljima i granama: Narodne novine 34/16
  47. Neely, B.H., Lovelace, J.B., Cowen, A.P. & Hiller, N.J. (2020). Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029–1062.
  48. Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316.
  49. Nielsen, S. & Nielsen, B. B. (2013). Research Notes and Commentaries Top Management Team Nationality Diversity and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 373–382.
  50. Ormiston, M.E., Wong, E.M. & Ha, J. (2021). The role of CEO emotional stability and team heterogeneity in shaping the top management team affective tone and firm performance relationship. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101543
  51. Othman, J. & Zakaria, Z. (2012). The Dimensions of Corporate Entrepreneurship and The Performance of Established Organization. Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(2), 111-131.
  52. Patzelt, H., Zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. & Nikol, P. (2008). Top management teams, business models, and performance of biotechnology ventures: An upper echelon perspective. British Journal of Management, 19(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00552.x
  53. Pemer, F., Börjeson, L. & Werr, A. (2020). The role of chief executive tenure for public organizations’ hiring of management consultants. Governance, 33(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12422
  54. Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational Demography: Implications for Management. California Management Review, 28(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165170
  55. Pitcher, P. & Smith, A.D. (2001). Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies. Organization Science. 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.1.10120
  56. Rababah, N.M. (2019). CEO-TMT Exchange, TMT Psychological Empowerment and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of TMT Incentive Pay. Turk Turizm Arastirmalari Dergisi, 2(1), 23–38.
  57. Ruiz-Jiménez, J.M., Fuentes-Fuentes, M. & Ruiz-Arroyo, M. (2016). Knowledge Combination Capability and Innovation: The Effects of Gender Diversity on Top Management Teams in Technology-Based Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.003
  58. Sakhdari, K. (2016). Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Review and Future Research Agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8), 296–303.
  59. Setiawan, H. & Erdogan, B. (2018). Key factors for successful corporate entrepreneurship: a study of Indonesian contractors. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484849
  60. Shaw, E., O’Loughlin, A. & McFadzean, E. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 2: a role- and process-based approach. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(4), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060510627786
  61. Su, Z., Yang, J. & Wang, Q. (2022). The Effects of Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Shared Vision on Entrepreneurial Bricolage in New Ventures: An Attention-Based View. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4), 1262–1275.
  62. Tadi, M. (2005). Moderatorski i medijacijski utjecaj samopoštovanja na odnos temeljnih crta ličnosti i never-balnih socijalnih vještina. Master thesis. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Croatian Studies. Croatia
  63. Talke, K., Salomo, S. & Rost, K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907–918.
  64. Tanikawa, T. & Jung, Y. (2016). Top management team (TMT) tenure diversity and firm performance: examining the moderating effect of TMT average age. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(3), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2014-0739
  65. Tanikawa, T., Kim, S. & Jung, Y. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: exploring a function of age. Team Performance Management, 23(3–4), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06-2016-0027
  66. Tseng, C. & Tseng, C.C. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship as a strategic approach for internal innovation performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2018-0047
  67. Umrani, W.A., Kura, K.M. & Ahmed, U. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship and business performance. PSU Research Review, 2(1), 59–80.
  68. Uppal, N. (2020). CEO narcissism, CEO duality, TMT agreeableness and firm performance: An empirical investigation in auto industry in India. European Business Review, 32(4), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-06-2019-0121
  69. Urbano, D., Turro, A., Wright, M. & Zahra, S. (2022). Corporate entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Small Business Economics, 59(4), 1541-1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00590-6.
  70. Vučković, V. (2010). Političko-poslovni ciklusi: postoje li u Hrvatskoj? Privredna kretanja i ekonomska politika, 125 / 2010.
  71. Waldman, D.A., Javidan, M. & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.013
  72. Wang, Z., He, Q. & Zhou, P. (2016). Top Management Team Heterogeneity Influence on Technological Innovation - The Empirical Analysis on the IT Enterprises from Six Central Provinces. Fifteenth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, 356–366.
  73. Wrede, M. & Dauth, T. (2020). A temporal perspective on the relationship between top management team internationalization and firms’ innovativeness. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(4), 542–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3119
  74. Yamak, S., Nielsen, S. & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2014). The Role of External Environment in Upper Echelons Theory: A Review of Existing Literature and Future Research Directions. Group and Organization Management, 39(1), 69–109.
  75. Yoon, W., Kim, S.J. & Song, J. (2016). Top management team characteristics and organizational creativity. Review of Managerial Science, 10(4), 757–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0175-7
  76. Zahra, S.A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship= an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A
  77. Zahra, S.A. & Garvis, D.M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00036-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2026-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 155 - 166
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2026
Published on: May 27, 2026
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Karolina Kokot, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.