Psychological Capital and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity

Ghanizadeh, Sohrab; Ardabili, Farzad Sattari; Kheirandish, Mohammad; Rasouli, Eshagh; Hassanzadeh, Mohammad

doi:10.2478/orga-2022-0014

Abstract

Background and purpose: Today’s dynamic environment is increasingly pressuring public organizations to be simultaneously flexible and efficient. The purpose of this study was to examine the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity in the relationship between psychological capital and the perfor-mance of public organizations that have bureaucratic limitations to their activity and are not as competitive as the private sector.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed and distributed among the employees of Management and Planning Organizations in 31 provinces in Iran, and a total of 373 questionnaires were returned. The data was analysed using CFA to validate the measures, and then the mediating effects of organi-zational ambidexterity was tested.

Results: The results indicated the significant relationship between psychological capital and organizational performance (B=0.55) and the positive mediation effect of organizational ambidexterity on this relationship (0.333).

Conclusion: The findings can help managers of public organizations to enhance their organizational performance by strengthening psychological capital and ambidexterity.

References

Affum-Osei, E., Adom Asante, E., Kwarteng Forkouh, S., & Abdul-Nasiru, I. (2020). Career adaptability and ambidextrous behavior among customer-service representatives: the role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 40(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2019.1594241
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Moon, M. J., & Walker, R. M. (2010). Assessing organizational performance: Exploring differences between internal and external measures. International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967491003766533
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308329961
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2017). Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. Innovation Journal, 22(2), 1-28. https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_276592407385.P001/REF.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bryson, J. M., Boal, K. B., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). Strategic orientation and ambidextrous public organizations. In Conference Paper, Organisational Strategy, Structure and Process: A Reflection on the Research Perspective of Raymond Miles and Charles Snow, Cardiff University (pp. 3-5). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.568.8&rep=rep1&-type=pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cannaerts, N., Segers, J., & Henderickx, E. (2016). Ambidextrous design and public organizations: A comparative case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(7), 708-724. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0210
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cannaerts, N., Segers, J., & Warsen, R. (2020). Ambi-dexterity and public organizations: a configurational perspective. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 688-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1676272
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.042610.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2015). Exploration, exploitation, and public sector innovation: An organizational learning perspective for the public sector. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership and Governance, 39(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1011762
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Delaney, C. (2005). The spirituality scale: Development and psychometric testing of a holistic instrument to assess the human spiritual dimension. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010105276180
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21, 1263-1273. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0564
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113-1123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fiset, J., & Dostaler, I. (2017). Opening the black box of ambidexterity: Three product development stories. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(3), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1060
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.2307/259268
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ghanizadeh, S., Sattari-Ardabili, F., Kheirandish. M., Rasouli, E., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2020). Ambidexterity in Public Organizations with an Emphasis on Managers’ Psychological Capital. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(1), 72-88. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2021.60518
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209−226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gieske, H., Duijn, M., & van Buuren, A. (2020). Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: Innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities. Public Management Review, 22(3), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1588354
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gieske, H., van Meerkerk, I., & van Buuren, A. (2019). The impact of innovation and optimization on public sector performance: testing the contribution of connective, ambidextrous, and learning capabilities. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(2), 432-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1470014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of Psychology, 147(5), 435-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.71066310.1080/00223980.2012.710663
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair J. F., Ringle C. M., and Sarstedt M. (2011). PLSSEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–15210.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodgkinson, I., Ravishankar, M. N., & Aitken-Fischer, M. (2011). Ambidextrous capital in the airline industry. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2011, No. 1, pp. 1-6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2011.65869134
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jansen, J. J., van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jansen, J. J., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2015). The role of human resources and organizational factors in ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s1-s238. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.2015.54.issue-S1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kammerlander, N., Burger, D., Fust, A., & Fueglistaller, U. (2015). Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katou, A.A (2021). Building a multilevel integrated framework of ambidexterity: Τhe role of dynamically changing environment and human capital management in the performance of Greek firms. Global Business and Organizational Excellence: A Review of Research & Best Practices, 40(6): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22131
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kauppila, O. P., & Tempelaar, M. P. (2016). The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous behaviour and the supportive role of group managers’ leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1019-1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12192
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kline, M. A. (2015). How to learn about teaching: An evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000090
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Larson, M., & Luthans F. (2006). Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitudes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130010701
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, S. M., Hwang, T. & Choi, D. (2012). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decision, 50(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211194921
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lin, C. & Chen, M. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News, 30(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710722955
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Demirkan, I. (2007). The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Science, 53(10), 1645-1658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0712
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2014). Introduction. The Problem-solving Capacity of the Modern State: Governance Challenges and Administrative Capacities. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716365.003.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716365.003.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014920630629071210.1177/0149206306290712
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive Organization Behavior: Developing and Managing Psychological Strength. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.6640181
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007a). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007b). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personal Psychology, 60(3), 541-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Lester, P. B. (2006). Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305285335
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Markides, C., (2013). Business model innovation: what can the ambidexterity literature teach us? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0172
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., Golant, B., & Sillince, J. (2020). The role of innovation narratives in accomplishing organizational ambidexterity. Strategic Organization, 19(4), 693-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019897234
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: a conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Narangerel, E. O., & Semerci, A. B. (2020). The Effects of Workload, Work Control and Self-Efficacy in Decision Making on Decision Making Styles. Journal of Behavior Studies in Organizations, 3, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.32038/JBSO.2020.03.04
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Newman, A., Schwarz, S., & Borgia, D. (2013). How does microfinance enhance entrepreneurial out-comes in emerging economies? The mediating mechanisms of psychological and social capital. International Small Business Journal: Reasearching Entrepreneurship, 32(2), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613485611
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Norton, P. J., & Weiss, B. J. (2009). The role of courage on behavioral approach in a fear-eliciting situation: A proof-of-concept pilot study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(2), 212-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.07.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nowacki, C., & Monk, A. (2020). Ambidexterity in government: The influence of different types of legitimacy on innovation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103840
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pablo, A. L., Reay, T., Dewald, J. R. & Casebeer. A. L. (2007). Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 687-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420-1442. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0255
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peterson, S. J., & Byron, K. (2008). Exploring the role of hope in job performance: Results from four studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(6), 785-803. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.492
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plimmer, G., Bryson, J., & Teo, S. T. T. (2017). Opening the black box: The mediating roles of organisational systems and ambidexterity in the HRM-performance link in public sector organisations. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1434-1451. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2016-0275
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pouramini, Z., Fayyazi, M., & Yahyavi Ghasem Gheshlaghi, M. (2018). The Relation between Hope and Pliability with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Management and Business Research Quarterly, 7, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.32038/mbrq.2018.07.03
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qiu, X. W., Yan, X. C., & Lv, Y. L. (2015). The effect of psychological capital and knowledge sharing on innovation performance for professional technical employees. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(4), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.84055
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.042810.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rinaldi, M., Montanari, R., & Bottani, E. (2015). Improving the efficiency of public administrations through business process reengineering and simulation: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 21(2), 419-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2014-0054
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press. Simon and Schuster Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of management studies, 46(5), 864-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharma, A., Gautam, H., & Chaudhary, R. (2020). Red Tape and Ambidexterity in Government Units. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 736-743. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1652314
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, E., & Umans, T. (2015). Organizational Ambidexterity at the Local Government Level: The Effects of Managerial Focus. Public Management Review, 17(6), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.849292
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sweetman, D., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Luthans, B. C. (2011). Relationship between positive psychological capital and creative performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.175
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2017). Human resource flexibility and performance in the hotel industry: The role of organizational ambidexterity. Personnel Review, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2015-0315
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Umans, T., Smith, E., Andersson, W., and Planken, W. (2020). Top management teams’ shared leadership and ambidexterity: The role of management control systems. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 444-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318783539
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863996
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Venkatraman, N., Lee, C. H., & Iyer, B. (2007). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. In Unpublished Manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/view-doc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.1790andrep=rep1and-type=pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Ambidexterity in product innovation management: the direct and contingent effects on product development performance. https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(b8105c72-a6a1-44af-9707-025864e6ce12).html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Public responsiveness of government organizations: Testing a preliminary model. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(2), 215-240. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576310204
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305562
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58-76. http://doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wright, P. M., Kacmar, K. M., McMahan, G. C., & DeLeeuw, K. L. (1995). P = f(M × A): Cognitive ability as a moderator of the relationship between personality and job performance. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1129-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90025-X
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, H., & Li, J. (2008). Untangling the effects of over-exploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34(5), 951-925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321547
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emo-tional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 545-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00051-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Psychological Capital and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity

Abstract

Paradigm

My account