Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of the Project Management Methodology Formation’s Method Cover

Application of the Project Management Methodology Formation’s Method

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Agile Business Consortium (2014). The DSDM Agile Project Framework. Retrieved from https://www.agile-business.org/page/TheDSDMAgileProjectFramework
  2. Anderson, D. J. (2010). Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business. Washington: Blue Hole Press.
  3. OGC (2017). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. London: TSO.
  4. Beck, K. (2004). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  5. Boehm, B. & Turner, R. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods. Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2004.131750310.1109/ICSE.2004.1317503
  6. IEEE (2014). Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK V3.0). IEEE Computer Society Press. 335 p.
  7. Bushuev, S. D., & Neizvestnyy, S. I. (2013). The project management methodologies genome as the universal knowledge model. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 14, 15–18.
  8. Conforto E., Salum F., Amaral D., et al. (2014). Can Agile Project Management Be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.2141010.1002/pmj.21410
  9. Čelesnik, G., Radujković, M., & Vrečko, I. (2018). Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management. Organizacija, 51(4), 223-237. http://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-002310.2478/orga-2018-0023
  10. Gallup (2012). The cost of bad project management. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/business-journal/152429/cost-bad-project-management.aspx
  11. Gartner (2012). Survey shows why projects fail. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2034616
  12. Gorakavi, P. K. (2009). Build Your Project Using Feature Driven Development. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-usa.org/articles/A4_AboutFDD.pdf
  13. Harvard Business Review (2011). Why your IT project may be riskier than you think, Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2011/09/why-your-it-project-may-be-riskier-than-you-think
  14. ISO (2012). ISO 21500:2012, Guidance on project management
  15. Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377–1392. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.00510.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005
  16. Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). The impact of project methodologies on project success in different project environments. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(2), 364–388. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-002510.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-0025
  17. Kononenko, I., Aghaee, A., & Lutsenko, S. (2016). Application of the Project Management Methodology Synthesis Method with fuzzy input data. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/3(80), 32–39. http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.6567110.15587/1729-4061.2016.65671
  18. Kononenko, I.V. & Lutsenko, S.Yu. (2017). Method for selection of project management approach based on fuzzy concepts. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management, 2(1224), 8–17. http://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.210.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.2
  19. Kononenko, I.V. & Lutsenko, S.Yu. (2018a). Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on project management. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic Management, Portfolio, Program and Project Management, 2(1225), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.20998/12451010.20998/124510
  20. Kononenko, I. & Lutsenko, S. (2018b). The Project Management Methodology and Guide Formation’s Method. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT) (pp. 156–159). Lviv, Ukraine. http://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.852662110.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526621
  21. Kryvinska, N. (2012). Building Consistent Formal Specification for the Service Enterprise Agility Foundation. Journal of Service Science Research, 4(2), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-012-0010-510.1007/s12927-012-0010-5
  22. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2012). Insights and Trends: Current Portfolio, Programme, and Project Management Practices The third global survey on the current state of project management. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com.tr/en/publications/arastirmalar/pages/pwc-global-project-management-report-small.pdf
  23. Project Management Institute. (2017a). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)–Sixth Edition. New-town Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  24. Project Management Institute. (2017b). Agile Practice Guide. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  25. Rehman, A., & Hussain, R (2007). Software project management methodologies/frameworks dynamics “A comparative approach”. Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies (ICIET) (pp. 1–5). Karachi, Pakistan.10.1109/ICIET.2007.4381330
  26. SCRUMstudy (2016). A guide to the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOK Guide), 2016 Edition. SCRUMstudy, a brand of VMEdu, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona USA. 340 p. The Standish Group (2013). CHAOS Research Report 2013. Retrieved from https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/GENREF/S130301C.pdf
  27. Whitaker, S. (2014). The Benefits of Tailoring: Making a Project Management Methodology Fit. PMI White Paper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2019-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 286 - 308
Submitted on: Jun 14, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 12, 2019
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Igor Kononenko, Svitlana Lutsenko, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.