Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Regular and Temporary Employees in Project Organized Business Pay Different Attention to Preconditions for Learning Cover

Regular and Temporary Employees in Project Organized Business Pay Different Attention to Preconditions for Learning

Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. Argote, L., & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016). Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 146-159. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.00310.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.003
  2. Bakker, R. M. (2010). Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00281.x10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00281.x
  3. Bakker, R. M., Cambré, B., Korlaar, L., & Raab, J. (2011). Managing the project learning paradox: A set-theoretic approach toward project knowledge transfer. International Journal of Project Management, 29(5), 494-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.00210.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.002
  4. Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2013). Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.00910.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.009
  5. Carlsson, S. A. (2003). Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter-organizational networks. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(3), 194-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/kpm.17910.1002/kpm.179
  6. Cartwright, S., & Gale, A. (1995). Project management: different gender, different culture? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16(4), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/0143773951008905810.1108/01437739510089058
  7. Chen, J., Tong, L., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2007). Inter-organizational knowledge management in complex products and systems: Challenges and an exploratory framework, Journal of Technology Management in China, 2(2), 134-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1746877071075607710.1108/17468770710756077
  8. Ellström, P.-E. (1992). Kompetens, utbildning och lärande i arbetslivet: problem, begrepp och teoretiska perspektiv [Competence, education, and learning in working life: problems, concepts, and theoretical perspective] (1. uppl.). Stockholm: Publica: Allmänna förl. distributör.
  9. Ercikan, K., & Roth, W-M. (2006) What Good Is Polarizing Research Into Qualitative and Quantitative? Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X03500501410.3102/0013189X035005014
  10. Gale, A., & Cartwright, S. (1995). Women in project management: entry into a male domain?: a discussion on gender and organizational culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16(2), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/0143773951008226210.1108/01437739510082262
  11. Huckman, R. S., & Pisano, G. P. (2006). The Firm Specificity of Individual Performance: Evidence from Cardiac Surgery. Management Science, 52(4), 473-488. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.046410.1287/mnsc.1050.0464
  12. Illeris, K. (2007). Lärande [Learning] (2., rev. o.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  13. Illeris, K. (2009). Competence, learning and education: how can competences be learned, and how can they be developed in formal education? In K. Illeris (Ed.), International perspectives on competence development: developing skills and capabilities (pp. 83-98). London; New York: Routledge.
  14. Illeris, K. (2011). The fundamentals of workplace learning: understanding how people learn in working life. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  15. IPMA. (2015). Individual Competence Baseline. (M. Sedlmayer, Ed.) (Version 4.). Zurich: International Project Management Association (IPMA). Retrieved from http://products.ipma.world/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/IPMA_ICB_4_0_WEB.pdf
  16. Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (2012). Preface. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (Second., pp. vii-x). New York: Routledge.
  17. Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2006). What’s New in New Forms of Organizing? On the Construction of Gender in Project-Based Work. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 841-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00613.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00613.x
  18. Loewenthal, K. M. (2004). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  19. Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Managment, 11(4), 437-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-
  20. Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture. Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.10.4135/9781483328478
  21. Mertens, D. M. (2012) What comes First? The Paradigm or the Approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 255-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/155868981246157410.1177/1558689812461574
  22. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
  23. Mullaly, M. E. & Thomas, J. (2010). Re-thinking project management maturity: perspectives gained from explorations of fit and value. Paper presented at PMI® Research Conference: Defining the Future of Project Management, Washington, DC. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  24. Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00018-Q10.1016/0956-5221(95)00018-Q
  25. Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  26. Prencipe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project- based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1373-1394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-310.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3
  27. Ragab, M. A. F., & Arisha, A. (2013). Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 873-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2012-038110.1108/JKM-12-2012-0381
  28. Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., Laurent, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., & Newell, S. (2004). Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579-1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084060404800110.1177/0170840604048001
  29. Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351-365. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.351.1442910.1287/mnsc.49.4.351.14429
  30. STA. (2015a). Trafikverkets uppdrag [STA’s mission]. Retrieved November 4, 2015, from http://www.trafikverket.se/om-oss/var-verksamhet/korta-fakta-om-trafikverket/
  31. STA. (2015b). Vem gör vad av myndigheterna inom transportområdet? [Who is doing what among the authorities in the STA sector?] Retrieved November 4, 2015, from http://www.trafikverket.se/om-oss/var-verksamhet/korta-fakta-om-trafikverket/vem-gor-vad-avmyndigheterna/Vem-gor-vad-av-myndigheterna-inom-transportomradet/
  32. Turner, R. J., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-010.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0
  33. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 830-853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x
  34. Wagner, S. M., & Buko, C. (2005). An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge-Sharing in Networks. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, (November), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2005.04104003.x10.1111/j.1745-493X.2005.04104003.x
  35. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. (D. Whetten, Ed.) Foundation for Organizational Science. SAGE Publications.
  36. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. Applied social research methods series, 5 (2. ed., p. xi, 171 p.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 110
Submitted on: Jan 5, 2018
Accepted on: May 15, 2018
Published on: Jun 22, 2018
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Gunnar Augustsson, Maria Rasmusson, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.