
Figure 1
Geographical location of the North Pacific

Figure 2
Annual averaged significant wave height

Figure 3
Differences between WAVEWATCH III-simulated results and the ECMWF product

Figure 4
Locations of the North Pacific NDBC buoys and TAO buoys
Table 1
The number of buoy values (N)
| buoy | N | buoy | N | buoy | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51000 | 8745 | 46006 | 8734 | TAO1 | 8756 |
| 51003 | 8747 | 46070 | 8740 | TAO2 | 8755 |
| 51004 | 8750 | 46071 | 8741 | TAO3 | 8753 |
| 52200 | 8738 | 51101 | 8736 | TAO4 | 8751 |
| 46001 | 8735 | 21413 | 8739 | TAO5 | 8754 |
| 46002 | 8742 | 21419 | 8740 | TAO6 | 8755 |
| 46072 | 8730 | 52404 | 8733 | TAO7 | 8753 |
| 46075 | 8743 | 52401 | 8739 | ||
| 46005 | 8737 | 52402 | 8736 |
Table 2
Comparison of simulated values and buoy values
| buoy | ME (cm) | RMSD (cm) | R | SS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51000 | −13.64 | 21.69 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| 51003 | −11.11 | 17.32 | 0.89 | 0.84 |
| 51004 | −9.71 | 14.39 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| 52200 | 1.03 | 7.52 | 0.95 | 0.91 |
| 46001 | −3.53 | 15.38 | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| 46002 | −3.59 | 20.22 | 0.88 | 0.81 |
| 46072 | 12.18 | 32.19 | 0.90 | 0.71 |
| 46075 | −7.01 | 12.79 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| 46005 | −1.39 | 18.37 | 0.91 | 0.80 |
| 46006 | −6.87 | 23.52 | 0.89 | 0.68 |
| 46070 | −9.63 | 18.85 | 0.91 | 0.82 |
| 46071 | 3.75 | 19.33 | 0.88 | 0.77 |
| 51101 | −8.29 | 21.03 | 0.93 | 0.87 |
| 21413 | −5.63 | 15.98 | 0.88 | 0.84 |
| 21419 | −10.65 | 20.81 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| 52404 | −7.23 | 23.06 | 0.85 | 0.75 |
| 52401 | −2.00 | 9.67 | 0.95 | 0.90 |
| 52402 | −3.68 | 23.52 | 0.92 | 0.86 |

Figure 5
Distribution of the surface Stokes drift velocity

Figure 6
Comparison of the surface Stokes drift velocities and HYCOM velocities and parameter b (the red curve shows the change in the monthly averaged sea surface Stokes drift velocity with latitude; the black curve shows the change in monthly averaged HYCOM surface ocean velocity with latitude; the blue curve represents the change in the velocity ratio b with latitude)

Figure 7
Distribution of Stokes transport

Figure 8
Ekman-Stokes number variation curve (the curve shows the variation in the latitudinal average Ekman-Stokes number with latitude)

Figure 9
Es varies with wind speed and latitude (the black curve shows the zonal average at 15°N with wind speed; the red curve shows the zonal average at 30°N with wind speed; the green curve indicates the zonal average at 45°N with wind speed; the blue curve indicates the zonal average at 60°N with wind speed)

Figure 10
Langmuir number

Figure 11
Stokes drift influence depth

Figure 12
Differences between SST values simulated without the Stokes drift and OISST data

Figure 13
Optimal value α

Figure 14
Differences between SST values simulated with the Stokes drift and OISST data
Table 3
Comparison of simulated SST and buoy SST
| buoy | No Stokes drift | Stokes drift | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSD (°C) | R | SS | RMSD (°C) | R | SS | |
| 51000 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 51003 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| 51004 | 1.25 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| 52200 | 1.46 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 1.25 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
| 46001 | 1.23 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 1.13 | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| 46002 | 1.10 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| 46072 | 1.24 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| 46075 | 1.41 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 1.13 | 0.88 | 0.87 |
| 46005 | 2.06 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.87 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
| 46006 | 1.43 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 1.28 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| 46070 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.89 | 0.83 |
| 46071 | 0.53 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.52 | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| 51101 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| 21413 | 1.22 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.84 |
| 21419 | 1.16 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.09 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| 52404 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| 52401 | 1.07 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.77 |
| 52402 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.96 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| TAO1 | 0.65 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.52 | 0.92 | 0.89 |
| TAO2 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.88 | 0.84 |
| TAO3 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| TAO4 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.02 | 0.85 | 0.81 |
| TAO5 | 1.14 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.83 |
| TAO6 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| TAO7 | 1.21 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 1.03 | 0.88 | 0.82 |
| Average | 1.08 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.84 |
Table 4
Comparison of simulated subsurface temperature and buoy data
| buoy | No Stokes drift | Stokes drift | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSD (°C) | R | SS | RMSD (°C) | R | SS | |
| 51000 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| 51003 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.77 |
| 51004 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| 52200 | 0.53 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.51 | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| 46001 | 1.77 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 1.93 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| 46002 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.87 |
| 46072 | 1.67 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 1.55 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| 46075 | 2.11 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.43 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
| 46005 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 1.27 | 0.92 | 0.83 |
| 46006 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.85 |
| 46070 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.69 | 0.85 | 0.78 |
| 46071 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| 51101 | 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.91 |
| 21413 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| 21419 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| 52404 | 1.26 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 1.25 | 0.89 | 0.78 |
| 52401 | 1.64 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.81 |
| 52402 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 0.89 |
| TAO1 | 1.74 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.34 | 0.85 | 0.86 |
| TAO2 | 0.52 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.89 |
| TAO3 | 1.09 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| TAO4 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.88 |
| TAO5 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| TAO6 | 1.37 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 1.13 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| TAO7 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 1.03 | 0.83 | 0.87 |
| Average | 1.06 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 1.05 | 0.85 | 0.85 |

Figure 15
Comparison of simulated and buoy-measured temperature profiles
Table 5
RMSD of experiments E-1, E-2, E-3, and E-4 (°C)
| Buoy | E-1 | E-2 | E-3 | E-4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51000 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| 51003 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.83 |
| 51004 | 1.12 | 1.22 | 1.24 | 1.19 |
| 52200 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.33 | 1.32 |
| 46001 | 1.13 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.15 |
| 46002 | 0.91 | 1.04 | 1.02 | 0.93 |
| 46072 | 1.01 | 1.19 | 1.17 | 1.12 |
| 46075 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.15 | 1.20 |
| 46005 | 1.87 | 1.82 | 1.80 | 1.75 |
| 46006 | 1.28 | 1.39 | 1.35 | 1.34 |
| 46070 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.65 |
| 46071 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.58 |
| 51101 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.83 |
| 21413 | 0.99 | 1.13 | 1.11 | 1.08 |
| 21419 | 1.09 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| 52404 | 0.83 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 0.98 |
| 52401 | 0.90 | 1.13 | 1.12 | 1.10 |
| 52402 | 0.96 | 1.11 | 1.09 | 1.04 |
| TAO1 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.55 |
| TAO2 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 |
| TAO3 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.87 |
| TAO4 | 1.02 | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.16 |
| TAO5 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.04 |
| TAO6 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.92 |
| TAO7 | 1.03 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 1.14 |
| Average | 0.95 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 1.02 |

Figure 16
Simulated results of different Stokes drift parameterization schemes