Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prompt gamma-ray methods for industrial process evaluation: A simulation study Cover

Prompt gamma-ray methods for industrial process evaluation: A simulation study

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Prompt gamma-ray spectrum of the reaction 157Gd (n, γ).
Prompt gamma-ray spectrum of the reaction 157Gd (n, γ).

Fig. 2

Neutron spectrum of 252Cf.
Neutron spectrum of 252Cf.

Fig. 3

Simulation setup.
Simulation setup.

Fig. 4

The gamma-ray spectrum obtained in the simulation: the pipe with a diameter of 10 cm (a), 20 cm (b), and 30 cm (c).
The gamma-ray spectrum obtained in the simulation: the pipe with a diameter of 10 cm (a), 20 cm (b), and 30 cm (c).

Fig. 5

Neutron dose rates from the neutron source with the minimum activity at different radii.
Neutron dose rates from the neutron source with the minimum activity at different radii.

Fig. 6

Neutron dose rates from the neutron source with the maximum activity at different radii.
Neutron dose rates from the neutron source with the maximum activity at different radii.

Fig. 7

The pipe with a diameter 10 cm without 57Gd (a) and with 57Gd (b). The pipe with a diameter 20 cm without 57Gd (c) and with 57Gd (d). The pipe with a diameter 30 cm without 57Gd (e) and with 57Gd.
The pipe with a diameter 10 cm without 57Gd (a) and with 57Gd (b). The pipe with a diameter 20 cm without 57Gd (c) and with 57Gd (d). The pipe with a diameter 30 cm without 57Gd (e) and with 57Gd.

Fig. 8

Imaging of the pipe with diameter 30 cm using 60Co (a) and prompt gamma-ray (b). (Fig. 8b is reproduced from Fig. 7e).
Imaging of the pipe with diameter 30 cm using 60Co (a) and prompt gamma-ray (b). (Fig. 8b is reproduced from Fig. 7e).

Fig. 9

Reconstructed prompt gamma CT images: (a) X plane, (b) Y plane, (c) Z plane.
Reconstructed prompt gamma CT images: (a) X plane, (b) Y plane, (c) Z plane.

Neutrons interactions with air, water, gadolinium, steel, and the detector

MaterialNuclidesAtom fractionTotal collisionsCollisions weightWeight lost to capturePhotons producedPhoton weight produced%
AirC1.50E–0441.68E–080.00E+0000.00
N7.84E–0149 8132.09E–041.06E–055152.16E–04
O2.11E–0115 6146.55E–052.77E–07421.76E–05
Ar4.67E–033091.30E–060.00E+00662.77E–05
Water + 5% GdH6.65E–01193 776 9008.13E–012.67E–0435 0381.47E–02
O3.33E–0137 866 1421.59E–014.52E–0491 4593.84E–02
157Gd2.01E–036 394 4712.68E–022.37E–0219 207 9048.25E–02
SteelC2.28E–02484 9842.03E–031.46E–062 7261.14E–03
Fe9.77E–0129 489 4491.24E–015.04E–047 955 5873.34E–02
NaINa5.00E–018 353 0333.50E–024.11E–051 276 7505.36E–03
I5.00E–0114 164 5045.94E–021.88E–038 494 5943.56E–02
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1508-5791 | Journal ISSN: 0029-5922
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 18
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2021
|
Accepted on: Nov 9, 2021
|
Published on: Feb 17, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Mohammed Siddig H. Mohammed, Abdulsalam Alhawsawi, M. S. Aljohani, Mohammed M. Damoom, Essam M. Banoqitah, Ezzat Elmoujarkach, published by Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.