Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Independent verification of treatment planning system calculations Cover

Independent verification of treatment planning system calculations

Open Access
|Jun 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Polystyrene/lung solid phantom.
Polystyrene/lung solid phantom.

Fig. 2

Frequency histograms of differences between Eclipse and OMP calculations of mean doses to the PTV for 6 MV (a) and 15 MV (b).
Frequency histograms of differences between Eclipse and OMP calculations of mean doses to the PTV for 6 MV (a) and 15 MV (b).

Fig. 3

Frequency histograms of differences between Eclipse and OMP calculations of doses to isocenter for 6 MV (a) and 15 MV beams (b).
Frequency histograms of differences between Eclipse and OMP calculations of doses to isocenter for 6 MV (a) and 15 MV beams (b).

Differences between Eclipse and OMP calculations of mean doses to the PTV

EnergyCasesAverage (%) ± STD (%)Range (%)p-value (p <0.001)
X6 MV1521.4 ± 1.0−3.4, 6.00.0
X15 MV1282.5 ± 0.6−0.2, 4.50.0

Differences between Eclipse and OMP calculations of dose to isocenter

EnergyCasesAverage (%) ± STD (%)Range (%)p-value (p <0.001)
X6 MV1521.3 ± 1.9−2.7, 10.60.0
X15 MV1282.1 ± 1.0−0.7, 5.60.0

Statistical summary of differences between Eclipse and OMP calculation with and without inhomogeneity correction

EnergyPlansAverage (%) ± STD (%)Range (%)p-value (p <0.001)
Mean dose with inhomogeneity correction

X6 MV241.3 ± 0.50.1, 2.10.000
X15 MV242.6 ± 0.61.6, 4.50.000

Dose at isocenter with inhomogeneity correction

X6 MV241.1 ± 1.5−1.0, 6.80.000
X15 MV242.2 ± 1.10.4, 5.20.000

Mean dose without inhomogeneity correction

X6 MV240.4 ± 0.4−0.8, 1.00.000
X15 MV241.0 ± 0.30.5, 1.60.000

Dose in isocenter without inhomogeneity correction

X6 MV240.2 ± 0.7−1.0, 2.40.110
X15 MV240.5 ± 0.9−2.1, 2.80.001

The number of analysed plans according to calculation models

EnergyNumber of treatment plans
X6 MV152
X15 MV128

The discrepancy between Eclipse and OMP calculations and measurements for various beams geometry

No.X6 MVX15 MV

ΔMEASUREMENTECLIPSE(%)\Delta _{{\rm{MEASUREMENT}}}^{{\rm{ECLIPSE}}}(\%)ΔMEASUREMENTOMP(%)\Delta _{{\rm{MEASUREMENT}}}^{{\rm{OMP}}}(\%)ΔMEASUREMENTECLIPSE(%)\Delta _{{\rm{MEASUREMENT}}}^{{\rm{ECLIPSE}}}(\%)ΔMEASUREMENTOMP(%)\Delta _{{\rm{MEASUREMENT}}}^{{\rm{OMP}}}(\%)
Polystyrene phantom

12.20.32.20.8
22.2−0.52.8−0.4
32.00.23.00.4
42.40.42.80.1
52.1−0.12.1−0.3
62.1−0.12.3−0.4

Polystyrene with bone equivalent material

72.51.42.51.4
82.30.53.60.8
92.60.62.6−0.1
102.80.84.01.3
112.80.83.51.0
122.40.63.40.8

Polystyrene with lung equivalent material

132.91.31.50.7
143.3−0.33.1−0.4
151.7−0.22.3−0.2
162.91.42.90.8
171.80.62.20.3
181.60.22.30.2

Geometries of treatment plans used for measurements

No.Number of fieldsGantry directionsSize of field (cm × cm)WedgeShape of field
Polystyrene

113 × 3Nonesquare
218 × 8Nonesquare
330°, 90°, 270°8 × 8, 8 × 8, 8 × 8Nonesquare
430°, 70°, 290°8 × 8, 8 × 8, 8 × 8Nonecircular
530°, 70°, 290°8 × 8, 8 × 8, 8 × 8none, 45 L, 45 Rcircular
630°, 70°, 290°8 × 8, 8 × 8, 8 × 8none, 45 OUT, 45 INcircular

Polystyrene with bone equivalent material

713 × 3Nonesquare
818 × 8Nonesquare
930°, 90°, 270°8 × 8, 10 × 8, 10 × 8Nonesquare
1030°, 45°, 315°8 × 8, 9.5 × 8, 9.5 × 8Nonecircular
1130°, 45°, 315°8 × 8, 9 × 8, 9 × 8none, 45 L, 45 Rcircular
1230°, 45°, 315°8 × 8, 8 × 9, 8 × 9none, 45 OUT, 45 INcircular

Polystyrene with lung equivalent material

1313 × 3Nonesquare
1418 × 8Nonesquare
1530°, 90°, 270°8 × 8, 9.5 × 8, 9.5 × 8Nonesquare
1630°, 50°, 310°8 × 8, 9 × 8, 9 × 8Nonecircular
1730°, 60°, 300°8 × 8, 9 × 8, 9 × 8none, 45 L, 45 Rcircular
1830°, 50°, 310°8 × 8, 8 × 9, 8 × 9none, 45 OUT, 45 INcircular
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2021-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1508-5791 | Journal ISSN: 0029-5922
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 53
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 2, 2020
Published on: Jun 8, 2021
Published by: Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Edyta Dąbrowska-Szewczyk, Anna Zawadzka, Beata Brzozowska, Agnieszka Walewska, Paweł Kukołowicz, published by Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.