| 1989 | HE 122/1989 vp | Environmental goals, slowing down emission growth. | Introducing fuel tax. | Significant tax revenue increase. | Reducing fuel usage growth by 1%. |
| 1994 | HE 89/1993 vp | Environmental goals, slowing down emission growth. | Introducing fuel tax based on the carbon content of the fuel. | A small increase in tax revenue. | Small environmental impact on the short term, possible long-term investment impact. |
| 1995 | HE 237/1994 vp | Adjusting the Finnish tax system to EU membership. | Continuing national taxes on some energy products. | Significant increase in energy taxes, compensating abolishment of some taxes. | Not estimated. |
| 1996 | HE 65/1995 vp | Increasing tax revenue. | Increasing the gasoline tax. | Significant revenue increase. | Not estimated. |
| 1997 | HE 225/1996 vp | Decreasing the energy costs of industry and increasing competitiveness. | Abolishing carbon taxes for electricity production, introducing electricity tax. | Significant increase in tax revenue. | Increase in carbon emissions. The increase was not estimated to be significant. |
| 1998 | HE 194/1997 vp | Subsidy renewable energy and energy with lower carbon intensity. | Tax subsidy for renewable energy production. | Significant increase in tax revenue despite new tax subsidies. | Increased competitiveness of renewable energy production and natural gas. Possible long-term reduction in carbon emissions. |
| 1998 | HE 84/1997 vp | Increasing the competitiveness of the fishing industry. | Abolishing fuel taxes for fishing boats. | Small loss of tax revenue. | Only small negative environmental impact. |
| 1998 | HE 206/1998 vp | Increasing the competitiveness of greenhouse farming. | New tax subsidy for greenhouse farming. | Small loss of tax revenue. | Not estimated. |
| 1999 | HE 55/1998 vp | Increasing energy taxes in order to finance cutting down revenue taxes. | Increase in all tax levels. New tax subsidies for district heating and wind power. New tax subsidies for the energy-intensive industry. | Significant increase in tax revenue. | Possible long-term reduction in carbon emissions due to their increased competitiveness. |
| 2003 | HE 130/2002 vp | Increase energy tax subsidies to cover deficits. | Increased renewable energy tax subsidies. Significant tax level increases. | Significant increase in tax revenue. | Possible reduction in energy demand growth and carbon emission growth. Increase in renewable energy production. |
| 2005 | HE 37/2005 vp | Keep peat competitive despite EU ETS. | Removing all taxes from peat. | Small loss of tax revenue. | A small increase in carbon emissions. (Disputed at the time, peat emissions are extremely significant in the 2020s). |
| 2006 | HE 56/2006 vp | Subsidizing agriculture. | New energy tax subsidy for agriculture. | Small loss of tax revenue. | Small negative environmental impact. |
| 2006 | HE 120/2006 vp | Increasing industry competitiveness despite the EU ETS. | Decreasing industry energy taxes, removing tax subsidies from competitive renewable energy sources. | Medium-sized loss of tax revenue. | No significant environmental impact as the EU ETS had just increased electricity prices. Smaller decrease of carbon emissions than in the base scenario. |
| 2007 | HE 61/2007 vp | To raise tax levels. | Increasing tax levels. | Significant increase in tax revenue. | Small positive environmental impact as emissions would grow slower. |
| 2009 | HE 185/2008 vp | Subsidize agriculture. | Increase in tax subsidies. | Small loss of tax revenue. | The small negative environmental impact that was compensated in other sectors. |
| 2010 | HE 147/2010 vp | Increasing energy taxation to be more carbonbased. | Abolishing base tax and taxing only energy and carbon contents. | Significant increase in tax revenue. | Significant greenhouse gas emission reduction in traffic and heating. No change in agriculture. |
| 2010 | HE 152/2010 vp | Promoting renewable energy production. | Starting new feed-in tariffs for renewable energy production. | Moderate costs to the state. | Possibility to achieve 20-20-20 goals. |
| 2011 | HE 53/2011 vp | Increasing taxes, decreasing carbon emissions, and increasing the use of sustainable biofuels. | Taxes were increased, and tax subsidies from carbon components of tax were abolished. New tax subsidy for sustainable biofuels. | A moderate increase in tax revenue. | Decrease in carbon emissions. |
| 2011 | HE 129/2011 vp | Increasing the competitiveness of energyintensive industries. | Increasing tax subsidies by making more industries eligible for aid. | Moderate costs to the state. | No estimated increase in carbon emissions as most of the subsidy receivers were already within EU ETS. |
| 2012 | HE 26/2012 vp | Making biofuel tax subsidies compatible with the EU state aid regulation | Taking account life-cycle emissions in carbon taxation. | No effect. | No effect. |
| 2013 | HE 91/2012 vp | Increasing the significance of carbon components in energy taxation. | Increasing carbon tax component and decreasing energy tax component. | Small loss of tax revenue due to tax subsidies. | Making carbon more costly and thus decreasing its usage in other than ETS sectors. |
| 2014 | HE 110/2013 vp | Increasing tax revenue. | Increasing taxes on traffic fuels and electricity. | A moderate increase in tax revenue. | Increasing competitiveness of biofuels and decrease in energy usage. |
| 2013 | HE 178/2013 vp | Increasing data centre competitiveness. | Making more industries eligible for electricity tax subsidies. | Small loss of tax revenue. | Increasing energy usage and a possible increase in carbon emissions if renewable energy capacity growth would not enough. |
| 2015 | HE 128/2014 vp | Increasing tax revenue, increasing peat and biomass usage in heating. Subsidize agriculture. | Increasing carbon taxes. Decreasing peat energy taxation. Removing mining industries from energy tax subsidies. | A small increase in tax revenue. | Increasing competitiveness of renewable energies and especially energy usage. Possible decrease in energy usage. |
| 2015 | HE234/2014 vp | Increasing peat competitiveness. | Increasing tax subsidy given to peat. | Small loss of tax revenue. | Estimated carbon emission reduction (disputed). |
| 2015 | HE 349/2014 vp | Promoting small-scale electricity production. | Leaving bigger installations outside the electricity taxation. Making the administrative process easier. | Very small loss of tax revenue. Possibly bigger losses in the future as small-scale production become more common. | A small increase in small-scale renewable energy production. |
| 2015 | HE 350/2014 vp | Removing tax subsidies from fossil fuels. | Removing tax advantages given to LPG. | A small increase in tax revenue. | No major environmental impact due to lack of alternatives. |
| 2016 | HE 359/2014 vp | Increasing peat competitiveness. (even more) | Increase tax subsidy given to peat. | Small loss of tax revenue. | Estimated carbon emission reduction (disputed). |
| 2016 | HE 34/2015 vp | Increasing tax revenue. Subsidize the mining industry. | Increasing carbon component of heating fuels. Giving mining industries eligibility for lower electricity taxes and electricity tax subsidies. | A moderate increase in tax revenue. | Increase in the competitiveness of biofuels. Increased carbon steering. |
| 2017 | HE 136/2016 vp | Covering deficits and financing tax cuts. | Increase in carbon and energy taxation. | A large increase in tax revenue. | Decrease in carbon emissions. Increase in the competitiveness of renewable energy. |
| 2018 | HE 138/2017 vp | Increasing tax revenue. | Increase in carbon and energy taxation. | A moderate increase in tax revenue. | Decrease in energy usage and carbon emissions. Increase in the competitiveness of renewable energy. |
| 2019 | HE 191/2018 vp | Making the whole system more compatible with EU state aid legislation. Increasing carbon steering in heating. Subsidizing agriculture. Increasing electricity storages. | Taking life-cycle emissions in carbon taxation into account. Taxing only the carbon contents of combined heating and electricity. | A small increase in tax revenue. | Minor carbon emission reductions in district heating. |
| 2020 | HE 66/2019 vp | Increasing tax revenue. | Increase in carbon and taxation on traffic fuels. | Major increase in tax revenue. | About 1,2 to 1,4% reduction in fuel usage from base scenario, meaning 0,7% decrease. Possibly promote electric cars. |
| 2021 | HE 144/2020 vp | Removing some environmental subsidies not related to GHG emissions | Removing tax subsidies from paraffin diesel. | Major increase in tax revenue. | About 0,2 to 0,9 reduction to fuel usage from base scenario, meaning 0,1 to 0,3 reduction in fuel usage. |
| 2021 | HE 167/2020 vp | Increasing competitiveness, increasing tax revenue and decreasing GHG emissions. | Removing tax subsidies from energy-intensive industries, decreasing industry electricity tax to EU minimum and increasing energy taxes on certain heating fuels. | A moderate increase in tax revenue. | Increase electrification in industry. Increase the competitiveness of renewable energy products. Decrease usage of fossil fuels. |
| 2021 | HE 144/2021 vp | Creating a price floor mechanism for peat due to taxation. Subsidizing peat usage in order to make the transition easier. | Price adjustments by taxation for peat if EU ETS price would be too low. Making usage of peat in small installations tax-free. | Small loss of tax revenue if ETS price would not lower. | A small increase in carbon emissions in the future compared to the base scenario. A small decrease in carbon emissions in the scenario where the EU ETS price drops. |
