References
- Bank, M., Duffy, F., Leyendecker, V., & Silva, M. (2021). The lobby network: Big tech’s web of influence in the EU. Corporate Europe Observatory.
https://corporateeurope.org/en/2021/08/lobby-network-big-techs-web-influence-eu - Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001 - Belair-Gagnon, V. (2015). Social media at BBC news: The re-making of crisis reporting (Vol. 10). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742052 - Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138796 - Brurås, S. (2016). Normative features of a successful press council. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(3), 162–173.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2016.1188011 - Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127 - Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 37–58.
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12111 - Chua, S., & Westlund, O. (2022). Platform configuration: A longitudinal study and conceptualization of a legacy news publisher’s platform-related innovation practices. Online Media and Global Communication, 1(1), 60–89.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/omgc-2022-0003 - Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
- Coen, D., Katsaitis, A., & Vannoni, M. (2021). Business lobbying in the European Union. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199589753.001.0001 - Enli, G. (2025). Regulatory barriers in the attention economy: Lack of support, trust, and measures. Media, Culture & Society, 47(8), 1636–1652.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251350008 - European Commission. (2022). Digital Services Act: Commission welcomes political agreement on rules ensuring a safe and accountable online environment.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_2545 - European Commission. (2024a). The Digital Services Act package.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package - European Commission. (2024b). Questions and answers on the Digital Services Act.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2348 - Flew, T. (2021). Regulating platforms. Polity Press.
- Flew, T., Martin, F., & Suzor, N. (2019). Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10(1), 33–50.
https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.33_1 - Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x - Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859948.001.0001 - Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 - Gorwa, R., Lechowski, G., & Schneiss, D. (2024). Platform lobbying: Policy influence strategies and the EU’s Digital Services Act. Internet Policy Review, 13(2), 1–25.
https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.2.1782 - Gullberg, A. T. (2015). Lobbying in Oslo or in Brussels? The case of a European Economic Area country. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1531–1550.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1025092 - Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867 - Hanegraaff, M., & Poletti, A. (2021). The rise of corporate lobbying in the European Union: An agenda for future research. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(4), 839–855.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13132 - Heermann, M. (2024). Undermining lobbying coalitions: The interest group politics of the EU copyright reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), 2287–2315.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2249948 - Helberger, N. (2020). The political power of platforms: How current attempts to regulate misinformation amplify opinion power. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 842–854.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1773888 - Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391913 - Hertz, R., & Imber, J. B. (1995). Studying elites using qualitative methods. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327341 - Humprecht, E., Herrero, L., Blassnig, S., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2022). Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 145–164.
https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054 - Ihlebæk, K. A., & Figenschou, T. U. (2023). Journalism as a strategic action field: How to study contestations and power dynamics between professional journalism and its challengers. Digital Journalism, 12(6), 851–868.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2214901 - Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., & Olsen, R. K. (2024). Norway: Media welfare in a small nation. In A. K. Schapals, & C. Pentzold (Eds.), Media compass: A companion to international media landscapes (pp. 106–119). Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394196272.ch11 - Ihlebæk, K. A., & Sundet, V. S. (2021). Global platforms and asymmetrical power: Industry dynamics and opportunities for policy change. New Media & Society, 25(8), 2183–2200.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211029662 - Jakobsson, P., Lindell, J., & Stiernstedt, F. (2024). The future of the Nordic media model: A digital media welfare state? Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855893 - Junk, W. M. (2019). When diversity works: The effects of coalition composition on the success of lobbying coalitions. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 660–674.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12437 - Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman.
- Lahusen, C. (2023). European lobbying: An occupational field between professionalism and activism. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003329923 - Maares, P., & Hanusch, F. (2022). Interpretations of the journalistic field: A systematic analysis of how journalism scholarship appropriates Bourdieusian thought. Journalism, 23(4), 736–754.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920959552 - Media Board. (2025). A new era for media regulation in Europe as the European Media Freedom Act’s main obligations become applicable. European Board for Media Services.
https://media-board.europa.eu/news-0/new-era-media-regulation-europe-european-media-freedom-acts-main-obligations-become-applicable-2025-08-08_en - Meese, J., & Hurcombe, E. (2021). Facebook, news media and platform dependency: The institutional impacts of news distribution on social platforms. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2367–2384.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820926472 - Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2022). The power of platforms: Shaping media and society. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190908850.001.0001 - Papaevangelou, C. (2023). ‘The non-interference principle’: Debating online platforms’ treatment of editorial content in the European Union’s Digital Services Act. European Journal of Communication, 38(5), 466–483.
https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231189036 - Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2022). Spaces of negotiation: Analyzing platform power in the news industry. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1391–1409.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2103011 - Puppis, M. (2009). Media regulation in small states. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1-2), 7–17.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508097927 - Rommetvedt, H. (2017). Scandinavian corporatism in decline. In O. Knutsen (Ed.), The Nordic models in political science: Challenged, but still viable? (pp. 171–192). Fagbokforlaget.
- Schwinges, A., Lock, I., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2024). Stepping on toes? Role dynamics between journalists and lobbyists regarding big tech’s accountability agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(3), 705–726.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241242401 - Steen-Johnsen, K., Sundet, V. S., & Enjolras, B. (2019). Theorizing policy-industry processes: A media policy field approach. European Journal of Communication 34(2), 190–204.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119830047 - Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjos, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001 - Tarrant, A., & Cowen, T. (2022). Big tech lobbying in the EU. The Political Quarterly, 93(2), 218–226.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13127 - Van den Bulck, H. (2012). Towards a media policy process analysis model and its methodological implications. In M. Puppis, & N. Just (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 217–232). Intellect.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvj36.14 - Van den Bulck, H., & Donders, K. (2014). Of discourses, stakeholders and advocacy coalitions in media policy: Tracing negotiations towards the new management contract of Flemish public broadcaster VRT. European Journal of Communication 29(1), 83–99.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113509362 - van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 - van Drunen, M. Z., Papaevangelou, C., Buijs, D., & Fathaigh, R. Ó. (2023). What can a media privilege look like? Unpacking three versions in the EMFA. The Journal of Media Law, 15(2), 152–167.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2023.2299097