Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Right-wing alternative media users in Scandinavia: A comparative study of ideological attitudes and (dis)trust Cover

Right-wing alternative media users in Scandinavia: A comparative study of ideological attitudes and (dis)trust

Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Ahva, L., van Dalen, A., Hovden, J. F., Kolbeins, G. H., Löfgren Nilsson, M., Skovsgaard, M., & Väliverronen, J. (2017). A welfare state of mind? Journalism Studies, 18(5), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1249005
  2. Alghasi, S., Eide, E., & Simonsen, A. H. (2020). Hvem er vi nå? – medier og minoriteter i Norge [Who are we now? – media and minorities in Norway]. Cappelen Damm akademisk.
  3. Andersen, K., Shehata, A., & Andersson, D. (2021). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412
  4. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
  5. Brems, M. K. (2022). Party-political and ideological partisanship in Danish alternative media: How distinguishing between types of partisanship can advance our understanding of the political roles of alternative media. Journalism Studies, 24(2), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157316
  6. Brems, M. K (2023). From stark opposition to partial adaption: How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media- and political mainstream. Journalistica, 17(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823
  7. Brems M. K. (2024). A left-right divide? Alternative news use and political trust, populist attitudes, and populist vote intentions in the case of Denmark. The International Journal of Press/Politics. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241301647
  8. Brochmann, G., Hagelund, A., Borevi, K., Jønsson, H. V., & Petersen, K. (2012). Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state, 1945–2010. Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127
  10. Carter, E. (2018). Right-wing extremism/radicalism: Reconstructing the concept. Journal of Political Ideologies, 23(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2018.1451227
  11. Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D., & Thomas, R. (2021). Why national media systems matter: A longitudinal analysis of how UK left-wing and right-wing alternative media critique mainstream media (2015–2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795
  12. de León, E., Makhortykh, M., & Adam, S. (2024). Hyperpartisan, alternative, and conspiracy media users: An anti-establishment portrait. Political Communication, 41(6), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325426
  13. Devine, D. (2024). Does political trust matter? A meta-analysis on the consequences of trust. Political Behavior, 46, 2241–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09916-y
  14. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
  15. Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., Herreros, F., Solheim, Ø. B., Winsvold, M., Gadarian, S., & Oksanen, A. (2019). Does trust prevent fear in the aftermath of terrorist attacks? Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(4), 39–55. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-201909303600
  16. Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
  17. Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2025). Challengers to journalism: Alternative media editors’ framing of editorial values and practices. Journalism Practice, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2538121
  18. Fletcher, R., & Park, S. (2017). The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979
  19. Frischlich, L., Hellmann, J. H., Brinkschulte, F., Becker, M., & Back, M. D. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism, conspiracy mentality, and susceptibility to distorted alternative news. Social Influence, 16(1), 24–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2021.1966499
  20. Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2023). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the COVID-19 crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259
  21. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
  22. Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
  23. Heft, A., Mayerhöffer, E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219
  24. Holt, K. (2016). «Alternativmedier»? En intervjustudie om mediekritik och mediemisstro [“Alternative media”? An interview study on media criticism and media distrust]. In L. Truedson (Ed.), Migrationen i medierna – men det får en väl inte prata om? [Migration in the media – but that’s not something we’re allowed to talk about, is it?] (pp. 113–150). Institut för mediestudier.
  25. Holt, K., Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
  26. Hovden, J. F., & Mjelde, H. (2019). Increasingly controversial, cultural, and political: The immigration debate in Scandinavian newspapers 1970–2016. Javnost - The Public, 26(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1589285
  27. Hovden, J. F., Mjelde, H., & Gripsrud, J. (2018). The Syrian refugee crisis in Scandinavian newspapers. Communications, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-0013
  28. Hovden, J. F., Nygren, G., & Zilliacus-Tikkanen, H. (Eds.). (2016). Becoming a journalist: Journalism education in the Nordic countries. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-4685
  29. Ihlebæk, K. A., & Holter, C. R. (2021). Hostile emotions: An exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news media. Journalism, 22(5), 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726
  30. Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., Eldridge, S. A., Frischlich, L., Cushion, S., & Holt, K. (2022). Understanding alternative news media and its contribution to diversity. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134165
  31. Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., & Olsen, R. K. (2024). Norway: Media welfare in a small nation. In A. K. Schapals, & C. Pentzold (Eds.), Media compass: A companion to international media landscapes (pp. 106–115). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394196272.ch11
  32. Ihlebæk, K. A., & Nygaard, S. (2021). Right-wing alternative media in the Scandinavian political communication landscape. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. Kristensen, & L. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 263–282). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-13
  33. Johansson, B., Ihlen, Ø., Lindholm, J., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2023). Communicating a pandemic: Crisis management and Covid-19 in the Nordic countries. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855688
  34. Jungar, A.-C., & Jupskås, A. R. (2014). Populist radical right parties in the Nordic region: A new and distinct party family? Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12024
  35. Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787
  36. Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846
  37. Mayerhöffer, E., Kristensen, J. B., & Ramsland, T. (2024). Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environments in Sweden and Denmark. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 92–119. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0009
  38. Mjelde, H., & Hovden, J. F. (2019). Populism in Scandinavian immigration discourse 1970–2016. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5483–5504. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11579/2858
  39. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037
  40. Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication and Society, 24(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778
  41. Nelson, J. L., & Kim, S. J. (2021). Improve trust, increase loyalty? Analyzing the relationship between news credibility and consumption. Journalism Practice, 15(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1719874
  42. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2019). Reuters Institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2019/
  43. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2018). Reuters Institute digital news report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2018/
  44. Noppari, E., Hiltunen, I., & Ahva, L., (2019). User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative and Community Media, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1
  45. Norris, P. (2017). The conceptual framework of political support. In S. Zmerli, & T. Van de Meer (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 19–32). Edward Elgar.
  46. Nygaard, S. (2020). Boundary work: Intermedia agenda-setting between right-wing alternative media and professional journalism. Journalism Studies, 21(6), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1722731
  47. Nygaard, S. (2021). On the mainstream/alternative continuum: Mainstream media reactions to right-wing alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1894962
  48. Pedersen, L., Ihlebæk, K. A., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2024). Boundary work in the Nordic media model: Metajournalistic discourse on alternative media in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 25(14), 1757–1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2385925
  49. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  50. Rauch, J. (2007). Activists as interpretive communities: Rituals of consumption and interaction in an alternative media audience. Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 994–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084345
  51. Rauch, J. (2015). Exploring the alternative-mainstream dialectic: What “alternative media” means to a hybrid audience. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12068
  52. Rauch, J. (2020). Resisting the news: Engaged audiences, alternative media, and popular critique of journalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007722
  53. Reiter, F., & Matthes, J. (2021). Correctives of the mainstream media? A panel study on mainstream media use, alternative digital media use, and the erosion of political interest as well as political knowledge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1974916
  54. Rothstein, B. (2001). Social capital in the social democratic welfare state. Politics & Society, 29(2), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  55. Schulze, H. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925
  56. Schwarzenegger, C. (2021). Communities of darkness? Users and uses of anti-system alternative media between audience and community. Media and Communication, 9(1), 99–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3418
  57. Schwarzenegger, C. (2023). Understanding the users of alternative news media – Media epistemologies, news consumption, and media practices. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2000454
  58. Shehata, A., Thomas, F., Glogger, I., & Andersen, K. (2023). Belief maintenance as a media effect: A conceptualization and empirical approach. Human Communication Research, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad033
  59. Skovsgaard, M., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2016). Opportunity structures for selective exposure: Investigating selective exposure and learning in Swedish election campaigns using panel survey data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216658157
  60. Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
  61. Slater, M. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
  62. Sniderman, P., Petersen, M. B., Slothuus, R., & Stubager, R. (2014). Paradoxes of liberal democracy: Islam, western Europe, and the Danish cartoon crisis. Princeton University Press
  63. Staender, A., Humprecht, E., & Esser, F. (2024). Alternative media vary between mild distortion and extreme misinformation: Steps toward a typology. Digital Journalism, 12(6), 830–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2326928
  64. Steppat, D., Castro, L., & Esser, F. (2023). What news users perceive as ‘alternative media’ varies between countries: How media fragmentation and polarization matter. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1939747
  65. Stier, S., Kirkizh, N., Froio, C., & Schroeder, R. (2020). Populist attitudes and selective exposure to online news: A cross-country analysis combining web tracking and surveys. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220907018
  66. Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001
  67. Strömbäck, J., Andersson, F., & Nedlund, E. (2017). Invandring i medierna – hur rapporterade svenska tidningar åren 2010–2015 [Immigration in the media – how Swedish newspapers reported in 2010–2015]. Statens offentliga utredningar, Rapport 2017:6 [State public investigations, Report 2017:6]. https://www.delmi.se/media/fhdksub0/delmi-rapport-2017_6.pdf
  68. Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
  69. Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital age. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
  70. Sønderskov, K. M. (2009). Different goods, different effects: Exploring the effects of generalized social trust in large-N collective action. Public Choice, 140(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9416-0
  71. Theorin, N. (2019). Maintainers of ethnic hierarchies? Investigating the relationship between media use and attitudes toward perceived remote versus perceived close immigration. Mass Communication and Society, 22(6), 827–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1660368
  72. Theorin, N., & Lundmark, S. (2024). Ten hypotheses generated for increasing survey response propensity among immigrants and inhabitants of socially disadvantaged areas. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2024-00003
  73. Theorin, N., & Strömbäck, J. (2020). Some media matter more than others: Investigating media effects on attitudes toward and perceptions of immigration in Sweden. International Migration Review, 54(4), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319893292
  74. Thorbjørnsrud, K., & Figenschou, T. U. (2020). The alarmed citizen: Fear, mistrust, and alternative media. Journalism Practice, 16(5), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113
  75. Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972
  76. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
  77. Tsfati, Y., Vliegenthart, R., Strömbäck, J., & Lindgren, E. (2024). An asymmetrical reinforcing spiral? Disentangling the longitudinal dynamics of media use and mainstream media trust. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae039
  78. Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Trust, democracy and governance: Can government politics influence generalised trust? In M. Hooghe, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 171–190). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979544_9
  79. Volkens, A., Burst, T., Krause, W., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., Weßels, B., & Zehnter, L. (2020). The manifesto data collection: Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2020b [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2020b
  80. Wettstein, M., Esser, F., Schulz, A., Wirz, D. S., & Wirth, W. (2018). News media as gatekeepers, critics, and initiators of populist communication: How journalists in ten countries deal with the populist challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218785979
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2025-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 217 - 249
Published on: Sep 26, 2025
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2025 Kari Steen-Johnsen, Audun Fladmoe, Karoline Andrea Ihlebæk, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.