References
- Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.
https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117 - Allan, S. (2010). Journalism and its publics: The Lippmann-Dewey debate. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (1st ed.) (pp. 60–70). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869468 - *Almgren, S. M., & Olsson, T. (2016). Commenting, sharing and tweeting news. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 67–81.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0018 - *Ampuja, M., Koivisto, J., & Väliverronen, E. (2014). Strong and weak forms of mediatization theory: A critical review. Nordicom Review, 35(S1), 111–124.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0107 - Andersen, J. G., & Hoff, J. (2001). Democracy and citizenship in Scandinavia. Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230507968 - *Andreassen, R. (2016). Online kinship: Social media as a site for challenging notions of gender and family. MedieKultur, 32(61), 76–92.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22157 - *Andreassen, R., Kaun, A., & Nikunen, K. (2021). Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 207–223.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0051 - Asenbaum, H. (2021). Rethinking digital democracy: From the disembodied discursive self to new materialist corporealities. Communication Theory, 31(3), 360–379.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz033 - Ashcraft, K. (2021). Communication as constitutive transmission? An encounter with affect. Communication Theory, 31(4), 571–592.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz027 - *Askanius, T. (2021). “I just want to be the friendly face of national socialism”: The turn to civility in the cultural expressions of neo-Nazism in Sweden. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 17–35.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0004 - *Askanius, T., & Hartley, J. M. (2019). Framing gender justice. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 19–36.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0022 - *Backholm, K., Ruohonen, H., & Strandberg, K. (2024). Online discussion threads as promotors of citizen democracy: Current opportunities and challenges for small- and medium-sized media organizations in Finland. Nordicon Review, 45(S1), 173–192.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0012 - *Baggesen, R. H. (2014). Augmenting the agora: Media and civic engagement in museums. MedieKultur, 30(56), 117–131.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8964 - Bakardjieva, M. (2012). Mundane citizenship: New media and civil society in Bulgaria. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(8), 1356–1374.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.712247 - *Baltz, A. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of Swedish local governments on Facebook: A visualisation of communication. Nordicom Review, 41(2), 147–162.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0020 - *Bechmann, A. (2019). Inequality in posting behaviour over time: A study of Danish Facebook users. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 31–49.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0012 - Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
- Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 - *Bhroin, N. N., Sand, S., & Rasmussen, T. (2021). Indigeneous journalism, media innovation, and social change: A review of previous research and a call for more critical approaches. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 185–206.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0050 - *Blaagaard, B., & Roslyng, M. M. (2022). Rethinking digital activism: The deconstruction, inclusion, and expansion of the activist body. MedieKultur, 38(72), 45–64.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.125721 - Bodó, B. (2021). Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2668–2690.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939 - *Bolin, N., Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2024). Second thoughts on digital first: Exploring the development of election campaigns among Swedish political parties, 2010–2022. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 15–35.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0006 - boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527 - *Brems, M. K. (2024). Who are the users of Danish alternative media? A survey study on the prevalence of alternative news use in Denmark and profiles of the users. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 81–113.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0014 - Bruns, A. (2023). From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication Theory, 33(2-3), 70–81.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007 - *Bruns, A., & Enli, G. (2018). The Norwegian Twittersphere: Structure and dynamics. Nordicom Review, 39(1), 129–148.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0006 - *Bruns, A., & Moon, B. (2019). One day in the life of a national Twittersphere. Nordicom Review, 40(S1), 11–30.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0011 - Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086 - Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066 - *Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2018). On political activism in digital games. MedieKultur, 34(64), 87–115.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.96924 - Chaput, C. (2010). Rhetorical circulation in late capitalism: Neoliberalism and the overdetermination of affective energy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 43(1), 1–25.
https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001 - *Christensen-Strynø, M. B. (2016). Mainstreaming and misfitting: Exploring disability and its intersection with gender in online disability awareness-raising videos. MedieKultur, 32(61), 58–75.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22387 - *Christiansen, L. B., & Heiselberg, M. H. (2022). When we shine, we shine together: A carnivalesque reading of affective solidarity among Danish fat-accepting Instagrammers. MedieKultur, 38(72), 28–44.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.129079 - Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four “positions”. New Media & Society, 13(6), 855–872.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481038956 - Dahlgren, P. (2006). Doing citizenship: The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3), 267–286.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406066073 - Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge, and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Javnost – the Public, 25(1-2), 20–27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819 - *Dahlgren, P. M. (2021). A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 15–33.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0002 - Dahlman, S., Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2021). Algorithms as organizational figuration: The sociotechnical arrangements of a fintech start-up. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211026702 - *Dahlman, S., Just, S. N., Munk Petersen, L., Valiant Lantz, P. M., & Würtz Kristiansen, N. (2023). Datafied female health: Sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech in Danish public discourse. MedieKultur, 39(74), 105–126.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133900 - *Damkjær, M. S., Gammelby, A. K., Johansen, S. L., & Mahnke, M. S. (2021). Struggling with technology: Perspectives on everyday life. Nordicom Review, 42(4), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0037 - Dean, J. (2003). Why the net is not a public sphere. Constellations, 10(1), 95–112.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00315 - Dean, J. (2019). Communicative capitalism and revolutionary form. Millennium, 47(3), 326–340.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829819840624 - Deseriis, M. (2021). Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: Toward a new framework. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2452–2473.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482092967 - *Dmitrow-Devold, K. (2017). Performing the self in the mainstream: Norwegian girls in blogging. Nordicom Review, 38(2), 65–78.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0391 - *Ekman, M. (2014). The dark side of online activism: Swedish right-wing extremist video activism on YouTube. MedieKultur, 30(56), 79–99.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8967 - *Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2024). Political communication as television news: Party-produced news of the Sweden Democrats during the 2022 election. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 66–91.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0008 - *Ekström, M. (2023). Authoritarianism in the discourse of online forums: A study of its articulation in the Swedish context. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 194–216.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0011 - *Elgesem, D. (2019). The meaning of links: On the interpretation of hyperlinks in the study of polarization in blogging about climate change. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 65–78.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0014 - *Engebretsen, M. (2023). Communicating health advice on social media: A multimodal case study. MedieKultur, 39(74), 164–184.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.134085 - Ervasti, H., Fridberg, T., Hjerm, M., Ringdal, K., & Kangas, O. (2008). The Nordic model. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 1–21). Edward Elgar.
- *Farjam, M., Bruhn, T., Gustofsson, N., & Segesten, A. D. (2024). The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 1–34.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0002 - *Farkas, J., & Schousboe, S. (2024). Facts, values, and the epistemic authority of journalism: How journalists use and define the terms fake news, junk news, misinformation, and disinformation. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 137–157.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0016 - *Farkas, J., & Schwartz, S. A. (2018). Please like, comment and share our campaign! How social media managers for Danish political parties perceive user-generated content. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 19–33.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0008 - *Flensburg, S., & Lai, S. S., (2020a). Comparing digital communication systems: An empirical framework for analysing the political economy of digital infrastructures. Nordicom Review, 41(2), 127–145.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0019 - Flensburg, S., & Lai, S. S. (2020b). Mapping digital communication systems: Infrastructures, markets, and policies as regulatory forces. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 692–710.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876533 - *Friis, J. A. (2022). Mellem underholdende kedsomhed og bedøvende overstimulering: Affektive rytmer i oplevelsen af hashtag-fænomenet #ProudBoys på Twitter [Between entertaining boredom and numbing overstimulation: Affective rhythms and experiences of the hashtag phenomenon #ProudBoys on Twitter]. MedieKultur, 38(72), 6–27.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.125739 - *Gelfgren, S. (2015). Why does the archbishop not tweet? Nordicom Review, 36(1), 109–123.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0009 - Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press. (Original work published 1979)
- Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). The MIT Press.
- Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderations, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
- *Givskov, C., & Trenz, H.-J. (2014). Civic engagement through mainstream online newspapers: Possibilities and shortcomings. MedieKultur, 30(56), 44–60.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16969 - *Grønning, A., & Sandberg, H. (2023). Introduction: The entanglements of media and health in everyday life. MedieKultur, 39(74), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.136096 - *Guðmundsson, B. (2019). Logics of the Icelandic hybrid media system: Snapchat and media-use before the 2016 and 2017 Alting elections. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 43–59.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0001 - Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2016). In the wake of new media: Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(4), 223–237.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281 - Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2020). Strategizing communication: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Samfundslitteratur.
- Gunkel, D. (2019). The medium of truth: Media studies in the post-truth era. Review of Communication, 19(4), 309–323.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1667015 - *Haanshuus, B. P., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2021). Recontextualising the news. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 37–50.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0005 - *Haastrup, H. K. (2018). Hermione’s feminist book club: Celebrity activism and cultural critique. MedieKultur, 34(65), 98–116.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104842 - *Haastrup, H. K. (2022). Personalising climate change on Instagram: Self-presentation, authenticity, and emotion. MedieKultur, 38(72), 65–85.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.129149 - Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
- Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press.
- Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171.
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341 - *Hansen, S. S. (2022). Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956–2021. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 56–78.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0004 - Hartley, J. M., Bengtsson, M., Hansen, A. S., & Sivertsen, M. F. (2023). Researching publics in a datafied society: Insights from four approaches to the concept of ‘publics’ and a (hybrid) research agenda. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1668–1686.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211021045 - *Hartley, J. M., & Pedersen, L. H. (2019). Beyond the informed citizen? Narratives of news engagement and civic experiences among Danish news users. MedieKultur, 35(66), 55–74.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.112626 - *Hornmoen, H., Hågvar, Y., Hyde-Clarke, N., Fonn, B. K., & Stuedahl, D. (2022). Media narratives, agonistic deliberation, and Skam: An analysis of how young people communicate in digital spaces. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0001 - *Isaksson, M., & Jørgensen, P. E. F. (2018). Connecting with citizens: The emotional rhetoric of Norwegian and Danish municipal websites. Nordicom Review, 39(1), 111–128.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0005 - *Jaakkola, M. (2018). Vernacular reviews as a form of co-consumption: The user-generated review videos on YouTube. MedieKultur, 34(65), 10–30.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104485 - *Jangdal, L. (2019). Local democracy and the media. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 69–83.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0027 - *Jensen, J. L. (2014). Online deliberation and beyond? A time-based and comparative study of Danish political debates online. MedieKultur, 30(56), 23–43.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16327 - *Jensen, J. L., & Dalbøge, J. (2023). I deres egen verden: Danske journalisters interaktioner på Twitter [In their own world: Danish journalists’ interactions on Twitter]. MedieKultur, 39(75), 136–155.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i75.134991 - Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203–222.
https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12014 - *Jensen, M., B., & Hvidtfeldt, K. (2023). Reconfigurations of illness and masculinity on Instagram. MedieKultur, 39(74), 73–104.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133885 - *Johansen, S. L., Lundtofte, T. E., & Mortensen, C. H. (2023). Pandemedia: How Covid-19 has affected the role of media in society. MedieKultur, 38(73), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.134829 - *Johansen, S. L., & Givskov, C. (2014). Media and civic engagement. MedieKultur, 30(56), 1–4.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.17286 - Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Disinformation and the structural transformations of the public arena: Addressing the actual to democracy. Social Media + Society, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928 - Just, S. N. (2016). This is not a pipe: Rationality and affect in European public debate. Communication and the Public, 1(3), 276–289.
https://doi.org/10.1177/205704731665581 - Just, S. N. (2019). An assemblage of avatars: Digital organization as affective intensification in the GamerGate controversy. Organization, 26(5), 716–738.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419842710 - Just, S. N. (2024). Controversial encounters in the age of algorithms: How digital technologies are stifling public debate and what to do about it. Bristol University Press.
- Just, S. N., Christensen, J. F., & Schwarzkopf, S. (2025). Disconnective action: Online activism against a corporate sponsorship at WorldPride 2021. New Media & Society, 27(1), 502–521.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231178775 - Jäger, A. (2024). Hyperpolitik. Informations Forlag.
- *Jørgensen, R. F. (2016). The right to privacy under pressure. Nordicom Review, 37(S1), 165–170.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0030 - *Jørgensen, R. F., & Zuleta, L. (2020). Private governance of freedom of expression on social media platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights. Nordicom Review, 41(1), 51–67.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0003 - Kalsnes, B., Falasca, K., & Kammer, A. (2021). Scandinavian political journalism in a time of fake news and disinformation. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. N. Kristensen, & L. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 283–304). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-14 - *Karlsson, M., Van Couvering, E. & Lindell, J. (2022). Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform era. Nordicom Review, 43(2), 190–213.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012 - *Kjær, K. M., Christiansen, L. B., & Heiselberg, M. H. (2022). Introduction digital activism and participation: Affect, feelings and politics. MedieKultur, 38(72), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v38i72.131969 - Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952 - Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4653–4670.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818779750 - *Klitgård, I. (2020). “Critical parents against plaster”: The MMR vaccination drama as satirical parody. MedieKultur, 36(68), 4–24.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.118571 - *Klug, D., Evans, M., & Kaufman, G. (2022). How TikTok served as a platform for young people to share and cope with lived COVID-19 experiences. MedieKultur, 38(73), 152–170.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128463 - *Knudsen, G. H., & Nielsen, M. V. (2019). Exploring the mediatization of organizational communication by religious communities in digital media. MedieKultur, 35(66), 101–121.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.106274 - Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s laws”. Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3105385 - *Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2018). Cultural journalists on social media. MedieKultur, 34(65), 76–97.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104488 - *Kristensen, N. N., Haastrup, H. K., & Holdgaard, N. (2018). Cultural critique: Re-negotiating cultural authority in digital media culture. MedieKultur, 34(65), 3–9.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.111265 - *Krzyżanowski, M., Ekman, M., Nilsson, P.-E., Gardell, M., & Christensen, C. (2021). Uncivility, racism, and populism: Discourses and interactive practices in anti- and post-democratic communication. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 3–15.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003 - Lafont, C. (2019). Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
- *Lai, S. S., Pagh, J., & Zeng, F. H. (2019). Tracing communicative patterns: A comparative ethnography across platforms, media and contexts. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 141–157.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0019 - *Larsson, A. O. (2014). Everyday elites, citizens, or extremists? Assessing the use and users of non-election political hashtags. MedieKultur, 30(56), 61–78.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8951 - *Larsson, S. (2014). Battling mainstream media, commentators and organized debaters: Experiences from citizens’ online opinion writing in Sweden. Nordicom Review, 35(2), 77–89.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0016 - *Lie, M. P. (2018). Local newspapers, Facebook and local civic engagement: A study of media use in two Norwegian communities. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 49–62.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0011 - *Liminga, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2023). Undermining the legitimacy of news media: How Swedish members of parliament use Twitter to criticise the news media. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 279–298.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0015 - Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P. H. (2020), Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719855301 - Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 74–101.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 - *Maagaard, C., & Lundholt, M. W. (2018). Taking spoofs seriously: Spoofs as counter-narratives in volunteer discourse. MedieKultur, 34(64), 116–137.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.24837 - *Magin, M., Larsson, A. O., Skogerbø, E., & Tønnesen, H. (2024). What makes the difference? Social media platforms and party characteristics as contextual factors for political parties’ use of populist political communication. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 36–65.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0007 - *Mai, J.-E. (2016). Three models of privacy: New perspectives on informational privacy. Nordicom Review, 37(S1), 171–175.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0031 - Marres, N. (2005). Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In B. Latour, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 208–217). The MIT Press.
- *Mathieu, D., & Jorge, A. (2020). The datafication of media (and) audiences: An introduction. MedieKultur, 36(69), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.122585 - *Mattus, M. (2014). The anyone-can-edit syndrome: Intercreation stories of three featured articles on Wikipedia. Nordicom Review, 35(1), 189–204.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0112 - *Mayerhöffer, E., Kristensen, J. B., & Ramsland, T. (2024). Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environment in Sweden and Denmark. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 92–119.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0009 - McMahon, L., Kleinman, Z., & Subramanian, C. (2025). Facebook and Instagram to get rid of fact checkers. BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly74mpy8klo - Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428 - Ministry of Digital Affairs. (2024). Tech-giganternes rolle som digital infrastruktur [The role of the tech giants as digital infrastructure].
https://tinyurl.com/2jawmjfj - *Moe, H., Lindtner, S., & Ytre-Arne, B. (2023). Polarisation and echo chambers? Making sense of the climate issue with social media in everyday life. Nordicom Review, 44(1), 23–43.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0002 - Moyo, L. (2009). Digital democracy: Enhancing the public sphere. In G. Creeber, & R. Martin (Eds.), Digital cultures: Understanding new media (pp. 139–150). Open University Press.
- *Mozdeika, L. (2024). Between civic virtue and vice: Self-censorship of political views on social media among Norwegian young adults. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 152–172.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0011 - *Møller, K., & Nordtug, M. (2022). Platformed bodies. MedieKultur, 37(71), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.128779 - Neuberger, C., Bartsch, A., Fröhlich, R., Hanitzsch, T., Reinemann, C., & Schindler, J. (2023). The digital transformation of knowledge order: A model for the analysis of the epistemic crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(2), 180–201.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950 - *Nielsen, L. Y. (2018). PewDiePie som kulturkritisk aktør – metakritik og konstruktionen af ‘indie’ [PewDiePie as a culturally critical actor – metacriticism and the construction of ‘indie’]. MedieKultur, 34(65), 31–53.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104552 - *Nielsen, L. Y., & Petersen, F. B. (2021). Regarding the mains of others: The spectacular bodies of mukbang videos. MedieKultur, 37(71), 122–144.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125685 - *Nielsen, R. K. (2014). Political communication research: New media, new challenges, and new opportunities. MedieKultur, 30(56), 5–22.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.9712 - *Nilsson, P.-E. (2021). “The new extreme right”: Uncivility, irony, and displacement in the French re-information sphere. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 89–102.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0008 - Nordbrandt, M. (2023). Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3392–3411.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393 - Nordic Council of Ministers. (2023). A Nordic approach to democratic debate in the age of big tech: Recommendations from the Nordic think tank for tech and democracy.
https://doi.org/10.6027/nord2023-004 - *Nordtug, M. (2020). Creating opportunities for digital engagement and participation. MedieKultur, 36(68), 25–41.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.114919 - O’Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2018). Four internets: The geopolitics of digital governance. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.206web.pdf - *Oh, D., Elayan, S., Sykora, M., & Downey, J. (2021). Unpacking uncivil society: Incivility and intolerance in the 2018 Irish abortion referendum discussions on Twitter. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 103–118.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0009 - *Olesen, M. (2018). #walkouton77: football fan activism in Premier League. MedieKultur, 34(65), 117–137.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104550 - Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244 - Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics. Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
- *Paulsen, I. H. (2023). Is mental health normalised in Norwegian news media? How mental health was framed in VG.no and NRK.no, 2018–2021. MedieKultur, 39(75), 114–135.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i75.141485 - Pfetsch, B. (2020). Democracy and digital dissonance: The co-occurrence of the transformation of political culture and communication infrastructure. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(25), 96–110.
https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.13.1(25).7 - *Photiou, I., Papadopoulou, L., Eleftheriadou, A., & Maniou, T. A. (2019). Visual Infotainment in the political news: A cultural approach in the post-truth era. MedieKultur, 35(66), 75–100.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.105281 - Picone, I. Kleut, J., Pavlíčková, T., Romic, B., Hartley, J. M., & De Ridder, S. (2019). Small acts of engagement: Reconnecting productive audiences with everyday practices. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2010–2028.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481983756 - Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: Connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213–231.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539 - *Rasmussen, P. K. B., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2022). Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices: Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy. MedieKultur, 37(71), 73–97.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125300 - *Raun, T., & Petersen, M. N. (2021). The mediatization of self-tracking: Knowledge production and community building in YouTube videos. Mediekultur, 37(71), 161–186.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125250 - *Raun, T., Rudloff, M., Thorhauge, A. M., & Sandvik, K. (2016). Introduction to gender and media revisited. MedieKultur, 32(61), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.24788 - *Reißmann, W., Siemon, M., Lünenborg, M., & Raetzsch, C. (2023). Making (female) health care work matter: The performative publics of #systemrelevant during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. MedieKultur, 38(73), 73–99.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128451 - *Robinson, J. Y. (2024). American media, Scandinavian audiences: Contextual fragmentation and polarization among Swedes and Norwegians engaging in American politics. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 120–152.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0010 - *Ruzza, C. (2021). The institutionalisation of populist political discourse and conservative uncivil society in the European Union: From the margins to the mainstream? Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 119–133.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0010 - *Sakariassen, H. (2020). A digital public sphere: Just in theory or a perceived reality for users of social network sites? MedieKultur, 36(68), 126–146.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.118440 - *Salonen, M., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2023). Post-publication gatekeeping practices: Exploring conversational and individual gatekeeping in Finnish newspapers’ Instagram accounts. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 253–278.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0014 - *Sandberg, L. A. C., Bjereld, U., Bunyik, K., Forsberg, M., & Johansson, R. (2019). Issue salience on Twitter during Swedish party leaders’ debates. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 49–61.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0033 - *Schreiber, M. (2023). #strokesurvivor on Instagram: Conjunctive experiences of adapting to disability. MedieKultur, 39(74), 50–72.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.132468 - *Segaard, S. B. (2015). Perceptions of social media. Nordicom Review, 36(2), 65–78.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0017 - *Severin-Nielsen, M. K. (2023). Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 172–193.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0010 - *Solverson, E. (2024). Active spectating in the digital public sphere: A qualitative exploration. Nordicom Review, 45(2), 170–194.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0018 - Stark, D., & Vanden Broeck, P. (2024). Principles of algorithmic management. Organization Theory, 5(2).
https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877241257213 - *Steinveg, B., & Bjørnå, H. (2023). Social media as an agenda-setting instrument in local politics. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 299–314.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0016 - *Stenström, K., & Pargman, T. C. (2021). Existential vulnerability and transition: Struggling with involuntary childlessness on Instagram. Nordicom Review, 42(S4), 168–184.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0048 - *Stenström, K., & Winter, K. (2022). Collective, unruly, and becoming: Bodies in and through TTC communication. MedieKultur, 37(71), 31–53.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.122653 - *Storsul, T. (2014). Deliberation or self-presentation? Young people, politics and social media. Nordicom Review, 35(2), 17–28.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0012 - *Svendsen, E. (2018). Danske intellektuelle på Facebook - eksemplificeret ved Svend Brinkmann og Carsten Jensen [Danish intellectuals on Facebook – exemplified by Svend Brinkmann and Carsten Jensen]. MedieKultur, 34(65), 54–75.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104886 - *Sveningsson, M., Vestberg, A., & Hedström, J. (2022). “Not quite the struggle of normatives”: Belonging and entitlement in Swedish “body activism”. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 38–55.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0003 - *Svensson, E.-M., & Edström, M. (2016). Market-driven challenges to freedom of expression and the interaction between the state, the market, and the media. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0013 - Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies (pp. 334–357). Routledge.
- Thomsen, M., Steinitz, S., Sivertsen, M. F., & Just, S. N. (2025). Digital community centers of the 21st century? A mixed-methods study of Facebook groups as fora for connective democracy. Social Media + Society, 11(1).
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251329063 - Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130 - *Tuomola, S. (2021). Who are you, the people? Nordicom Review, 42(1), 51–65.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0006 - *Valtysson, B. (2015). After the performance. Nordicom Review, 36(2), 61–64.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0016 - van Dijk, J. (2000). Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In K. L. Hacker, & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 30–53). Sage.
- Warner, M. (2002). Public and Counterpublics. Zone Books.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218891 - Whipple, M. (2005). The Dewey-Lippmann debate today: Communication distortions, reflective agency, and participatory democracy. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 156–178.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00248.x - *Widholm, A., & Ekman, M. (2024). Democracy and digital disintegration: Platforms, actors, citizens. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0005 - Winseck, D. (2002). Illusions of perfect information and fantasies of control in the information society. New Media & Society, 4(1), 93–122.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226280 - *Ytre-Arne, B. (2016). The social media experiences of long-term patients: Illness, identity, and participation. Nordicom Review, 37(1), 57–70.
https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0002 - *Zhao, J. (2017). Hong Kong protests: A quantitative and bottom-up account of resistance against Chinese social media (sina weibo) censorship. MedieKultur, 33(62), 72–99.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v33i62.24325 - Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.