Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mediating Power-to-X: A case study of green imaginaries and environmental conflicts in local Danish news media Cover

Mediating Power-to-X: A case study of green imaginaries and environmental conflicts in local Danish news media

By: Anders HorsbølORCID  
Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
  2. Beck, S., Jasanoff, S., Stirling, A., & Polzin, C. (2021). The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010
  3. Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (2010). (Eds.). Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan.
  4. Byrgesen, K. (2021, June 19). Power-to-X. Brint- og energiby eller oplevelses- og kulturby? Jeg er ikke i tvivl [Power-to-X. Hydrogen and energy city or experience and culture city? I have no doubt]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  5. Carbaugh, D., & Cerulli, T. (2013). Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based practice. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.749296
  6. Carvalho, A., Riquito, M., & Ferreira, V. (2022). Sociotechnical imaginaries of energy transition: The case of the Portuguese roadmap for carbon neutrality 2050. Energy Reports, 8, 2413–2423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.138
  7. Daiyan, R., MacGill, I., & Amal, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges for renewable Power-to-X. ACS Energy Lett, 5(12), 3843–3847. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02249
  8. Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. (2021). The government's strategy for Power-to-X. https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/ptx/strategy_ptx.pdf
  9. Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004
  10. Díaz-Pont, L., Maeseele, P., Sjolander, A. E., Mishra, M., & Foxwell-Norton, K. (Eds.). (2020). The local and the digital in environmental communication. Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37330-6
  11. Dryzek, J. S. (2021). The politics of the Earth (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  12. Ellis, G., & Ferraro, G. (2016). The social acceptance of wind energy: Where we stand and the path ahead. Publications office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2789/696070
  13. Ellis, G., Schneider, N., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2023). Dynamics of social acceptance of renewable energy: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 181, 113706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113706
  14. Eskjær, M. (2019). Et tabt årti? Dansk klimadækning siden COP15 [A lost decade? Danish climate coverage since COP15]. Tidsskriftet Politik, 22(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v22i3.117726
  15. Eskjær, M. F., & Horsbøl, A. (2023). New environmental controversies: Towards a typology of green conflicts. Sustainability, 15(3), 1914. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15031914
  16. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
  17. Fløttum, K., & Gjerstad, Ø. (2017). Narratives in climate change discourse. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), e429. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.429
  18. Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
  19. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. Amerian Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1086/229213
  20. Gravengaard, G. (2010). Journalistik i praksis: valg og fravalg af nyhedsideer [Journalism in practice: Selection and non-selection of news ideas]. Samfundslitteratur.
  21. Hagmund-Hansen, P. (2023, May 2). Solceller ødelægger livet – for de få [Solar cells ruin life – for the few]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  22. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
  23. Hanghøj, N. (2021a, April 11). Ingen bekymringer over brintfabrik – nul spørgsmål til ansøgning [No worries about hydrogen plant - zero questions about application]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  24. Hanghøj, N. (2021b, August 19). Nu går den grønne omstilling i gang på en mark ved Ydre Ringvej [Now the green conversion is getting underway on a field at Ydre Ringvej]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  25. Hanghøj, N. (2023a, January 1). Fredericia vil levere fremtidens grønne brændsler [Fredericia will supply the green fuels of the future]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  26. Hanghøj, N. (2023b, January 24). Kæmpe solcellepark på tegnebrættet på Ydre Ringvej [Giant solar park on the drawing board on Ydre Ringvej]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  27. Hanghøj, N. (2023c, February 10). Politikere sætter solceller ved Ydre Ringvej i venteposition [Politicians put solar cells at Ydre Ringvej on hold]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  28. Hanghøj, N. (2023d, April 16). Nervøse naboer indkaldt til møde om mega solcellepark [Nervous neighbours summoned to meeting about mega solar park]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  29. Hanghøj, N. (2023e, May 5). Naboerne til solceller bag raffinaderiet siger nej tak [The neighbours of solar cells behind the refinery say no thanks]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  30. Hansen, A. (2015). News coverage of the environment: A longitudinal perspective. In A. Hansen, & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environmental communication (pp. 209–220). Routledge.
  31. Harcup, T., & O'Neill, D. (2017). What is news? Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193
  32. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Blackwell.
  33. Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Polity.
  34. Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of mediatization. Polity.
  35. Hjarvard S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge.
  36. Holm, H. N. (2022, March 3). Green Hydrogen henter flere kunder trods underskud på 149 mio. kroner [Green Hydrogen acquires more customers despite a deficit of DKK 149 million]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  37. Horsbøl, A. (2013). Energy transition in and by the local media: The public emergence of an ‘energy town’. Nordicom Review, 34(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0051
  38. Horsbøl, A. (2020). Green conflicts in environmental discourse: A topos-based integrative analysis of critical voices. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617757
  39. Huan, C. (2024). Politicized or popularized? News values and news voices in China's and Australia's media discourse of climate change. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2200194
  40. Hutchins, B., & Lester, L. (2015). Theorizing the enactment of mediatized environmental conflict. International Communication Gazette, 77(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514568765
  41. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge.
  42. Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical discourse stylistics: The power of English. Palgrave Macmillan.
  43. jfm business. (n.d.). Fredericia Dagblad. Retrieved July 2, 2024, from https://business.jfm.dk/nyhedsmedier/aviser-og-nyhedssites/fredericia-dagblad/
  44. Killerich, M. S. (2021, March 17). Byrådsmedlemmer uenige om sikkerheden på måske kommende brintfabrik [City councilors disagree about the safety of a possible future hydrogen factory]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  45. Kim, S. H., & Jasanoff, S. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. The University of Chicago Press.
  46. Kirkegaard, J., K., Cronin, T., Nyborg, S., & Karnøe, P. (2021). Paradigm shift in Danish wind power: The (un)sustainable transformation of a sector. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1799769
  47. Kruse, H. (2021, February 13). Trekantområdet vil være centrum for grønne brændstoffer [The triangle area will be the centre for green fuels]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  48. Laursen, P. A. M. (2021, February 13). Grøn omstilling: Fredericia skal satse på Power-to-X [Green transition: Fredericia must bet on Power-to-X]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  49. Le Billon, P. (2015). Environmental Conflict. In T. Perreault, G. Bridge, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of political ecology (pp. 598–608). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759289
  50. Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (Eds.). (2013). Environmental conflict and the media. Peter Lang.
  51. Lischinsky, A., & Sjölander, A. E. (2014). Talking green in the public sphere: Press releases, corporate voices and the environment. Nordicom Review, 35(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0108
  52. Luhmann, N. (1996). Die Realität der Massenmedien [The reality of mass media]. Westdeutscher Verlag.
  53. Madsen, K. (2023, January 14). Green Tech-iværksætter vil opføre fabrik i Fredericia [Green Tech entrepreneur will build a factory in Fredericia]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  54. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
  55. Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Denmark. (n.d.). Denmark's huge Power-to-X potential. Retrieved July 2, 2024, from https://investindk.com/set-up-a-business/cleantech/power-to-x
  56. Nerlich, B., Forsyth, R., & Clarke, D. (2012). Climate in the news: How differences in media discourse between the US and UK reflect national priorities. Environmental Communication, 6(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.644633
  57. Palys, J. M., & Daoutidis, P. (2022). Power-to-X: A review and perspective. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 165, 107948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107948
  58. Rand, J., & Hoen, B. (2017). Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? Energy Research & Social Science, 29, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
  59. Rasmussen, R. D. (2021, April 14). Fremtidens brændstoffer: Kun ved at samarbejde kan vi få grønne transportløsninger [Fuels of the future: Only by working together can we get green transport solutions]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  60. Roddis, P., Roelich, K., Tran, K., Carver, S., Dallimer, M., & Ziv, G. (2020). What shapes community acceptance of large-scale solar farms? A case study of the UK's first ‘nationally significant’ solar farm. Solar Energy, 209, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.065
  61. Rudek, T. J., & Huang, H. T. (2023). Future at play: Applying reflexive public reason in the case of Taiwanese energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 106, 103325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103325
  62. Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(1), e675. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675
  63. Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. Routledge.
  64. Siemens Energy. (2021). Power-to-X: The crucial business on the way to a carbon-free world. https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/offerings/technical-papers/download-power-to-x.html
  65. Simmet, H. R. (2018). “Lighting a dark continent”: Imaginaries of energy transition in Senegal. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.022
  66. Skov, I. R., Schneider, N., Schweiger, G., Schöggl, J.-P., & Posch, A. (2021). Power-to-X in Denmark: An analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Energies, 14(4), 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040913
  67. Sparre, M. (2022a, November 15). Brintfirma køber grund i Stakkesvang [Brintfirma buys land in Stakkesvang]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  68. Sparre, M. (2022b, December 29). Testforsøg på brintfabrik gik godt [Tests at the hydrogen factory went well]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  69. Sterner, M., & Specht, M. (2021). Power-to-gas and power-to-X – The history and results of developing a new storage concept. Energies, 14(20), 6594. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206594
  70. Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. D. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge University Press.
  71. van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing social action. Discourse & Society, 6(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005
  72. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical analysis. Oxford University Press.
  73. Vind, N. M., & Olsen, K. B. (2023, January 31). Replik: Solceller skal op på tagene, ikke besætte god landbrugsjord [Reply: Solar cells must go up on roofs, not occupy good agricultural land]. Fredericia Dagblad.
  74. Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O'Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). ‘Green On green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(6), 853–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294376
  75. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
  76. Zoé, C., Devine-Wright, P., & Wills, J. (2021). Integrating sociotechnical and spatial imaginaries in researching energy futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102207
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 217 - 237
Published on: Sep 26, 2024
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Anders Horsbøl, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.