Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
Beck, S., Jasanoff, S., Stirling, A., & Polzin, C. (2021). The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010
Byrgesen, K. (2021, June 19). Power-to-X. Brint- og energiby eller oplevelses- og kulturby? Jeg er ikke i tvivl [Power-to-X. Hydrogen and energy city or experience and culture city? I have no doubt]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Carbaugh, D., & Cerulli, T. (2013). Cultural discourses of dwelling: Investigating environmental communication as a place-based practice. Environmental Communication, 7(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.749296
Carvalho, A., Riquito, M., & Ferreira, V. (2022). Sociotechnical imaginaries of energy transition: The case of the Portuguese roadmap for carbon neutrality 2050. Energy Reports, 8, 2413–2423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.138
Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. (2021). The government's strategy for Power-to-X.https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/ptx/strategy_ptx.pdf
Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004
Díaz-Pont, L., Maeseele, P., Sjolander, A. E., Mishra, M., & Foxwell-Norton, K. (Eds.). (2020). The local and the digital in environmental communication. Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37330-6
Ellis, G., & Ferraro, G. (2016). The social acceptance of wind energy: Where we stand and the path ahead. Publications office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2789/696070
Ellis, G., Schneider, N., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2023). Dynamics of social acceptance of renewable energy: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 181, 113706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113706
Eskjær, M. (2019). Et tabt årti? Dansk klimadækning siden COP15 [A lost decade? Danish climate coverage since COP15]. Tidsskriftet Politik, 22(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v22i3.117726
Eskjær, M. F., & Horsbøl, A. (2023). New environmental controversies: Towards a typology of green conflicts. Sustainability, 15(3), 1914. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15031914
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. Amerian Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1086/229213
Gravengaard, G. (2010). Journalistik i praksis: valg og fravalg af nyhedsideer [Journalism in practice: Selection and non-selection of news ideas]. Samfundslitteratur.
Hanghøj, N. (2021a, April 11). Ingen bekymringer over brintfabrik – nul spørgsmål til ansøgning [No worries about hydrogen plant - zero questions about application]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hanghøj, N. (2021b, August 19). Nu går den grønne omstilling i gang på en mark ved Ydre Ringvej [Now the green conversion is getting underway on a field at Ydre Ringvej]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hanghøj, N. (2023a, January 1). Fredericia vil levere fremtidens grønne brændsler [Fredericia will supply the green fuels of the future]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hanghøj, N. (2023b, January 24). Kæmpe solcellepark på tegnebrættet på Ydre Ringvej [Giant solar park on the drawing board on Ydre Ringvej]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hanghøj, N. (2023c, February 10). Politikere sætter solceller ved Ydre Ringvej i venteposition [Politicians put solar cells at Ydre Ringvej on hold]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hanghøj, N. (2023d, April 16). Nervøse naboer indkaldt til møde om mega solcellepark [Nervous neighbours summoned to meeting about mega solar park]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hanghøj, N. (2023e, May 5). Naboerne til solceller bag raffinaderiet siger nej tak [The neighbours of solar cells behind the refinery say no thanks]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Hansen, A. (2015). News coverage of the environment: A longitudinal perspective. In A. Hansen, & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environmental communication (pp. 209–220). Routledge.
Holm, H. N. (2022, March 3). Green Hydrogen henter flere kunder trods underskud på 149 mio. kroner [Green Hydrogen acquires more customers despite a deficit of DKK 149 million]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Horsbøl, A. (2013). Energy transition in and by the local media: The public emergence of an ‘energy town’. Nordicom Review, 34(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0051
Horsbøl, A. (2020). Green conflicts in environmental discourse: A topos-based integrative analysis of critical voices. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617757
Huan, C. (2024). Politicized or popularized? News values and news voices in China's and Australia's media discourse of climate change. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2200194
Hutchins, B., & Lester, L. (2015). Theorizing the enactment of mediatized environmental conflict. International Communication Gazette, 77(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514568765
Killerich, M. S. (2021, March 17). Byrådsmedlemmer uenige om sikkerheden på måske kommende brintfabrik [City councilors disagree about the safety of a possible future hydrogen factory]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Kim, S. H., & Jasanoff, S. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. The University of Chicago Press.
Kirkegaard, J., K., Cronin, T., Nyborg, S., & Karnøe, P. (2021). Paradigm shift in Danish wind power: The (un)sustainable transformation of a sector. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1799769
Kruse, H. (2021, February 13). Trekantområdet vil være centrum for grønne brændstoffer [The triangle area will be the centre for green fuels]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Laursen, P. A. M. (2021, February 13). Grøn omstilling: Fredericia skal satse på Power-to-X [Green transition: Fredericia must bet on Power-to-X]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Le Billon, P. (2015). Environmental Conflict. In T. Perreault, G. Bridge, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of political ecology (pp. 598–608). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759289
Lischinsky, A., & Sjölander, A. E. (2014). Talking green in the public sphere: Press releases, corporate voices and the environment. Nordicom Review, 35(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0108
Madsen, K. (2023, January 14). Green Tech-iværksætter vil opføre fabrik i Fredericia [Green Tech entrepreneur will build a factory in Fredericia]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Denmark. (n.d.). Denmark's huge Power-to-X potential. Retrieved July 2, 2024, from https://investindk.com/set-up-a-business/cleantech/power-to-x
Nerlich, B., Forsyth, R., & Clarke, D. (2012). Climate in the news: How differences in media discourse between the US and UK reflect national priorities. Environmental Communication, 6(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.644633
Rand, J., & Hoen, B. (2017). Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? Energy Research & Social Science, 29, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
Rasmussen, R. D. (2021, April 14). Fremtidens brændstoffer: Kun ved at samarbejde kan vi få grønne transportløsninger [Fuels of the future: Only by working together can we get green transport solutions]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Roddis, P., Roelich, K., Tran, K., Carver, S., Dallimer, M., & Ziv, G. (2020). What shapes community acceptance of large-scale solar farms? A case study of the UK's first ‘nationally significant’ solar farm. Solar Energy, 209, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.065
Rudek, T. J., & Huang, H. T. (2023). Future at play: Applying reflexive public reason in the case of Taiwanese energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 106, 103325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103325
Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(1), e675. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675
Siemens Energy. (2021). Power-to-X: The crucial business on the way to a carbon-free world.https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/offerings/technical-papers/download-power-to-x.html
Simmet, H. R. (2018). “Lighting a dark continent”: Imaginaries of energy transition in Senegal. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.022
Skov, I. R., Schneider, N., Schweiger, G., Schöggl, J.-P., & Posch, A. (2021). Power-to-X in Denmark: An analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Energies, 14(4), 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040913
Sterner, M., & Specht, M. (2021). Power-to-gas and power-to-X – The history and results of developing a new storage concept. Energies, 14(20), 6594. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206594
Vind, N. M., & Olsen, K. B. (2023, January 31). Replik: Solceller skal op på tagene, ikke besætte god landbrugsjord [Reply: Solar cells must go up on roofs, not occupy good agricultural land]. Fredericia Dagblad.
Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O'Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). ‘Green On green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(6), 853–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294376
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
Zoé, C., Devine-Wright, P., & Wills, J. (2021). Integrating sociotechnical and spatial imaginaries in researching energy futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102207