Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Who are the users of Danish alternative media? A survey study on the prevalence of alternative news use in Denmark and profiles of the users Cover

Who are the users of Danish alternative media? A survey study on the prevalence of alternative news use in Denmark and profiles of the users

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Albæk, E., Hopmann, D. N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Kunsten at holde balancen: Dækningen af folketingsvalgkampe i tv-nyhederne på DR1 og TV2 1994–2007 [The art of balancing: The coverage of general election campaigns in television news on DR1 and TV2 1994–2007]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
  2. Albæk, E., van Dalen, A., Pihl-Tingvad, S., Skovsgaard, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Den danske journalist: værdier, produktion, indhold [The Danish journalist: Values, production, content]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
  3. Andersen, K, de Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2016). Measuring media diet in a high-choice environment – Testing the list-frequency technique. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150973
  4. Andersen, K., Johansson, J., Johansson, B., & Shehata, A. (2022). Maintenance and reformation of news repertoires: A latent transition analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(1), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211019750
  5. Andersen, K., Shehata, A., & Andersson, D. (2021). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412
  6. Arguedas, A., Robertson, C. T., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: A literature review. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.60625/RISJ-ETXJ-7K60
  7. Atton, C. (2002). News cultures and new social movements: Radical journalism and the mainstream media. Journalism Studies, 3(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670022000019209
  8. Blach-Ørsten, M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Det politiske informationslandskab i Danmark 2.0. [The political information landscape in Denmark 2.0]. Politica, 53(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130381
  9. Brems, M. K. (2022). Party-political and ideological partisanship in Danish alternative media: How distinguishing between types of partisanship can advance our understanding of the political roles of alternative media. Journalism Studies, 24(2), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157316
  10. Brems, M. K.. (2023). From stark opposition to partial adaption: How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media- and political mainstream. Journalistica, 17(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823
  11. Cushion, S. (2023). Beyond mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360865
  12. Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D., & Thomas, R. (2021). Why national media systems matter: A longitudinal analysis of how UK left-wing and right-wing alternative media critique mainstream media (2015–2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795
  13. Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Sage.
  14. Figenschou, T., & Ihlebæk, K. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
  15. Freudenthaler, R., & Wessler, H. (2022). Mapping emerging and legacy outlets online by their democratic functions – Agonistic, deliberative, or corrosive? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(2), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211015077
  16. Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2022). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the Covid-19 crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259
  17. Hansen, K. M. (2021). Vælgernes sociodemografiske træk fordelt på partierne [The electorate’s sociodemographic traits by the parties]. In K. M. Hansen, & R. Stubager (Eds.), Klimavalget [The climate election] (pp. 103–122). DJØF Forlag.
  18. Hansen, K. M., & Hjort, F. (2021). Udkantsdanmark og landlig bevidsthed [Outskirt Denmark and rural consciousness]. In K. M. Hansen, & R. Stubager (Eds.), Klimavalget [The climate election] (pp. 159–178). DJØF Forlag.
  19. Hansen, K. M., & Stubager, R. (2020). The Danish national election study 2019 [4. CVAP Working Paper Series]. Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
  20. Heft, A., Mayerhöffer E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219
  21. Helberger, N., & Wojcieszak, M. (2018). Exposure diversity. In P.M. Napoli (Ed.), Mediated communication (pp. 535–560). De Gruyter Mouton.
  22. Hjarvard, S. (2010). The views of the news: The role of political newspapers in a changing media landscape. Nothern Lights, 8(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.8.25_1
  23. Holt, K. (2020). Right-wing alternative media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454691
  24. Holt, K., Figenschou, T., & Frischlich L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
  25. Kenix, L. J. (2011). Alternative and mainstream media: The converging spectrum. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849665421
  26. Klawier, T., Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2022). Comparing frame repertoires of mainstream and right-wing alternative media. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1387–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2048186
  27. Kristensen, I. T., Kjeldsen, C., & Dalgaard, T. (2007). Landdistriktskommuner: Indikatorer for landdistrikt [Country district municipalities: Indicators for country district]. Danmarks Jord-brugsforskning.
  28. Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). News media, knowledge, and political interest: Evidence of a dual role from a field experiment. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12314
  29. Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787
  30. Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846
  31. Mayerhöffer, E., & Schwartz, S. (2020). Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or partisan? Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]. In S. Just, & I. Guldbrandsen (Eds.), #FV19: Politisk kommunikation på digitale medier [#FV19: Political communication on digital media] (pp. 203–226). Samfundslitteratur.
  32. McDowell-Naylor, D., Cushion, S., & Thomas, R. (2023). A typology of alternative online political media in the United Kingdom: A longitudinal content analysis (2015–2018). Journalism, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211059585
  33. Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. E. (2014, October 21). Political polarization and media habits. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/
  34. Müller, P., & Bach, R. L. (2021). Populist alternative news use and its role for elections: Webtracking and survey evidence from two campaign periods. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2663–2683. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032969
  35. Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and co. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778
  36. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. (2018). Reuters Institute digital news report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/digital-news-report-2018
  37. Noppari, E., Hiltunen, I., & Ahva, L. (2019). User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative and Community Media, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1
  38. Nygaard, S. (2019). The appearance of objectivity: How immigration-critical alternative media report the news. Journalism Practice, 13(10), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1577697
  39. Pampel, F. C. (2021). Logistic regression: A primer (2nd ed.). Sage.
  40. Rae, M. (2021). Hyperpartisan news: Rethinking the media for populist politics. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910416
  41. Rauch, J. (2019). Comparing progressive and conservative audiences for alternative media and their attitudes towards journalism. In J. D. Atkinson, & L. J. Kenix (Eds.), Alternative media meets mainstream politics: Activist nation rising (pp. 19–38). Lexington Books.
  42. Reinemann, C., Matthes, J., & Sheafer, T. (2016). Citizens and populist political communication: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 381–393). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
  43. Schrøder, K., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2018). Danskernes brug af Nyhedsmedier 2018 [The Danish population’s use of news media 2018]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285599
  44. Schrøder, K., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2021). Danskernes brug af Nyhedsmedier 2021 [The Danish population’s use of news media 2021]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5749233
  45. Schulz, A. (2019.) Where populist citizens get the news: An investigation of news audience polarization along populist attitudes in 11 countries. Communication Monographs, 86(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1508876
  46. Schulze, H. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925
  47. Schwarzenegger, C. (2021). Communities of darkness? Users and uses of anti-system alternative media between audience and community. Media and Communication, 9(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3418
  48. Steppat, D., Castro, L., & Esser, F. (2021). What News users perceive as ‘alternative media’ varies between countries: How media fragmentation and polarization matter. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1939747
  49. Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds018
  50. Stubager R., Hansen, K. M., Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Nadeau, R. (2021). The Danish voter: Democratic ideals and challenges. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10031711
  51. Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital age. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
  52. Theorin, N., & Strömbäck, J. (2020). Some media matter more than others: Investigating media effects on attitudes toward and perceptions of immigration in Sweden. International Migration Review, 54(4), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319893292
  53. Thorbjørnsrud, K., & Figenschou, T. U. (2020). The alarmed citizen: Fear, mistrust, and alternative media. Journalism Practice, 16(5), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113
  54. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
  55. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2
  56. von Nordheim, G., Müller, H., & Scheppe, M. (2019). Young, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media coverage of the 2015–16 refugee crisis in German newspapers. Journal of Alternative and Community Media, 4(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00042_1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 81 - 113
Published on: Mar 21, 2024
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Miriam Kroman Brems, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.