References
- Abbott, J. Y. (2017). Tensions in the scholarship on participatory journalism and citizen journalism. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(3–4), 278–297.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1350927 - Ahva, L. (2013). Public journalism and professional reflexivity. Journalism, 14(6), 790–806.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912455895 - Backholm, K., Hägglund, S., Rautanen, K., & Wingren, M. (2022). What drives news choices and trust in journalism of young people? In V. J. E. Manninen, M. K. Niemi, & A. Ridge-Newman (Eds.), Futures of journalism: Technology-stimulated evolution in the audience-news media relationship (pp. 313–328). Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_20 - Bergström, A., & Wadbring, I. (2015). Beneficial yet crappy: Journalists and audiences on obstacles and opportunities in reader comments. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 137–151.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114559378 - Boberg, S., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Frischlich, L., & Quandt, T. (2018). The moral gatekeeper? Moderation and deletion of user-generated content in a leading news forum. Media and Communication, 6(4), 58–69.
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1493 - Borger, M., van Hoof, A., Costera Meijer, I., & Sanders, J. (2013). Constructing participatory journalism as a scholarly object: A genealogical analysis. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 117–134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740267 - Bro, P., & Wallberg, F. (2015). Gatekeeping in a digital era: Principles, practices and technological platforms. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 92–105.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928468 - Canter, L. (2013). The misconception of online comment threads: Content and control on local newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 7(5), 604–619.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.740172 - Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 307–326.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 - Cohen, J. (2002). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In D. Matravers, & J. E. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy (pp. 342–360). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986820 - Council for Mass Media in Finland. (2011, September 5). Journalistic guidelines.
https://jsn.fi/en/council-for-mass-media/ - Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
- Deuze, M., Bruns, A., & Neuberger, C. (2007). Preparing for an age of participatory news. Journalism Practice, 1(3), 322–338.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701504864 - European Commission. (2022, July 28). Digital economy and society index (DESI) 2022: Finland.
https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/88700 - Finnish Broadcasting Company. (n.d.). Guidelines for discussion.
https://yle.fi/aihe/s/discussion-policy - Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604432.001.0001 - Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton University Press.
- Habermas, J. (1986). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Wiley.
- Heinonen, A. (2011). The journalist’s relationship with users: New dimensions to conventional roles. In J. B. Singer, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, A. Hermida, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 34–55). Wiley-Blackwell.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444340747 - Kohvakka, R., & Saarenmaa, K. (2022, March 3). Verkkomedian seuraaminen yleistyi erityisesti pandemian alussa – toisena vuotena muutokset pienempiä [Following digital media became common especially in the beginning of the pandemic – smaller changes in the second year]. Statistics Finland.
https://www.stat.fi/tietotrendit/artikkelit/2022/verkkomedian-seuraaminen-yleistyi-erityisesti-pandemian-alussa-toisena-vuotena-muutokset-pienempia/ - Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (4th ed.). Random House.
- Kreiss, D., & Brennen, J. (2016). Normative models of digital journalism. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), The Sage handbook of digital journalism (pp. 299–314). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957909 - Liu, J., & McLeod, D. M. (2021). Pathways to news commenting and the removal of the comment system on news websites. Journalism, 22(4), 867–881.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919849954 - MacDonald, J. B., Saliba, A. J., Hodgins, G., & Ovington, L.A. (2016). Burnout in journalists: A systematic literature review. Burnout Research, 3(2), 34–44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2016.03.001 - Marchionni, D. M. (2013). Journalism-as-a-conversation: A concept explication. Communication Theory, 23(2), 131–147.
https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12007 - Masullo, G. M., Riedl, M. J., & Huang, Q. E. (2022). Engagement moderation: What journalists should say to improve online discussions. Journalism Practice, 16(4), 738–754.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1808858 - Masullo Chen, G., & Pain, P. (2017). Normalizing online comments. Journalism Practice, 11(7), 876–892.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1205954 - Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
- Morrison, J. (2017). Finishing the “unfinished” story: Online newspaper discussion threads as journalistic texts. Digital Journalism, 5(2), 213–232.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1165129 - Nelson, M. N., Ksiazek, T. B., & Springer, N. (2021). Killing the comments: Why do news organizations remove user commentary functions? Journalism and Media, 2(4), 572–583.
https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040034 - Newman, N. (2022). Executive summary and key findings. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, C. T. Robertson, K. Eddy, & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute digital news report 2022 (pp. 9–32). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022 - Nip, J. Y. (2006). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 212–236.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533528 - Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2022). A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 4209–4251.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175 - Peters, C., & Witschge. T. (2015). From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 19–34.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928455 - Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48.
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519 - Reporters Without Borders. (n.d.). Finland.
https://rsf.org/en/country/finland - Robinson, S. (2010). Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist–audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence, 16(1), 125–143.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347719 - Salonen, M., & Laaksonen, S. (2023). Post-publication gatekeeping practices. Exploring conversational and visual gatekeeping on Finnish newspapers’ Instagram accounts. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 253–278.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0014 - Salonen, M., Olbertz-Siitonen M., Uskali, T., & Laaksonen, S. (2023). Conversational gatekeeping – Social interactional practices of post-publication gatekeeping on newspapers’ Facebook pages. Journalism Practice, 17(9), 2053–2077.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2034520 - Santana, A. D. (2011). Online readers’ comments represent new opinion pipeline. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(3), 66–81.
https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291103200306 - Schultz, T. (1999). Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 U.S. newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(1), JCMC513.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00331.x - Singer, J. B., & Ashman, I. (2009). “Comment is free, but facts are sacred”: User-generated content and ethical constructs at the Guardian. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 24(1), 3–21.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520802644345 - Strandberg, K., Himmelroos, S., & Grönlund, K. (2019). Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization. International Political Science Review, 40(1), 41–57.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117692136 - Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A., & Curry, A. L. (2015). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 188–203.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12104 - Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950 - Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swsg - Thomas, R. J. (2022). The welcome persistence of “we write, you read” journalism. In V. J. E. Manninen, M. K. Niemi, & A. Ridge-Newman (Eds.), Futures of journalism: Technology-stimulated evolution in the audience-news media relationship (pp. 143–158). Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_10 - Wolfgang, J. D. (2016). Pursuing the ideal: How news website commenting policies structure public discourse. Digital Journalism, 4(6), 764–783.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1090882 - Wolfgang, J. D., McConnell, S., & Blackburn, H. (2020). Commenters as a threat to journalism? How comment moderators perceive the role of the audience. Digital Journalism, 8(7), 925–944.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1802319 - Zamith, R., & Lewis, S. C. (2014). From public spaces to public sphere: Rethinking systems for reader comments on online news sites. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 558–574.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.882066 - Ziegele, M., & Jost, P. B. (2020). Not funny? The effects of factual versus sarcastic journalistic responses to uncivil user comments. Communication Research, 47(6), 891–920.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216671854