Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environments in Sweden and Denmark Cover

Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environments in Sweden and Denmark

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the “counter” in counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x
  2. Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220153
  3. Bengtsson, M., Hansen, A. S., Hartley, J. M., Kristensen, J. B., Mayerhöffer, E., & Ramsland, T. (2021). Conspiracy theories during Covid 19: The case of Denmark. Roskilde University. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5556012
  4. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
  5. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
  6. Blondel, V., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment, P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  7. Boberg, S., Quandt, T., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020). Pandemic populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the corona crisis – A computational content analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02566. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.02566
  8. Brems, M. K. (2023). Party-political and ideological partisanship in Danish alternative media: How distinguishing between types of partisanship can advance our understanding of the political roles of alternative media. Journalism Studies, 24(2), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157316
  9. Brouwer, D. C. (2006). Communication as counterpublic. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as…perspectives on theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329055
  10. Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. Peter Lang.
  11. Bruns, A. (2015). Working the story: News curation in social media as a second wave of citizen journalism. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 379–388). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717241.
  12. Bruns, A. (2018). Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism social media and the public sphere. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b13293
  13. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, C., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
  14. Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002003
  15. Downing, J. D. H. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204994
  16. Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2022). Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communication. Journalism, 25(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136940
  17. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
  18. Freudenthaler, R. (2020). Which online counter-publics on Facebook are fostering agonistic respect? An assessment of counter-publics debating Germany’s refugee policy. Javnost – The Public, 27(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1804121
  19. Giglietto, F., Righetti, N., Rossi, L., & Marino, G. (2020). It takes a village to manipulate the media: Coordinated link sharing behavior during 2018 and 2019 Italian elections. Information, Communication & Society, 23(6), 867–891. https://doi.org/10/ggsmrg
  20. Graham, T., Bruns, A., Zhu, G., & Campbell, R. (2020). Like a virus: The coordinated spread of coronavirus disinformation. The Australia Institute. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/202960
  21. Grimme, C., Assenmacher, D., & Adam, L. (2018). Changing perspectives: Is it sufficient to detect social bots? In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media: User experience and behavior (Vol. 10913) (pp. 445–461). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91521-0_32
  22. Haanshuus, B. P., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2021). Recontextualising the news: How antisemitic discourses are constructed in extreme far-right alternative media. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0005
  23. Harcup, T. (2012). Alternative journalism, alternative voices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203077214
  24. Heft, A., & Buehling, K. (2022). Measuring the diffusion of conspiracy theories in digital information ecologies. Convergence, 28(4), 940–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221091809
  25. Heft, A., Knüpfer, C., Reinhardt, S., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Toward a transnational information ecology on the right? Hyperlink networking among right-wing digital news sites in Europe and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 484–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220963670
  26. Heft, A., Mayerhöffer, E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219
  27. Herasimenka, A., Bright, J., Knuutila, A., & Howard, P. N. (2022). Misinformation and professional news on largely unmoderated platforms: The case of Telegram. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 20(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2076272
  28. Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., & Weeks, B. (2021). Understanding audience engagement with mainstream and alternative news posts on Facebook. Digital Journalism, 9(5), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1924068
  29. Holt, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
  30. Howard, P. (2020). Lie machines: How to save democracy from troll armies, deceitful robots, junk news operations, and political operatives. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252415
  31. Humprecht, E., Hellmueller, L., & Lischka, J. A. (2020). Hostile emotions in news comments: A cross-national analysis of Facebook discussions. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120912481
  32. Häussler, T. (2021). Civil society, the media and the internet: Changing roles and challenging authorities in digital political communication ecologies. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1265–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1697338
  33. Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., Eldridge II, S. A., Frischlich, L., Cushion, S., & Holt, K. (2022). Understanding alternative news media and its contribution to diversity. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134165
  34. Ihlebæk, K. A., & Nygaard, S. (2021). Right-wing alternative media in the Scandinavian political communication landscape. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. N. Kristensen, & L. W. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 263–282). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-13
  35. Jackson, S., & Kreiss, D. (2023). Recentering power: Conceptualizing counterpublics and defensive publics. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad004
  36. Kaiser, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2019). Integrating concepts of counterpublics into generalised public sphere frameworks: Contemporary transformations in radical forms. Javnost – The Public, 26(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1558676
  37. Kleis Nielsen, R., & Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318
  38. Kristensen, J. B., Henriksen, F. M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2023). Did Covid-19 blur partisan boundaries? A comparison of partisan affinity and source heterophily in online alternative news-sharing networks before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231192963
  39. Larsson, A. O. (2019). News use as amplification: Norwegian national, regional, and hyperpartisan media on Facebook. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019831439
  40. Lien, A. N. (2022). A battle for truth: Islam-related counterpublic discourse on Scandinavian news media Facebook pages. New Media & Society, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068436
  41. Loucaides, D., & Perrone, A. (2022, March 10). The media giant you’ve never heard of, and why you should pay attention. openDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/epoch-times-media-giant-youve-never-heard-of-and-why-you-should-pay-attention/
  42. Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846
  43. Mayerhöffer, E., & Heft, A. (2022). Between journalistic and movement logic: Disentangling referencing practices of right-wing alternative online news media. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1409–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1974915
  44. Mayerhöffer, E., & Schwartz, S. A. (2020). Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or biased? Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]. In I. T. Guldbrandsen, & S. N. Just (Eds.), #FV19: Politisk kommunikation på digitale medier [#FV19: Political communication on digital media] (pp. 203–226). Samfundslitteratur.
  45. Merten, L., Metoui, N., Makhortykh, M., Trilling, D., & Moeller, J. (2022). News won’t find me? Exploring inequalities in social media news use with tracking data. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1127–1147. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17068
  46. Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. University of Minnesota Press.
  47. Rae, M. (2021). Hyperpartisan news: Rethinking the media for populist politics. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910416
  48. Rao, A., Morstatter, F., Hu, M., Chen, E., Burghardt, K., Ferrara, E., & Lerman, K. (2021). Political partisanship and anti-science attitudes in online discussions about Covid-19: Twitter content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e26692. https://doi.org/10.2196/26692
  49. Sandberg, L., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Exploring the link between right-wing alternative media and social media during the Swedish 2018 election. Statsvetenskaplig Tidsskrift, 12, 421–440. https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/19816
  50. Scharkow, M., Mangold, F., Stier, S., & Breuer, J. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(6), 2761–2763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117
  51. Schmidt, A. L., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Betsch, C., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2018). Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook. Vaccine, 36(25), 3606–3612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.040
  52. Schulze, H., Hohner, J., Greipl, S., Girgnhuber, M., Desta, I., & Rieger, D. (2022). Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: A longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on Telegram. Convergence, 28(4), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221104977
  53. Sessa, M. G., Willaert, T., & Van Soest, J. (2022). The disinformative ecosystem: Link sharing practices on Telegram as evidence of cross-platform amplification. EDMO BELUX. http://tinyurl.com/8ckr4e23
  54. Simon, M., Welbers, K., Kroon, A. C., & Trilling, D. (2022). Linked in the dark: A network approach to understanding information flows within the Dutch Telegramsphere. Information, Communication & Society, 26(15), 3054–3078. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2133549
  55. Strömbäck, J. (2023). Political alternative media as a democratic challenge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2178947
  56. Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
  57. Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public spheres in interaction: Comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12156
  58. Warner, M. (2005). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.
  59. Zehring, M., & Domahidi, E. (2023). German corona protest mobilizers on Telegram and their relations to the far right: A network and topic analysis. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231155106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 92 - 119
Published on: Mar 12, 2024
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Eva Mayerhöffer, Jakob Bæk Kristensen, Tim Ramsland, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.