Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022
References
- Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Sage.
- Blach-Ørsten, M., Eberholst, M. K., & Burkal, R. (2017). From hybrid media system to hybrid-media politicians: Danish politicians and their cross-media presence in the 2015 national election campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(4), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1369917
- Blumenthal, S. (1980). The permanent campaign: Inside the world of elite political operatives. Beacon Press.
- Bode, L., Lassen, D. S., Kim, Y. M., Shah, D. V., Fowler, E. F., Ridout, T., & Franz, M. (2016). Coherent campaigns? Campaign broadcast and social messaging. Online Information Review, 40(5), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0348
- Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). Studying politics across media. Political Communication, 35(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334730
- Bor, S. E. (2014). Using social network sites to improve communication between political campaigns and citizens in the 2012 election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213490698
- Borah, P., Fowler, E., & Ridout, T. N. (2018). Television vs. YouTube: Political advertising in the 2012 presidential election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(3), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1476280
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340
- Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2016). Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731
- D’heer, E. (2018). Media logic revisited: The concept of social media logic as alternative framework to study politicians’ usage of social media during election times. In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner-Pfock (Eds.), Media logic(s) revisited: Modelling the interplay between media institutions, media technology and societal change (pp. 173–194). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_9
- Dacombe, R. (2018). Systematic reviews in political science: What can the approach contribute to political research? Political Studies Review, 16(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916680641
- de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035
- Enli, G. (2017). New media and politics. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(3–4), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1392251
- Enli, G., & Moe, H. (2013). Introduction to special issue: Social media and election campaigns – key tendencies and ways forward. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.784795
- Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
- Ernst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S., & Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable opportunity structures for populist communication: Comparing different types of politicians and issues in social media, television and the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
- Farkas, J., & Schwartz, S. A. (2018). Please like, comment and share our campaign! How social media managers for Danish political parties perceive user-generated content. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0008
- Filimonov, K., Russmann, U., & Svensson, J. (2016). Picturing the party: Instagram and party campaigning in the 2014 Swedish elections. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662179
- Fink, A. (2020). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). Sage.
- Fisher, C., Marshall, D., & McCallum, K. (2018). Bypassing the press gallery: From Howard to Hanson. Media International Australia, 167(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X18766077
- Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., Martin, G. J., Peskowitz, Z., & Ridout, T. N. (2021). Political advertising online and offline. The American Political Science Review 115(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000696
- Giasson, T., Le Bars, G., & Dubois, P. (2019). Is social media transforming Canadian electioneering? Hybridity and online partisan strategies in the 2012 Quebec election. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 52(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423918000902
- Gil de Zúñiga, H., Koc Michalska, K., & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: How social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society, 22(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893978
- Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2020). Setting the trend or changing the game? Professionalization and digitalization of election campaigns in Sweden. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(3), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555
- Guðmundsson, B. (2016). New media – opportunity for new and small parties? Political communication before the parliamentary elections in Iceland in 2013. Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration, 12(1), 47–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2016.12.1.3
- Guðmundsson, B. (2019). Logics of the Icelandic hybrid media system. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0001
- Guðmundsson, B., Hjálmarsdóttir, H. B., & Kristjánsdóttir, V. K. V. (2019). Politics, marketing and social media in the 2018 local elections in Iceland. Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration, 15(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2019.15.2.2
- Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2017). Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969
- Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign? The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2012), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004
- Jost, P. (2022). How politicians adapt to new media logic. A longitudinal perspective on accommodation to user-engagement on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2076271
- Jungherr, A. (2016a). Four functions of digital tools in election campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597
- Jungherr, A. (2016b). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
- Jungherr, A., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics: How digital media are reshaping democracy. Cambridge University Press.
- Kalsnes, B. (2016). The social media paradox explained: Comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practice. Social Media + Society, (April–June), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616
- Kang, T., Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2018). Issue consistency? Comparing television advertising, tweets, and E-mail in the 2014 senate campaigns. Political Communication, 35(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334729
- Karlsen, R., & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
- Kleis Nielsen, R. (2014). Political communication research: New media, new challenges, and new opportunities. MedieKultur, 56, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.9712
- Klinger, U., & Russmann, U. (2017). “Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919
- Kovic, M., Rauchfleisch, A., Metag, J., Caspar, C., & Szenogrady, J. (2017). Brute force effects of mass media presence and social media activity on electoral outcome. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(4), 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1374228
- Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. (2022). Owning identity: Struggles to align voters during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In D. Taras, & R. Davis (Eds.), Electoral campaigns, media, and the new world of digital politics (pp. 23–43). University of Michigan Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.12013603.4
- Kruikemeier, S., Gattermann, K., & Vliegenthart, R. (2018). Understanding the dynamics of politicians’ visibility in traditional and social media. The Information Society, 34(4), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334
- Larsson, A. O. (2015). Pandering, protesting, engaging: Norwegian party leaders on Facebook during the 2013 ‘Short campaign’. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.967269
- Larsson, A. O., & Skogerbø, E. (2018). Out with the old, in with the new? Perceptions of social (and other) media by local and regional Norwegian politicians. New Media & Society, 20(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661549
- Laube, S. (2020). The adapted position: Preparing political contents for a hybrid media environment. Media, Culture & Society, 42(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719853501
- Lilleker, D. G., Tenscher, J., & Štětka, V. (2015). Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679
- Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J., & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication: A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
- Marchetti, R., & Ceccobelli, D. (2016). Twitter and television in a hybrid media system: The 2013 Italian election campaign. Journalism Practice, 10(5), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1040051
- McGregor, S. C. (2020). “Taking the temperature of the room”: How political campaigns use social media to understand and represent public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa012
- Mendes, K., & Dikwal-Bot, D. (2022). Feminism, social media, and political campaigns: Justin Trudeau and Sadiq Khan. In D. Taras, & R. Davis (Eds.), Electoral campaigns, media, and the new world of digital politics (pp. 60–82). University of Michigan Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.12013603.6
- Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
- Neihouser, M., & Ouellet, C. (2022). MPs, digital world and the media: Have the patterns of mediatisation of French MPs changed with the digital age? Journal of Legislative Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2022.2078075
- Ohme, J. (2019). When digital natives enter the electorate: Political social media use among first-time voters and its effects on campaign participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1613279
- Paatelainen, L., Kannasto, E., & Isotalus, P. (2022). Functions of hybrid media: How parties and their leaders use traditional media in their social media campaign communication. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.817285
- Park, K., & Suiter, J. (2021). Hybrid media consumption and production in #ge2020: The battle to own ‘change’. Irish Political Studies, 36(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1976975
- Pineda, A., Bellido-Pérez, E., & Barragán-Romero, A. I. (2022). “Backstage moments during the campaign”: The interactive use of Instagram by Spanish party leaders. New Media & Society, 24(5), 1133–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972390
- Postill, J. (2018). Populism and social media: A global perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772186
- Ridge-Newman, A. (2020). Digital media as a driver of change in political organisation: 2010 and 2015 UK general elections. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720916398
- Schäfer, A. (2021). Digital heuristics: How parties strategize political communication in hybrid media environments. New Media & Society, 25(3), 522–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211012101
- Serazio, M. (2015). Managing the digital news cyclone: Power, participation, and political production strategies. International Journal of Communication, 2015(9), 1907–1925.
- Skovsgaard, M., & van Dalen, A. (2013). Dodging the gatekeepers? Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876
- Splendore, S., & Rega, R. (2017). The mediatization of politics in the hybrid media system: The case of Italian political journalism. Northern Lights, 15(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.15.111_1
- Steffan, D., & Venema, N. (2020). New medium, old strategies? Comparing online and traditional campaign posters for German Bundestag elections, 2013–2017. European Journal of Communication, 35(4), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903681
- Su, Y., & Borah, P. (2019). Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1641451
- Suiter, J., Culloty, E., Greene, D., & Siapera, E. (2018). Hybrid media and populist currents in Ireland's 2016 general election. European Journal of Communication, 33(4), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118775297
- Vaccari, C. (2010). “Technology is a commodity”: The internet in the 2008 United States presidential election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(4), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681003656664
- Van Aelst, P., van Erkel, P., D’heer, E., & Harder, R. A. (2017). Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203973
- van Dalen, A., Fazekas, Z., Klemmensen, R., & Hansen, K. M. (2015). Policy considerations on Facebook: Agendas, coherence, and communication patterns in the 2011 Danish parliamentary elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1061398
Language: English
Page range: 172 - 193
Published on: Jun 23, 2023
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Majbritt K. Severin-Nielsen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.