Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Between harm and sensationalism: Court reporters negotiating objectivity when reflecting on ethical dilemmas in the Submarine Murder Trial Cover

Between harm and sensationalism: Court reporters negotiating objectivity when reflecting on ethical dilemmas in the Submarine Murder Trial

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Berkowitz, D. (1992). Non-routine news and newswork: Exploring a what-a-story. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00770.x
  2. Bernzen, A. K. (2018). The court and the camera: Should privacy be a concern in court reporting? Journal of Media Law, 10(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442
  3. Blach-Ørsten, M. (2019). The emergence of an increasingly competitive news regime in Denmark. In R. Kuhn, & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Political journalism in transition (pp. 147–172). I.B. Tauris.
  4. Blach-Ørsten, M., Møller Hartley, J., & Flensburg, S. (2017). Denmark: Voluntary accountability driven by political pressure. In T. Eberwein, S. Fengler, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), European handbook of media accountability (1st ed.) (pp. 54–62). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616353
  5. Blach-Ørsten, M., Møller Hartley, J., Flensburg, S., & Olsen, M. B. (2015). Medieetik – mediernes udvikling i Danmark 2015 [Media ethics – the development of Danish media 2015].
  6. Blach-Ørsten, M., Møller Hartley, J., & Wittchen, M. B. (2021a). Fabrication and erroneous information. Journalistica, 15(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v15i1.125395
  7. Blach-Ørsten, M., Wittchen, M. B., & Møller Hartley, J. (2021b). Ethics on the beat: An analysis of ethical breaches across news beats from 1999 to 2019. Journalism Practice, 15(9), 1383–1399. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1956363
  8. Bock, M. A., & Araiza, J. A. (2015). Facing the death penalty while facing the cameras. Journalism Practice, 9(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.964496
  9. Brurås, S. (2009). Kriminaljournalistikkens etikk – PFU-udttalelser belyst fra tre moralfilosofiske posisjoner [The ethics of crime journalism – Statements from the Norwegian Press Council elucidated from three moral philosophical positions.] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Norway].
  10. Brurås, S., & Røssland, L. A. (2005). Full Skjæring – Drabssaken, nyhetsjakten og menneskene bak nyheterne [Complete coverage – The murder case, the news hunt, and the people behind the news]. University of Bergen.
  11. Carlson, M. (2014). Gone, but not forgotten: Memories of journalistic deviance as metajournalistic discourse. Journalism Studies, 15(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.790620
  12. Donsbach, W., & Klett, B. (1993). Subjective objectivity: How journalists in four countries define a key term of their profession. Gazette, 51(1), 53–83.
  13. Donsbach, W., & Patterson, T. E. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131
  14. Ericson, R. V., Baranek, P. M., & Chan, J. B. L. (1989). Negotiating control: A study of news sources. Open University Press.
  15. Frey, E. (2013). Norway’s media coverage: The salute of a man who does not regret. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 28(1), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2013.755078
  16. Gerbner, G. (1995). Cameras on trial: The “O. J. Show” turns the tide. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(4), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159509364325
  17. Gottschalck, A. (2018, January 14). »Ubådssagen«: Få overblikket over danmarkshistoriens mest omtalte drabssag her [“The Submarine Case”: A recap of the most publicised murder trial in Danish history]. Berlingske. https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/ubaadssagen-faa-overblikket-over-danmarkshistoriens-mest-omtalte-drabssag-her
  18. Grabe, M. E. (2000). Narratives of guilt: Television news magazine coverage of the O. J. Simpson criminal trial. Howard Journal of Communications, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461700246706
  19. Hackett, R. A. (1984). Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(3), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360036
  20. Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193
  21. Hartley, J. M., & Askanius, T. (2020). Activist-journalism and the norm of objectivity: Role performance in the reporting of the #MeToo movement in Denmark and Sweden. Journalism Practice, 15(6), 860–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1805792
  22. Hochberger, R. S. (2006). Ethical issues in covering courts. Syracuse Law Review, 56(3), 443–458.
  23. Johnston, J. (2018). Three phases of courts’ publicity: Reconfiguring Bentham’s open justice in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(4), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000228
  24. Johnston, J., & Breit, R. (2010). Towards a narratology of court reporting. Media International Australia, 137, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1013700106
  25. Jones, R. (2021). “It’s the best job on the paper”– The courts beat during the journalism crisis. Journalism Practice, 15(9), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1910980
  26. Jørgensen, O., & Nielsen, P. L. (2018). Mediejura – det handler om informations- og ytringsfrihed [Media law – regarding freedom of information and expression] (4th ed.). Ajour.
  27. Knight, M. (2017). The accused is entering the courtroom: The live-tweeting of a murder trial. Journal of Media Practice, 18(2–3), 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2017.1374681
  28. Lahav, H., & Reich, Z. (2011). Authors and poets write the news a case study of a radical journalistic experiment. Journalism Studies, 12(5), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.562659
  29. Lehrmann, U. (2011). Tabloid crime journalism: Writing on the edge of existence. Northern Lights, 9(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.9.179_1
  30. Lund, A. B. (2003). Kriminalitet i danske massemedier [Crime in Danish mass media]. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 90(3), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v90i3.71565
  31. Machill, M., Beiler, M., & Hellmann, I. (2007). The selection process in local court reporting: A case study of four Dresden daily newspapers. Journalism Practice, 1(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780601078878
  32. Magin, M., & Maurer, P. (2019). Beat journalism and reporting. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.905
  33. Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in journalism. Polity Press.
  34. Mindich, D. T. Z. (1998). Just the facts: How “objectivity” came to define American journalism. New York University Press.
  35. Mogensen, K. (2013). Visualizing a mass murder: The portraits of Anders Bering Breivik in Danish national dailies. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(1), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2013.755083
  36. Musalayah, M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A. A., & Tamam, E. (2012). Court reporters’ understanding on the code of ethics in news reporting. The Public Administration and Social Policies Review, 1(8), 2–16. https://revad.uvvg.ro/files/nr8/1.%20mushalayah.pdf
  37. Patterson, T. E. (1998). The political roles of the journalist. In D. M. D. N. P. Graber (Ed.), The politics of news: The news of politics (pp. 23–39). CQ Press.
  38. Pressenævnet. (2013). The press ethical rules. https://www.pressenaevnet.dk/press-ethical-rules/
  39. Reese, S. D. (1990). The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the wall street journal. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360187
  40. Reich, Z., & Barnoy, A. (2016). Reconstructing production practices through interviewing. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), The Sage handbook of digital journalism (pp. 477–493). Sage.
  41. Rodrick, S. (2014). Achieving the aims of open justice? The relationship between the courts, the media and the public. Deakin Law Review, 19(1), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2014vol19no1art210
  42. Schrøder, K. C., & Ørsten, M. (2018). Digital news report 2018: Denmark. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2018/denmark-2018/
  43. Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news. Basic Books.
  44. Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
  45. Schudson, M. (2018). Why journalism still matters. Polity Press.
  46. Schudson, M., & Anderson, C. (2020). Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 136–150). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497
  47. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
  48. Skovsgaard, M. (2010). The Danish journalist [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark].
  49. Skovsgaard, M., Albæk, E., Bro, P., & de Vreese, C. (2012). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism, 14(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912442286
  50. Thomsen, A. H., Leth, P. M., Hougen, H. P., Villesen, P., & Brink, O. (2019). Homicide in Denmark 1992–2016. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.07.001
  51. Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776752
  52. Vinson, C. D., & Ertter, J. S. (2002). Entertainment or education: How do media cover the courts? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(4), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/108118002236351
  53. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Challenging presentism in journalism studies: An emotional life history approach to understanding the lived experience of journalists. Journalism, 20(5), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918760670
  54. Ward, S. J. A. (2015). The invention of journalism ethics: The path to objectivity and beyond (2nd ed.). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  55. Waterhouse-Watson, D. (2019). The ethics of court reporting: Storytelling in the courtroom and newsroom. In D. Waterhouse-Watson, Football and sexual crime, from the courtroom to the newsroom: Transforming narratives (pp. 61–92). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33705-6_3
  56. Westerståhl, J. (1977). Objektiv nyhetsförmedling [Objective news coverage]. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 80(3), 195–202. https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/2850/2415
  57. Westerståhl, J. (1983). Objective news reporting: General premises. Communication Research, 10(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365083010003007
  58. Wittchen, B. M. (2019). I sandhedens grænseland: En analyse af presseetiske dilemmaer i Ekstra Bladets dækning af ubådssagen [In the border of truth: An analysis of press ethical dilemmas in the coverage of the submarine trial in the tabloid Ekstra Bladet]. Journalistica, 13(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v13i1.113664
  59. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 106 - 122
Published on: Mar 15, 2023
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Maria Bendix Wittchen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.